Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.04
    0.036396418 = product of:
      0.072792836 = sum of:
        0.053759433 = weight(_text_:data in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053759433 = score(doc=2246,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.3630661 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
        0.019033402 = product of:
          0.038066804 = sum of:
            0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038066804 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Integration of information data banks and compatibility of indexing languages
  2. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.01
    0.011102819 = product of:
      0.044411276 = sum of:
        0.044411276 = product of:
          0.08882255 = sum of:
            0.08882255 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08882255 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  3. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.01
    0.008972432 = product of:
      0.03588973 = sum of:
        0.03588973 = product of:
          0.07177946 = sum of:
            0.07177946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07177946 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  4. Fugmann, R.: Unusual possibilities in indexing and classification (1990) 0.01
    0.008478476 = product of:
      0.033913903 = sum of:
        0.033913903 = product of:
          0.067827806 = sum of:
            0.067827806 = weight(_text_:processing in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067827806 = score(doc=4781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Contemporary research in information science has concentrated on the development of methods for the algorithmic processing of natural language texts. Often, the equivalence of this approach to the intellectual technique of content analysis and indexing is claimed. It is, however, disregarded that contemporary intellectual techniques are far from exploiting their full capabilities. This is largely due to the omission of vocabulary categorisation. It is demonstrated how categorisation can drastically improve the quality of indexing and classification, and, hence, of retrieval
  5. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01
    0.007930585 = product of:
      0.03172234 = sum of:
        0.03172234 = product of:
          0.06344468 = sum of:
            0.06344468 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06344468 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  6. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.01
    0.0055514094 = product of:
      0.022205638 = sum of:
        0.022205638 = product of:
          0.044411276 = sum of:
            0.044411276 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044411276 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00