-
Mills, J.; Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Introduction and auxiliary schedules (1992)
0.07
0.06605669 = product of:
0.19817007 = sum of:
0.19036543 = product of:
0.5710963 = sum of:
0.5710963 = weight(_text_:bliss in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.5710963 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
1.6728933 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.007804629 = weight(_text_:in in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007804629 = score(doc=821,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Diese Einführung hat den Umfang einen kleinen Lehrbuches. - Das eigentliche Klassifikationssystem erscheint in Lieferungen
- LCSH
- Bliss Bibliographic classification
- PRECIS
- Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
- Subject
- Bliss Bibliographic classification
Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
-
Thomas, A.R.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd Edition : principles features and applications (1992)
0.04
0.03956775 = product of:
0.118703246 = sum of:
0.109045506 = product of:
0.32713652 = sum of:
0.32713652 = weight(_text_:bliss in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32713652 = score(doc=541,freq=6.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.95827 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.009657737 = weight(_text_:in in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009657737 = score(doc=541,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Publication of the 2nd ed. of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification presents librarians with a fresh opportunity to reassess the nature and benefits of helpful order for their collections and records. Half the parts are now available, exhibiting major expansion, revision, and development of the scheme. The new edition is sponsored by the Bliss Classification Association which welcomes the views and inputs of American librarians. It has been applied to libraries and information centers and used in thesaurus construction. This edition provides intensive subject specifity through detailed term listings and full synthetic capability. The notation is designed to be as brief as possible for the detail attainable. The classification allows a large measure of flexibility in arrangement and syntax
-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.03
0.033992175 = product of:
0.06798435 = sum of:
0.0097557865 = weight(_text_:in in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0097557865 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.02590033 = weight(_text_:und in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02590033 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105769046 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.032328233 = product of:
0.064656466 = sum of:
0.064656466 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064656466 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16711365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Maltby, A.; Gill, L.: ¬The case for Bliss : modern classification practice and principles in the context of the Bibliographic classification (1979)
0.03
0.033231672 = product of:
0.09969501 = sum of:
0.08993922 = product of:
0.26981765 = sum of:
0.26981765 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26981765 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.7903678 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0097557865 = weight(_text_:in in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0097557865 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
-
Coates, E.J.: BC2 and BSO : presentation at the 36th Allerton Institute, 1994 session on preparing traditional classifications for the future (1995)
0.03
0.03159572 = product of:
0.094787166 = sum of:
0.07788964 = product of:
0.23366892 = sum of:
0.23366892 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23366892 = score(doc=5566,freq=6.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.6844786 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.01689752 = weight(_text_:in in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01689752 = score(doc=5566,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.260307 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article pertains to two further general classifications, which, in contrast to the reigning classifications just mentioned, incorporate in a thoroughgoing manner a modem view of the world. One of these was announced in 1910, to a chorus of disapproval, saw the light of day as a completed scheme in 1935, fell into suspended animation after the death of its author in the 1950s, and was revived, drastically revised and expanded in England by Jack Mills in 1967. A large part of the expanded scheme has appeared in the form of separately published fascicles; the remainder mostly in the areas of science and technology are in an advanced state of preparation. I refer of course to the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. I use the expression "of course" with some slight hesitation having once met a North American library school academic who thought that Henry Evelyn Bliss was an Englishman who lived in the London inner suburb of Islington. This was an unconscious tribute to Jack Mills, though perhaps unfair to Bliss himself, not to mention America, whose son he was.
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
-
Broughton, V.: ¬A faceted classification as the basis of a faceted terminology : conversion of a classified structure to thesaurus format in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd Edition (2008)
0.03
0.03095736 = product of:
0.092872076 = sum of:
0.076315954 = product of:
0.22894785 = sum of:
0.22894785 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22894785 = score(doc=1857,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.6706493 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.01655612 = weight(_text_:in in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01655612 = score(doc=1857,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Facet analysis is an established methodology for building classifications and subject indexing systems, but has been less rigorously applied to thesauri. The process of creating a compatible thesaurus from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition highlights the ways in which the conceptual relationships in a subject field are handled in the two types of retrieval languages. An underlying uniformity of theory is established, and the way in which software can manage the relationships is discussed. The manner of displaying verbal expressions of concepts (vocabulary control) is also considered, but is found to be less well controlled in the classification than in the thesaurus. Nevertheless, there is good reason to think that facet analysis provides a sound basis for structuring a variety of knowledge organization tools.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains".
-
Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments
0.03
0.030600928 = product of:
0.09180278 = sum of:
0.076315954 = product of:
0.22894785 = sum of:
0.22894785 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22894785 = score(doc=3532,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.6706493 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.015486832 = weight(_text_:in in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015486832 = score(doc=3532,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The Bliss Bibliographic Classification is the only example of a fully faceted general classification scheme in the Western world. Although it is the object of much interest as a model for other tools it suffers from the lack of a web presence, and remedying this is an immediate objective for its editors. Understanding how this might be done presents some challenges, as the scheme is semantically very rich and complex in the range and nature of the relationships it contains. The automatic management of these is already in place using local software, but exporting this to a common data format needs careful thought and planning. Various encoding schemes, both for traditional classifications, and for digital materials, represent variously: the concepts; their functional roles; and the relationships between them. Integrating these aspects in a coherent and interchangeable manner appears to be achievable, but the most appropriate format is as yet unclear.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12
- Source
- Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
-
Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004)
0.02
0.022767186 = product of:
0.06830156 = sum of:
0.053963535 = product of:
0.1618906 = sum of:
0.1618906 = weight(_text_:bliss in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1618906 = score(doc=831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.01433802 = weight(_text_:in in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01433802 = score(doc=831,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
-
Dahlberg, I.: Ontische Strukturen und Wissensmuster in der Wissensorganisation (2004)
0.02
0.02223428 = product of:
0.066702835 = sum of:
0.017560417 = weight(_text_:in in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017560417 = score(doc=3155,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.27051896 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
0.04914242 = weight(_text_:und in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04914242 = score(doc=3155,freq=20.0), product of:
0.105769046 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Ein jeder Mensch ist mit seinem Dasein eingebettet in kosmische Gesetzmäßigkeiten und findet sich individualisiert und begrenzt durch die Bedingungen von Raum und Zeit; seine jeweilige "Mitgift" in vorgefundener Umgebung verlangt nach menschlicher Sinn Erfüllung. Diese ontischen Gegebenheiten können als Strukturvorgabe angesehen werden, die sich durch die kategorialen und logischen Strukturen menschlichen Denkens und Sprechens - z.B. in artikulierten Sätzen menschlichen Wissens - ergänzen lässt. Dabei bilden sich Wissensmuster, die sich in einem ontologisch fundierten Gesamtschema aller Wissensgebiete zur Darstellung bringen lassen können. Der Vortrag erläutert die hier angedeuteten kategorialen und systemtheoretischen Grundlagen mit Bezug auf die Konstruktion eines neuen, universalen Ordnungssystems aller Wissensgebiete, das vor 30 Jahren konzipiert wurde und sich bereits in vielfacher Hinsicht bewährt hat. Seine Rasterdarstellung ermöglicht eine übersichtliche, fokussierbare und unkomplizierte Handhabung in elektronischen Medien.
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.8
- Source
- Wissensorganisation in kooperativen Lern- und Arbeitsumgebungen: Proceedings der 8. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Regensburg, 9.-11. Oktober 2002. Hrsg.: G. Budin u. H.P. Ohly
-
Broughton, V.: Language related problems in the construction of faceted terminologies and their automatic management (2008)
0.02
0.020382585 = product of:
0.061147753 = sum of:
0.04496961 = product of:
0.13490883 = sum of:
0.13490883 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13490883 = score(doc=2497,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.016178142 = weight(_text_:in in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016178142 = score(doc=2497,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.24922498 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- The paper describes current work on the generation of a thesaurus format from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2). The practical problems that occur in moving from a concept based approach to a terminological approach cluster around issues of vocabulary control that are not fully addressed in a systematic structure. These difficulties can be exacerbated within domains in the humanities because large numbers of culture specific terms may need to be accommodated in any thesaurus. The ways in which these problems can be resolved within the context of a semi-automated approach to the thesaurus generation have consequences for the management of classification data in the source vocabulary. The way in which the vocabulary is marked up for the purpose of machine manipulation is described, and some of the implications for editorial policy are discussed and examples given. The value of the classification notation as a language independent representation and mapping tool should not be sacrificed in such an exercise.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.11
- Source
- Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
-
Broughton, V.: Concepts and terms in the faceted classification : the case of UDC (2010)
0.02
0.019867763 = product of:
0.05960329 = sum of:
0.04496961 = product of:
0.13490883 = sum of:
0.13490883 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13490883 = score(doc=4065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 4065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4065)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.01463368 = weight(_text_:in in 4065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01463368 = score(doc=4065,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 4065, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4065)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Recent revision of UDC classes has aimed at implementing a more faceted approach. Many compound classes have been removed from the main tables, and more radical revisions of classes (particularly those for Medicine and Religion) have introduced a rigorous analysis, a clearer sense of citation order, and building of compound classes according to a more logical system syntax. The faceted approach provides a means of formalizing the relationships in the classification and making them explicit for machine recognition. In the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2) (which has been a source for both UDC classes mentioned above), terminologies are encoded for automatic generation of hierarchical and associative relationships. Nevertheless, difficulties are encountered in vocabulary control, and a similar phenomenon is observed in UDC. Current work has revealed differences in the vocabulary of humanities and science, notably the way in which terms in the humanities should be handled when these are semantically complex. Achieving a balance between rigour in the structure of the classification and the complexity of natural language expression remains partially unresolved at present, but provides a fertile field for further research.
