Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.10
    0.10116865 = product of:
      0.2023373 = sum of:
        0.2023373 = sum of:
          0.1457384 = weight(_text_:maps in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1457384 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33534583 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059678096 = queryNorm
              0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.056598905 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056598905 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059678096 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper maps the concepts "space" and "dimensionality" in classifications, in particular in visualizations hereof, from a historical perspective. After a historical excursion in the domain of classification theory of what in mathematics is known as dimensionality reduction in representations of a single universe of knowledge, its potentiality will be explored for information retrieval and navigation in the multiverse of the World Wide Web.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  2. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.07
    0.07176197 = sum of:
      0.043462522 = product of:
        0.13038756 = sum of:
          0.13038756 = weight(_text_:objects in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13038756 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31719333 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059678096 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.028299453 = product of:
        0.056598905 = sum of:
          0.056598905 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056598905 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059678096 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  3. Asundi, A.Y.: Domain specific categories and relations and their potential applications : a case study of two arrays of agriculture schedule of Colon Classification (2012) 0.03
    0.031229656 = product of:
      0.062459312 = sum of:
        0.062459312 = product of:
          0.124918625 = sum of:
            0.124918625 = weight(_text_:maps in 843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124918625 = score(doc=843,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33534583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059678096 = queryNorm
                0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 843, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=843)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The categories/isolates are broadly conceived as common and special. The common categories are applicable to all the classes of subjects in a Classification system, whereas the specials are applicable within a domain or specified classes of a classification system. The CC has represented some unique special categories, especially in the Agriculture Subject schedule, and such a provision is not seen in any other classification system; not even in any other subject schedule of Colon Classification. These special categories are termed here as "Domain Specific Categories". The paper analyses the thematic relationships within and outside the subject schedule with potential applications in devising a scheme of metadata as demonstrated in a research study on Indian Medicinal Plants. The other potential applications of such thematic relationships are in the creation of semantic maps and in linking concepts from different domains of knowledge.
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.02
    0.020213896 = product of:
      0.040427793 = sum of:
        0.040427793 = product of:
          0.080855586 = sum of:
            0.080855586 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080855586 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059678096 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  5. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.02
    0.016171116 = product of:
      0.032342233 = sum of:
        0.032342233 = product of:
          0.064684466 = sum of:
            0.064684466 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064684466 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059678096 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  6. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.02
    0.016171116 = product of:
      0.032342233 = sum of:
        0.032342233 = product of:
          0.064684466 = sum of:
            0.064684466 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064684466 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059678096 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  7. Aparecida Moura, M.: Emerging discursive formations, folksonomy and social semantic information spaces (SSIS) : the contributions of the theory of integrative levels in the studies carried out by the Classification Research Group (CRG) (2014) 0.02
    0.01552233 = product of:
      0.03104466 = sum of:
        0.03104466 = product of:
          0.09313398 = sum of:
            0.09313398 = weight(_text_:objects in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09313398 = score(doc=1395,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31719333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059678096 = queryNorm
                0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on the discursive formations emerging from the Social Semantic Information Spaces (SSIS) in light of the concept of emergence in the theory of integrative levels. The study aims to identify the opportunities and challenges of incorporating epistemological considerations in the act of acquiring knowledge into the consolidation of knowledge organization and mediation processes and devices in the emergence of phenomena. The goal was to analyze the effects of that concept on the actions of a sample of researchers registered in an emerging research domain in SSIS in order to understand this type of indexing done by the users and communities as a classification of integrating levels. The methodology was established by triangulation through social network analysis, consensus analysis and archaeology of knowledge. It was possible to conclude that there is a collective effort to settle a semantic interoperability model for the labeling of contents based on best practices regarding the description of the objects shared in SSIS.
