-
Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001)
0.02
0.021040944 = product of:
0.04208189 = sum of:
0.04208189 = product of:
0.08416378 = sum of:
0.08416378 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08416378 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:41:59
-
Subject retrieval in a networked environment : Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC (2003)
0.02
0.019463679 = product of:
0.038927358 = sum of:
0.038927358 = sum of:
0.02490006 = weight(_text_:language in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02490006 = score(doc=3964,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.1226029 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
0.014027297 = weight(_text_:22 in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014027297 = score(doc=3964,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 31(2004) no.2, S.117-118 (D. Campbell): "This excellent volume offers 22 papers delivered at an IFLA Satellite meeting in Dublin Ohio in 2001. The conference gathered together information and computer scientists to discuss an important and difficult question: in what specific ways can the accumulated skills, theories and traditions of librarianship be mobilized to face the challenges of providing subject access to information in present and future networked information environments? The papers which grapple with this question are organized in a surprisingly deft and coherent way. Many conferences and proceedings have unhappy sessions that contain a hodge-podge of papers that didn't quite fit any other categories. As befits a good classificationist, editor I.C. McIlwaine has kept this problem to a minimum. The papers are organized into eight sessions, which split into two broad categories. The first five sessions deal with subject domains, and the last three deal with subject access tools. The five sessions and thirteen papers that discuss access in different domains appear in order of in creasing intension. The first papers deal with access in multilingual environments, followed by papers an access across multiple vocabularies and across sectors, ending up with studies of domain-specific retrieval (primarily education). Some of the papers offer predictably strong work by scholars engaged in ongoing, long-term research. Gerard Riesthuis offers a clear analysis of the complexities of negotiating non-identical thesauri, particularly in cases where hierarchical structure varies across different languages. Hope Olson and Dennis Ward use Olson's familiar and welcome method of using provocative and unconventional theory to generate meliorative approaches to blas in general subject access schemes. Many papers, an the other hand, deal with specific ongoing projects: Renardus, The High Level Thesaurus Project, The Colorado Digitization Project and The Iter Bibliography for medieval and Renaissance material. Most of these papers display a similar structure: an explanation of the theory and purpose of the project, an account of problems encountered in the implementation, and a discussion of the results, both promising and disappointing, thus far. Of these papers, the account of the Multilanguage Access to Subjects Project in Europe (MACS) deserves special mention. In describing how the project is founded an the principle of the equality of languages, with each subject heading language maintained in its own database, and with no single language used as a pivot for the others, Elisabeth Freyre and Max Naudi offer a particularly vivid example of the way the ethics of librarianship translate into pragmatic contexts and concrete procedures. The three sessions and nine papers devoted to subject access tools split into two kinds: papers that discuss the use of theory and research to generate new tools for a networked environment, and those that discuss the transformation of traditional subject access tools in this environment. In the new tool development area, Mary Burke provides a promising example of the bidirectional approach that is so often necessary: in her case study of user-driven classification of photographs, she user personal construct theory to clarify the practice of classification, while at the same time using practice to test the theory. Carol Bean and Rebecca Green offer an intriguing combination of librarianship and computer science, importing frame representation technique from artificial intelligence to standardize syntagmatic relationships to enhance recall and precision.
-
Xu, J.; Croft, W.B.: Topic-based language models for distributed retrieval (2000)
0.02
0.018675046 = product of:
0.037350092 = sum of:
0.037350092 = product of:
0.074700184 = sum of:
0.074700184 = weight(_text_:language in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074700184 = score(doc=38,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Effective retrieval in a distributed environment is an important but difficult problem. Lack of effectiveness appears to have two major causes. First, existing collection selection algorithms do not work well on heterogeneous collections. Second, relevant documents are scattered over many collections and searching a few collections misses many relevant documents. We propose a topic-oriented approach to distributed retrieval. With this approach, we structure the document set of a distributed retrieval environment around a set of topics. Retrieval for a query involves first selecting the right topics for the query and then dispatching the search process to collections that contain such topics. The content of a topic is characterized by a language model. In environments where the labeling of documents by topics is unavailable, document clustering is employed for topic identification. Based on these ideas, three methods are proposed to suit different environments. We show that all three methods improve effectiveness of distributed retrieval
-
Ghiselli, C.; Padula, M.: ¬A unified access to extract knowledge from heterogeneous Web archives (2001)
0.02
0.015406125 = product of:
0.03081225 = sum of:
0.03081225 = product of:
0.0616245 = sum of:
0.0616245 = weight(_text_:language in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0616245 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes the integration of tools to provide unified access to remote and heterogeneous archives, the contents of which can be grouped under the same subject, and which have been integrated to allow the user to navigate and conduct thematic searches. The information sources are locally frequently modified, added to, and removed, therefore attention has been paid to the permanence of their references. Source interoperability is supported at language, protocol and schema levels. The architecture is based on a new common schema of the archives which is defined in new representation and query languages on the basis of an ontology to avoid misunderstanding and ambiguity.
