-
Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999)
0.18
0.17509836 = product of:
0.40407312 = sum of:
0.06582528 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06582528 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12306474 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.5348834 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.04371247 = weight(_text_:buch in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04371247 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10028592 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.009933459 = weight(_text_:und in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009933459 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.028413082 = product of:
0.056826163 = sum of:
0.056826163 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056826163 = score(doc=1659,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04103456 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04103456 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.42231607 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.056826163 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056826163 = score(doc=1659,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.056826163 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056826163 = score(doc=1659,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003741601 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.009933459 = weight(_text_:und in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009933459 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.028712219 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028712219 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.35326135 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.028712219 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028712219 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.35326135 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.028712219 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028712219 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.35326135 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.43333334 = coord(13/30)
- Classification
- AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis
- RVK
- AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis
- Type
- s
-
Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994)
0.03
0.025645241 = product of:
0.10990818 = sum of:
0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014048031 = score(doc=1643,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.014206541 = product of:
0.028413082 = sum of:
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.0069998945 = weight(_text_:in in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0069998945 = score(doc=1643,freq=14.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014048031 = score(doc=1643,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.0037795147 = weight(_text_:s in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037795147 = score(doc=1643,freq=10.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16116315 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
- Abstract
- Die Diskussion um Vor- und Nachteile von Präkoordination oder Postkoordination wird unter den in der verbalen Sacherschließung Engagierten in Deutschland seit Jahren geführt. Mit zunehmender Verbreitung der RSWK gewinnen die Überlegungen, die sich angesichts der Ausbreitung des OPAC für das 'Zerschlagen' der Schlagwortketten aussprechen, an Bedeutung. In diesem Zusammenhang trägt eine Berücksichtigung der internationalen Debatte um Prä- und Postkoordination zur Erweiterung des nationalen Horizontes bei. Der Beitrag ist eine leicht gekürzte Übersetzung eines Referates, das die Autorin beim IFLA Satellite Meeting zum Thema 'Subject indexing in the 90's - principles and practices' im August 1993 in Lissabon gehalten hat
- Footnote
- Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 41(1994) H.3, S.279-294
-
Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not? (1995)
0.01
0.005408008 = product of:
0.05408008 = sum of:
0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00705523 = score(doc=3606,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
0.042517517 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042517517 = score(doc=3606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.41740587 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004507334 = score(doc=3606,freq=8.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not?: a new view of the old question. In: Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.5, S.817-833.
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch die deutsche Übersetzung in: ZfBB (1994) H.3, S.294-297
- Pages
- S.231-255
- Source
- Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
-
Chan, L.M.: Subject access systems in the USA (1995)
0.00
6.198117E-4 = product of:
0.009297175 = sum of:
0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006110009 = score(doc=1633,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
0.0031871665 = weight(_text_:s in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031871665 = score(doc=1633,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Pages
- S.181-212
- Source
- Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Subject control : the British viewpoint (1995)
0.00
5.450645E-4 = product of:
0.008175967 = sum of:
0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004988801 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.0031871665 = weight(_text_:s in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031871665 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Pages
- S.166-180
- Source
- Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
-
Lopes, M.I.: Principles underlying subject heading languages : an international approach (1996)
0.00
5.43019E-4 = product of:
0.008145284 = sum of:
0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061733257 = score(doc=5608,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Discusses the problems in establishing commonly accepted principles for subject retrieval between different bibliographic systems. The Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages was established to devise general principles for any subject retrieval system and to review existing real systems in the light of such principles and compare them in order to evaluate the extent of their coverage and their application in current practices. Provides a background and history of the Working Group. Discusses the principles underlying subject headings and their purposes and the state of the work and major findings
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 25(1995) no.1, S.10-12
-
Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : I. The best of pre-coordination and post-coordination (1998)
0.00
4.6544487E-4 = product of:
0.0069816727 = sum of:
0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052914224 = score(doc=2322,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The introduction of computerized post-coordination has solved many of the problems of pre-coordinated subject access. However, the adoption of computerized post-coordination results in the loss of some pre-coordination benefits. Specifically, the effect of hiding terms within the context of others is lost in post-coodination which give lead status to every document term. This results in spurious matches of terms out of context. Library patrons and Internet searchers are increasingly dissatisfied with subject access performance, in part because of unmanageably large retrieval sets. The need to enhance precision and limit the size of retrieval sets motivates this work which proposes partial coordination, an approach which incorporates the advantages of computer search with the ability of pre-coordination to limit spurious partial matches and thereby enhance precision
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1254-1269
-
Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : II. A preliminary evaluation and failure analysis (1998)
0.00
4.6544487E-4 = product of:
0.0069816727 = sum of:
0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052914224 = score(doc=2323,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Partial coordination is a new method for cataloging documents for subject access. It is especially designed to enhance the precision of document searches in online environments. This article reports a preliminary evaluation of partial coordination that shows promising results compared with full-text retrieval. We also report the difficulties in empirically evaluating the effectiveness of automatic full-text retrieval in contrast to mixed methods such as partial coordination which combine human cataloging with computerized retrieval. Based on our study, we propose research in this area will substantially benefit from a common framework for failure analysis and a common data set. This will allow information retrieval researchers adapting 'library style'cataloging to large electronic document collections, as well as those developing automated or mixed methods, to directly compare their proposals for indexing and retrieval. This article concludes by suggesting guidelines for constructing such as testbed
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1270-1282
-
Studwell, W.E.: ¬The three camps : the present and possible future status of subject access in online catalogues (1996)
0.00
3.854188E-4 = product of:
0.0057812817 = sum of:
0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 6579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003527615 = score(doc=6579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 6579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6579)
0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 6579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002253667 = score(doc=6579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6579)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Source
- Behavioral and social sciences librarian. 14(1996) no.2, S.61-64
-
Geißelmann, F.: RSWK für den Online-Katalog : Werkstattbericht zur 3. Auflage (1997)
0.00
1.7638075E-4 = product of:
0.0052914224 = sum of:
0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052914224 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Footnote
- Vortrag anläßlich des 24. Österreichischen Bibliothekartages 1996 in Innsbruck
