Search (721 results, page 1 of 37)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.06
    0.060106136 = product of:
      0.0901592 = sum of:
        0.08128187 = product of:
          0.24384561 = sum of:
            0.24384561 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24384561 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43387505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0088773295 = weight(_text_:in in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0088773295 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  2. Dasgupta, S.K.: Search engines : tooles for exploring the Internet (1998) 0.06
    0.05848889 = product of:
      0.087733336 = sum of:
        0.016739251 = weight(_text_:in in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016739251 = score(doc=3524,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
        0.07099409 = product of:
          0.14198817 = sum of:
            0.14198817 = weight(_text_:education in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14198817 = score(doc=3524,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.5889057 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Lists search engines in Internet, covering wide areas of interest
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 5th National Convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), at Bhubaneswar, 4-5 March 1998
    Source
    Information management in academic and research libraries: Proceedings of the 5th National convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), Bhubaneswar, India, 4-5 March 1998. Ed. by M. Mahapatra et al
  3. Höfer, W.: Detektive im Web (1999) 0.05
    0.047592625 = product of:
      0.07138894 = sum of:
        0.012554439 = weight(_text_:in in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012554439 = score(doc=4007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
        0.058834497 = product of:
          0.117668994 = sum of:
            0.117668994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.117668994 = score(doc=4007,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ohne Altavista, Excite & Co. wären Internet-Surfer aufgeschmissen. Wie die Daten-Spürhunde arbeiten, wie Sie ihre Website anmelden und welche Tools helfen, steht in diesem Suchmaschinen-Special
    Date
    22. 8.1999 20:22:06
  4. Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999) 0.04
    0.042121883 = product of:
      0.06318282 = sum of:
        0.014646845 = weight(_text_:in in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014646845 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
        0.04853598 = product of:
          0.09707196 = sum of:
            0.09707196 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09707196 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
  5. ap: Suchmaschinen in neuem Gewand : Metaspinner kennt 600 Millionen Seiten (1999) 0.04
    0.042121883 = product of:
      0.06318282 = sum of:
        0.014646845 = weight(_text_:in in 4224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014646845 = score(doc=4224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4224)
        0.04853598 = product of:
          0.09707196 = sum of:
            0.09707196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09707196 = score(doc=4224,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4224, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4224)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  6. Chau, M.; Wong, C.H.; Zhou, Y.; Qin, J.; Chen, H.: Evaluating the use of search engine development tools in IT education (2010) 0.04
    0.040608823 = product of:
      0.060913235 = sum of:
        0.016541928 = weight(_text_:in in 3325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016541928 = score(doc=3325,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 3325, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3325)
        0.044371307 = product of:
          0.088742614 = sum of:
            0.088742614 = weight(_text_:education in 3325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088742614 = score(doc=3325,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.36806607 = fieldWeight in 3325, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3325)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    It is important for education in computer science and information systems to keep up to date with the latest development in technology. With the rapid development of the Internet and the Web, many schools have included Internet-related technologies, such as Web search engines and e-commerce, as part of their curricula. Previous research has shown that it is effective to use search engine development tools to facilitate students' learning. However, the effectiveness of these tools in the classroom has not been evaluated. In this article, we review the design of three search engine development tools, SpidersRUs, Greenstone, and Alkaline, followed by an evaluation study that compared the three tools in the classroom. In the study, 33 students were divided into 13 groups and each group used the three tools to develop three independent search engines in a class project. Our evaluation results showed that SpidersRUs performed better than the two other tools in overall satisfaction and the level of knowledge gained in their learning experience when using the tools for a class project on Internet applications development.
  7. Phipps, S.E.; Maloney, K.: Choices in the paradigm shift : where next for libraries? (2005) 0.04
    0.03618816 = product of:
      0.054282237 = sum of:
        0.010356884 = weight(_text_:in in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010356884 = score(doc=360,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
        0.043925352 = product of:
          0.087850705 = sum of:
            0.087850705 = weight(_text_:education in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087850705 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    External factors are forcing libraries to seriously evaluate and redefine their purpose within higher education. Libraries have identified themselves as gateways to information. Google, and other Internet search tools, have changed the need and importance of the gatekeeper role in libraries. The authors argue that libraries have a role that is broader than that of gatekeeper. It is necessary to move beyond our existing mental models and truly redefine our unique role based on the needs within the external environment. To develop this broader role, libraries must develop collaborative relationships and leverage existing tools and services.
  8. Bager, J.: Weniger ist mehr : Internet-Suchmaschinen richtig einsetzen (1998) 0.04
    0.03610447 = product of:
      0.054156706 = sum of:
        0.012554439 = weight(_text_:in in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012554439 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
        0.041602265 = product of:
          0.08320453 = sum of:
            0.08320453 = weight(_text_:22 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08320453 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    'Windows-95-Tuning' führt zur Manta-Homepage, 'Grafik-Probleme' leitet zur Psycho-Site: Wer Suchmaschinen falsch bedient, versinkt in Fluten nutzloser Treffer
    Date
    29.12.1998 11:22:00
  9. Hock, R.E.: How to do field searching in Web search engines : a field trip (1998) 0.03
    0.031728417 = product of:
      0.04759262 = sum of:
        0.008369626 = weight(_text_:in in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008369626 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
        0.039222997 = product of:
          0.07844599 = sum of:
            0.07844599 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07844599 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.18-22
  10. Loeper, D. von: Sherlock Holmes im Netz (1997) 0.03
    0.03008706 = product of:
      0.045130588 = sum of:
        0.010462033 = weight(_text_:in in 6566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010462033 = score(doc=6566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6566)
        0.034668557 = product of:
          0.069337115 = sum of:
            0.069337115 = weight(_text_:22 in 6566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069337115 = score(doc=6566,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6566, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Der deutsche Konkurrent, der Lieferant in Fernost oder der neue Partner für Nordamerika - sie alle sind vielleicht schon im Internet vertreten. Das Wissen um ihre Existenz und die Kenntnis ihrer Internet-Adresse ist wichtig, vielleicht sogar entscheidend im Wettbewerb. Aber wie finden?
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:50:29
  11. Hüskes, R.; Kleber, D.: ¬Den Server im Griff (1999) 0.03
    0.03008706 = product of:
      0.045130588 = sum of:
        0.010462033 = weight(_text_:in in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010462033 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
        0.034668557 = product of:
          0.069337115 = sum of:
            0.069337115 = weight(_text_:22 in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069337115 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgereifte Suchfunktionen auf dem eigenen Webserver sind wichtiger der je. Dabei ist es gar nicht schwer, eine eigene Suchfunktion in den Server zu integrieren
    Date
    22. 8.1999 21:21:10
  12. Sieverts, E.: Slimmerds onder de zoekmachines (1998) 0.03
    0.02815431 = product of:
      0.042231463 = sum of:
        0.014496619 = weight(_text_:in in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014496619 = score(doc=2414,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Web search engines generally use best match search techniques, rather than traditional Boolean operators. Precision in searching will depend on the numbers of selected terms appearing in a document and the inclusion of less-common words in the search string. Users are, therefore, recommended to enter as many words as possible. ExCite and WebCrawler lead users from a relevant document to other documents containing similar word patterns, while MusCat and EuroFerret suggest additional keywords for searching
    Date
    29.12.1998 11:22:34
  13. Notess, G.R.: Toward more comprehensive Web searching : single searching versus megasearching (1998) 0.03
    0.02815431 = product of:
      0.042231463 = sum of:
        0.014496619 = weight(_text_:in in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014496619 = score(doc=3278,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In spite of their size, the major Web indexes are not comprehensive. Considers approaches carrying out comprehensive searches, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. In the single search tool approach, users search the largest of the databses one by one, using the command language uniqe to each to increase the precision of the esearch. In the megasearch approach, search engines use 1 form that simultaneously seands a single query to a number of search engines and then presents the results. Inference Find, Dogpile and MetaFind are examples of good metasearch engines
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.2, S.73-76
  14. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.03
    0.026380857 = product of:
      0.039571285 = sum of:
        0.011836439 = weight(_text_:in in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011836439 = score(doc=4867,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  15. Schüler, P.: Wertes Wissen : Knowledge Management vermeidet Datenfriedhöfe (2001) 0.03
    0.026380857 = product of:
      0.039571285 = sum of:
        0.011836439 = weight(_text_:in in 6815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011836439 = score(doc=6815,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 6815, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6815)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 6815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=6815,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6815, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6815)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Wer ohne spezielle Vorkenntnisse schnell in einem Thema Fuß fassen will, ist auf intelligente Recherchierhilfen angewiesen. Gurus der künstlichen Intelligenz kennen schon langm Wege, die Datenwelt besser als mit Schlagwort-Suchmaschinen nach Inhalten zu durchforsten - nur in der Praxis war davon wenig zu sehen. Aktuelle Software zum Content-Retrieval will die scheinbare Utopie verwirklichen
    Date
    8.11.2001 19:58:22
  16. Lewandowski, D.: Abfragesprachen und erweiterte Funktionen von WWW-Suchmaschinen (2004) 0.03
    0.026380857 = product of:
      0.039571285 = sum of:
        0.011836439 = weight(_text_:in in 2314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011836439 = score(doc=2314,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2314, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2314)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 2314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=2314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2314)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Der Artikel stellt die erweiterten Suchmöglichkeiten in den wichtigsten Suchmaschinen vor. Dabei handelt es sich um Google, Alta Vista, Hotbot (Inktomi), Teoma und Fireball. Die Oualität von Suchmaschinen wird in der Regel durch Retrievaltests verglichen. Vordem Hintergrund professioneller Ansprüche an die Recherchefähigkeiten der Suchmaschinen müssen aber zusätzlich auch deren Abfragemöglichkeiten betrachtet werden. Nur ausgereifte Abfragesprachen erlauben komplexe Suchanfragen, wie sie im professionellen Umfeld gestellt werden.
    Date
    28.11.2004 13:11:22
  17. dpa: Froogle sucht nach Produkten (2004) 0.03
    0.026380857 = product of:
      0.039571285 = sum of:
        0.011836439 = weight(_text_:in in 2865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011836439 = score(doc=2865,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2865, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2865)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 2865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=2865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    "Ab sofort bietet Google als neuen Service auch in Deutschland die Produkt-Suchmaschine Froogle an. Froogle Deutschland sucht im Netz mit Hilfe der gleichen Technologie wie Google nach Informationen über Produkt-Angebote. Die Treffer können nach dem Preis sortiert und mit Bild gezeigt werden. Google, der führende Internet-Suchmaschinenbetreiber, erwartet nach jüngsten Studien, dass dieses Jahr 23 Millionen Deutsche online einkaufen und dabei über 7,6 Milliarden Euro ausgeben werden. Wie viele Einträge die Produktdatenbank zum Start bereit hält, teilte das Uriternehmen nicht mit. In den USA ist Froogle bereits seit rund zwei Jahren verfügbar."
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  18. Lewandowski, D.: Query understanding (2011) 0.03
    0.026380857 = product of:
      0.039571285 = sum of:
        0.011836439 = weight(_text_:in in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011836439 = score(doc=344,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Kapitel wird beschrieben, wie Suchmaschinen Suchanfragen interpretieren können, um letztendlich den Nutzern besser auf ihren Kontext zugeschnittene Ergebnisse liefern zu können. Nach einer Diskussion der Notwendigkeit und der Einsatzmöglichkeiten des Query Understanding wird aufgezeigt, auf welcher Datenbasis und an welchen Ansatzpunkten Suchanfragen interpretiert werden können. Dann erfolgt eine Erläuterung der Interpretationsmöglichkeiten anhand der Suchanfragen-Facetten von Calderon-Benavides et al. (2010), welcher sich eine Diskussion der Verfahren zur Ermittlung der Facetten anschließt.
    Date
    18. 9.2018 18:22:18
    Source
    Handbuch Internet-Suchmaschinen, 2: Neue Entwicklungen in der Web-Suche. Hrsg.: D. Lewandowski
  19. Williamson, N.J.: Knowledge structures and the Internet : progress and prospects (2006) 0.03
    0.025943225 = product of:
      0.038914837 = sum of:
        0.014646845 = weight(_text_:in in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014646845 = score(doc=238,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper analyses the development of the knowledge structures provided as aids to users in searching the Internet. Specific focus is given to web directories, thesauri and gateways and portals. The paper assumes that users need to be able to access information in two ways - to locate information on a subject directly in response to a search term and to be able to browse so as to familiarize themselves with a domain or to refine a request. Emphasis is to the browsing aspect. Background and development are addressed. Structures are analyzed, problems are identified, and future directions discussed.
    Date
    27.12.2008 15:56:22
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.10
  20. Price, A.: NOVAGate : a Nordic gateway to electronic resources in the forestry, veterinary and agricultural sciences (2000) 0.02
    0.024635023 = product of:
      0.036952533 = sum of:
        0.012684541 = weight(_text_:in in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012684541 = score(doc=4874,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    NOVAGate is a subject-based information gateway covering electronic resources in the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service, which opened in July 1998, is produced by the veterinary and agricultural libraries of the 5 Nordic countries - Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden - which serve the NOVA University. The gateway covers Nordic and European resources as well as the resources of international organizations, but being planned is a network of subject gateways which will give access to a wide range of international quality resources within the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service uses the ROADS software
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:00

Years

Languages