Search (85 results, page 2 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Averesch, D.: Googeln ohne Google : Mit alternativen Suchmaschinen gelingt ein neutraler Überblick (2010) 0.00 
    0.003431873 = product of:
  0.006863746 = sum of:
    0.006863746 = product of:
      0.013727492 = sum of:
        0.013727492 = weight(_text_:22 in 3374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013727492 = score(doc=3374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  2. Milonas, E.: ¬An examination of facets within search engine result pages (2017) 0.00 
    0.003270795 = product of:
  0.00654159 = sum of:
    0.00654159 = product of:
      0.01308318 = sum of:
        0.01308318 = weight(_text_:e in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01308318 = score(doc=4160,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.26950687 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  3. Roux, M.: Metadata for search engines : what can be learned from e-Sciences? (2012) 0.00 
    0.0023128013 = product of:
  0.0046256026 = sum of:
    0.0046256026 = product of:
      0.009251205 = sum of:
        0.009251205 = weight(_text_:e in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009251205 = score(doc=96,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    E-sciences are data-intensive sciences that make a large use of the Web to share, collect, and process data. In this context, primary scientific data is becoming a new challenging issue as data must be extensively described (1) to account for empiric conditions and results that allow interpretation and/or analyses and (2) to be understandable by computers used for data storage and information retrieval. With this respect, metadata is a focal point whatever it is considered from the point of view of the user to visualize and exploit data as well as this of the search tools to find and retrieve information. Numerous disciplines are concerned with the issues of describing complex observations and addressing pertinent knowledge. In this paper, similarities and differences in data description and exploration strategies among disciplines in e-sciences are examined.
    Language
    e
  4. ¬Die Googleisierung der Informationssuche : Suchmaschinen zwischen Nutzung und Regulierung (2014) 0.00 
    0.0017238604 = product of:
  0.0034477208 = sum of:
    0.0034477208 = product of:
      0.0068954416 = sum of:
        0.0068954416 = weight(_text_:e in 1840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068954416 = score(doc=1840,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.14204259 = fieldWeight in 1840, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    AYZ (E)
    KNZZ (E)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitt. VOEB 68(2015) H.1, S.180-183 (O.Oberhauser): "Aus dieser kurzen Skizze geht hervor, dass der vorliegende Band eine Reihe interessanter und mitunter auch brisanter Teilthemen beinhaltet. Wer an der Diskussion um die Rolle der meistgenutzten Suchmaschine in unserer Gesellschaft Interesse hat, findet in diesem Buch reichlich Material und Ideen. Jeder Beitrag wird zudem durch ein Literaturverzeichnis ergänzt, in dem weiterführende Quellen genannt werden. Die Beiträge sind durchweg "lesbar" geschrieben und nur in mässigem Ausmass von soziologischem oder rechtswissenschaftlichem Fachjargon durchsetzt. In stilistischer Hinsicht ist der Text dennoch nicht ohne Probleme, zumal bereits im ersten Absatz der Einleitung ein als Hauptsatz "verkaufter" Nebensatz auffällt ("Denn Suchmaschinenbetreiber wie Google ermöglichen und gestalten den Zugang zu Informationen im Netz.") und die gleiche stilistische Schwäche allein in der 19-seitigen Einleitung in über einem Dutzend weiterer Fälle registriert werden kann, vom nächsten Beitrag gar nicht zu sprechen. Ein funktionierendes Verlagslektorat hätte derlei rigoros bereinigen müssen. Es hätte eventuell auch dafür Sorge tragen können, dass am Ende des Bandes nicht nur ein Verzeichnis der Autorinnen und Autoren aufscheint, sondern auch ein Sachregister - ein solches fehlt nämlich bedauerlicherweise. In optischer Hinsicht ist der Hardcover-Band ansprechend gestaltet und gut gelungen. Der Preis liegt mit rund 80 Euro leider in der Oberklasse; auch die E-Book-Version macht die Anschaffung nicht billiger, da kein Preisunterschied zur gebundenen Ausgabe besteht. Dennoch ist das Buch aufgrund der interessanten Inhalte durchaus zu empfehlen; grössere Bibliotheken sowie kommunikations- und informationswissenschaftliche Spezialsammlungen sollten es nach Möglichkeit erwerben."
    GHBS
    AYZ (E)
    KNZZ (E)
  5. Vaughan, L.; Romero-Frías, E.: Web search volume as a predictor of academic fame : an exploration of Google trends (2014) 0.00 
    0.0016353976 = product of:
  0.003270795 = sum of:
    0.003270795 = product of:
      0.00654159 = sum of:
        0.00654159 = weight(_text_:e in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00654159 = score(doc=1233,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  6. Hodson, H.: Google's fact-checking bots build vast knowledge bank (2014) 0.00 
    0.0015418675 = product of:
  0.003083735 = sum of:
    0.003083735 = product of:
      0.00616747 = sum of:
        0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00616747 = score(doc=1700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  7. ¬Der Google Hummingbird Algorithmus : semantisch-holistische Suche (2013) 0.00 
    0.0015418675 = product of:
  0.003083735 = sum of:
    0.003083735 = product of:
      0.00616747 = sum of:
        0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00616747 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  8. Chau, M.; Wong, C.H.; Zhou, Y.; Qin, J.; Chen, H.: Evaluating the use of search engine development tools in IT education (2010) 0.00 
    0.0013628312 = product of:
  0.0027256624 = sum of:
    0.0027256624 = product of:
      0.005451325 = sum of:
        0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 3325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005451325 = score(doc=3325,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 3325, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3325)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It is important for education in computer science and information systems to keep up to date with the latest development in technology. With the rapid development of the Internet and the Web, many schools have included Internet-related technologies, such as Web search engines and e-commerce, as part of their curricula. Previous research has shown that it is effective to use search engine development tools to facilitate students' learning. However, the effectiveness of these tools in the classroom has not been evaluated. In this article, we review the design of three search engine development tools, SpidersRUs, Greenstone, and Alkaline, followed by an evaluation study that compared the three tools in the classroom. In the study, 33 students were divided into 13 groups and each group used the three tools to develop three independent search engines in a class project. Our evaluation results showed that SpidersRUs performed better than the two other tools in overall satisfaction and the level of knowledge gained in their learning experience when using the tools for a class project on Internet applications development.
    Language
    e
  9. Joint, N.: ¬The one-stop shop search engine : a transformational library technology? ANTAEUS (2010) 0.00 
    0.0013628312 = product of:
  0.0027256624 = sum of:
    0.0027256624 = product of:
      0.005451325 = sum of:
        0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 4201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005451325 = score(doc=4201,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 4201, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to form one of a series which will give an overview of so-called "transformational" areas of digital library technology. The aim will be to assess how much real transformation these applications are bringing about, in terms of creating genuine user benefit and also changing everyday library practice. Design/methodology/approach - An overview of the present state of development of the one-stop shop library search engine, with particular reference to its relationship with the underlying bibliographic databases to which it provides a simplified single interface. Findings - The paper finds that the success of federated searching has proved valuable but limited to date in creating a one-stop shop search engine to rival Google Scholar; but the persistent value of the bibliographic databases sitting underneath a federated search system means that a harvesting search engine could well answer the need for a true one-stop search engine for academic and scholarly information. Research limitations/implications - This paper is based on the hypothesis that Google's success in providing such an apparently high degree of access to electronic journal services is not what it seems, and that it does not render library discovery tools obsolete. It argues that Google has not diminished the pre-eminent role of library bibliographic databases in mediating access to e-journal text, although this hypothesis needs further research to validate or disprove it. Practical implications - The paper affirms the value of bibliographic databases to practitioner librarians and the potential of single interface discovery tools in library practice. Originality/value - The paper uses statistics from US LIS sources to shed light on UK discovery tool issues.
    Language
    e
  10. Souza, J.; Carvalho, A.; Cristo, M.; Moura, E.; Calado, P.; Chirita, P.-A.; Nejdl, W.: Using site-level connections to estimate link confidence (2012) 0.00 
    0.0013628312 = product of:
  0.0027256624 = sum of:
    0.0027256624 = product of:
      0.005451325 = sum of:
        0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005451325 = score(doc=498,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  11. Sarigil, E.; Sengor Altingovde, I.; Blanco, R.; Barla Cambazoglu, B.; Ozcan, R.; Ulusoy, Ö.: Characterizing, predicting, and handling web search queries that match very few or no results (2018) 0.00 
    0.0013628312 = product of:
  0.0027256624 = sum of:
    0.0027256624 = product of:
      0.005451325 = sum of:
        0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 4039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005451325 = score(doc=4039,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 4039, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4039)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  12. Truran, M.; Schmakeit, J.-F.; Ashman, H.: ¬The effect of user intent on the stability of search engine results (2011) 0.00 
    0.001349134 = product of:
  0.002698268 = sum of:
    0.002698268 = product of:
      0.005396536 = sum of:
        0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 4478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005396536 = score(doc=4478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 4478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4478)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  13. Kopp, O.: Google Hummingbird-Algorithmus-Update : Infos & Hintergründe (2013) 0.00 
    0.001349134 = product of:
  0.002698268 = sum of:
    0.002698268 = product of:
      0.005396536 = sum of:
        0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 2522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005396536 = score(doc=2522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2522)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  14. Lewandowski, D.; Kerkmann, F.; Rümmele, S.; Sünkler, S.: ¬An empirical investigation on search engine ad disclosure (2018) 0.00 
    0.001349134 = product of:
  0.002698268 = sum of:
    0.002698268 = product of:
      0.005396536 = sum of:
        0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005396536 = score(doc=4115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  15. Croft, W.B.; Metzler, D.; Strohman, T.: Search engines : information retrieval in practice (2010) 0.00 
    0.0011564007 = product of:
  0.0023128013 = sum of:
    0.0023128013 = product of:
      0.0046256026 = sum of:
        0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 2605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046256026 = score(doc=2605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2605)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  16. Waller, V.: Not just information : who searches for what on the search engine Google? (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011564007 = product of:
  0.0023128013 = sum of:
    0.0023128013 = product of:
      0.0046256026 = sum of:
        0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046256026 = score(doc=4373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  17. What is Schema.org? (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011564007 = product of:
  0.0023128013 = sum of:
    0.0023128013 = product of:
      0.0046256026 = sum of:
        0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 4437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046256026 = score(doc=4437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4437)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  18. Thelwall, M.: Assessing web search engines : a webometric approach (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011564007 = product of:
  0.0023128013 = sum of:
    0.0023128013 = product of:
      0.0046256026 = sum of:
        0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046256026 = score(doc=10,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  19. Ke, W.: Decentralized search and the clustering paradox in large scale information networks (2012) 0.00 
    0.0011564007 = product of:
  0.0023128013 = sum of:
    0.0023128013 = product of:
      0.0046256026 = sum of:
        0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 94) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046256026 = score(doc=94,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 94, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=94)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  20. Das, A.; Jain, A.: Indexing the World Wide Web : the journey so far (2012) 0.00 
    0.0011564007 = product of:
  0.0023128013 = sum of:
    0.0023128013 = product of:
      0.0046256026 = sum of:
        0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 95) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046256026 = score(doc=95,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 95, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=95)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e

Authors

Languages

  • e 74
  • d 11

Types

  • a 69
  • el 12
  • m 8
  • s 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications