Search (47 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Szostak, R.: Facet analysis using grammar (2017) 0.00 
    0.0017712747 = product of:
  0.0035425494 = sum of:
    0.0035425494 = product of:
      0.010627648 = sum of:
        0.010627648 = weight(_text_:a in 3866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010627648 = score(doc=3866,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 3866, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3866)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Basic grammar can achieve most/all of the goals of facet analysis without requiring the use of facet indicators. Facet analysis is thus rendered far simpler for classificationist, classifier, and user. We compare facet analysis and grammar, and show how various facets can be represented grammatically. We then address potential challenges in employing grammar as subject classification. A detailed review of basic grammar supports the hypothesis that it is feasible to usefully employ grammatical construction in subject classification. A manageable - and programmable - set of adjustments is required as classifiers move fairly directly from sentences in a document (or object or idea) description to formulating a subject classification. The user likewise can move fairly quickly from a query to the identification of relevant works. A review of theories in linguistics indicates that a grammatical approach should reduce ambiguity while encouraging ease of use. This paper applies the recommended approach to a small sample of recently published books. It finds that the approach is feasible and results in a more precise subject description than the subject headings assigned at present. It then explores PRECIS, an indexing system developed in the 1970s. Though our approach differs from PRECIS in many important ways, the experience of PRECIS supports our conclusions regarding both feasibility and precision.
    Type
    a
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Why a new universal classification system is needed (2017) 0.00 
    0.0017534725 = product of:
  0.003506945 = sum of:
    0.003506945 = product of:
      0.0105208345 = sum of:
        0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105208345 = score(doc=3614,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Research history of the last 70 years highlights various systems for contents assessment and retrieval of scientific literature, such as universal classifications, thesauri, ontologies etc., which have followed developments of their own, notwithstanding a general trend towards interoperability, i.e. either to become instruments for cooperation or to widen their scope to encompass neighbouring fields within their framework. In the case of thesauri and ontologies, the endeavour to upgrade them into a universal system was bound to miscarry. This paper purports to indicate ways to gain from past experience and possibly rally material achievements while updating and promoting the ontologically-based faceted Information Coding Classification as a progressive universal system fit for meeting whatever requirements in the fields of information and science at large.
    Type
    a
  3. Gnoli, C.; Pullman, T.; Cousson, P.; Merli, G.; Szostak, R.: Representing the structural elements of a freely faceted classification (2011) 0.00 
    0.0016803787 = product of:
  0.0033607574 = sum of:
    0.0033607574 = product of:
      0.010082272 = sum of:
        0.010082272 = weight(_text_:a in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010082272 = score(doc=4825,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Freely faceted classifications allow for free combination of concepts across all knowledge domains, and for sorting of the resulting compound classmarks. Starting from work by the Classification Research Group, the Integrative Levels Classification (ILC) project has produced a first edition of a general freely faceted scheme. The system is managed as a MySQL database, and can be browsed through a Web interface. The ILC database structure provides a case for identifying and representing the structural elements of any freely faceted classification. These belong to both the notational and the verbal planes. Notational elements include: arrays, chains, deictics, facets, foci, place of definition of foci, examples of combinations, subclasses of a faceted class, groupings, related classes; verbal elements include: main caption, synonyms, descriptions, included terms, related terms, notes. Encoding of some of these elements in an international mark-up format like SKOS can be problematic, especially as this does not provide for faceted structures, although approximate SKOS equivalents are identified for most of them.
    Source
    Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero
    Type
    a
  4. Barité, M.; Rauch, M.: Systematifier : in rescue of a useful tool in domain analysis (2017) 0.00 
    0.0016803787 = product of:
  0.0033607574 = sum of:
    0.0033607574 = product of:
      0.010082272 = sum of:
        0.010082272 = weight(_text_:a in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010082272 = score(doc=4142,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Literature on the systematifier is remarkably limited in knowledge organization. Dahlberg created the procedure in the seventies as a guide for the construction of classification systems and showed its applicability in systems she developed. According to her initial conception, all disciplines should be structured in the following sequence: Foundations and theories-Subjects of study-Methods-Influences-Applications-Environment. The nature of the procedure is determined in this study and the concept is situated in relation with the domain analysis methodologies. As a tool for the organization of the map of a certain domain, it is associated with a rationalist perspective and the top-down design of systems construction. It would require a reassessment of its scope in order to ensure its applicability to multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary domains. Among other conclusions, it is highlighted that the greatest potential of the systematifier is given by the fact that-as a methodological device-it can act as: i)an analyzer of a subject area; ii)an organizer of its main terms; and, iii)an identifier of links, bridges and intersection points with other knowledge areas.
    Type
    a
  5. Rajaram, S.: Principles for helpful sequence and their relevance in technical writings : a study (2015) 0.00 
    0.0016464281 = product of:
  0.0032928563 = sum of:
    0.0032928563 = product of:
      0.009878568 = sum of:
        0.009878568 = weight(_text_:a in 2795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009878568 = score(doc=2795,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2795, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2795)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A modest attempt is made in this paper to show how Ranganathan's Principles for Helpful Sequence are relevant in technical writings as writers need to organise the knowledge in a helpful sequence. Instead of relying on intuition, a deliberate understanding of the Principles for Helpful Sequence as recognised by Ranganathan would be more useful in bringing out effective products. The paper first outlines the eight Principles for Helpful Sequence and then goes on to explore the relevance of each of these eight principles to a wide range of technical documents. The paper concludes that an understanding of these principles is part of the core competencies of technical writers even in the web environment.
    Type
    a
  6. Doria, O.D.: ¬The role of activities awareness in faceted classification development (2012) 0.00 
    0.0015683535 = product of:
  0.003136707 = sum of:
    0.003136707 = product of:
      0.009410121 = sum of:
        0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009410121 = score(doc=364,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we propose a part of the methodological work to accompanying the development of a new type of Knowledge Organization System (KOS) based on faceted classification. Our approach to faceted classification differs from its traditional use. We develop a theoretical typology of professional documents based on their uses. Then we correlate these types of documents to specific types of KOS according to their degree of structural constraint and activities they aim to serve.
    Type
    a
  7. LaBarre, K.: Facet analysis (2010) 0.00 
    0.0015683535 = product of:
  0.003136707 = sum of:
    0.003136707 = product of:
      0.009410121 = sum of:
        0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 1596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009410121 = score(doc=1596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1596)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  8. Raghavan, K.S.: ¬The Colon Classification : a few considerations on its future (2015) 0.00 
    0.0015522675 = product of:
  0.003104535 = sum of:
    0.003104535 = product of:
      0.009313605 = sum of:
        0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009313605 = score(doc=2760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The article highlights the efforts and plans of Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science for revival of CC. Presents a brief history of the Scheme and explains is features. Discusses areas needing revamping for continual revision and existence of CC. Also seeks feedback from LIS professionals on the revision of the Scheme.
    Type
    a
  9. Satija, M.P.: Save the national heritage : revise the Colon Classification (2015) 0.00 
    0.0015522675 = product of:
  0.003104535 = sum of:
    0.003104535 = product of:
      0.009313605 = sum of:
        0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009313605 = score(doc=2791,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper presents a case for the revival of Colon Classification (CC). It traces the status of CC in brief and discusses its features. The author brings to light attempts made at providing a base for continuous improvements in the scheme and bringing it back to life. Measures for the revival of CC are suggested.
    Type
    a
  10. Hudon, M.; Fortier, A.: Facet : itself a multifaceted concept (2018) 0.00 
    0.0015522675 = product of:
  0.003104535 = sum of:
    0.003104535 = product of:
      0.009313605 = sum of:
        0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 4741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009313605 = score(doc=4741,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4741, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4741)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  11. Johnson, E.H.: S R Ranganathan in the Internet age (2019) 0.00 
    0.0015029765 = product of:
  0.003005953 = sum of:
    0.003005953 = product of:
      0.009017859 = sum of:
        0.009017859 = weight(_text_:a in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009017859 = score(doc=5406,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    S R Ranganathan's ideas have influenced library classification since the inception of his Colon Classification in 1933. His address at Elsinore, "Library Classification Through a Century", was his grand vision of the century of progress in classification from 1876 to 1975, and looked to the future of faceted classification as the means to provide a cohesive system to organize the world's information. Fifty years later, the internet and its achievements, social ecology, and consequences present a far more complicated picture, with the library as he knew it as a very small part and the problems that he confronted now greatly exacerbated. The systematic nature of Ranganathan's canons, principles, postulates, and devices suggest that modern semantic algorithms could guide automatic subject tagging. The vision presented here is one of internet-wide faceted classification and retrieval, implemented as open, distributed facets providing unified faceted searching across all web sites.
