Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.01
    0.0145317 = product of:
      0.0290634 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
        0.019341951 = product of:
          0.038683902 = sum of:
            0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038683902 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  2. Ho, J.: ¬An analysis of the structure of a subject heading list (1993) 0.01
    0.0056708455 = product of:
      0.022683382 = sum of:
        0.022683382 = weight(_text_:information in 6856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022683382 = score(doc=6856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6856)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 19(1993) no.2, S.32-54
  3. Williamson, N.J.: Subject cataloguing and LCSH (1991) 0.00
    0.0045827352 = product of:
      0.018330941 = sum of:
        0.018330941 = weight(_text_:information in 7926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018330941 = score(doc=7926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 7926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7926)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  4. Conway, M. O'Hara: Characteristics of subject headings in the Library of Congress BOOKSM database (1993) 0.00
    0.004080932 = product of:
      0.016323728 = sum of:
        0.016323728 = product of:
          0.032647457 = sum of:
            0.032647457 = weight(_text_:technology in 3135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032647457 = score(doc=3135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 3135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3135)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A thourough understanding of current subject cataloging practice, especially Library of Congress practice, will assist librarians in making the best use of new and emerging technology to ease the task of constructing subject headings. To gain insight into the most current subject cataloging practices at the Library of Congress, a random sample of one thousand bibliographic records with one or more 6XX fields and Library of Congress card numbers assigned from 1988 to the present was drawn from the BOOKSM database. Library of Congress catalogers rely heavily on the system of free-floating subdivisions in the process of constructing subject headings. Attempts to improve the subject cataloging process must take into account this fundamental characteristic of the Library of Congress subject headings system
  5. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : II. A preliminary evaluation and failure analysis (1998) 0.00
    0.0034370513 = product of:
      0.013748205 = sum of:
        0.013748205 = weight(_text_:information in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013748205 = score(doc=2323,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Partial coordination is a new method for cataloging documents for subject access. It is especially designed to enhance the precision of document searches in online environments. This article reports a preliminary evaluation of partial coordination that shows promising results compared with full-text retrieval. We also report the difficulties in empirically evaluating the effectiveness of automatic full-text retrieval in contrast to mixed methods such as partial coordination which combine human cataloging with computerized retrieval. Based on our study, we propose research in this area will substantially benefit from a common framework for failure analysis and a common data set. This will allow information retrieval researchers adapting 'library style'cataloging to large electronic document collections, as well as those developing automated or mixed methods, to directly compare their proposals for indexing and retrieval. This article concludes by suggesting guidelines for constructing such as testbed
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1270-1282
  6. Studwell, W.E.: ¬A tale of two decades, or, the decline of the fortunes of LC subject headings (1994) 0.00
    0.003240483 = product of:
      0.012961932 = sum of:
        0.012961932 = weight(_text_:information in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012961932 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Western Association of Map Libraries information bulletin. 25(1994) no.2, S.73-74
  7. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : I. The best of pre-coordination and post-coordination (1998) 0.00
    0.0024303624 = product of:
      0.00972145 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1254-1269
  8. Biswas, S.C.; Smith, F.: Efficiency and effectiveness of deep structure based indexing languages : PRECIS vs. DSIS (1991) 0.00
    0.0020253018 = product of:
      0.008101207 = sum of:
        0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 2187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008101207 = score(doc=2187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2187)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 16(1991), S.6-21