-
Fong, W.W.: Searching the World Wide Web (1996)
0.07
0.07207365 = product of:
0.10811047 = sum of:
0.019537456 = weight(_text_:of in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019537456 = score(doc=6597,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
0.088573016 = sum of:
0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0320066 = score(doc=6597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=6597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews the availability on the WWW, of search engines designed to organize various web information sources. Discusses the differences and similarities of each search engine and their advantages and disadvantages. Search engines included in the study were: AltaVista, CUI W3 Catalog, InfoSeek, Lycos, Magellan, Yahoo
- Source
- Journal of library and information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.15-36
-
Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999)
0.05
0.046157025 = product of:
0.06923553 = sum of:
0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01973992 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.049495615 = product of:
0.09899123 = sum of:
0.09899123 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09899123 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
-
Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996)
0.04
0.039563164 = product of:
0.059344746 = sum of:
0.016919931 = weight(_text_:of in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016919931 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.042424813 = product of:
0.084849626 = sum of:
0.084849626 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084849626 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Basically a good listing in table format of features from the major search engines
- Date
- 10.11.1996 16:36:22
-
Veltman, S.: Search engines (1999)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 4541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=4541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4541)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 4541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=4541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 4541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4541)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.64, [=Suppl.27]
-
Notess, G.R.: Toward more comprehensive Web searching : single searching versus megasearching (1998)
0.04
0.035670638 = product of:
0.053505957 = sum of:
0.025222747 = weight(_text_:of in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025222747 = score(doc=3278,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In spite of their size, the major Web indexes are not comprehensive. Considers approaches carrying out comprehensive searches, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. In the single search tool approach, users search the largest of the databses one by one, using the command language uniqe to each to increase the precision of the esearch. In the megasearch approach, search engines use 1 form that simultaneously seands a single query to a number of search engines and then presents the results. Inference Find, Dogpile and MetaFind are examples of good metasearch engines
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.2, S.73-76
-
Herring, S.D.: ¬The value of interdisciplinarity : a study based on the design of Internet search engines (1999)
0.03
0.03453625 = product of:
0.05180437 = sum of:
0.027304424 = weight(_text_:of in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027304424 = score(doc=3458,freq=30.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
0.024499949 = product of:
0.048999898 = sum of:
0.048999898 = weight(_text_:science in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048999898 = score(doc=3458,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3564397 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Continued development of the Internet requires the development of efficient, easy-to-use search engines. Ideally, such development should call upon knowledge and skills from a variety of disciplines, including computer science, information science, psychology, and ergonomics. The current study is intended to determine whether search engines shows a pattern of interdisciplinarity. 2 disciplines were selected as the focus for the study: computer science, and library/information science. A citation analysis was conducted to measure levels of interdisciplinary research and publishing in Internet search engine design and development. The results show a higher level of interdisciplinarity among library and information scientists than among computer scientists or among any of those categorized as 'other'. This is reflected both in the types of journals in which the authors publish, and in the references they cite to support their work. However, almost no authors published articles or cited references in fields such as cognitive science, ergonomics, or psychology. The results of this study are analyzed in terms of the writings of Patrick Wilson, Bruno Latour, Pierre Bordieu, Fritz Ringer, and Thomas Pinelli, focusing on cognitive authority within a profession, interaction between disciplines, and information-gathering habits of professionals. Suggestions for further research are given
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.4, S.358-365
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998)
0.03
0.032616116 = product of:
0.048924174 = sum of:
0.024176367 = weight(_text_:of in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024176367 = score(doc=2186,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Evaluates the performance of 8 major Internet search engines in answering 21 real reference questions and 5 made up subject questions. Reports on the retrieval and relevancy ranking abilities of the search engines. Concludes that the search engines did not produce good results for the reference questions unlike for the subject questions. The best engines are identified by type of questions, with Infoseek best for the subject questions, and OpenText best for refrence questions
- Date
- 25.12.1998 19:22:51
- Footnote
- Part of an issue devoted to electronic resources and their use in libraries, from the viewpoint of reference services, with an emphasis on the Internet and Geographic Information Systems
-
Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998)
0.03
0.032616116 = product of:
0.048924174 = sum of:
0.024176367 = weight(_text_:of in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024176367 = score(doc=1673,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia; vgl. auch: http://www7.scu.edu.au/programme/posters/1846/com1846.htm.
