Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Broughton, V.: ¬A faceted classification as the basis of a faceted terminology : conversion of a classified structure to thesaurus format in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd Edition (2008) 0.09
    0.091230854 = sum of:
      0.07790968 = product of:
        0.23372903 = sum of:
          0.23372903 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23372903 = score(doc=1857,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.6706493 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013321174 = product of:
        0.03996352 = sum of:
          0.03996352 = weight(_text_:29 in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03996352 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Facet analysis is an established methodology for building classifications and subject indexing systems, but has been less rigorously applied to thesauri. The process of creating a compatible thesaurus from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition highlights the ways in which the conceptual relationships in a subject field are handled in the two types of retrieval languages. An underlying uniformity of theory is established, and the way in which software can manage the relationships is discussed. The manner of displaying verbal expressions of concepts (vocabulary control) is also considered, but is found to be less well controlled in the classification than in the thesaurus. Nevertheless, there is good reason to think that facet analysis provides a sound basis for structuring a variety of knowledge organization tools.
    Date
    31. 5.2008 19:11:29
  2. Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification Second Edition (2009) 0.05
    0.051939793 = product of:
      0.103879586 = sum of:
        0.103879586 = product of:
          0.31163874 = sum of:
            0.31163874 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.31163874 = score(doc=3755,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.8941991 = fieldWeight in 3755, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3755)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This entry looks at the origins of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition and the theory on which it is built. The reasons for the decision to revise the classification are examined, as are the influences on classification theory of the mid-twentieth century. The process of revision and construction of schedules using facet analysis is described. The use of BC2 is considered along with some recent development work on thesaural and digital formats.
  3. Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004) 0.03
    0.027545234 = product of:
      0.05509047 = sum of:
        0.05509047 = product of:
          0.1652714 = sum of:
            0.1652714 = weight(_text_:bliss in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1652714 = score(doc=831,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
  4. Broughton, V.: Language related problems in the construction of faceted terminologies and their automatic management (2008) 0.02
    0.02295436 = product of:
      0.04590872 = sum of:
        0.04590872 = product of:
          0.13772616 = sum of:
            0.13772616 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13772616 = score(doc=2497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    The paper describes current work on the generation of a thesaurus format from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2). The practical problems that occur in moving from a concept based approach to a terminological approach cluster around issues of vocabulary control that are not fully addressed in a systematic structure. These difficulties can be exacerbated within domains in the humanities because large numbers of culture specific terms may need to be accommodated in any thesaurus. The ways in which these problems can be resolved within the context of a semi-automated approach to the thesaurus generation have consequences for the management of classification data in the source vocabulary. The way in which the vocabulary is marked up for the purpose of machine manipulation is described, and some of the implications for editorial policy are discussed and examples given. The value of the classification notation as a language independent representation and mapping tool should not be sacrificed in such an exercise.
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Towards a future for knowledge organization (2006) 0.01
    0.008880783 = product of:
      0.017761566 = sum of:
        0.017761566 = product of:
          0.053284694 = sum of:
            0.053284694 = weight(_text_:29 in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053284694 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 2.2008 13:41:01
  6. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.008800895 = product of:
      0.01760179 = sum of:
        0.01760179 = product of:
          0.052805368 = sum of:
            0.052805368 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052805368 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35