-
Haldenwanger, H.H.M.: Begriff und Sprache in der Dokumentation (1961)
0.02
0.017897481 = product of:
0.05369244 = sum of:
0.014690663 = weight(_text_:in in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014690663 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06109367 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04491341 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.039001778 = weight(_text_:und in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039001778 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0995446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04491341 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
-
Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967)
0.00
0.0034218046 = product of:
0.020530827 = sum of:
0.020530827 = weight(_text_:in in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020530827 = score(doc=1194,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06109367 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04491341 = queryNorm
0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
- Source
- Studies in southwestern ethnolinguistics. Eds.: D. Hymes u. W.E. Bittle
-
Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965)
0.00
0.0021204147 = product of:
0.0127224885 = sum of:
0.0127224885 = weight(_text_:in in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0127224885 = score(doc=834,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06109367 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04491341 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Index language (the system of symbols for representing subject content after analysis) is considered as a separate component and a variable in an information retrieval system. It is suggested that for purposes of testing, comparing and evaluating index language, the techniques of structural linguistics may provide a descriptive methodology by which all such languages (hierarchical and faceted classification, analytico-synthetic indexing, traditional subject indexing, indexes and classifications based on automatic text analysis, etc.) could be described in term of a linguistic model, and compared on a common basis