-
Farradane, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval (1967)
0.04
0.042636923 = product of:
0.08527385 = sum of:
0.03468703 = weight(_text_:information in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03468703 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09032827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051455088 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.050586812 = product of:
0.101173624 = sum of:
0.101173624 = weight(_text_:organization in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101173624 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18345574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051455088 = queryNorm
0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967) S.297-314
-
Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967)
0.00
0.004379899 = product of:
0.017519595 = sum of:
0.017519595 = weight(_text_:information in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017519595 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09032827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051455088 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
-
Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965)
0.00
0.0035039193 = product of:
0.014015677 = sum of:
0.014015677 = weight(_text_:information in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014015677 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09032827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051455088 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Index language (the system of symbols for representing subject content after analysis) is considered as a separate component and a variable in an information retrieval system. It is suggested that for purposes of testing, comparing and evaluating index language, the techniques of structural linguistics may provide a descriptive methodology by which all such languages (hierarchical and faceted classification, analytico-synthetic indexing, traditional subject indexing, indexes and classifications based on automatic text analysis, etc.) could be described in term of a linguistic model, and compared on a common basis