-
Conhaim, W.W.: Search tools (1996)
0.03
0.031880446 = product of:
0.047820665 = sum of:
0.019537456 = weight(_text_:of in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019537456 = score(doc=4738,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the 3 most popular searching tools for the WWW: InfoSeek, Yahoo and Lycos. Searching Internet directories can also be a useful search technique. Lists other searching engines. Points out a number of evaluations of these search engines published on the WWW. A number of search tools are available for specialized areas. Sites are available that enable parallel searching using several tools at once. Describes WWW pages with information about search engines
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:39:31
-
Sieverts, E.: Slimmerds onder de zoekmachines (1998)
0.03
0.031880446 = product of:
0.047820665 = sum of:
0.019537456 = weight(_text_:of in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019537456 = score(doc=2414,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Web search engines generally use best match search techniques, rather than traditional Boolean operators. Precision in searching will depend on the numbers of selected terms appearing in a document and the inclusion of less-common words in the search string. Users are, therefore, recommended to enter as many words as possible. ExCite and WebCrawler lead users from a relevant document to other documents containing similar word patterns, while MusCat and EuroFerret suggest additional keywords for searching
- Date
- 29.12.1998 11:22:34
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Top of the class among the search engines
-
Berinstein, P.: Turning visual : image search engines on the Web (1998)
0.03
0.031880446 = product of:
0.047820665 = sum of:
0.019537456 = weight(_text_:of in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019537456 = score(doc=3595,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Gives an overview of image search engines on the Web. They work by: looking for graphics files; looking for a caption; looking for Web sites whose titles indicate the presence of picturres on a certain subject; or employing human intervention. Describes the image search capabilities of: AltaVista; Amazing Picture Machine (Http://www.ncrtec.org/picture.htm); HotBot; ImageSurfer (http://ipix.yahoo.com); Lycos; Web Clip Art Search Engine and WebSEEK. The search engines employing human intervention provide the best results
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.37-38,40-42
-
From 'storage and retrieval systems' to 'search engines' : text retrieval in evolution (1998)
0.03
0.031830467 = product of:
0.047745697 = sum of:
0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 7016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01973992 = score(doc=7016,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 7016, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7016)
0.028005775 = product of:
0.05601155 = sum of:
0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 7016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05601155 = score(doc=7016,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 7016, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7016)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 24(1998), April/May, S.6-20
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Customizable multi-engine search tool with clustering (1997)
0.03
0.031211808 = product of:
0.046817712 = sum of:
0.022069903 = weight(_text_:of in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022069903 = score(doc=2670,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Proposes a new idea of searching under the multi-engine search architecture to overcome the problems associated with relevance ranking. These include clustering of the search results and extraction of co-occurence keywords, which, with the user's feedback, better refines the query in the searching process. The system also provides the construction of the concept space to gradually customize the search tool to fit the usage for the user at the same time
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue of papers from the 6th International World Wide Web conference, held 7-11 Apr 1997, Santa Clara, California
-
Gourbin, G.: ¬Une nouvelle profession : cyber-documentaliste l'exemple de Nomade (1998)
0.03
0.031211808 = product of:
0.046817712 = sum of:
0.022069903 = weight(_text_:of in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022069903 = score(doc=2980,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=2980,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Users who want to exploit all the information sources on the Web will need an efficient search and selection tool e.g. a directory or search engine. Directories list Web sites and analyze their contents. Describes the behind-the-scenes work of documentalists specialized in surfing, tracking and indexing French language sites for the directory Nomade. Describes the creation of Nomade, its functioning and indexing, and how this new profession of 'cyber-documentalist' is changing the practices and functions of information professionals as they become Internet information organizers
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: A new profession: cyber-documentalist: the example of Nomade
-
Brueggeman, P.: Full text Web indexes (1997)
0.03
0.030127995 = product of:
0.045191992 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=159,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
0.022632083 = product of:
0.045264166 = sum of:
0.045264166 = weight(_text_:science in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045264166 = score(doc=159,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Briefly reviews the major WWW search engines from the viewpoint of their effectiveness in retrieving full text information on marine science
- Source
- Tradition and innovation: planning our future. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the International Association of Aquatic and Marine Science Libraries and Information Centres (IAMSLIC), Monterey Bay, CA, 13-18 Oct. 1996. Ed.: J.W. Markham et al
-
Bilal, D.: Web search engines for children : a comparative study and performance evaluation of Yahooligans!, AskJeeves for Kids, and Super Snooper (1999)
0.03
0.029752336 = product of:
0.044628505 = sum of:
0.027304424 = weight(_text_:of in 6544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027304424 = score(doc=6544,freq=30.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 6544, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6544)
0.01732408 = product of:
0.03464816 = sum of:
0.03464816 = weight(_text_:science in 6544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464816 = score(doc=6544,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 6544, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6544)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This study compared the search features and retrieval performance of Yahooligans!, Ask Jeeves for Kids, and Super Snooper on identical searches. This extended the earlier research conducted by Bilal (1999), which examined the cognitive, affective, and physical behaviors of twenty-two 7th grade science students' use of Yahooligans! search engine. The three types of searches the students formulated in Yahooligans! on an imposed fact-driven query were here conducted in Ask Jeeves for Kids and Super Snooper. The retrieval performance criteria of the three engines included: (1) retrieval output, (2) relevance, (3) overlap in results, and (4) redundancy. A matrix of features (e.g., database coverage, search interface, search capabilities, retrieval interface, filtering, feedback, online help, FAQs, and advertisements) was developed to compare the engines. The performance of the natural language capability embedded in Ask Jeeves for Kids was evaluated by comparing the results retrieved directly from Yahooligans! to those Ask Jeeves for Kids returned from Yahooligans! on identical searches.The. results shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of each engine and appropriateness to specific types of queries. Yahooligans! was the most effective on keyword searching. Super Snooper returned the highest number of hits but with zero relevance on all types of searches. Ask Jeeves for Kids was successful only on one keyword search and failed both the natural language phrase and multiple keyword. Implications are made for improving the engines' design, retrieval performance, and search features, as well as for user instruction
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol. 36
- Source
- Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
-
Kurzke, C.; Galle, M.; Bathelt, M.: WebAssistant : a user profile specific information retrieval assistant (1998)
0.03
0.029658487 = product of:
0.04448773 = sum of:
0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 3559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01973992 = score(doc=3559,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3559, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3559)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 3559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=3559,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3559, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3559)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the concept of a proxy based information classification and filtering utility, named Web Assistant. On the behalf of users a private view of the WWW is generated based on a previously determined profile. This profile is created by monitoring the user anf group activities when browsing WWW pages. Additional features are integrated to allow for easy interoperability workgroups with similar project interests, maintain personal and common hotlists with automatic modification checks and a sophisticated search engine front-end
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
-
Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.: Inquirus, the NECI meta search engine (1998)
0.03
0.029658487 = product of:
0.04448773 = sum of:
0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 3604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01973992 = score(doc=3604,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3604, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3604)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 3604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=3604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Presents Inquirus, a WWW meta search engine which works by downloading and analysing the individual documents. It makes improvements over existing search engines in a number of areas: more useful document summaries incorporating query term context, identification of both pages which no longer exist and pages which no longer contain the query terms, advanced detection of duplicate pages, improved document ranking using proximity information, dramatically improved precision for certain queries by using specific expressive forms, and quick jump links and highlighting when viewing the full document
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
-
Amato, G.; Rabitti, F.; Savino, P.: Multimedia document search on the Web (1998)
0.03
0.029490318 = product of:
0.044235475 = sum of:
0.015952265 = weight(_text_:of in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015952265 = score(doc=3605,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Presents a multimedia model which describes the various multimedia components, their structure and their relationships with a pre-defined taxonomy of concepts, in order to support search engine information retrieval process
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
-
Cronin, B.; Snyder, H.W.; Rosembaum, H.; Martinson, A.; Callahan, E.: Invoked on the Web (1998)
0.03
0.029088955 = product of:
0.04363343 = sum of:
0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027630134 = score(doc=2327,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
0.0160033 = product of:
0.0320066 = sum of:
0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0320066 = score(doc=2327,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Where, how, and why are scholars invoked on the WWW? An inductively derived typology was used to captue genres of invocation. Comparative data were gathered using five commercial search engines. It is argued that the Web fosters mow modalities of scholarly communication. Different categories of invocation are identified and analyzed in terms of their potential to inform sociometric and bibliometric analyses of academic interaction
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1319-1328
