Search (89 results, page 5 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Glowacka, T.: Jezyk hasel przedmiotowych KABA po szesciu latach istnienia (1999) 0.00
    0.0010177598 = product of:
      0.011195358 = sum of:
        0.011195358 = weight(_text_:of in 3139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011195358 = score(doc=3139,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3139, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3139)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: KABA subject headings system: 6 years of its development
  2. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: Do patrons understand Library of Congress Subject Headings? (1999) 0.00
    0.0010177598 = product of:
      0.011195358 = sum of:
        0.011195358 = weight(_text_:of in 6072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011195358 = score(doc=6072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 6072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6072)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
  3. Austin, D.: PRECIS: Introduction (1987) 0.00
    0.0010177598 = product of:
      0.011195358 = sum of:
        0.011195358 = weight(_text_:of in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011195358 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.42, [=Suppl.7]
  4. Smith, A.: Physics Subject Headings (PhySH) (2020) 0.00
    0.0010177598 = product of:
      0.011195358 = sum of:
        0.011195358 = weight(_text_:of in 5884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011195358 = score(doc=5884,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5884, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5884)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Abstract
    PhySH (Physics Subject Headings) was developed by the American Physical Society and first used in 2016 as a faceted hierarchical controlled vocabulary for physics, with some basic terms from related fields. It was developed mainly for the purpose of associating subjects with papers submitted to and published in the Physical Review family of journals. The scheme is organized at the top level with a two-dimensional classification, with one dimension (labeled "disciplines") representing professional divisions within physics, and the other dimension (labeled "facets") providing a conceptual partitioning of terms. PhySH was preceded in use by PACS ("Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme"), which was in turn preceded by more ad hoc approaches, and this history and related vocabularies or categorizations will also be briefly discussed.
    Series
    Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization
  5. Studwell, W.E.: Ten years after the question : has there been an answer? (1995) 0.00
    9.595532E-4 = product of:
      0.010555085 = sum of:
        0.010555085 = weight(_text_:of in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010555085 = score(doc=3725,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Abstract
    Over 10 years have passed since the 1985 call for a comprehensive theoretical code for LSCH, and no such code has been developed or announced. Although considerable progress has been made towards the goals of a code, i.e. making the headings and their usage more logical, more consistent, clearer and more user friendly, much still remains to be done to achieve complete subject heading standardization plus documentation of the standards
  6. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00
    8.814059E-4 = product of:
      0.009695465 = sum of:
        0.009695465 = weight(_text_:of in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009695465 = score(doc=5599,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
  7. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00
    8.814059E-4 = product of:
      0.009695465 = sum of:
        0.009695465 = weight(_text_:of in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009695465 = score(doc=5602,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
  8. Buizza, P.; Guerrini, M.: ¬Un modello concettuale per il nuovo Soggettario : l'indicizzazione per soggetto alla luce di FRBR (2001) 0.00
    8.4813323E-4 = product of:
      0.009329465 = sum of:
        0.009329465 = weight(_text_:of in 3738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009329465 = score(doc=3738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 3738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3738)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: A conceptual model for the new BNCF subject headings: subject indexing in the light of FRBR
  9. Kanjilal, A.: Permuted keyword index using CDS/ISIS : a tutorial (1992) 0.00
    8.3960907E-4 = product of:
      0.0092357 = sum of:
        0.0092357 = weight(_text_:of in 5810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0092357 = score(doc=5810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 5810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5810)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a utility program designed to generate a permuted keyword index from a CDS/ISIS database. The different keywords which are used to describe the subject content of documents are presented together in a string, thus showing the context in which the lead term is used. Indexes can also be generated for any repeatable field, such as author and report number. The string is rotated from left to right to provide an access from each of the terms used. Pascal is the language used and a step by step tutorial is given to create the necessary databases

Authors

Languages

  • e 76
  • i 8
  • pl 2
  • d 1
  • f 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…