-
Ashford, J.H.; Matkin, D.I.: Studies in the application of free text package systems for information storage and retrieval in libraries and related information centres (1982)
0.05
0.048659682 = product of:
0.07298952 = sum of:
0.035031762 = weight(_text_:information in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035031762 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
0.03795776 = product of:
0.07591552 = sum of:
0.07591552 = weight(_text_:systems in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07591552 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Freitext in Informationssystemen (1985)
0.04
0.035845123 = product of:
0.05376768 = sum of:
0.021232454 = weight(_text_:information in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021232454 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.032535225 = product of:
0.06507045 = sum of:
0.06507045 = weight(_text_:systems in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06507045 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Deutsche Fassung von 'Free text in information systems' in: International classification 12(1985) H.2, S.95-98. Wegen einiger Ungereimtheiten sollte die englische Fassung benutzt werden
-
Free text in information systems: capabilities and limitations (1985)
0.04
0.035845123 = product of:
0.05376768 = sum of:
0.021232454 = weight(_text_:information in 2045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021232454 = score(doc=2045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2045)
0.032535225 = product of:
0.06507045 = sum of:
0.06507045 = weight(_text_:systems in 2045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06507045 = score(doc=2045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 2045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2045)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993)
0.04
0.035120055 = product of:
0.052680083 = sum of:
0.024517128 = weight(_text_:information in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024517128 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.028162954 = product of:
0.05632591 = sum of:
0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05632591 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:22:09
-
Perez, E.: Text enhancement : Controlled vocabulary vs. free text (1982)
0.03
0.033795103 = product of:
0.050692655 = sum of:
0.02001815 = weight(_text_:information in 1355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02001815 = score(doc=1355,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1355, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1355)
0.030674506 = product of:
0.061349012 = sum of:
0.061349012 = weight(_text_:systems in 1355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061349012 = score(doc=1355,freq=4.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 1355, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1355)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Full-text databases are becoming increasingly practical for publication and general use, since most publishers now use some form of computerized editorial and publication system. "Free text" retrieval from full-text databases is possible with many existing systems, but some information professionals are doubtful about the quality of information retrieval using this type of access. The "augmentation" or "enrichment" needed for practical operation of these systems is discussed
-
Tenopir, C.: Full-text retrieval : systems and files (1994)
0.03
0.029886318 = product of:
0.044829477 = sum of:
0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01415497 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
0.030674506 = product of:
0.061349012 = sum of:
0.061349012 = weight(_text_:systems in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061349012 = score(doc=2424,freq=4.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of the development of full text databases, encompassing: types of commercially available full text databases; online systems for full text databases; CD-ROM databases for full text databases; full text databases on magnetic discs or tapes; creation of full text databases; searching and display requirements for full text searching and software. Concludes that bibliographic information services without full text support solve only half of the retrieval problems
-
Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986)
0.03
0.029870933 = product of:
0.0448064 = sum of:
0.017693711 = weight(_text_:information in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017693711 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.027112689 = product of:
0.054225378 = sum of:
0.054225378 = weight(_text_:systems in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054225378 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.339541 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
-
Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989)
0.03
0.028236447 = product of:
0.04235467 = sum of:
0.021232454 = weight(_text_:information in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021232454 = score(doc=3564,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.021122215 = product of:
0.04224443 = sum of:
0.04224443 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04224443 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
- Date
- 9. 1.1996 10:22:31
- Imprint
- Medford, New Jersey : Learned Information
- Source
- ASIS'89. Managing information and technology. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington D.C., 30.10.-2.11.1989. Vol.26. Ed.by J. Katzer and G.B. Newby
-
Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001)
0.03
0.02821195 = product of:
0.042317923 = sum of:
0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01415497 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.028162954 = product of:
0.05632591 = sum of:
0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05632591 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 14. 6.2001 12:22:31
-
Schmidt, J.: Full-text searching : as seen from a non-bibliographic searcher's point of view (1989)
0.03
0.026954245 = product of:
0.040431365 = sum of:
0.021452487 = weight(_text_:information in 2876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021452487 = score(doc=2876,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2876, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2876)
0.01897888 = product of:
0.03795776 = sum of:
0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 2876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03795776 = score(doc=2876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2876)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines searching capabilities and search results relating to the same full text data base made available by: a host that offers a command language designed for searching bibliographic data bases and a host that provides search facilities that have been specially designed for full text retrieval. Moreover, the CD-ROM format of an encyclopedia is compared with the equivalent on-line version of the same work, Academic American Encyclopedia. Results reveal that it is easier to search on those systems that offer searching facilities which have been specially designed for full text retrieval.
