Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Stone, A.T.: Up-ending Cutter's pyramid : the case for making subject references to broader terms (1996) 0.04
    0.042126022 = sum of:
      0.020857763 = product of:
        0.12514657 = sum of:
          0.12514657 = weight(_text_:back in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12514657 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26939675 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044850662 = queryNorm
              0.4645437 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.021268258 = product of:
        0.042536516 = sum of:
          0.042536516 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042536516 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044850662 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in library OPACs might be improved for some users by taking advantage of all of the hierarchical relationships which are indicated on existing LCSH entries. Recommends that cross references pointing to broader terms be displayed, in addition to those for narrower and related terms to which users have traditionally benn directed. Traces the old practice back to Charles Cutter, reports on deliberations of the ALCTS Subject Analysis Committee nearly 120 years later. Discusses practical concerns related to implementing the change, including the accuracy of hierarchical relationships in the LCSH system and possible techniques for using the MARC format to generate the cross references
    Date
    22. 4.1997 20:43:23
  2. Markey, K.; Atherton, P.; Newton, C.: ¬An analysis of controlled vocabulary and free text search statements in online searches (1980) 0.02
    0.020636227 = product of:
      0.041272454 = sum of:
        0.041272454 = product of:
          0.08254491 = sum of:
            0.08254491 = weight(_text_:c in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08254491 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.02
    0.017688196 = product of:
      0.035376392 = sum of:
        0.035376392 = product of:
          0.070752785 = sum of:
            0.070752785 = weight(_text_:c in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070752785 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.01
    0.012153291 = product of:
      0.024306582 = sum of:
        0.024306582 = product of:
          0.048613165 = sum of:
            0.048613165 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048613165 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  5. Wilkens, K.: Drei Sätze zur Idee einer integrierten Formal-und Sacherschließung in Datenbanken (1995) 0.01
    0.01179213 = product of:
      0.02358426 = sum of:
        0.02358426 = product of:
          0.04716852 = sum of:
            0.04716852 = weight(_text_:c in 1031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04716852 = score(doc=1031,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1031, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1031)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Vorsatz zum Sinn von Normdateien: "Die sachgerechte Nutzung von Normdateien erfordert eine ausgeklügelte Datenbankstruktur, über die sich Bibliothekare und Informatiker offensichtlich erst noch verständigen müssen"; Hauptsatz zur Redundanz von P,T,G,C,K,Z,F - verbale Sacherschließung als Funktion: "Außer den Sachschlagwörtern können alle anderen Schlagwortkategorien der RSWK/SWD 'eingespart', auf die Einrichtung eigener Schlagwortkettenfelder in den Titelaufnahmen kann verzichtet werden: Nachsatz zur 'Kombinatorik': "An die Stelle von Schlagwortketten würden Chiffren für Verknüpfungskombinationen ('Kombinationsmuster') treten, die auch im Sinne von Steuerungsinstrumenten zu nutzen wären"
  6. Julien, C.-A.; Tirilly, P.; Leide, J.E.; Guastavino, C.: Using the LCSH hierarchy to browse a collection (2012) 0.01
    0.01042287 = product of:
      0.02084574 = sum of:
        0.02084574 = product of:
          0.04169148 = sum of:
            0.04169148 = weight(_text_:c in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04169148 = score(doc=834,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Julien, C.-A.; Guastavino, C.; Bouthillier, F.: Capitalizing on information organization and information visualization for a new-generation catalogue (2012) 0.01
    0.01042287 = product of:
      0.02084574 = sum of:
        0.02084574 = product of:
          0.04169148 = sum of:
            0.04169148 = weight(_text_:c in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04169148 = score(doc=5567,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (2001) 0.01
    0.0103181135 = product of:
      0.020636227 = sum of:
        0.020636227 = product of:
          0.041272454 = sum of:
            0.041272454 = weight(_text_:c in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041272454 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.4, S.206-208 (C. Arsenault):"Overall, this is an excellent work, on an ever increasingly pertinent topic. This long-awaited second edition provides a thorough and comprehensive update of an already important text. I very highly recommend it to professionals and academics alike ; both neophytes and veterans will find it valuable. It is a fundamental work that cannot be ignored in the field of subject analysis and retrieval for all bibliographic systems, including online catalogs."
  9. Ashton, J.; Kent, C.: New approaches to subject indexing at the British Library (2017) 0.01
    0.0103181135 = product of:
      0.020636227 = sum of:
        0.020636227 = product of:
          0.041272454 = sum of:
            0.041272454 = weight(_text_:c in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041272454 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Ashton, J.; Kent, C.: FAST: a journey toward sustainability in subject indexing at the British Library (2023) 0.01
    0.0103181135 = product of:
      0.020636227 = sum of:
        0.020636227 = product of:
          0.041272454 = sum of:
            0.041272454 = weight(_text_:c in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041272454 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.01
    0.009114968 = product of:
      0.018229935 = sum of:
        0.018229935 = product of:
          0.03645987 = sum of:
            0.03645987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03645987 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
  12. Frommeyer, J.: Chronological terms and period subdivisions in LCSH, RAMEAU, and RSWK : development of an integrative model for time retrieval across various online catalogs (2004) 0.01
    0.009114968 = product of:
      0.018229935 = sum of:
        0.018229935 = product of:
          0.03645987 = sum of:
            0.03645987 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03645987 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010) 0.01
    0.009114968 = product of:
      0.018229935 = sum of:
        0.018229935 = product of:
          0.03645987 = sum of:
            0.03645987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03645987 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  14. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.01
    0.009114968 = product of:
      0.018229935 = sum of:
        0.018229935 = product of:
          0.03645987 = sum of:
            0.03645987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03645987 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
  15. Cousins, S.A.: Enhancing subject access to OPACs : controlled vocabulary vs. natural language (1992) 0.01
    0.008939041 = product of:
      0.017878082 = sum of:
        0.017878082 = product of:
          0.10726848 = sum of:
            0.10726848 = weight(_text_:back in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10726848 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26939675 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.3981803 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
          0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Experimental evidence suggests that enhancing the subject content of OPAC records can improve retrieval performance. This is based on the use of natural language index terms derived from the table of contents and back-of-the-book index of documents. The research reported here investigates the alternative approach of translating these natural language terms into controlled vocabulary. Subject queries were collected by interview at the catalogue, and indexing of the queries demonstrated the impressive ability of PRECIS, and to a lesser extent LCSH, to represent users' information needs. DDC performed poorly in this respect. The assumption was made that an index language adequately specific to represent users' queries should be adequate to represent document contents. Searches were carried out on three test databases, and both natural language and PRECIS enhancement of MARC records increased the number of relevant documents found, with PRECIS showing the better performance. However, with weak stemming the advantage of PRECIS was lost. Consideration must also be given to the potential advantages of controlled vocabulary, over and above basic retrieval performance measures
  16. Tirilly, P.; Julien, C.-A.: Random walks for subject hierarchy simplification (2012) 0.01
    0.008844098 = product of:
      0.017688196 = sum of:
        0.017688196 = product of:
          0.035376392 = sum of:
            0.035376392 = weight(_text_:c in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035376392 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Walsh, J.: ¬The use of Library of Congress Subject Headings in digital collections (2011) 0.01
    0.008427808 = product of:
      0.016855616 = sum of:
        0.016855616 = product of:
          0.1011337 = sum of:
            0.1011337 = weight(_text_:back in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1011337 = score(doc=4549,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.26939675 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.375408 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
          0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper attempts to explain the wide dissemination of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) within digital libraries and presents some of the advantages and disadvantages of using this controlled vocabulary in digital collections. The paper also presents other classifications used in digital collections for subject access and explores ways of improving search functionality in digital collections that employ LCSH. Design/methodology/approach - Unlike traditional libraries that use Library of Congress Classification for organization and retrieval, digital libraries use metadata forms for organization and retrieval. The collections exist in cyberspace of the internet which is known for containing the universe of knowledge. The use of LCSH for information retrieval has been widely criticized for its difficulty of use and its information retrieval effectiveness in online environments. The Library of Congress (LOC) has claimed the headings were not based on comprehensive principles nor ever intended to cover the universe of knowledge. Despite these claims and criticisms, LCSH is the most popular choice for subject access in digital libraries. Findings - The number of digital collections increases every year and LCSH is still the most popular choice of controlled vocabulary for subject access. Of the numerous criticisms, difficulties of use and user unfamiliarity are the greatest disadvantages of using LCSH for subject access. Average users only have a vague notion of what they are looking for when initializing a search. More work is required in automated generation of subject headings and increased usage of LCSH in faceted search retrieval systems. This will provide users with better access to the LCSH used in the back end of information retrieval. Originality/value - The Greek researchers who developed the Dissertation DSPace system believe this type of module will eventually replace the traditional keyword-based indexing back ends employed by many information retrieval modules within current digital library systems. The system offers the type of access and interactivity that will acquaint users with how LCSH looks and is used. Faceted search and automated pattern matching using an ontology based on LCSH have the best promise of overcoming the disadvantages that have always plagued the LOC-controlled vocabulary. These retrieval techniques give LCSH an opportunity to finally achieve the optimal precision and recall it has so far failed to deliver.
  18. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.01
    0.007595807 = product of:
      0.015191614 = sum of:
        0.015191614 = product of:
          0.030383227 = sum of:
            0.030383227 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030383227 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  19. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.01
    0.007595807 = product of:
      0.015191614 = sum of:
        0.015191614 = product of:
          0.030383227 = sum of:
            0.030383227 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030383227 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
  20. Geißelmann, F. (Hrsg.): Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen (1994) 0.01
    0.0075194654 = product of:
      0.015038931 = sum of:
        0.015038931 = product of:
          0.030077862 = sum of:
            0.030077862 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030077862 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044850662 = queryNorm
                0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 7.2018 16:22:16
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .

Years

Languages

  • e 20
  • d 4

Types

  • a 22
  • m 2