-
Cochrane, P.A.: Improving LCSH for use in online catalogs revisited : What progress has been made? What issues still remain? (2000)
0.04
0.035443865 = product of:
0.0797487 = sum of:
0.021543756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021543756 = score(doc=5609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
0.031220913 = weight(_text_:use in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031220913 = score(doc=5609,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2870708 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
0.017272491 = weight(_text_:of in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017272491 = score(doc=5609,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
0.009711544 = product of:
0.029134631 = sum of:
0.029134631 = weight(_text_:29 in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029134631 = score(doc=5609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- In 1986 Libraries Unlimited published Cochrane's book, Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs; Exercises for Self-Help with a Selection of Background Readings. This was preceded in 1981 by an ERIC publication (ED 208 900) by Cochrane, with Monika Kirtland Bibliographic and Bibliometric Essay which documented critical views of LCSH and an analysis of vocabulary control in LCSH (parts of which were published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly' 1(2/3) (1982), 71-94). Three features of LCSH will be re-examined to check on progress since the time of these earlier publications: notes, structure of relationships between headings in the list, and links between Library of Congress classification numbers and LCSH or other vocabularies
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.03
0.03414467 = product of:
0.10243401 = sum of:
0.03554538 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554538 = score(doc=2883,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.044610593 = weight(_text_:use in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044610593 = score(doc=2883,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4101866 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.022278037 = weight(_text_:of in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022278037 = score(doc=2883,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Source
- Online '88. Proceedings of the Online Inc., Conference, New York, 11-12 October 1988
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.03
0.033799082 = product of:
0.101397246 = sum of:
0.03554538 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554538 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.044610593 = weight(_text_:use in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044610593 = score(doc=207,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4101866 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.021241274 = weight(_text_:of in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021241274 = score(doc=207,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Walsh, J.: ¬The use of Library of Congress Subject Headings in digital collections (2011)
0.03
0.032903347 = product of:
0.09871004 = sum of:
0.04308751 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04308751 = score(doc=4549,freq=18.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.40105084 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
0.036050804 = weight(_text_:use in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036050804 = score(doc=4549,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33148083 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
0.019571727 = weight(_text_:of in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019571727 = score(doc=4549,freq=52.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.35238793 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
52.0 = termFreq=52.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper attempts to explain the wide dissemination of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) within digital libraries and presents some of the advantages and disadvantages of using this controlled vocabulary in digital collections. The paper also presents other classifications used in digital collections for subject access and explores ways of improving search functionality in digital collections that employ LCSH. Design/methodology/approach - Unlike traditional libraries that use Library of Congress Classification for organization and retrieval, digital libraries use metadata forms for organization and retrieval. The collections exist in cyberspace of the internet which is known for containing the universe of knowledge. The use of LCSH for information retrieval has been widely criticized for its difficulty of use and its information retrieval effectiveness in online environments. The Library of Congress (LOC) has claimed the headings were not based on comprehensive principles nor ever intended to cover the universe of knowledge. Despite these claims and criticisms, LCSH is the most popular choice for subject access in digital libraries. Findings - The number of digital collections increases every year and LCSH is still the most popular choice of controlled vocabulary for subject access. Of the numerous criticisms, difficulties of use and user unfamiliarity are the greatest disadvantages of using LCSH for subject access. Average users only have a vague notion of what they are looking for when initializing a search. More work is required in automated generation of subject headings and increased usage of LCSH in faceted search retrieval systems. This will provide users with better access to the LCSH used in the back end of information retrieval. Originality/value - The Greek researchers who developed the Dissertation DSPace system believe this type of module will eventually replace the traditional keyword-based indexing back ends employed by many information retrieval modules within current digital library systems. The system offers the type of access and interactivity that will acquaint users with how LCSH looks and is used. Faceted search and automated pattern matching using an ontology based on LCSH have the best promise of overcoming the disadvantages that have always plagued the LOC-controlled vocabulary. These retrieval techniques give LCSH an opportunity to finally achieve the optimal precision and recall it has so far failed to deliver.