-
Scheele, M.: ¬Die universelle Facetten-Classifikation (UFC) und ihre mögliche Bedeutung für Allgemeinbildung, Terminologieforschung und Informationswesen (1978)
0.02
0.018553756 = product of:
0.055661265 = sum of:
0.011706944 = weight(_text_:in in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011706944 = score(doc=66,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
0.04395432 = weight(_text_:und in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04395432 = score(doc=66,freq=4.0), product of:
0.105769046 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Kooperation in der Klassifikation II. Proc. der Sekt.4-6 der 2. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Frankfurt-Höchst, 6.-7.4.1978
-
Broughton, V.: Facet analysis as a tool for modelling subject domains and terminologies (2011)
0.02
0.0182418 = product of:
0.054725397 = sum of:
0.04496961 = product of:
0.13490883 = sum of:
0.13490883 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13490883 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0097557865 = weight(_text_:in in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0097557865 = score(doc=4826,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Facet analysis is proposed as a general theory of knowledge organization, with an associated methodology that may be applied to the development of terminology tools in a variety of contexts and formats. Faceted classifications originated as a means of representing complexity in semantic content that facilitates logical organization and effective retrieval in a physical environment. This is achieved through meticulous analysis of concepts, their structural and functional status (based on fundamental categories), and their inter-relationships. These features provide an excellent basis for the general conceptual modelling of domains, and for the generation of KOS other than systematic classifications. This is demonstrated by the adoption of a faceted approach to many web search and visualization tools, and by the emergence of a facet based methodology for the construction of thesauri. Current work on the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (Second Edition) is investigating the ways in which the full complexity of faceted structures may be represented through encoded data, capable of generating intellectually and mechanically compatible forms of indexing tools from a single source. It is suggested that a number of research questions relating to the Semantic Web could be tackled through the medium of facet analysis.
-
Dahlberg, I.: Wissensmuster und Musterwissen im Erfassen klassifikatorischer Ganzheiten (1980)
0.02
0.017769817 = product of:
0.053309448 = sum of:
0.00844876 = weight(_text_:in in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00844876 = score(doc=124,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.044860687 = weight(_text_:und in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044860687 = score(doc=124,freq=24.0), product of:
0.105769046 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Als 'klassifikatorische Ganzheiten' gelten hier Wissensgebiete, bzw. ihre Begriffe. Die Muster, die sich aufgrund der Begriffsrelationen von Wissensgebieten gewinnen lassen, werden sowohl durch formkategoriale als auch durch seinskategoriale Bezüge dieser Begriffe geprägt. Logische und linguistische Untersuchungen haben gezeigt, daß sich Wissensbereiche und Wissensgebiete formkategorial jeweils zu Triaden zusammenordnen lassen und als solche entsprechende Wissensmuster bilden. Ein universales System von 3**3 Triaden von Wissensgebieten wird vorgestellt und erläutert. Es wird dabei gezeigt, wie sich auch in der Interaktion von Wissensgebieten miteinander, z.B. in der Verwendung der Methoden und Verfahren eines Gebietes in einem anderen Gebiet oder der Fundierung eines Gebiets durch ein anderes gewisse Muster abzeichnen, die die Systemstellen eines solchen Systems apriori und auch aposteriori "systematisch" besetzen, ohne die innere Ordnung des Systems und seiner Triaden zu beeinträchtigen. Auf diese Weisen wird durch den Aspekt des internalen Bezugs von Wissensmustern (gegenüber dem o.g. elementalen und totalen) ein Musterwissen gewonnen, das insbesondere auch bei der Benutzung eines solchen Systems von großem Nutzen sein kann, da es das Gedächtnis stützt, die Mustererkennung ermöglicht und dementsprechend die Handhabung bei Einspeicherung und Retrieval von zu ordenbarem Wissen erleichtert.
