Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.04
    0.044905595 = product of:
      0.08981119 = sum of:
        0.08981119 = sum of:
          0.054652706 = weight(_text_:services in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054652706 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.28682584 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03515849 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  2. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.04
    0.044282272 = product of:
      0.088564545 = sum of:
        0.088564545 = sum of:
          0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04637436 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042190183 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  3. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.04
    0.044282272 = product of:
      0.088564545 = sum of:
        0.088564545 = sum of:
          0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04637436 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042190183 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 53(2009) no.3, S.174-184
  4. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.04
    0.044282272 = product of:
      0.088564545 = sum of:
        0.088564545 = sum of:
          0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04637436 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042190183 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 53(2009) no.4, S.243-250
  5. Farkas, M.G.: Social software in libraries : building collaboration, communication, and community online (2007) 0.02
    0.016395813 = product of:
      0.032791626 = sum of:
        0.032791626 = product of:
          0.06558325 = sum of:
            0.06558325 = weight(_text_:services in 2364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06558325 = score(doc=2364,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.344191 = fieldWeight in 2364, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Electronic reference services (Libraries)
    Subject
    Electronic reference services (Libraries)
  6. Shiri, A.: Trend analysis in social tagging : an LIS perspective (2007) 0.02
    0.01545812 = product of:
      0.03091624 = sum of:
        0.03091624 = product of:
          0.06183248 = sum of:
            0.06183248 = weight(_text_:services in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06183248 = score(doc=529,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
  7. Regulski, K.: Aufwand und Nutzen beim Einsatz von Social-Bookmarking-Services als Nachweisinstrument für wissenschaftliche Forschungsartikel am Beispiel von BibSonomy (2007) 0.02
    0.01545812 = product of:
      0.03091624 = sum of:
        0.03091624 = product of:
          0.06183248 = sum of:
            0.06183248 = weight(_text_:services in 4595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06183248 = score(doc=4595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 4595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01
    0.014063395 = product of:
      0.02812679 = sum of:
        0.02812679 = product of:
          0.05625358 = sum of:
            0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05625358 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.15-22
  9. Tonkin, E.; Baptista, A.A.; Hooland, S. van; Resmini, A.; Mendéz, E.; Neville, L.: Kinds of Tags : a collaborative research study on tag usage and structure (2007) 0.01
    0.013525856 = product of:
      0.027051711 = sum of:
        0.027051711 = product of:
          0.054103423 = sum of:
            0.054103423 = weight(_text_:services in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054103423 = score(doc=531,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
  10. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01
    0.012430402 = product of:
      0.024860805 = sum of:
        0.024860805 = product of:
          0.04972161 = sum of:
            0.04972161 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04972161 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.01
    0.01230547 = product of:
      0.02461094 = sum of:
        0.02461094 = product of:
          0.04922188 = sum of:
            0.04922188 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04922188 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  12. Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007) 0.01
    0.01159359 = product of:
      0.02318718 = sum of:
        0.02318718 = product of:
          0.04637436 = sum of:
            0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04637436 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Although user tagging of library resources shows substantial promise as a means of improving the quality of users' access to those resources, several important questions about the level and nature of the warrant for basing retrieval tools on user tagging are yet to receive full consideration by library practitioners and researchers. Among these is the simple evaluative question: What, specifically, are the factors that determine whether or not user-tagging services will be successful? If success is to be defined in terms of the effectiveness with which systems perform the particular functions expected of them (rather than simply in terms of popularity), an understanding is needed both of the multifunctional nature of tagging tools, and of the complex nature of users' mental models of that multifunctionality. In this paper, a conceptual framework is developed for the evaluation of systems that integrate user tagging with more traditional methods of library resource description.
  13. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  14. Hänger, C.: Knowledge management in the digital age : the possibilities of user generated content (2009) 0.01
    0.009661325 = product of:
      0.01932265 = sum of:
        0.01932265 = product of:
          0.0386453 = sum of:
            0.0386453 = weight(_text_:services in 2813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0386453 = score(doc=2813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 2813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Today, in times of Web 2.0., graduates and undergraduates interact in virtual communities like studiVZ (Studentenverzeichnis) and generate content by reviewing or tagging documents. This phenomenon offers good prospects for academic libraries. They can use the customers' tags for indexing the growing amount of electronic resources and thereby optimize the search for these documents. Important examples are the journals, databases and e-books included in the "Nationallizenzen" financed by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The documents in this collection are not manually indexed by librarians and have no annotation according to the German standard classification systems. Connecting search systems by means of Web-2.0.-services is an important task for libraries. For this purpose users are encouraged to tag printed and electronic resources in search systems like the libraries' online catalogs and to establish connections between entries in other systems, e.g. Bibsonomy, and the items found in the online catalog. As a consequence annotations chosen by both, users and librarians, will coexist: The items in the tagging systems and the online catalog are linked, library users may find other publications of interest, and contacts between library users with similar scientific interests may be established. Librarians have to face the fact that user generated tags do not necessarily have the same quality as their own annotations and will therefore have to seek for instruments for comparing user generated tags with library generated keywords.
  15. Nov, O.; Naaman, M.; Ye, C.: Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community : a multidimensional perspective (2010) 0.01
    0.009661325 = product of:
      0.01932265 = sum of:
        0.01932265 = product of:
          0.0386453 = sum of:
            0.0386453 = weight(_text_:services in 3424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0386453 = score(doc=3424,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 3424, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3424)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years we have witnessed a significant growth of social-computing communities - online services in which users share information in various forms. As content contributions from participants are critical to the viability of these communities, it is important to understand what drives users to participate and share information with others in such settings. We extend previous literature on user contribution by studying the factors that are associated with various forms of participation in a large online photo-sharing community. Using survey and system data, we examine four different forms of participation and consider the differences between these forms. We build on theories of motivation to examine the relationship between users' participation and their motivations with respect to their tenure in the community. Amongst our findings, we identify individual motivations (both extrinsic and intrinsic) that underpin user participation, and their effects on different forms of information sharing; we show that tenure in the community does affect participation, but that this effect depends on the type of participation activity. Finally, we demonstrate that tenure in the community has a weak moderating effect on a number of motivations with regard to their effect on participation. Directions for future research, as well as implications for theory and practice, are discussed.
  16. Estrada, L.M.; Hildebrand, M.; Boer, V. de; Ossenbruggen, J. van: Time-based tags for fiction movies : comparing experts to novices using a video labeling game (2017) 0.01
    0.009661325 = product of:
      0.01932265 = sum of:
        0.01932265 = product of:
          0.0386453 = sum of:
            0.0386453 = weight(_text_:services in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0386453 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The cultural heritage sector has embraced social tagging as a way to increase both access to online content and to engage users with their digital collections. In this article, we build on two current lines of research. (a) We use Waisda?, an existing labeling game, to add time-based annotations to content. (b) In this context, we investigate the role of experts in human-based computation (nichesourcing). We report on a small-scale experiment in which we applied Waisda? to content from film archives. We study the differences in the type of time-based tags between experts and novices for film clips in a crowdsourcing setting. The findings show high similarity in the number and type of tags (mostly factual). In the less frequent tags, however, experts used more domain-specific terms. We conclude that competitive games are not suited to elicit real expert-level descriptions. We also confirm that providing guidelines, based on conceptual frameworks that are more suited to moving images in a time-based fashion, could result in increasing the quality of the tags, thus allowing for creating more tag-based innovative services for online audiovisual heritage.
  17. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01
    0.008789622 = product of:
      0.017579244 = sum of:
        0.017579244 = product of:
          0.03515849 = sum of:
            0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03515849 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  18. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.01
    0.008789622 = product of:
      0.017579244 = sum of:
        0.017579244 = product of:
          0.03515849 = sum of:
            0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03515849 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  19. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.01
    0.008789622 = product of:
      0.017579244 = sum of:
        0.017579244 = product of:
          0.03515849 = sum of:
            0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03515849 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  20. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.01
    0.008789622 = product of:
      0.017579244 = sum of:
        0.017579244 = product of:
          0.03515849 = sum of:
            0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03515849 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22

Languages

  • e 21
  • d 4

Types