Search (72 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Dow Jones unveils knowledge indexing system (1997) 0.02
    0.018400777 = product of:
      0.05520233 = sum of:
        0.05520233 = product of:
          0.082803495 = sum of:
            0.0415382 = weight(_text_:online in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0415382 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
            0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041265294 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Dow Jones Interactive Publishing has developed a sophisticated automatic knowledge indexing system that will allow searchers of the Dow Jones News / Retrieval service to get highly targeted results from a search in the service's Publications Library. Instead of relying on a thesaurus of company names, the new system uses a combination of that basic algorithm plus unique rules based on the editorial styles of individual publications in the Library. Dow Jones have also announced its acceptance of the definitions of 'selected full text' and 'full text' from Bibliodata's Fulltext Sources Online directory
  2. Pritchard-Schoch, T.: Comparing natural language retrieval : Win & Freestyle (1995) 0.02
    0.018400777 = product of:
      0.05520233 = sum of:
        0.05520233 = product of:
          0.082803495 = sum of:
            0.0415382 = weight(_text_:online in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0415382 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
            0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041265294 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online. 19(1995) no.4, S.83-87
  3. Wacholder, N.; Byrd, R.J.: Retrieving information from full text using linguistic knowledge (1994) 0.02
    0.016668199 = product of:
      0.050004594 = sum of:
        0.050004594 = product of:
          0.07500689 = sum of:
            0.04405792 = weight(_text_:online in 8524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04405792 = score(doc=8524,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.284522 = fieldWeight in 8524, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8524)
            0.03094897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03094897 = score(doc=8524,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 8524, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8524)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Examines how techniques in the field of natural language processing can be applied to the analysis of text in information retrieval. State of the art text searching programs cannot distinguish, for example, between occurrences of the sickness, AIDS and aids as tool or between library school and school nor equate such terms as online or on-line which are variants of the same form. To make these distinction, systems must incorporate knowledge about the meaning of words in context. Research in natural language processing has concentrated on the automatic 'understanding' of language; how to analyze the grammatical structure and meaning of text. Although many asoects of this research remain experimental, describes how these techniques to recognize spelling variants, names, acronyms, and abbreviations
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th National Online Meeting 1994, New York, 10-12 May 1994. Ed. by M.E. Williams
  4. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.01
    0.0128155565 = product of:
      0.03844667 = sum of:
        0.03844667 = product of:
          0.11534 = sum of:
            0.11534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11534 = score(doc=1356,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.74731416 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  5. Kramer, A.: Datendetektive : Volltextsuchmaschinen trotzen dem Chaos auf der Festplatte (2004) 0.01
    0.01201222 = product of:
      0.03603666 = sum of:
        0.03603666 = weight(_text_:im in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03603666 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Wo war noch mal die Adressliste für das nächste Klassentreffen, wie lautet das Angebot vom Partyservice und wer hat überhaupt schon alles zugesagt? Das System braucht schon für eine einfache Recherche im Volltext aller Dateien extrem lange. Suchprogramme von Drittanbietern arbeiten nicht nur schneller, sondern auch besser
  6. Ojala, M.: Research into full-text retrieval (1990) 0.01
    0.011462582 = product of:
      0.034387745 = sum of:
        0.034387745 = product of:
          0.103163235 = sum of:
            0.103163235 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103163235 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985) 0.01
    0.011462582 = product of:
      0.034387745 = sum of:
        0.034387745 = product of:
          0.103163235 = sum of:
            0.103163235 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103163235 = score(doc=1345,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  8. Kirkbride, P.: Full text, free text, and controlled vocabulary : strategic search planning (1991) 0.01
    0.011422425 = product of:
      0.034267273 = sum of:
        0.034267273 = product of:
          0.102801815 = sum of:
            0.102801815 = weight(_text_:online in 2941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102801815 = score(doc=2941,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.6638847 = fieldWeight in 2941, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2941)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Wilton, CT : Online Inc.
    Source
    Online/CD-ROM '91. Conference, Chicago, IL, 11.-13.11.1991
  9. Sormunen, E.: Free-text searching in full-text databases : probing system limits (1993) 0.01
    0.011422425 = product of:
      0.034267273 = sum of:
        0.034267273 = product of:
          0.102801815 = sum of:
            0.102801815 = weight(_text_:online in 7120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102801815 = score(doc=7120,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.6638847 = fieldWeight in 7120, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7120)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
  10. Mallinson, P.: Developments in free text retrieval systems (1993) 0.01
    0.009926887 = product of:
      0.029780662 = sum of:
        0.029780662 = product of:
          0.08934198 = sum of:
            0.08934198 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08934198 = score(doc=4931,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a typical traditional 1989 free text system and discusses developments in data storage, in search strategy and in the storage and retrieval of real time data. Outlines the following areas in which free text systems are likely to develop: standards; integration; dynamic data exchange; improved user interfaces; and better retrieval methods
  11. Ro, J.S.: ¬An evaluation of the applicability of ranking algorithms to improve the effectiveness of full-text retrieval : 1. On the effectiveness of full-text retrieval (1988) 0.01
    0.009726323 = product of:
      0.02917897 = sum of:
        0.02917897 = product of:
          0.08753691 = sum of:
            0.08753691 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08753691 = score(doc=4030,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Notess, G.R.: Tracking title search capabilities (2001) 0.01
    0.009230712 = product of:
      0.027692135 = sum of:
        0.027692135 = product of:
          0.0830764 = sum of:
            0.0830764 = weight(_text_:online in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0830764 = score(doc=558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5364998 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online. 25(2001) no.3, S.72-74
  13. Frederick, S.C.: SIRE: full-text retrieval with augmented search (1985) 0.01
    0.009170066 = product of:
      0.027510196 = sum of:
        0.027510196 = product of:
          0.08253059 = sum of:
            0.08253059 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08253059 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.01
    0.009170066 = product of:
      0.027510196 = sum of:
        0.027510196 = product of:
          0.08253059 = sum of:
            0.08253059 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08253059 = score(doc=2054,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
  15. Kugler, A.: Automatisierte Volltexterschließung von Retrodigitalisaten am Beispiel historischer Zeitungen (2018) 0.01
    0.009009165 = product of:
      0.027027493 = sum of:
        0.027027493 = weight(_text_:im in 4595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027027493 = score(doc=4595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 4595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4595)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Seit ein paar Jahren postuliert die DFG in ihren Praxisregeln "Digitalisierung", dass eine ausschließliche Bilddigitalisierung nicht mehr den wissenschaftlichen Ansprüchen Genüge leiste, sondern der digitale Volltext notwendig sei, da dieser die Basis für eine wissenschaftliche Nachnutzung darstellt. Um ein besseres Verständnis davon zu erlangen, was sich hinter dem Begriff "Volltext" verbirgt, wird im Folgenden ein kleiner Einblick in die technischen Verfahren zur automatisierten Volltexterschließung von Retrodigitalisaten geboten. Fortschritte und auch Grenzen der aktuellen Methoden werden vorgestellt und wie Qualität in diesem Zusammenhang überhaupt bemessen werden kann. Die automatisierten Verfahren zur Volltexterschließung werden am Beispiel historischer Zeitungen erläutert, da deren Zugänglichmachung gerade in den Geisteswissenschaften ein großes Desiderat ist und diese Quellengattung zugleich aufgrund der Spaltenstruktur besondere technische Herausforderungen mit sich bringt. 2016 wurde das DFG-Projekt zur Erstellung eines "Masterplan Zeitungsdigitalisierung" fertiggestellt, dessen Ergebnisse hier einfließen.
  16. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.; Groeniger, B.O.: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : pt.4: indexing and full-text retrieval programs (1992) 0.01
    0.008423243 = product of:
      0.025269728 = sum of:
        0.025269728 = product of:
          0.07580918 = sum of:
            0.07580918 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07580918 = score(doc=2051,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the fourth in a series on microcomputer software for information storage and retrieval, test results of six indexing and full-text retrieval programs are presented and various properties and qualities of these programs are discussed. The common faeture of programs in these categories is that they are primarily meant to retrieve words (or combination of them) in large text files. To do this they either simply index existing text files in one or more formats (indexing programs), or they store and index them in their own database format (full-text retrieval programs). The programs reviewed in this issue are the indexing programs Ask-it, Texplore and ZYindex and the full-text retrieval programs KAware, textMaster and WordCruncher. All programs run under MS-DOS. In addition ZYindex has a Windows and a Unix version and TextMaster is also available for for Unix. For each of the six programs almost 100 facts and test results are tabulated. The programs are also discussed individually
  17. Sievert, M.C.: Full-text information retrieval : introduction (1996) 0.01
    0.00810527 = product of:
      0.024315808 = sum of:
        0.024315808 = product of:
          0.07294742 = sum of:
            0.07294742 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07294742 = score(doc=4719,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Introduces a special section devoted to full text information retrieval. Gives an overview of full text databases and research into them. There is a lack of a single definition of full text. Articles in the library related literature about full text have appeared with increasing frequnecy
  18. Hildreth, C.R.: ¬The use and understanding of keyword searching in a university online catalog (1997) 0.01
    0.008076874 = product of:
      0.02423062 = sum of:
        0.02423062 = product of:
          0.07269186 = sum of:
            0.07269186 = weight(_text_:online in 7377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07269186 = score(doc=7377,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 7377, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7377)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Bernstein, L.M.; Williamson, R.E.: Testing of a natural language retrieval system for a full text knowledge base (1984) 0.01
    0.008023808 = product of:
      0.024071421 = sum of:
        0.024071421 = product of:
          0.07221426 = sum of:
            0.07221426 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07221426 = score(doc=1803,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1803, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1803)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  20. Warner, A.J.: ¬The role of linguistic analysis in full-text retrieval (1994) 0.01
    0.008023808 = product of:
      0.024071421 = sum of:
        0.024071421 = product of:
          0.07221426 = sum of:
            0.07221426 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07221426 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 57
  • d 12
  • nl 2
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…