Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985) 0.01 
    0.012429634 = product of:
  0.024859268 = sum of:
    0.024859268 = product of:
      0.049718536 = sum of:
        0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049718536 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05242341 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:01
  2. Boll, J.J.: From subject headings to descriptors : the hidden trend in Library of Congress Subject Headings (1981) 0.01 
    0.010597459 = product of:
  0.021194918 = sum of:
    0.021194918 = product of:
      0.042389836 = sum of:
        0.042389836 = weight(_text_:2 in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042389836 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05242341 = queryNorm
            0.32742465 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 1(1981) nos.2/3, S.3-28
  3. Kirtland, M.; Cochrane, P.A.: Critical views of LCSH - Library of Congress Subject Headings : a bibliographic and bibliometric essay (1981) 0.01 
    0.00999138 = product of:
  0.01998276 = sum of:
    0.01998276 = product of:
      0.03996552 = sum of:
        0.03996552 = weight(_text_:2 in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03996552 = score(doc=273,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05242341 = queryNorm
            0.30869892 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die Nachfolger: Shubert, S.B.: Critical views of LCSH - ten years later: a bibliographic essay. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 15(1992) no.2, S.37-97. Fischer, K.S.: Critical views of LCSH, 1990-2001: the third bibliographic essay. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 41(2005) no.1, S.x-xx.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 1(1981) nos.2/3, S.71-94
  4. Devadason, F.J.: Computerization of Deep Structure Based Indexes (1985) 0.01 
    0.0061818515 = product of:
  0.012363703 = sum of:
    0.012363703 = product of:
      0.024727406 = sum of:
        0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 1636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727406 = score(doc=1636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05242341 = queryNorm
            0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 1636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1636)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Deep Structure Indexing System is based on: (1) a set of postulated elementary categories of the elements fit to form componentes of names of subjects; (2) a set of syntax rules with reference to the categories; (3) a vocabulary control tool such as Classaurus; (4) a set of indicator digits to denote the categories and their subdivisions; and (5) a set of codes to denote a few of the decisions of the indexer. Names of subjects formulated on the basis mentioned above are input to a set of computer programs to generate several different types of subject index entires. This paper describes briefly the Deep Structure Index System

Authors