-
Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997)
0.01
0.014027297 = product of:
0.028054593 = sum of:
0.028054593 = product of:
0.056109186 = sum of:
0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056109186 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
-
Dempsey, L.; Russell, R.; Kirriemur, J.W.: Towards distributed library systems : Z39.50 in a European context (1996)
0.01
0.014027297 = product of:
0.028054593 = sum of:
0.028054593 = product of:
0.056109186 = sum of:
0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056109186 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Program. 30(1996) no.1, S.1-22
-
Ashton, J.: ONE: the final OPAC frontier (1998)
0.01
0.014027297 = product of:
0.028054593 = sum of:
0.028054593 = product of:
0.056109186 = sum of:
0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056109186 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Select newsletter. 1998, no.22, Spring, S.5-6
-
Lunau, C.D.: Z39.50: a critical component of the Canadian resource sharing infrastructure : implementation activities and results achieved (1997)
0.01
0.014027297 = product of:
0.028054593 = sum of:
0.028054593 = product of:
0.056109186 = sum of:
0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056109186 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 3.1999 17:22:57
-
Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993)
0.01
0.014027297 = product of:
0.028054593 = sum of:
0.028054593 = product of:
0.056109186 = sum of:
0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056109186 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:47:22
-
Croft, W.B.: Combining approaches to information retrieval (2000)
0.01
0.01320525 = product of:
0.0264105 = sum of:
0.0264105 = product of:
0.052821 = sum of:
0.052821 = weight(_text_:language in 6862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052821 = score(doc=6862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.26008 = fieldWeight in 6862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The combination of different text representations and search strategies has become a standard technique for improving the effectiveness of information retrieval. Combination, for example, has been studied extensively in the TREC evaluations and is the basis of the "meta-search" engines used on the Web. This paper examines the development of this technique, including both experimental results and the retrieval models that have been proposed as formal frameworks for combination. We show that combining approaches for information retrieval can be modeled as combining the outputs of multiple classifiers based on one or more representations, and that this simple model can provide explanations for many of the experimental results. We also show that this view of combination is very similar to the inference net model, and that a new approach to retrieval based on language models supports combination and can be integrated with the inference net model
-
Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001)
0.01
0.012398495 = product of:
0.02479699 = sum of:
0.02479699 = product of:
0.04959398 = sum of:
0.04959398 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04959398 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:22
-
Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000)
0.01
0.012273884 = product of:
0.024547769 = sum of:
0.024547769 = product of:
0.049095538 = sum of:
0.049095538 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049095538 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:54
-
Helmes, L.; Steidl, N.: Webservices praktisch angewandt : FIZ Karlsruhe entwickelt Automatisierung der Informationsinfrastruktur (2003)
0.01
0.011004375 = product of:
0.02200875 = sum of:
0.02200875 = product of:
0.0440175 = sum of:
0.0440175 = weight(_text_:language in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0440175 = score(doc=1967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In diesem Beitrag werden Webservices als Träger für die Vernetzung unterschiedlicher Informationsangebote vorgestellt. Am Beispiel der technischen Realisierung für das Meta-Portal vascoda.de beschreibt er den Einsatz von Webservices im FIZ Karlsruhe. Erklärt werden das Konzept von Webservices, ihre Funktionsweise und die softwaretechnischen Schritte für die nahtlose Zusammenführung der teilnehmenden Webservice-Anbieter und Webservice-Nutzer. Nach Art einer Gebrauchsanweisung wird auf die in diesem Zusammenhang verwendeten Standardprotokolle und Programmiersprachen eingegangen. Webservices werden definiert als verteilte, lose gekoppelte und wiederverwendbare Software-Komponenten, die über XML-basierte Standard-Protokolle miteinander kommunizieren und auf vier wesentlichen Komponenten beruhen: dem Simple ObjectAccess Protocol (SOAP), der Webservice Description Language (WSDL), der Universal Description, Discovery and Integration (UDDI) und Standard-Internetprotkollen (HTTP[S], SMTP u.a.). Verteilte, unterschiedliche Softwaresysteme nahtlos so zusammenzuführen, dass sie sich gegenseitig verstehen und ihre Daten automatisch austauschen können, ist ein altes Ziel der Softwareentwicklung. Mit dem Konzept der Webservices scheint es sich nun verwirklichen zu lassen. Webservices bieten technisch zunächst prinzipiell nichts Neues: die Möglichkeiten, Funktionalitäten entfernter' Programme in lokale Anwendungen einzubauen, findet man seit Jahren in verschiedensten Technologien und Systemen (z.B. Remote Procedure Calls als Bestandteil von Unix, CORBA, COM, usw.). Die große Chance von Webservices liegt darin, dass sie auf akzeptierten und praktizierten Standards aufbauen und ihr relativ einfaches Konzept weithin unterstützt wird.
