Search (28 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Marcus, J.: Full text year in review : 1996 (1996) 0.01
    0.006697874 = product of:
      0.013395748 = sum of:
        0.013395748 = product of:
          0.040187243 = sum of:
            0.040187243 = weight(_text_:j in 7737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040187243 = score(doc=7737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503219 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 7737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7737)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Blake, P.: Leading edge : Verity keeps it in the family (1997) 0.01
    0.006432054 = product of:
      0.012864108 = sum of:
        0.012864108 = product of:
          0.038592324 = sum of:
            0.038592324 = weight(_text_:p in 7398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038592324 = score(doc=7398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503219 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 7398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7398)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Muddamalle, M.R.: Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval : a case study in soil mechanics (1998) 0.01
    0.006432054 = product of:
      0.012864108 = sum of:
        0.012864108 = product of:
          0.038592324 = sum of:
            0.038592324 = weight(_text_:p in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038592324 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503219 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The effectiveness ot two information retrieval tools, namely, thesaurus and natural language, in an information retrieval system has been studies. A database SOILSC was created using a HP3000/58 series minicomputer and MINISIS software. Records of articles totalling 17.918 published in various journals, received in the Central Water and Power Research Station (CWPRS) library (Pune, India) since 1988, have been stored. The information needs of a soil mechanics group have been formulated using thesaurus and natural language into 81 search strategies. In consultation with the user, relevance of the retrieved documents was assessed and, recall (R) and precision (P) values were calculated. Since both thesaurus and natural language have shown identical performance in information retrieval, a combination of these two have been suggested for making searches and providing relevant information
  4. Meunier, J.-G.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lebel, H.: ¬A call for enhanced representation of content as a means of improving online full-text retrieval (1987) 0.01
    0.0058606397 = product of:
      0.0117212795 = sum of:
        0.0117212795 = product of:
          0.03516384 = sum of:
            0.03516384 = weight(_text_:j in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03516384 = score(doc=2049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503219 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Schmidt, J.: Full-text searching : as seen from a non-bibliographic searcher's point of view (1989) 0.01
    0.0058606397 = product of:
      0.0117212795 = sum of:
        0.0117212795 = product of:
          0.03516384 = sum of:
            0.03516384 = weight(_text_:j in 2876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03516384 = score(doc=2876,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503219 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2876, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2876)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Preston, L.A.; Ebbs, C.M.; Luther, J.: 'Full text' access evaluation : are we getting the real thing? (1998) 0.01
    0.0058606397 = product of:
      0.0117212795 = sum of:
        0.0117212795 = product of:
          0.03516384 = sum of:
            0.03516384 = weight(_text_:j in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03516384 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503219 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017) 0.01
    0.0053600455 = product of:
      0.010720091 = sum of:
        0.010720091 = product of:
          0.03216027 = sum of:
            0.03216027 = weight(_text_:p in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03216027 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503219 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018) 0.01
    0.0053600455 = product of:
      0.010720091 = sum of:
        0.010720091 = product of:
          0.03216027 = sum of:
            0.03216027 = weight(_text_:p in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03216027 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503219 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)