  8. Szostak, R.: Basic Concepts Classification (BCC) (2020) 0.02
    0.01552233 = product of:
      0.03104466 = sum of:
        0.03104466 = product of:
          0.09313398 = sum of:
            0.09313398 = weight(_text_:objects in 5883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09313398 = score(doc=5883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31719333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059678096 = queryNorm
                0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 5883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5883)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Basics Concept Classification (BCC) is a "universal" scheme: it attempts to encompass all areas of human understanding. Whereas most universal schemes are organized around scholarly disciplines, the BCC is instead organized around phenomena (things), the relationships that exist among phenomena, and the properties that phenomena and relators may possess. This structure allows the BCC to apply facet analysis without requiring the use of "facet indicators." The main motivation for the BCC was a recognition that existing classifications that are organized around disciplines serve interdisciplinary scholarship poorly. Complex concepts that might be understood quite differently across groups and individuals can generally be broken into basic concepts for which there is enough shared understanding for the purposes of classification. Documents, ideas, and objects are classified synthetically by combining entries from the schedules of phenomena, relators, and properties. The inclusion of separate schedules of-generally verb-like-relators is one of the most unusual aspects of the BCC. This (and the schedules of properties that serve as adjectives or adverbs) allows the production of sentence-like subject strings. Documents can then be classified in terms of the main arguments made in the document. BCC provides very precise descriptors of documents by combining phenomena, relators, and properties synthetically. The terminology employed in the BCC reduces terminological ambiguity. The BCC is still being developed and it needs to be fleshed out in certain respects. Yet it also needs to be applied; only in application can the feasibility and desirability of the classification be adequately assessed.
  9. Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.013012356 = product of:
      0.026024712 = sum of:
        0.026024712 = product of:
          0.052049424 = sum of:
            0.052049424 = weight(_text_:maps in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052049424 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33534583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059678096 = queryNorm
                0.15521118 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Several of the papers are clearly written as primers and neatly address the second agenda item: attracting others to the study and use of facet analysis. The most valuable papers are written in clear, approachable language. Vickery's paper (p. 145-160) is a clarion call for faceted classification and facet analysis. The heart of the paper is a primer for central concepts and techniques. Vickery explains the value of using faceted classification in document retrieval. Also provided are potential solutions to thorny interface and display issues with facets. Vickery looks to complementary themes in knowledge organization, such as thesauri and ontologies as potential areas for extending the facet concept. Broughton (p. 193-210) describes a rigorous approach to the application of facet analysis in the creation of a compatible thesaurus from the schedules of the 2nd edition of the Bliss Classification (BC2). This discussion of exemplary faceted thesauri, recent standards work, and difficulties encountered in the project will provide valuable guidance for future research in this area. Slavic (p. 257-271) provides a challenge to make faceted classification come 'alive' through promoting the use of machine-readable formats for use and exchange in applications such as Topic Maps and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization Systems), and as supported by the standard BS8723 (2005) Structured Vocabulary for Information Retrieval. She also urges designers of faceted classifications to get involved in standards work. Cheti and Paradisi (p. 223-241) outline a basic approach to converting an existing subject indexing tool, the Nuovo Soggetario, into a faceted thesaurus through the use of facet analysis. This discussion, well grounded in the canonical literature, may well serve as a primer for future efforts. Also useful for those who wish to construct faceted thesauri is the article by Tudhope and Binding (p. 211-222). This contains an outline of basic elements to be found in exemplar faceted thesauri, and a discussion of project FACET (Faceted Access to Cultural heritage Terminology) with algorithmically-based semantic query expansion in a dataset composed of items from the National Museum of Science and Industry indexed with AAT (Art and Architecture Thesaurus). This paper looks to the future hybridization of ontologies and facets through standards developments such as SKOS because of the "lightweight semantics" inherent in facets.
  10. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.01
    0.010106948 = product of:
      0.020213896 = sum of:
        0.020213896 = product of:
          0.040427793 = sum of:
            0.040427793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040427793 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059678096 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  11. Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014) 0.01
    0.010106948 = product of:
      0.020213896 = sum of:
        0.020213896 = product of:
          0.040427793 = sum of:
            0.040427793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040427793 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059678096 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.01
    0.010106948 = product of:
      0.020213896 = sum of:
        0.020213896 = product of:
          0.040427793 = sum of:
            0.040427793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040427793 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059678096 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik