Search (68 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.02
    0.020117057 = product of:
      0.040234115 = sum of:
        0.040234115 = product of:
          0.06035117 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=7701,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
    Type
    a
  2. Stegentritt, E.: EMIR: Multilinguales Freitextretrieval Projekt (1992) 0.02
    0.01628453 = product of:
      0.03256906 = sum of:
        0.03256906 = product of:
          0.048853584 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=3149,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
            0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037446793 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
    Type
    a
  3. Freiburg, J.: Richtig suchen! : Textrecherche mit askSam (1995) 0.02
    0.01517087 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.03034174 = product of:
          0.04551261 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
            0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037446793 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    In'side Multimedia. 1995, H.8, S.68-70
    Type
    a
  4. Falk, H.: Building and using document databases (1998) 0.02
    0.01517087 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.03034174 = product of:
          0.04551261 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=3858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
            0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037446793 = score(doc=3858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Falk, H.: Document file searching (1998) 0.01
    0.012642393 = product of:
      0.025284786 = sum of:
        0.025284786 = product of:
          0.037927177 = sum of:
            0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067215143 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
            0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031205663 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Baguhn, J.: Volltextretrieval : stürmische Entwicklungen (1995) 0.01
    0.010856352 = product of:
      0.021712704 = sum of:
        0.021712704 = product of:
          0.032569055 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=2329,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
            0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02496453 = score(doc=2329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    a
    Source
    Cogito. 11(1995) H.5, S.62-63
    Type
    a
  7. Turtle, H.; Flood, J.: Query evaluation : strategies and optimizations (1995) 0.01
    0.010856352 = product of:
      0.021712704 = sum of:
        0.021712704 = product of:
          0.032569055 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=4087,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
            0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02496453 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the 2 major query evaluation strategies used in large text retrieval systems and analyzes the performance of these strategies. Discusses several optimization techniques that can be used to reduce evaluation costs and present simulation results to compare the performance of these optimization techniques when evaluating natural language queries with a collection of full text legal materials
    Type
    a
  8. Paijmans, H.: Gravity wells of meaning : detecting information rich passages in scientific texts (1997) 0.01
    0.010856352 = product of:
      0.021712704 = sum of:
        0.021712704 = product of:
          0.032569055 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 7444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=7444,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7444, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7444)
            0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 7444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02496453 = score(doc=7444,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 7444, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7444)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents research in which 4 term weigthing schemes were used to detect information rich passages in texts and the results compared. Demonstrates that word categories and frequency derived weights have a close correlation but that weighting according to the first mention theory or the cue method shows no correlation with frequency based weights
    Type
    a
  9. Albus, W.; Smulders, H.: Doeltreffend zoeken in volledige teksten : 1. full-text retrieval bij de HavenInformatieBank (1998) 0.01
    0.010418028 = product of:
      0.020836055 = sum of:
        0.020836055 = product of:
          0.031254083 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=1682,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
            0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021843962 = score(doc=1682,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    At Rotterdam Ports Authority in the Netherlands the Habour information database includes a press cuttings service and various online databases. To enable research staff to have direct access to information the POINT (Point Information Net) was begun in 1993. Using Verity software POINT provides simultaneously full text searching on a range of databases. The software uses current Web indexing technqiues to overcome the problems of excessive recall and low precision. A key element is the system's ability to recognise word combinations
    Type
    a
  10. Palos, S.: Indexierung, Volltextrecherche und digital Text-Dossiers (1999) 0.01
    0.010113914 = product of:
      0.020227827 = sum of:
        0.020227827 = product of:
          0.03034174 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
            0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02496453 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 50(1999) H.7, S.413-419
    Type
    a
  11. Albus, W.; Smulders, H.: Doeltreffend zoeken in volledige teksten : 2. full-text retrieval bij de HavenInformatieBank (1998) 0.01
    0.009997789 = product of:
      0.019995578 = sum of:
        0.019995578 = product of:
          0.029993366 = sum of:
            0.008149404 = weight(_text_:a in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008149404 = score(doc=2368,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
            0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021843962 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    At Rotterdam Port Authority an information database has been created with approx. 100.000 full text documents online. Topic software has been used to identify word groups and refine search strategies to optimize precision and recall. The software guides users from selected terms to other relevant word combinations. Although the system would benefit from further refinement, users are generally satisfied. The database includes a number of foreign language documents but lacks a thesaurus of foreign terms
    Type
    a
  12. Voorbij, H.: Title keywords and subject descriptors : a comparison of subject search entries of books in the humanities and social sciences (1998) 0.01