- Source
- Wissensstrukturen und Ordnungsmuster. Proc. der 4. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Salzburg, 16.-19.4.1980. Red.: W. Dahlberg
-
Dahlberg, I.: Information Coding Classification : Geschichtliches, Prinzipien, Inhaltliches (2010)
0.02
0.017492648 = product of:
0.05247794 = sum of:
0.011037413 = weight(_text_:in in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011037413 = score(doc=4057,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
0.041440528 = weight(_text_:und in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041440528 = score(doc=4057,freq=8.0), product of:
0.105769046 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Der Beitrag umfasst eine Einführung in das Verständnis der Information Coding Classification (ICC), einer Universalklassifikation von Wissensgebieten. Er enthält (1) Entstehungsgeschichte (1970 bis 1977), (2) ihre Prinzipien: Begriffe, Begriffsbeziehungen, Notation, Hauptklassen als Objektbereiche in Integrationsstufen, Systemstellenplan als Systematifikator mit neun Aspekten zur Untergliederung, Verbindungsmöglichkeiten mit anderen Systemen, Systemstellen zur Darstellung von Inter- und Transdisziplinarität. Verwendungsmöglichkeiten. (3) Erläuterung ihres Inhalts und kurze Erörterung der Probleme bei der Konzeption und Erarbeitung.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.8, S.449-454
-
Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification Second Edition (2009)
0.02
0.016959101 = product of:
0.101754606 = sum of:
0.101754606 = product of:
0.30526382 = sum of:
0.30526382 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30526382 = score(doc=3755,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34138238 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.8941991 = fieldWeight in 3755, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3755)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This entry looks at the origins of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition and the theory on which it is built. The reasons for the decision to revise the classification are examined, as are the influences on classification theory of the mid-twentieth century. The process of revision and construction of schedules using facet analysis is described. The use of BC2 is considered along with some recent development work on thesaural and digital formats.
-
Broughton, V.: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (2006)
0.01
0.014956462 = product of:
0.044869386 = sum of:
0.0068983827 = weight(_text_:in in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068983827 = score(doc=2874,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.037971005 = product of:
0.07594201 = sum of:
0.07594201 = weight(_text_:ausbildung in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07594201 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2561309 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3671665 = idf(docFreq=560, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.29649687 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3671665 = idf(docFreq=560, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft: UK library & information schools: UCL SLAIS.
- Theme
- Ausbildung
-
Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012)
0.01
0.013981745 = product of:
0.041945234 = sum of:
0.019315474 = weight(_text_:in in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019315474 = score(doc=632,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.022629762 = product of:
0.045259524 = sum of:
0.045259524 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045259524 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16711365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper maps the concepts "space" and "dimensionality" in classifications, in particular in visualizations hereof, from a historical perspective. After a historical excursion in the domain of classification theory of what in mathematics is known as dimensionality reduction in representations of a single universe of knowledge, its potentiality will be explored for information retrieval and navigation in the multiverse of the World Wide Web.
- Content
- This paper is an adaptation and augmented version of a paper presented at the NASKO 2011 conference: Charles van den Heuvel. 2011. Multidimensional classifications: Past and future conceptualizations and visualizations. In Smiraglia, Richard P., ed. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, Vol. 3. Toronto, Canada, pp. 105-21. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_6_e.pdf.
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:31:25
-
Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012)
0.01
0.013126868 = product of:
0.039380603 = sum of:
0.013518016 = weight(_text_:in in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013518016 = score(doc=826,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
0.025862586 = product of:
0.05172517 = sum of:
0.05172517 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05172517 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16711365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Describes the effect of scheme change on the semantics in faceted classification. Two types of change are identified: ecological change and lexical change. Examples from different editions of the Colon Classification are used to illustrate change.
- Date
- 2. 6.2013 18:33:22
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.13
- Source
- Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.0123 = product of:
0.0369 = sum of:
0.011037413 = weight(_text_:in in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011037413 = score(doc=5083,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06491381 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.025862586 = product of:
0.05172517 = sum of:
0.05172517 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05172517 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16711365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04772181 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
