Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.04
    0.04151684 = sum of:
      0.021057224 = product of:
        0.084228896 = sum of:
          0.084228896 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084228896 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.020459617 = product of:
        0.040919233 = sum of:
          0.040919233 = weight(_text_:j in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040919233 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
  2. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.04
    0.038416967 = product of:
      0.07683393 = sum of:
        0.07683393 = sum of:
          0.041334666 = weight(_text_:j in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041334666 = score(doc=5492,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
          0.035499264 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035499264 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.03
    0.032363646 = product of:
      0.06472729 = sum of:
        0.06472729 = sum of:
          0.029228024 = weight(_text_:j in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029228024 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.035499264 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035499264 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  4. Hunter, J.: Collaborative semantic tagging and annotation systems (2009) 0.02
    0.02338242 = product of:
      0.04676484 = sum of:
        0.04676484 = product of:
          0.09352968 = sum of:
            0.09352968 = weight(_text_:j in 7382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09352968 = score(doc=7382,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 7382, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Peters, I.; Schumann, L.; Terliesner, J.: Folksonomy-basiertes Information Retrieval unter der Lupe (2012) 0.01
    0.014467134 = product of:
      0.028934268 = sum of:
        0.028934268 = product of:
          0.057868537 = sum of:
            0.057868537 = weight(_text_:j in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057868537 = score(doc=406,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-4/iwp-2012-0047/iwp-2012-0047.xml?format=INT.
  6. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01
    0.014199706 = product of:
      0.028399412 = sum of:
        0.028399412 = product of:
          0.056798823 = sum of:
            0.056798823 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056798823 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.15-22
  7. Knautz, K.; Stock, W.G.: Collective indexing of emotions in videos (2011) 0.01
    0.01302578 = product of:
      0.02605156 = sum of:
        0.02605156 = product of:
          0.10420624 = sum of:
            0.10420624 = weight(_text_:authors in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10420624 = score(doc=295,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The object of this empirical research study is emotion, as depicted and aroused in videos. This paper seeks to answer the questions: Are users able to index such emotions consistently? Are the users' votes usable for emotional video retrieval? Design/methodology/approach - The authors worked with a controlled vocabulary for nine basic emotions (love, happiness, fun, surprise, desire, sadness, anger, disgust and fear), a slide control for adjusting the emotions' intensity, and the approach of broad folksonomies. Different users tagged the same videos. The test persons had the task of indexing the emotions of 20 videos (reprocessed clips from YouTube). The authors distinguished between emotions which were depicted in the video and those that were evoked in the user. Data were received from 776 participants and a total of 279,360 slide control values were analyzed. Findings - The consistency of the users' votes is very high; the tag distributions for the particular videos' emotions are stable. The final shape of the distributions will be reached by the tagging activities of only very few users (less than 100). By applying the approach of power tags it is possible to separate the pivotal emotions of every document - if indeed there is any feeling at all. Originality/value - This paper is one of the first steps in the new research area of emotional information retrieval (EmIR). To the authors' knowledge, it is the first research project into the collective indexing of emotions in videos.
  8. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01
    0.012550885 = product of:
      0.02510177 = sum of:
        0.02510177 = product of:
          0.05020354 = sum of:
            0.05020354 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05020354 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  9. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.01
    0.012424742 = product of:
      0.024849484 = sum of:
        0.024849484 = product of:
          0.049698967 = sum of:
            0.049698967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049698967 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  10. Wang, J.; Clements, M.; Yang, J.; Vries, A.P. de; Reinders, M.J.T.: Personalization of tagging systems (2010) 0.01
    0.012400401 = product of:
      0.024800802 = sum of:
        0.024800802 = product of:
          0.049601603 = sum of:
            0.049601603 = weight(_text_:j in 4229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049601603 = score(doc=4229,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 4229, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Golbeck, J.; Koepfler, J.; Emmerling, B.: ¬An experimental study of social tagging behavior and image content (2011) 0.01
    0.012400401 = product of:
      0.024800802 = sum of:
        0.024800802 = product of:
          0.049601603 = sum of:
            0.049601603 = weight(_text_:j in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049601603 = score(doc=4748,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.01
    0.010649779 = product of:
      0.021299558 = sum of:
        0.021299558 = product of:
          0.042599116 = sum of:
            0.042599116 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042599116 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  13. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.01
    0.010649779 = product of:
      0.021299558 = sum of:
        0.021299558 = product of:
          0.042599116 = sum of:
            0.042599116 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042599116 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.01
    0.010649779 = product of:
      0.021299558 = sum of:
        0.021299558 = product of:
          0.042599116 = sum of:
            0.042599116 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042599116 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.01
    0.010649779 = product of:
      0.021299558 = sum of:
        0.021299558 = product of:
          0.042599116 = sum of:
            0.042599116 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042599116 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  16. Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012) 0.01
    0.010333667 = product of:
      0.020667333 = sum of:
        0.020667333 = product of:
          0.041334666 = sum of:
            0.041334666 = weight(_text_:j in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041334666 = score(doc=4970,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Chae, G.; Park, J.; Park, J.; Yeo, W.S.; Shi, C.: Linking and clustering artworks using social tags : revitalizing crowd-sourced information on cultural collections (2016) 0.01
    0.010333667 = product of:
      0.020667333 = sum of:
        0.020667333 = product of:
          0.041334666 = sum of:
            0.041334666 = weight(_text_:j in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041334666 = score(doc=2852,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Bertram, J.: Social Tagging : zum Potential einer neuen Indexiermethode (2009) 0.01
    0.010229808 = product of:
      0.020459617 = sum of:
        0.020459617 = product of:
          0.040919233 = sum of:
            0.040919233 = weight(_text_:j in 2328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040919233 = score(doc=2328,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2328, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2328)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Abbas, J.: In the margins : reflections on scribbles (2007) 0.01
    0.010229808 = product of:
      0.020459617 = sum of:
        0.020459617 = product of:
          0.040919233 = sum of:
            0.040919233 = weight(_text_:j in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040919233 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Voß, J.: Vom Social Tagging zum Semantic Tagging (2008) 0.01
    0.010229808 = product of:
      0.020459617 = sum of:
        0.020459617 = product of:
          0.040919233 = sum of:
            0.040919233 = weight(_text_:j in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040919233 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 39
  • d 11

Types

  • a 47
  • el 5
  • b 2
  • More… Less…