    0.0085617015 = product of:
      0.017123403 = sum of:
        0.017123403 = product of:
          0.025685104 = sum of:
            0.010082272 = weight(_text_:a in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010082272 = score(doc=4721,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
            0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015602832 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to compare the value of subject descriptors and title keywords as entries to subject searches, two studies were carried out. Both studies concentrated on monographs in the humanities and social sciences, held by the online public access catalogue of the National Library of the Netherlands. In the first study, a comparison was made by subject librarians between the subject descriptors and the title keywords of 475 records. They could express their opinion on a scale from 1 (descriptor is exactly or almost the same as word in title) to 7 (descriptor does not appear in title at all). It was concluded that 37 per cent of the records are considerably enhanced by a subject descriptor, and 49 per cent slightly or considerably enhanced. In the second study, subject librarians performed subject searches using title keywords and subject descriptors on the same topic. The relative recall amounted to 48 per cent and 86 per cent respectively. Failure analysis revealed the reasons why so many records that were found by subject descriptors were not found by title keywords. First, although completely meaningless titles hardly ever appear, the title of a publication does not always offer sufficient clues for title keyword searching. In those cases, descriptors may enhance the record of a publication. A second and even more important task of subject descriptors is controlling the vocabulary. Many relevant titles cannot be retrieved by title keyword searching because of the wide diversity of ways of expressing a topic. Descriptors take away the burden of vocabulary control from the user.
    Type
    a
  13. Kristensen, J.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The effectiveness of a searching thesaurus in free-text searching in a full-text database (1990) 0.00
    0.003104535 = product of:
      0.00620907 = sum of:
        0.00620907 = product of:
          0.01862721 = sum of:
            0.01862721 = weight(_text_:a in 2043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01862721 = score(doc=2043,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.3530471 = fieldWeight in 2043, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2043)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  14. Marcus, J.: Everyone's a futurist : full text year in review - 1994 (1994) 0.00
    0.0025348421 = product of:
      0.0050696842 = sum of:
        0.0050696842 = product of:
          0.015209052 = sum of:
            0.015209052 = weight(_text_:a in 2126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015209052 = score(doc=2126,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 2126, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2126)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  15. Kristensen, J.: Expanding end-users' query statements for free text searching with a search-aid thesaurus (1993) 0.00
    0.0023711277 = product of:
      0.0047422554 = sum of:
        0.0047422554 = product of:
          0.014226765 = sum of:
            0.014226765 = weight(_text_:a in 6621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014226765 = score(doc=6621,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 6621, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6621)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Tests the effectiveness of a thesaurus as a search-aid in free text searching of a full text database. A set of queries was searched against a large full text database of newspaper articles. The thesaurus contained equivalence, hierarchical and associative relationships. Each query was searched in five modes: basic search, synonym search, narrower term search, related term search, and union of all previous searches. The searches were analyzed in terms of relative recall and precision
    Type
    a
  16. White, F.: ISYS 3.01 : a review (1993) 0.00
    0.0023711277 = product of:
      0.0047422554 = sum of:
        0.0047422554 = product of:
          0.014226765 = sum of:
            0.014226765 = weight(_text_:a in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014226765 = score(doc=2052,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews ISYS, a full text retrieval system from Odyssey developments. ISYS supports a wide variety of wordprocessor, text and spreadsheet formats. A programming interface is included for developers to integrate ISYS into their own applications. Describes how to use ISYS to create a database index for a set of documents and then query that index to locate, retrieve and display information from the indexed documents. Discusses configuration options, precedence of operators, displaying and manipulating search results, the advanced menu, ease of learning and use, documentation and library applications
    Type
    a
  17. Ojala, M.: Research into full-text retrieval (1990) 0.00
    0.0022405048 = product of:
      0.0044810097 = sum of:
        0.0044810097 = product of:
          0.013443029 = sum of:
            0.013443029 = weight(_text_:a in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013443029 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Sievert, M.C.: Full-text information retrieval : introduction (1996) 0.00
    0.0022405048 = product of:
      0.0044810097 = sum of:
        0.0044810097 = product of:
          0.013443029 = sum of:
            0.013443029 = weight(_text_:a in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013443029 = score(doc=4719,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Introduces a special section devoted to full text information retrieval. Gives an overview of full text databases and research into them. There is a lack of a single definition of full text. Articles in the library related literature about full text have appeared with increasing frequnecy
    Type
    a
  19. Hildreth, C.R.: ¬The use and understanding of keyword searching in a university online catalog (1997) 0.00
    0.0022179869 = product of:
      0.0044359737 = sum of:
        0.0044359737 = product of:
          0.013307921 = sum of:
            0.013307921 = weight(_text_:a in 7377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013307921 = score(doc=7377,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 7377, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7377)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  20. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.00
    0.002019564 = product of:
      0.004039128 = sum of:
        0.004039128 = product of:
          0.012117383 = sum of:
            0.012117383 = weight(_text_:a in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012117383 = score(doc=4214,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.22966442 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
    Type
    a

Languages

Types

  • a 67
  • s 1
  • More… Less…