Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Bladow, N.; Dorey, C.; Frederickson, L.; Grover, P.; Knudtson, Y.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Lazarou, V.: What's the Buzz about? : An empirical examination of Search on Yahoo! (2005) 0.00
    0.0043455283 = product of:
      0.02172764 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  2. Ding, L.; Finin, T.; Joshi, A.; Peng, Y.; Cost, R.S.; Sachs, J.; Pan, R.; Reddivari, P.; Doshi, V.: Swoogle : a Semantic Web search and metadata engine (2004) 0.00
    0.0043455283 = product of:
      0.02172764 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 4704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=4704,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 4704, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4704)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  3. Dambeck, H.: Wie Google mit Milliarden Unbekannten rechnet : Teil 2: Ausgerechnet: Der Page Rank für ein Mini-Web aus drei Seiten (2009) 0.00
    0.0028297836 = product of:
      0.014148918 = sum of:
        0.014148918 = product of:
          0.028297836 = sum of:
            0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028297836 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  4. Boldi, P.; Santini, M.; Vigna, S.: PageRank as a function of the damping factor (2005) 0.00
    0.0028109495 = product of:
      0.014054747 = sum of:
        0.014054747 = product of:
          0.028109495 = sum of:
            0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028109495 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  5. Baeza-Yates, R.; Boldi, P.; Castillo, C.: Generalizing PageRank : damping functions for linkbased ranking algorithms (2006) 0.00
    0.0028109495 = product of:
      0.014054747 = sum of:
        0.014054747 = product of:
          0.028109495 = sum of:
            0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028109495 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  6. Dambeck, H.: Wie Google mit Milliarden Unbekannten rechnet : Teil.1 (2009) 0.00
    0.0022638268 = product of:
      0.011319133 = sum of:
        0.011319133 = product of:
          0.022638267 = sum of:
            0.022638267 = weight(_text_:h in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022638267 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  7. Krempl, S.: Google muss zerschlagen werden (2007) 0.00
    0.0019808484 = product of:
      0.009904242 = sum of:
        0.009904242 = product of:
          0.019808484 = sum of:
            0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019808484 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. die Studie "Maurer, H. et al: Report on dangers and opportunities posed by large search engines, particularly Google" unter: http://www.iicm.tugraz.at/iicm_papers/dangers_google.pdf.
  8. Palm, G.: ¬Der Zeitgeist in der Suchmaschine : Unser alltäglicher "Google-Hupf" und seine Spuren (2002) 0.00
    0.0014148918 = product of:
      0.007074459 = sum of:
        0.007074459 = product of:
          0.014148918 = sum of:
            0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 1226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014148918 = score(doc=1226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Zeitmaschinen gibt es schon länger, spätestens seit H. G. Wells, aber eine Zeitgeistmaschine existiert erst seit 1998: Google. Trend-Gurus und ihre Trend-Büros gehören demnächst der Vergangenheit an. Eine weitere Ironie des Netzes, das heute bereits verabschiedet, was doch für morgen bestimmt war. Google macht die ohnehin so anfechtbare Zunft der Seher tendenziell arbeitslos, weil die Suchmaschine der Suchmaschinen sich nicht auf Nostradamus oder Horoskop, Kassandra oder Kaffeesatz, sondern auf Suchanfragen verlässt. Was die Welt umtreibt, was mega-in oder mega-out ist, bildet sich in Googles Zeitgeistfeature ab. Das komplexe Wunder von Google ist der Vokal "o", der bekanntlich erstaunlich dehnbar ist, wenn die Welt auf der Suche nach sich selbst ist. Google führt sich auf ein Wortspiel mit dem mathematischen Begriff "googol" zurück, eine 1 mit 100 Nullen. Rechnet man Googles Partnerschaften mit Yahoo und anderen dazu, wird pro Tag ca. 150 Millionen mal gegoogelt - Tendenz selbstverständlich steigend. Nach Google-Mitgründer Larry Page besteht der Anspruch der perfekten Suchmaschine darin, dass sie genau versteht, was der Suchende will und ihn exakt bedient. Doch das ist nur die längst nicht erreichte Sonnenseite der blitzschnell generierten Suchantworten der digitalen Wissensgesellschaft. Die vielen Fragen der Wissbegierigen sind selbst Antworten - Antworten auf die Frage nach den Interessen, Wünschen und Begierden der Netzgesellschaft.
  9. Maurer, H.; Balke, T.; Kappe,, F.; Kulathuramaiyer, N.; Weber, S.; Zaka, B.: Report on dangers and opportunities posed by large search engines, particularly Google (2007) 0.00
    8.48935E-4 = product of:
      0.004244675 = sum of:
        0.004244675 = product of:
          0.00848935 = sum of:
            0.00848935 = weight(_text_:h in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00848935 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.08234863 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)