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998)
0.03
0.03244904 = product of:
0.07301034 = sum of:
0.01795313 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01795313 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.031864714 = weight(_text_:use in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031864714 = score(doc=2337,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.29299045 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.015172338 = weight(_text_:of in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015172338 = score(doc=2337,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.008020152 = product of:
0.024060456 = sum of:
0.024060456 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024060456 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Studwell, W.E.: Of eggs and baskets : getting more access out of LC Subject Headings in an online environment (1991)
0.03
0.030674338 = product of:
0.092023015 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
0.044610593 = weight(_text_:use in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044610593 = score(doc=515,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4101866 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
0.022278037 = weight(_text_:of in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022278037 = score(doc=515,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Libraries using the LCSH can increase the effectiveness of their subject access. This can be accomplished through one of four methods for applying an increased number of headings: the addition of subject headings in situations where none have been supplied by LC; the use of pattern secondary headings; the use of major + minor techniques; and the use of minor + major techniques. Each of these methods will provide additional subject access to supplement that produced by the Library of Congress
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002)
0.03
0.030624343 = product of:
0.09187303 = sum of:
0.060934942 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060934942 = score(doc=3807,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.011514995 = weight(_text_:of in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011514995 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.019423088 = product of:
0.058269262 = sum of:
0.058269262 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058269262 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Date
- 18. 5.2002 17:29:00
- Source
- Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.2, S.111-122
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000)
0.03
0.029970998 = product of:
0.06743474 = sum of:
0.021543756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021543756 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076517 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.01410293 = weight(_text_:of in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01410293 = score(doc=5612,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.009711544 = product of:
0.029134631 = sum of:
0.029134631 = weight(_text_:29 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029134631 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000)
0.03
0.028123945 = product of:
0.084371835 = sum of:
0.030467471 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030467471 = score(doc=5920,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.015232908 = weight(_text_:of in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015232908 = score(doc=5920,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.038671453 = product of:
0.058007177 = sum of:
0.029134631 = weight(_text_:29 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029134631 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.028872546 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028872546 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
- Date
- 27. 5.2001 16:22:21
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Ralston, N.M.: Controlled vocabularies for MEDLARS databases (1995)
0.03
0.02772638 = product of:
0.08317914 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.044610593 = weight(_text_:use in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044610593 = score(doc=2640,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4101866 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.013434161 = weight(_text_:of in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013434161 = score(doc=2640,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- For many years, searching medical and health-related topics has caused thousands of searchers to consult the well-known Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) controlled vocabulary. This plan works well for searching MEDLINE, but what about the MEDLARS databases such as TOXLIT, BIOETHICSLINE and POPLINE? Several printed vocabularies are available for searchers who wish to benefit from the consistency afforded by consulting established term lists. Occasionally, use of keywords from vocabularies other than MeSH is recommended even when information in the database is also indexed to MeSH. Search techniques available for use with several of the controlled vocabularies which are discussed vary, but built-in consistency of term use is a continuing theme from one controlled vocabulary to another
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Cousins, S.A.: Enhancing subject access to OPACs : controlled vocabulary vs. natural language (1992)
0.03
0.026716784 = product of:
0.08015035 = sum of:
0.03731488 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03731488 = score(doc=2230,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076517 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.020758953 = weight(_text_:of in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020758953 = score(doc=2230,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Experimental evidence suggests that enhancing the subject content of OPAC records can improve retrieval performance. This is based on the use of natural language index terms derived from the table of contents and back-of-the-book index of documents. The research reported here investigates the alternative approach of translating these natural language terms into controlled vocabulary. Subject queries were collected by interview at the catalogue, and indexing of the queries demonstrated the impressive ability of PRECIS, and to a lesser extent LCSH, to represent users' information needs. DDC performed poorly in this respect. The assumption was made that an index language adequately specific to represent users' queries should be adequate to represent document contents. Searches were carried out on three test databases, and both natural language and PRECIS enhancement of MARC records increased the number of relevant documents found, with PRECIS showing the better performance. However, with weak stemming the advantage of PRECIS was lost. Consideration must also be given to the potential advantages of controlled vocabulary, over and above basic retrieval performance measures
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 48(1992) no.3, S.291-309
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Yi, K.; Chan, L.M.: Revisiting the syntactical and structural analysis of Library of Congress Subject Headings for the digital environment (2010)
0.02
0.024947561 = product of:
0.074842684 = sum of:
0.030467471 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030467471 = score(doc=3431,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076517 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
0.022298694 = weight(_text_:of in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022298694 = score(doc=3431,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- With the current information environment characterized by the proliferation of digital resources, including collaboratively created and shared resources, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) is facing the challenges of effective and efficient subject-based organization and retrieval of digital resources. To explore the feasibility of utilizing LCSH in a digital environment, we might need to revisit its basic characteristics. The objectives of our study were to analyze LCSH in both syntactic and relational structures, to discover the structural characteristics of LCSH, and to identify problems and issues for the feasibility of LCSH as an effective subject access tool. This study reports and discusses issues raised by the syntactic and hierarchical structures of LCSH that present challenges to its use in a networked environment. Given the results of this study, we recommend a number of provisional future directions for the development of LCSH towards further becoming a viable system for digital and networked resources.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.677-687
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Connell, T.H.: Use of the LCSH system : realities (1996)
0.02
0.023680521 = product of:
0.07104156 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
0.02015124 = weight(_text_:of in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02015124 = score(doc=6941,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Explores the question of whether academic libraries keep up with the changes in the LCSH system. Analysis of the handling of 15 subject headings in 50 academic library catalogues available via the Internet found that libraries are not consistently maintaining subject authority control, or making syndetic references and scope notes in their catalogues. Discusses the results from the perspective of the libraries' performance, performance on the headings overall, performance on references, performance on the type of change made to the headings,a nd performance within 3 widely used onlien catalogue systems (DRA, INNOPAC and NOTIS). Discusses the implications of the findings in relationship to expressions of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of subject cataloguing expressed by discussion groups on the Internet
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.: FAST - a new approach to controlled subject access (2008)
0.02
0.023657158 = product of:
0.070971474 = sum of:
0.021543756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021543756 = score(doc=2181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
0.031220913 = weight(_text_:use in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031220913 = score(doc=2181,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2870708 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
0.018206805 = weight(_text_:of in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018206805 = score(doc=2181,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid proliferation of digital resources, are forcing changes in bibliographic control to make it easier to use, understand, and apply subject data. Subject headings are no exception. The enormous volume and rapid growth of digital libraries and repositories and the emergence of numerous metadata schemes have spurred a reexamination of the way subject data are to be provided for such resources efficiently and effectively. To address this need, OCLC in cooperation with the Library of Congress, has taken a new approach, called FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology). FAST headings are based on the existing vocabulary in Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), but are applied with a simpler syntax than required by Library of Congress application policies. Adapting the LCSH vocabulary in a simplified faceted syntax retains the rich vocabulary of LCSH while making it easier to understand, control, apply, and use.
- Source
- New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996)
0.02
0.023635466 = product of:
0.07090639 = sum of:
0.03731488 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03731488 = score(doc=5698,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076517 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.011514995 = weight(_text_:of in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011514995 = score(doc=5698,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Describes the shortcomings of search engines for the WWW comparing their current capabilities to those of the first generation CD-ROM products. Some allow phrase searching and most are improving their Boolean searching. Few allow truncation, wild cards or nested logic. They are stateless, losing previous search criteria. Unlike the indexing and classification systems for today's CD-ROMs, those for Web pages are random, unstructured and of variable quality. Considers that at best Web search engines can only offer free text searching. Discusses whether automatic data classification systems such as Infoseek Ultra can overcome the haphazard nature of the Web with neural network technology, and whether Boolean search techniques may be redundant when replaced by technology such as the Euroferret search engine. However, artificial intelligence is rarely successful on huge, varied databases. Relevance ranking and automatic query expansion still use the same simple inverted indexes. Most Web search engines do nothing more than word counting. Further complications arise with foreign languages
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Dean, R.J.: FAST: development of simplified headings for metadata (2004)
0.02
0.023016443 = product of:
0.06904933 = sum of:
0.021543756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021543756 = score(doc=5682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
0.031220913 = weight(_text_:use in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031220913 = score(doc=5682,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2870708 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
0.016284661 = weight(_text_:of in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016284661 = score(doc=5682,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) headings is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains compatibility with LCSH--any valid Library of Congress subject heading can be converted to FAST headings.
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Miller, U.; Teitelbaum, R.: Pre-coordination and post-coordination : past and future (2002)
0.02
0.022766106 = product of:
0.06829832 = sum of:
0.043534026 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043534026 = score(doc=1395,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.013434161 = weight(_text_:of in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013434161 = score(doc=1395,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.011330134 = product of:
0.0339904 = sum of:
0.0339904 = weight(_text_:29 in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0339904 = score(doc=1395,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- This article deals with the meaningful processing of information in relation to two systems of Information processing: pre-coordination and post-coordination. The different approaches are discussed, with emphasis an the need for a controlled vocabulary in information retrieval. Assigned indexing, which employs a controlled vocabulary, is described in detail. Types of indexing language can be divided into two broad groups - those using pre-coordinated terms and those depending an post-coordination. They represent two different basic approaches in processing and Information retrieval. The historical development of these two approaches is described, as well as the two tools that apply to these approaches: thesauri and subject headings.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.87-93
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Nicholson, J.; Lake, S.: Implementation of FAST in two digital repositories : breaking silos, unifying subject practices (2023)
0.02
0.022447914 = product of:
0.06734374 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
0.016453419 = weight(_text_:of in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016453419 = score(doc=1174,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- This study traces evolving approaches to the use of the FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) in digital repositories at Atkins Library at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, where changes in staffing, the launch of an institutional repository, and efforts to address problematic language in metadata have necessitated a shift from an in-depth indexing approach to FAST to a lightweight "tagging" model more suited to present-day metadata needs. Despite the subject schema's apparent simplicity, Atkins' experience with FAST has shown that it still requires significant time, effort, and experimentation in order to deploy it to best effect.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in Themenheft: Implementation of Faceted Vocabularies.
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001)
0.02
0.022333825 = product of:
0.100502215 = sum of:
0.08706805 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08706805 = score(doc=3826,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
0.013434161 = weight(_text_:of in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013434161 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 35(2001), S.249-298
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002)
0.02
0.02211106 = product of:
0.049749885 = sum of:
0.01777269 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01777269 = score(doc=97,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.012877968 = weight(_text_:use in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012877968 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.11841066 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.013434161 = weight(_text_:of in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013434161 = score(doc=97,freq=32.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.005665067 = product of:
0.0169952 = sum of:
0.0169952 = weight(_text_:29 in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0169952 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the World Wide Web. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing system of Ranganathan. A prototype Software System has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and to input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the Standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and the URL of the web document, the record is stored in the System. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The System stores the Surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. The search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using the chain indexing technique. If a single term is Input, the System searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved Keadings is too large (running into more than a page) the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The System searches subject headings already retrieved and looks for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL, the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed in a Windows NT environment using ASP and a web server is under rigorous testing. The database and Index management routines need further development.
An interesting but somewhat confusing article telling how the writers described web pages with Dublin Core metadata, including a faceted classification, and built a system that lets users browse the collection through the facets. They seem to want to cover too much in a short article, and unnecessary space is given over to screen shots showing how Dublin Core metadata was entered. The screen shots of the resulting browsable system are, unfortunately, not as enlightening as one would hope, and there is no discussion of how the system was actually written or the technology behind it. Still, it could be worth reading as an example of such a system and how it is treated in journals.
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Devadason, F.J.: Facet analysis and Semantic Web: musings of a student of Ranganathan. Unter: http://www.geocities.com/devadason.geo/FASEMWEB.html#FacetedIndex.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.61-77
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
