Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.017107517 = product of:
  0.059876308 = sum of:
    0.015294613 = product of:
      0.030589227 = sum of:
        0.030589227 = weight(_text_:c in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030589227 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13377286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03878143 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.044581693 = weight(_text_:only in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044581693 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1614961 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03878143 = queryNorm
        0.2760543 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

This paper addresses the importance of improving the effectiveness of voice search systems through partial query modification. A user-centered experiment was designed to compare the effectiveness of an experimental system using partial query modification feature to a baseline system in which users could issue complete queries only, with 32 participants each searching on eight different tasks. The results indicate that the participants spent significantly more time preparing the modification but significantly less time speaking the modification by using the experimental system than by using the baseline system. The participants found that the experimental system (a) was more effective, (b) gave them more control, (c) was easier for the search tasks, and (d) saved them time than the baseline system. The results contribute to improving future voice search system design and benefiting the research community in general. System implications and future work were discussed.

0.0063688136 = product of:
  0.044581693 = sum of:
    0.044581693 = weight(_text_:only in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044581693 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1614961 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03878143 = queryNorm
        0.2760543 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

We present a collection of algorithms to filter a stream of documents in such a way that the filtered documents will cover as well as possible the interest of a person, keeping in mind that, at any given time, the offered documents should not only be relevant, but should also be diversified, in the sense of covering all the interests of the person. We use a modification of the WEBSOM algorithm to create a user model based on a self-organizing network trained using a collection of documents representative of the person's interests. We introduce the concepts of freshness and coverage. A document is fresh if it belongs to a semantic area of interest to a person for which no documents were seen in the recent past; a group of documents has coverage to the extent to which it is a good representation of all the interests of a person. Our tests show that these algorithms can effectively increase the coverage of the documents that are shown to the user without overly affecting precision.

0.0053073447 = product of:
  0.03715141 = sum of:
    0.03715141 = weight(_text_:only in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03715141 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1614961 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03878143 = queryNorm
        0.23004524 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

This article investigates how to improve the effectiveness of voice search systems. Earlier research found that participants employed voice search much less frequently than keyboard search. The main reasons that participants disliked voice search are system mistakes and the inability to modify queries. In keyboard search, query reformulation is facilitated by partial query modification, which is not supported by most of the current voice search systems. Consequently, users need to speak the complete query in voice search even with only minor changes. This article focuses on examining partial query modification during voice search through a Wizard of Oz user experiment. It examines if users would prefer partial query modification and how they perform it in voice search. Thirty-two participants participated in the experiment. Results indicated that when given the opportunity, the users performed more partial query modifications than complete queries. Common partial query modification strategies and patterns emerged from the experiment. The results can be used to improve the voice search system design and benefit the research community in general. System implications and future work were discussed.

0.0053073447 = product of:
  0.03715141 = sum of:
    0.03715141 = weight(_text_:only in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03715141 = score(doc=443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1614961 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03878143 = queryNorm
        0.23004524 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

There is no information search system can assist young children's known picture book search needs since the information is not organized according to their cognitive abilities and needs. Therefore, this study explored young children's known picture book search strategies and extracted picture book search elements by simulating a search scenario and playing a picture book search game. The study found 29 elements children used to search for known picture books. Then, these elements are classified into three dimensions: The first dimension is the concept category of an element. The second dimension is an element's status in the story. The third dimension indicates where an element appears in a picture book. Additionally, it revealed a young children's general search strategy: Children first use auditory elements that they hear from the adults during reading. After receiving error returns, they add visual elements that they see by themselves in picture books. The findings can not only help to understand young children's known-item search and reformulation strategies during searching but also provide theoretical support for the development of a picture book information organization schema in the search system.

0.0043175747 = product of:
  0.030223021 = sum of:
    0.030223021 = weight(_text_:g in 5817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030223021 = score(doc=5817,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14566101 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03878143 = queryNorm
        0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 5817, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5817)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.003937833 = product of:
  0.02756483 = sum of:
    0.02756483 = weight(_text_:u in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02756483 = score(doc=644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12698764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03878143 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.002184945 = product of:
  0.015294613 = sum of:
    0.015294613 = product of:
      0.030589227 = sum of:
        0.030589227 = weight(_text_:c in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030589227 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13377286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03878143 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.0018207873 = product of:
  0.012745511 = sum of:
    0.012745511 = product of:
      0.025491022 = sum of:
        0.025491022 = weight(_text_:c in 495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025491022 = score(doc=495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13377286 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03878143 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=495)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)