    Type
    a
  12. Giri, K.; Gokhale, P.: Developing a banking service ontology using Protégé, an open source software (2015) 0.00 
    0.0014819547 = product of:
  0.0029639094 = sum of:
    0.0029639094 = product of:
      0.008891728 = sum of:
        0.008891728 = weight(_text_:a in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008891728 = score(doc=2793,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Computers have transformed from single isolated devices to entry points into a worldwide network of information exchange. Consequently, support in the exchange of data, information, and knowledge is becoming the key issue in computer technology today. The increasing volume of data available on the Web makes information retrieval a tedious and difficult task. Researchers are now exploring the possibility of creating a semantic web, in which meaning is made explicit, allowing machines to process and integrate web resources intelligently. The vision of the semantic web introduces the next generation of the Web by establishing a layer of machine-understandable data. The success of the semantic web depends on the easy creation, integration and use of semantic data, which will depend on web ontology. The faceted approach towards analyzing and representing knowledge given by S R Ranganathan would be useful in this regard. Ontology development in different fields is one such area where this approach given by Ranganathan could be applied. This paper presents a case of developing ontology for the field of banking.
    Type
    a
  13. Panigrahi, P.: Ranganathan and Dewey in hierarchical subject classification : some similarities (2015) 0.00 
    0.0012674211 = product of:
  0.0025348421 = sum of:
    0.0025348421 = product of:
      0.007604526 = sum of:
        0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007604526 = score(doc=2789,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    S R Ranganathan and Melvil Dewey devised two types of classification schemes viz., faceted and enumerative. Ranganathan's faceted classification scheme is based on postulates, principles and canons. It has a strong theory. While working with the two schemes, similarities are observed. This paper tries to identify and present some relationships.
    Type
    a
  14. Frické, M.: Faceted classification : orthogonal facets and graphs of foci? (2011) 0.00 
    0.0012524803 = product of:
  0.0025049606 = sum of:
    0.0025049606 = product of:
      0.007514882 = sum of:
        0.007514882 = weight(_text_:a in 4850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007514882 = score(doc=4850,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 4850, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4850)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Faceted classification is based on the core ideas that there are kinds or categories of concepts, and that compound, or non-elemental, concepts, which are ubiquitous in classification and subject annotation, are to be identified as being constructions of concepts of the different kinds. The categories of concepts are facets, and the individual concepts, which are instances of those facets, are foci. Usually, there are constraints on how the foci can be combined into the compound concepts. What is standard is that any combination of foci is permitted from kind-to-kind across facets, but that the foci within a facet are restricted in their use by virtue of being dependent on each other, either by being exclusive of each other or by bearing some kind of hierarchical relationship to each other. Thus faceted classification is typically considered to be a synthetic classification consisting of orthogonal facets which themselves are composed individually either of exclusive foci or of a hierarchy of foci. This paper addresses in particular this second exclusive-or-hierarchical foci condition. It evaluates the arguments for the condition and finds them not conclusive. It suggests that wider synthetic constructions should be allowed on foci within a facet.
    Type
    a
  15. Aparecida Moura, M.: Emerging discursive formations, folksonomy and social semantic information spaces (SSIS) : the contributions of the theory of integrative levels in the studies carried out by the Classification Research Group (CRG) (2014) 0.00 
    0.0012524803 = product of:
  0.0025049606 = sum of:
    0.0025049606 = product of:
      0.007514882 = sum of:
        0.007514882 = weight(_text_:a in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007514882 = score(doc=1395,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on the discursive formations emerging from the Social Semantic Information Spaces (SSIS) in light of the concept of emergence in the theory of integrative levels. The study aims to identify the opportunities and challenges of incorporating epistemological considerations in the act of acquiring knowledge into the consolidation of knowledge organization and mediation processes and devices in the emergence of phenomena. The goal was to analyze the effects of that concept on the actions of a sample of researchers registered in an emerging research domain in SSIS in order to understand this type of indexing done by the users and communities as a classification of integrating levels. The methodology was established by triangulation through social network analysis, consensus analysis and archaeology of knowledge. It was possible to conclude that there is a collective effort to settle a semantic interoperability model for the labeling of contents based on best practices regarding the description of the objects shared in SSIS.
