Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Walhout, J.; Oomen, P.; Jarodzka, H.; Brand-Gruwel, S.: Effects of task complexity on online search behavior of adolescents (2017) 0.02
    0.017611569 = product of:
      0.08805784 = sum of:
        0.08805784 = weight(_text_:line in 3588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08805784 = score(doc=3588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 3588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3588)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluation of information during information problem-solving processes already starts when trying to select the appropriate search result on a search engine results page (SERP). Up to now, research has mainly focused on the evaluation of webpages, while the evaluation of SERPs received less attention. Furthermore, task complexity is often not taken into account. A within-subjects design was used to study the influence of task complexity on search query formulation, evaluation of search results, and task performance. Three search tasks were used: a fact-finding, cause-effect, and a controversial topic task. To measure perceptual search processes, we used a combination of log files, eye-tracking data, answer forms, and think-aloud protocols. The results reveal that an increase in task complexity results in more search queries and used keywords, more time to formulate search queries, and more considered search results on the SERPs. Furthermore, higher ranked search results were considered more often than lower ranked results. However, not all the results for the most complex task were in line with expectations. These conflicting results can be explained by a lack of prior knowledge and the possible interference of prior attitudes.
  2. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.01
    0.008240959 = product of:
      0.04120479 = sum of:
        0.04120479 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04120479 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
  3. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.01
    0.0068674656 = product of:
      0.034337327 = sum of:
        0.034337327 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034337327 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
  4. Monchaux, S.; Amadieu, F.; Chevalier, A.; Mariné, C.: Query strategies during information searching : effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved (2015) 0.01
    0.0068674656 = product of:
      0.034337327 = sum of:
        0.034337327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034337327 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25. 1.2016 18:46:22
  5. Pontis, S.; Blandford, A.; Greifeneder, E.; Attalla, H.; Neal, D.: Keeping up to date : an academic researcher's information journey (2017) 0.01
    0.0068674656 = product of:
      0.034337327 = sum of:
        0.034337327 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034337327 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35
  6. Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018) 0.01
    0.0068674656 = product of:
      0.034337327 = sum of:
        0.034337327 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034337327 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9.12.2018 16:22:25
  7. Sachse, J.: ¬The influence of snippet length on user behavior in mobile web search (2019) 0.01
    0.0068674656 = product of:
      0.034337327 = sum of:
        0.034337327 = weight(_text_:22 in 5493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034337327 = score(doc=5493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5493)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Hopkins, M.E.; Zavalina, O.L.: Evaluating physicians' serendipitous knowledge discovery in online discovery systems : a new approach (2019) 0.01
    0.0068674656 = product of:
      0.034337327 = sum of:
        0.034337327 = weight(_text_:22 in 5842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034337327 = score(doc=5842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5842)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Renugadevi, S.; Geetha, T.V.; Gayathiri, R.L.; Prathyusha, S.; Kaviya, T.: Collaborative search using an implicitly formed academic network (2014) 0.01
    0.0054939725 = product of:
      0.027469862 = sum of:
        0.027469862 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027469862 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Waschatz, B.: Schmökern ist schwierig : Viele Uni-Bibliotheken ordnen ihre Bücher nicht - Tipps für eine erfolgreiche Suche (2010) 0.00
    0.0041204793 = product of:
      0.020602396 = sum of:
        0.020602396 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020602396 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22