-
SRW/U erleichtert verteilte Datenbankrecherchen (2005)
0.01
0.011004375 = product of:
0.02200875 = sum of:
0.02200875 = product of:
0.0440175 = sum of:
0.0440175 = weight(_text_:language in 3972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0440175 = score(doc=3972,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 3972, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3972)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Seit zwei Jahrzehnten nutzen vor allem Bibliotheksverbünde das Protokoll Z39.50, um ihren Benutzern im Internet die simultane Abfrage mehrerer Datenbanken zu ermöglichen. Jetzt gibt es einen Nachfolger dieses Protokolls, der eine einfachere Implementierung verspricht. Damit ist auch eine größere Verbreitung für die Suche in verteilten Datenbeständen anderer Institutionen, wie z.B. Archiven und Museen, wahrscheinlich. SRW/U (Search and Retrieve Web Service bzw. Search and Retrieve URL Service, www.loc.90v/z3950/agency/zing/srw) wurde von einer an der Library of Congress angesiedelten Initiative entwickelt und beruht auf etablierten Standards wie URI und XML. Die mit SRW und SRU möglichen Abfragen und Ergebnisse unterscheiden sich nur in der Art der Übertragung, verwenden aber beide dieselben Prozeduren. Davon gibt es nur drei: explain, scan und searchRetrieve. Die beiden Erstgenannten dienen dazu, allgemeine Informationen über den Datenanbieter bzw. die verfügbaren Indexe zubekommen. Das Herzstück ist die search-Retrieve-Anweisung. Damit werden Anfragen direkt an die Datenbank gesendet und die Parameter des Suchergebnisses definiert. Verwendet wird dafür die Retrievalsprache CQL (Common Query Language), die simple Freitextsuchen, aber auch mit Boolschen Operatoren verknüpfte Recherchen ermöglicht. Bei SRU werden die Suchbefehle mittels einfacher HTTP GET -Anfragen übermittelt, die Ergebnisse in XML zurückgeliefert. Zur Strukturierung der Daten dienen z.B. Dublin Core, MARC oder EAD. Welches Format von der jeweiligen Datenbank bereitgestellt wird, kann durch die explain-Anweisung ermittelt gebracht werden."
-
Fang, L.: ¬A developing search service : heterogeneous resources integration and retrieval system (2004)
0.01
0.011004375 = product of:
0.02200875 = sum of:
0.02200875 = product of:
0.0440175 = sum of:
0.0440175 = weight(_text_:language in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0440175 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article describes two approaches for searching heterogeneous resources, which are explained as they are used in two corresponding existing systems-RIRS (Resource Integration Retrieval System) and HRUSP (Heterogeneous Resource Union Search Platform). On analyzing the existing systems, a possible framework-the MUSP (Multimetadata-Based Union Search Platform) is presented. Libraries now face a dilemma. On one hand, libraries subscribe to many types of database retrieval systems that are produced by various providers. The libraries build their data and information systems independently. This results in highly heterogeneous and distributed systems at the technical level (e.g., different operating systems and user interfaces) and at the conceptual level (e.g., the same objects are named using different terms). On the other hand, end users want to access all these heterogeneous data via a union interface, without having to know the structure of each information system or the different retrieval methods used by the systems. Libraries must achieve a harmony between information providers and users. In order to bridge the gap between the service providers and the users, it would seem that all source databases would need to be rebuilt according to a uniform data structure and query language, but this seems impossible. Fortunately, however, libraries and information and technology providers are now making an effort to find a middle course that meets the requirements of both data providers and users. They are doing this through resource integration.
-
Neuroth, H.; Lepschy, P.: ¬Das EU-Projekt Renardus (2001)
0.01
0.010520472 = product of:
0.021040944 = sum of:
0.021040944 = product of:
0.04208189 = sum of:
0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04208189 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:32:15
-
Avrahami, T.T.; Yau, L.; Si, L.; Callan, J.P.: ¬The FedLemur project : Federated search in the real world (2006)
0.01
0.010520472 = product of:
0.021040944 = sum of:
0.021040944 = product of:
0.04208189 = sum of:
0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 5271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04208189 = score(doc=5271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:02:07
-
Meiert, M.: Elektronische Publikationen an Hochschulen : Modellierung des elektronischen Publikationsprozesses am Beispiel der Universität Hildesheim (2006)
0.01
0.010520472 = product of:
0.021040944 = sum of:
0.021040944 = product of:
0.04208189 = sum of:
0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04208189 = score(doc=5974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 9.2006 13:22:15
-
Nicholson, D.; Steele, M.: CATRIONA : a distributed, locally-oriented, Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet (1996)
0.01
0.010520472 = product of:
0.021040944 = sum of:
0.021040944 = product of:
0.04208189 = sum of:
0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04208189 = score(doc=603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=603)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.127-141
-
Johnson, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval (2000)
0.01
0.00876706 = product of:
0.01753412 = sum of:
0.01753412 = product of:
0.03506824 = sum of:
0.03506824 = weight(_text_:22 in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03506824 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
