Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.04
    0.03898656 = product of:
      0.058479838 = sum of:
        0.016708525 = product of:
          0.08354262 = sum of:
            0.08354262 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08354262 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.04177131 = product of:
          0.08354262 = sum of:
            0.08354262 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08354262 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  2. Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.; Bekavac, B.: Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich : AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de (2002) 0.04
    0.03617395 = product of:
      0.10852185 = sum of:
        0.10852185 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10852185 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20799294 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.52175736 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.02
    0.022278037 = product of:
      0.033417054 = sum of:
        0.009547729 = product of:
          0.047738645 = sum of:
            0.047738645 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047738645 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.023869323 = product of:
          0.047738645 = sum of:
            0.047738645 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047738645 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  4. Schaat, S.: Von der automatisierten Manipulation zur Manipulation der Automatisierung (2019) 0.02
    0.022278037 = product of:
      0.033417054 = sum of:
        0.009547729 = product of:
          0.047738645 = sum of:
            0.047738645 = weight(_text_:22 in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047738645 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.023869323 = product of:
          0.047738645 = sum of:
            0.047738645 = weight(_text_:22 in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047738645 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    19. 2.2019 17:22:00
  5. Boldi, P.; Santini, M.; Vigna, S.: PageRank as a function of the damping factor (2005) 0.01
    0.013923772 = product of:
      0.020885658 = sum of:
        0.0059673307 = product of:
          0.029836653 = sum of:
            0.029836653 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029836653 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.014918326 = product of:
          0.029836653 = sum of:
            0.029836653 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029836653 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  6. Baeza-Yates, R.; Boldi, P.; Castillo, C.: Generalizing PageRank : damping functions for linkbased ranking algorithms (2006) 0.01
    0.013923772 = product of:
      0.020885658 = sum of:
        0.0059673307 = product of:
          0.029836653 = sum of:
            0.029836653 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029836653 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.014918326 = product of:
          0.029836653 = sum of:
            0.029836653 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029836653 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  7. Franke-Maier, M.; Rüter, C.: Discover Sacherschließung! : Was machen suchmaschinenbasierte Systeme mit unseren inhaltlichen Metadaten? (2015) 0.01
    0.009569195 = product of:
      0.028707584 = sum of:
        0.028707584 = product of:
          0.05741517 = sum of:
            0.05741517 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05741517 = score(doc=1706,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18082327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044043828 = queryNorm
                0.31752092 = fieldWeight in 1706, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1706)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discovery Systeme erlauben einen neuen und anderen Zugriff auf verfügbare Ressourcen einer Bibliothek als die traditionellen Online-Kataloge. Daraus ergeben sich Probleme, aber auch Chancen für die Nutzung und Sichtbarkeit der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung. Der Vortrag gibt einen Einblick in die Funktionalitäten und Funktionsweisen von Discovery Systemen am Beispiel eines großen Players, Primo von ExLibris, sowie die Auswirkungen auf bibliothekarische inhaltliche Metadaten. Es werden Chancen und Grenzen der Technik beleuchtet. Der Vortrag schließt mit der Reflektion der Implikationen für die Arbeit im Fachreferat.