    Type
    a
  16. Ghosh, S.; Panigrahi, P.: Use of Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic approach in developing a domain ontology in library and information science (2015) 0.00 
    0.0012524803 = product of:
  0.0025049606 = sum of:
    0.0025049606 = product of:
      0.007514882 = sum of:
        0.007514882 = weight(_text_:a in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007514882 = score(doc=2798,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Classification is the basis of knowledge organization. Ontology, a comparatively new concept used as a tool for knowledge organization, establishes connections between terms and concepts enhancing the scope and usefulness of library classification. Ranganathan had invented the strong theory of the analytico-synthetic method in classification and devised Colon Classification. In this study a domain ontology on library and information science has been developed by implementing Raganathan's faceted approach of classification. The hierarchical relationships among terms have been established primarily keeping conformity with that of Ranganathan's Colon Classification (7th edition). But to accommodate new vocabularies, DDC 23rd edition and UDC Standard edition are consulted. The Protégé ontology editor has been used. The study carefully examines the steps in which the analytico-synthetic method have been followed. Ranganathan's Canon of Characteristics and its relevant Canons have been followed for defining the class-subclass hierarchy. It concludes by identifying the drawbacks as well as the merits faced while developing the ontology. This paper proves the relevance and importance of Ranganathan's philosophy in developing ontology based knowledge organization.
    Type
    a
  17. Madalli, D.P.; Prasad, A.R.D.: Analytico-synthetic approach for handling knowledge diversity in media content analysis (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011642005 = product of:
  0.002328401 = sum of:
    0.002328401 = product of:
      0.006985203 = sum of:
        0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 4827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006985203 = score(doc=4827,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4827, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4827)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Knowledge space is diverse and thus extremely complex. With increased means for online publishing and communication world communities are actively contributing content. This augments the need to find and access resources in different contexts and for different purposes. Owing to different socio-cultural backgrounds, purposes and applications, knowledge generated by people is marked by diversity. Hence, knowledge representation for building diversity-aware tools presents interesting research challenges. In this paper, we provide an analytico-synthetic approach for dealing with topical diversity following a faceted subject indexing method. Illustrations are used to demonstrate facet analysis and synthesis for use in annotations for Media Content Analysis within the European Commission (EC) funded 'Living Knowledge' project.
    Source
    Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero
    Type
    a
  18. Asundi, A.Y.: Epistemological basis of some common categories : a study of space and time as common concepts (2012) 0.00 
    0.0011642005 = product of:
  0.002328401 = sum of:
    0.002328401 = product of:
      0.006985203 = sum of:
        0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006985203 = score(doc=842,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 842, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=842)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
    Type
    a
  19. Babbar, P.: Web CC : an effort towards its revival (2015) 0.00 
    0.0011642005 = product of:
  0.002328401 = sum of:
    0.002328401 = product of:
      0.006985203 = sum of:
        0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 2792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006985203 = score(doc=2792,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2792, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2792)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Colon Classification (CC), based on dynamic theory of classification saw seven editions from 1928 to 1987. Libraries practising it continued with extensions and additions carried out to meet their needs since it was not revised for long after the 7th edition. Revision requires adding terms in different disciplines, organising them in relation to each other and assigning notation for shelf classification. Use of ICT would help in reviving CC and is essential for regular revision of a classification scheme. The paper explores the possibility for creation of an expert system through the design of Web based Colon Classification. The author explores the possibility by designing a prototype for online revision of Colon Classification in the paper.
    Type
    a
  20. Frické, M.: Logical division (2016) 0.00 
    0.0011202524 = product of:
  0.0022405048 = sum of:
    0.0022405048 = product of:
      0.0067215143 = sum of:
        0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067215143 = score(doc=3183,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Division is obviously important to Knowledge Organization. Typically, an organizational infrastructure might acknowledge three types of connecting relationships: class hierarchies, where some classes are subclasses of others, partitive hierarchies, where some items are parts of others, and instantiation, where some items are members of some classes (see Z39.19 ANSI/NISO 2005 as an example). The first two of these involve division (the third, instantiation, does not involve division). Logical division would usually be a part of hierarchical classification systems, which, in turn, are central to shelving in libraries, to subject classification schemes, to controlled vocabularies, and to thesauri. Partitive hierarchies, and partitive division, are often essential to controlled vocabularies, thesauri, and subject tagging systems. Partitive hierarchies also relate to the bearers of information; for example, a journal would typically have its component articles as parts and, in turn, they might have sections as their parts, and, of course, components might be arrived at by partitive division (see Tillett 2009 as an illustration). Finally, verbal division, disambiguating homographs, is basic to controlled vocabularies. Thus Division is a broad and relevant topic. This article, though, is going to focus on Logical Division.
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

  • e 46
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 45
  • el 3
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes