Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.038918592 = product of:
  0.11675577 = sum of:
    0.07569169 = weight(_text_:wide in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07569169 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
    0.04106408 = weight(_text_:web in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04106408 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Is there a future for the library cataloger? For the past thirty years this debate has increased with the continued growth of online resources and greater access to the World Wide Web. Many are concerned that library administrators believe budgetary resources would be better spent on other matters, leaving library users with an overabundance of electronic information to muddle through on their own. This article focuses on the future of the cataloging profession and its importance to the needs of library patrons.

0.037412353 = product of:
  0.11223706 = sum of:
    0.02053204 = weight(_text_:web in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02053204 = score(doc=3350,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14235806 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
    0.09170502 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09170502 = score(doc=3350,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.252991 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.36248332 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

So gewohnt der über das Netz nutzbare Katalog mittlerweile ist, die Entwicklung ist immer noch nicht an ihr Ende gekommen. Verschiedene Funktionalitäten wie Inhaltsangaben, Register, Cover, Empfehlungen zu ähnlicher Literatur sowie Merkmale von Web 2.0 wie Personalisierbarkeit, Listenerstellung, gemeinsame Nutzung und Erschließung sowie RSS können noch hinzukommen - freilich mit unterschiedlicher Wahrscheinlichkeit. Technische, rechtliche und - nicht zu vergessen - wirtschaftliche Schranken machen es unwahrscheinlich, dass alles auf einmal eingeführt werden wird. In diesem Artikel sollen die verschiedenen Versatzstücke eines »Katalogs der Zukunft« dargestellt und bewertet werden, um einen Ausblick zu geben, wohin die Reise gehen kann und wird. Wann der Aufbruch stattfindet und welches die verschiedenen Verweilstationen sind, das ist Sache der Politik, der Finanzen und der Technik; ihre Durchsetzungskraft, Akzeptanz und Rahmenbedingungen die einer jeden Bibliothek. Thema ist aber auch der »Katalog der Gegenwart« und seine bis heute vielfach unausgeschöpften Möglichkeiten. Hier sollen deren Nutzen aufgezeigt, die finanzielle und personelle Machbarkeit erörtert und bibliothekarische Vorbehalte beseitigt werden.

0.009461462 = product of:
  0.056768768 = sum of:
    0.056768768 = weight(_text_:wide in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056768768 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19327477 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043621145 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The paper discusses the nature of values in general and the nature and utility of the values of librarianship. Delineates the changes that have occurred and are occurring in the wider world and the nature of change; also the importance of values in providing a framework for dealing with present and future change. Stresses the centrality of the human record to societal progress, the place of the human record in cultural heritage, and the central purpose of libraries in facilitating interaction with the human record and furthering the transmission of cultural heritage. Urges a turning away from the alien value systems of information technology, consumerism, materialism, and corporate management, and a consequent set of alliances between libraries and a wide range of cultural institutions and associations.

0.0024625263 = product of:
  0.014775158 = sum of:
    0.014775158 = product of:
      0.029550316 = sum of:
        0.029550316 = weight(_text_:22 in 4312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029550316 = score(doc=4312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043621145 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4312)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

22. 6.2018 13:47:33

0.001970021 = product of:
  0.011820125 = sum of:
    0.011820125 = product of:
      0.02364025 = sum of:
        0.02364025 = weight(_text_:22 in 5234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02364025 = score(doc=5234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15275382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043621145 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5234)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

22. 1.2018 11:33:49