-
Publishers go head-to-head over search tools : Elsevier's Scopus (2004)
0.02
0.024908276 = product of:
0.049816553 = sum of:
0.049816553 = product of:
0.099633105 = sum of:
0.099633105 = weight(_text_:journals in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099633105 = score(doc=2496,freq=8.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.38832808 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Will there ever be a science equivalent of Google? Two of the world's biggest science publishing and information firms seem to think that there will. They are about to compete head-to-head to create the most popular tool for searching the scientific literature. Elsevier, the Amsterdam-based publisher of more than 1,800 journals, has announced that this autumn it will launch Scopus, an online search engine covering abstracts and references from 14,000 scientific journals. Scopus will arrive as a direct competitor for the established Web of Science, owned by Thomson ISI of Philadelphia, the scientific information specialist. "Scopus will definitely be a threat to ISI," says one science publishing expert, who asked not to be named. "But ISI will not just let this happen. There will be some kind of arms race in terms of adding new features." Many researchers are already wedded to subject-specific databases of scientific information, such as PubMed, for biomedical research. But Web of Science is currently the only service to cover the full spectrum of scientific disciplines and publications. It can also generate the citation statistics that are sometimes used to measure the quality ofjournals and individual papers. ISI, which is widely used by libraries worldwide, may be hard to displace. It covers fewer than 9,000 journals, but it has been available in its present form since 1997 and includes a 60-year archive of papers. Thomson ISI says it will extend this to 105 years by the end of 2005. The company also owns the only extensive database an patent abstracts.
Elsevier cannot hope to match this coverage in the short term. The company has been able to draw an its experience of running biomedical and pharmaceutical databases, and developers began compiling a multidisciplinary index two years ago. Even so, when it launches, Scopus will index only five years of references far some journals, rising to ten years during 2005. Data an abstracts will go back further, in some cases to the mid-1960s. Because Scopus has been built from scratch, Elsevier has been able to work with librarians to develop an alternative to the Web of Science interface, which has been criticized by some users. "Users are very happy with Scopus," says Steven Gheyselinck, a librarian at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland who has been testing it. Although Scopus and Web of Science are the only products aiming to cover all of science, other search engines are also under development. The Google of science could end up being Google itself the company has collaborated with nine publishers, including Nature Publishing Group, to create an engine called CrossRef Search. This service, a pilot of which appeared last month, allows users to search digital versions of all papers held by the publishers involved and returns links to articles an their websites. Unlike Web of Science and Scopus, which scan through the titles and abstracts of articles, CrossRef Search also searches the full text of papers. Many of the other 300 or so members of CrossRef - a publishers' collaboration established to allow easier linking between citations - are likely to join the service if the pilot is successful."
-
Lackie, R.J.: Google's Print and Scholar initiatives : the value of and impact on libraries and information services (2005)
0.02
0.024908276 = product of:
0.049816553 = sum of:
0.049816553 = product of:
0.099633105 = sum of:
0.099633105 = weight(_text_:journals in 356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099633105 = score(doc=356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.38832808 = fieldWeight in 356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Google regularly makes headlines with new Web-based tools, but two recent projects promise to have profound implications for the future of librarianship. With Google's recent big push to add content from books and journals into its database via its expanded Google Print and new Google Scholar initiatives, today's academic libraries and publishers, among others, are taking notice. Many are sitting back and watching how others deal with these initiatives, while some are raising their voices in question, praise, or protest.
-
MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000)
0.02
0.024477057 = product of:
0.048954114 = sum of:
0.048954114 = product of:
0.09790823 = sum of:
0.09790823 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09790823 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:40:22
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.02
0.02423105 = product of:
0.0484621 = sum of:
0.0484621 = product of:
0.0969242 = sum of:
0.0969242 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0969242 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008)
0.02
0.02423105 = product of:
0.0484621 = sum of:
0.0484621 = product of:
0.0969242 = sum of:
0.0969242 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0969242 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 6.2008 16:22:20
-
Cheng, S.; YunTao, P.; JunPeng, Y.; Hong, G.; ZhengLu, Y.; ZhiYu, H.: PageRank, HITS and impact factor for journal ranking (2009)
0.02
0.017791625 = product of:
0.03558325 = sum of:
0.03558325 = product of:
0.0711665 = sum of:
0.0711665 = weight(_text_:journals in 2513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0711665 = score(doc=2513,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.2773772 = fieldWeight in 2513, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2513)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Journal citation measures are one of the most widely used bibliometric tools. The most well-known measure is the ISI Impact Factor, under the standard definition, the impact factor of journal j in a given year is the average number of citations received by papers published in the previous two years of journal j. However, the impact factor has its "intrinsic" limitations, it is a ranking measure based fundamentally on a pure counting of the in-degrees of nodes in the network, and its calculation does not take into account the "impact" or "prestige" of the journals in which the citations appear. Google's PageRank algorithm and Kleinberg's HITS method are webpage ranking algorithm, they compute the scores of webpages based on a combination of the number of hyperlinks that point to the page and the status of pages that the hyperlinks originate from, a page is important if it is pointed to by other important pages. We demonstrate how popular webpage algorithm PageRank and HITS can be used ranking journal, and we compared ISI impact factor, PageRank and HITS for journal ranking, and with PageRank and HITS compute respectively including self-citation and non self-citation, and discussed the merit and shortcomings and the scope of application that the various algorithms are used to rank journal.
-
Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000)
0.02
0.017307894 = product of:
0.03461579 = sum of:
0.03461579 = product of:
0.06923158 = sum of:
0.06923158 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06923158 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:41:31
-
Eggeling, T.; Kroschel, A.: Alles finden im Web (2000)
0.02
0.017307894 = product of:
0.03461579 = sum of:
0.03461579 = product of:
0.06923158 = sum of:
0.06923158 = weight(_text_:22 in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06923158 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2000 14:06:22
-
Poulakos, I.: ¬"Die Leute suchen immer dasselbe" (2001)
0.02
0.017307894 = product of:
0.03461579 = sum of:
0.03461579 = product of:
0.06923158 = sum of:
0.06923158 = weight(_text_:22 in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06923158 = score(doc=5541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 1.1997 12:15:22
-
Sauer, D.: Alles schneller finden (2001)
0.02
0.017307894 = product of:
0.03461579 = sum of:
0.03461579 = product of:
0.06923158 = sum of:
0.06923158 = weight(_text_:22 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06923158 = score(doc=6835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11.11.2001 17:25:22
-
Breyer, K.: Kommerz statt Information (2002)
0.02
0.017307894 = product of:
0.03461579 = sum of:
0.03461579 = product of:
0.06923158 = sum of:
0.06923158 = weight(_text_:22 in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06923158 = score(doc=568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 5.2002 21:21:22
-
Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:24
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:41:16
-
Hülsmann, M.: Profi-Suche : Suchdienste richtig nutzen (2001)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 6422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=6422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 14:19:22
-
Schüler, P.: Wertes Wissen : Knowledge Management vermeidet Datenfriedhöfe (2001)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 6815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=6815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6815)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.11.2001 19:58:22
-
Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
-
Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:36:13
-
Lewandowski, D.: Alles nur noch Google? : Entwicklungen im Bereich der WWW-Suchmaschinen (2002)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 9.2002 18:49:22
-
Lewandowski, D.: Abfragesprachen und erweiterte Funktionen von WWW-Suchmaschinen (2004)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 2314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=2314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2314)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28.11.2004 13:11:22
