Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.027097825 = product of:
  0.12194021 = sum of:
    0.08706375 = weight(_text_:open in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08706375 = score(doc=3248,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.5970458 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
    0.034876462 = weight(_text_:access in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034876462 = score(doc=3248,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.31775886 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Es mag etwas egomanisch anmuten, wenn ich beschreibe, wie ich mir nicht nur das wissenschaftliche Publizieren der Zukunft vorstelle, sondern auch weitergehende Überlegungen zu Open Access und Open Science skizziere, die über das eigentliche Anliegen des vorliegenden Sammelbandes (Taubert/Weingart 2016) hinausgehen. An dieser Stelle sollte man umfangreiche Datenanalysen zum Publikationsverhalten und daraus abgeleitete Prognosen erwarten. Aber dies geschieht bereits in anderen Beiträgen zu diesem Sammelband in ausführlicher Weise, und so nehme ich mir die Freiheit zu einer ganz subjektiven Meinungsäußerung, die auf langjähriger Beschäftigung mit dem Thema basiert. Ich werde Grundzüge aufzeigen und prinzipielle Überlegungen anstellen, nicht aber auf die genaue Rolle der Beteiligten, die konkrete Ausgestaltung der zugehörigen Informationstechnik oder auf Details der rechtlichen Rahmenwerke eingehen.

0.015154057 = product of:
  0.06819326 = sum of:
    0.043531876 = weight(_text_:open in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043531876 = score(doc=2456,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
    0.024661385 = weight(_text_:access in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024661385 = score(doc=2456,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Von verschiedenen wissenschaftspolitischen Expertengremien sind in den letzten Jahren Analysen und Entwicklungsvorschläge zur Situation der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland vorgelegt worden. Der Wissenschaftsrat thematisierte 2012 mit seinen jüngsten "Empfehlungen zur Weiterentwicklung der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland bis 2020" vor allem Fragen der strukturellen Organisation und Koordination von Einrichtungen aus dem Bereich der Informationsinfrastrukturen. Inwieweit die Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrats dabei auf Belange des wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesens eingehen, soll im vorliegenden Beitrag betrachtet werden. Dazu werden die Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrats zunächst in den bibliothekspolitischen Kontext eingeordnet (Abschnitt 1.1 und 1.3) und in ihren relevanten Aspekten vorgestellt (Abschnitt 1.2). In einer kritischen Analyse werden daraufhin wesentliche Punkte des Papiers diskutiert (Abschnitt 2), die im Hinblick auf ihre Auswirkungen auf das wissenschaftliche Bibliothekswesen in Deutschland bewertet (Abschnitt 3) werden. Als tendenziell problematisch erweisen sich dabei u. a. die Aussagen des Wissenschaftsrat zum Thema Open Access sowie zu den Finanzierungsmodalitäten künftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen und ihrer vorgeschlagenen zentralen Steuerung.

0.0056430213 = product of:
  0.05078719 = sum of:
    0.05078719 = weight(_text_:open in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05078719 = score(doc=3735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Open Password. 2017, Nr.229 vom 24.07.2017 [http://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=300&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045]

0.0036535384 = product of:
  0.032881845 = sum of:
    0.032881845 = weight(_text_:access in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032881845 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Is there a future for the library cataloger? For the past thirty years this debate has increased with the continued growth of online resources and greater access to the World Wide Web. Many are concerned that library administrators believe budgetary resources would be better spent on other matters, leaving library users with an overabundance of electronic information to muddle through on their own. This article focuses on the future of the cataloging profession and its importance to the needs of library patrons.

0.0016146512 = product of:
  0.01453186 = sum of:
    0.01453186 = weight(_text_:access in 3273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01453186 = score(doc=3273,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.13239953 = fieldWeight in 3273, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3273)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Content

This in turn will accelerate the already widening economic inequality around the world. The internet and the platforms which it makes possible allow very small groups of individuals to make enormous profits while employing very few people. This is inevitable, it is progress, but it is also socially destructive. We need to put this alongside the financial crash, which brought home to people that a very few individuals working in the financial sector can accrue huge rewards and that the rest of us underwrite that success and pick up the bill when their greed leads us astray. So taken together we are living in a world of widening, not diminishing, financial inequality, in which many people can see not just their standard of living, but their ability to earn a living at all, disappearing. It is no wonder then that they are searching for a new deal, which Trump and Brexit might have appeared to represent. It is also the case that another unintended consequence of the global spread of the internet and social media is that the stark nature of these inequalities are far more apparent than they have been in the past. For me, the ability to use technology to communicate has been a liberating and positive experience. Without it, I would not have been able to continue working these many years past. But it also means that the lives of the richest people in the most prosperous parts of the world are agonisingly visible to anyone, however poor and who has access to a phone. And since there are now more people with a telephone than access to clean water in Sub-Saharan Africa, this will shortly mean nearly everyone on our increasingly crowded planet will not be able to escape the inequality.

8.124744E-4 = product of:
  0.0073122694 = sum of:
    0.0073122694 = product of:
      0.021936808 = sum of:
        0.021936808 = weight(_text_:22 in 4312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021936808 = score(doc=4312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4312)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Date

22. 6.2018 13:47:33

6.499795E-4 = product of:
  0.0058498154 = sum of:
    0.0058498154 = product of:
      0.017549446 = sum of:
        0.017549446 = weight(_text_:22 in 5234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017549446 = score(doc=5234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5234)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Date

22. 1.2018 11:33:49