- Imprint
- Oxford : Learned Information
- Source
- Online Information 89. Proceedings of the 13th International Online Information Meeting, London, 12-14 December 1989
-
Huang, Y.-L.: ¬A theoretic and empirical research of cluster indexing for Mandarine Chinese full text document (1998)
0.03
0.026150528 = product of:
0.03922579 = sum of:
0.012385598 = weight(_text_:information in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012385598 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
0.026840193 = product of:
0.053680386 = sum of:
0.053680386 = weight(_text_:systems in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053680386 = score(doc=513,freq=4.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Since most popular commercialized systems for full text retrieval are designed with full text scaning and Boolean logic query mode, these systems use an oversimplified relationship between the indexing form and the content of document. Reports the use of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to develop a Cluster Indexing Model (CIM) based on a Vector Space Model (VSM) in orer to explore the index theory of cluster indexing for chinese full text documents. From a series of experiments, it was found that the indexing performance of CIM is better than traditional VSM, and has almost equivalent effectiveness of the authority control of index terms
- Source
- Bulletin of library and information science. 1998, no.24, S.44-68
-
Meunier, J.-G.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lebel, H.: ¬A call for enhanced representation of content as a means of improving online full-text retrieval (1987)
0.02
0.024329841 = product of:
0.03649476 = sum of:
0.017515881 = weight(_text_:information in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017515881 = score(doc=2049,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
0.01897888 = product of:
0.03795776 = sum of:
0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03795776 = score(doc=2049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Given the phenomena of growth and diversification which affect both text databases and their users, it is essential to reflect on the nature of textual information and its representation within the very particular framework of interactive retrieval systems. The latter aim to correlate two types of conceptual structures, that of the user and that of the text, by way of a third structure - the interface. A typology of levels, of representation is proposed (typographical, lexical, statistical, linguistic, semiotic, and pragmatic). These representations, obtained by means of a multiplicity of strategies (intra-sentence, intratextual, intertextual) applied to different units of information and interrelated, render the interaction between diverse users and the database more flexible and more adaptable
-
Dubois, C.P.R.: Free text vs. controlled vocabulary; a reassessment (1987)
0.02
0.023896746 = product of:
0.03584512 = sum of:
0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01415497 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
0.02169015 = product of:
0.0433803 = sum of:
0.0433803 = weight(_text_:systems in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0433803 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Free text and controlled vocabulary searching can no longer be viewed as antagonistic techniques in information retrieval since they both display advantages and weaknesses dependent on a fairly wide range of context, with the option to use both increasingly favoured. An attempt is made to present a list of features associated with the two techniques and to suggest a methodology to assist in deciding on the optimal retrieval technique for a particular purpose. The relevance of the techniques in expert systems and full text contexts is also discussed. Finally, recommendations for further research are suggested, concentrating on survey techniques in real-life retrieval situations
-
Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995)
0.02
0.023896746 = product of:
0.03584512 = sum of:
0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01415497 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.02169015 = product of:
0.0433803 = sum of:
0.0433803 = weight(_text_:systems in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0433803 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
- Source
- Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32
-
Turtle, H.; Flood, J.: Query evaluation : strategies and optimizations (1995)
0.02
0.023896746 = product of:
0.03584512 = sum of:
0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01415497 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
0.02169015 = product of:
0.0433803 = sum of:
0.0433803 = weight(_text_:systems in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0433803 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the 2 major query evaluation strategies used in large text retrieval systems and analyzes the performance of these strategies. Discusses several optimization techniques that can be used to reduce evaluation costs and present simulation results to compare the performance of these optimization techniques when evaluating natural language queries with a collection of full text legal materials
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.6, S.831-850
-
Wacholder, N.; Byrd, R.J.: Retrieving information from full text using linguistic knowledge (1994)
0.02
0.02310364 = product of:
0.03465546 = sum of:
0.018387845 = weight(_text_:information in 8524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018387845 = score(doc=8524,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 8524, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8524)
0.016267613 = product of:
0.032535225 = sum of:
0.032535225 = weight(_text_:systems in 8524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032535225 = score(doc=8524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 8524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8524)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines how techniques in the field of natural language processing can be applied to the analysis of text in information retrieval. State of the art text searching programs cannot distinguish, for example, between occurrences of the sickness, AIDS and aids as tool or between library school and school nor equate such terms as online or on-line which are variants of the same form. To make these distinction, systems must incorporate knowledge about the meaning of words in context. Research in natural language processing has concentrated on the automatic 'understanding' of language; how to analyze the grammatical structure and meaning of text. Although many asoects of this research remain experimental, describes how these techniques to recognize spelling variants, names, acronyms, and abbreviations
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Learned Information
-
Couvreur, T.R.; Benzel, R.N.; Miller, S.F.; Zeitler, D.N.; Lee, D.L.; Singhal, M.; Shivaratri, N.; Wong, W.Y.P.: ¬An analysis of performance and cost factors in searching large text databases using parallel search systems (1994)
0.02
0.020909652 = product of:
0.03136448 = sum of:
0.012385598 = weight(_text_:information in 7657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012385598 = score(doc=7657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 7657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7657)
0.01897888 = product of:
0.03795776 = sum of:
0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 7657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03795776 = score(doc=7657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 7657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.7, S.443-464
-
Pearce, C.; Nicholas, C.: TELLTALE: Experiments in a dynamic hypertext environment for degraded and multilingual data (1996)
0.02
0.02085415 = product of:
0.031281225 = sum of:
0.015013612 = weight(_text_:information in 4071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015013612 = score(doc=4071,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4071, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4071)
0.016267613 = product of:
0.032535225 = sum of:
0.032535225 = weight(_text_:systems in 4071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032535225 = score(doc=4071,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 4071, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4071)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Methods and tools for finding documents relevant to a user's needs in a document corpora can be found in the information retrieval, library science, and hypertext communities. Typically, these systems provide retrieval capabilities for fairly static copora, their algorithms are dependent on the language for which they are written, e.g. English, and they do not perform well when presented with misspelled words or text that has been degraded by OCR techniques. In this article, we present experimentation results for the TELLTALE system. TELLTALE is a dynamic hypertext environment that provides full-text search from a hypertext-style user interface for text corpora that may be garbled by OCR or transmission errors, and that may contain languages other than English. TELLTALE uses several techniques based on n-grams (n character sequences of text). With these results we show that the dynamic linkage mechanisms in TELLTALE are tolerant of garbles in up to 30% of the characters in the body of the texts
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.263-275
-
Mallinson, P.: Developments in free text retrieval systems (1993)
0.01
0.0127810445 = product of:
0.03834313 = sum of:
0.03834313 = product of:
0.07668626 = sum of:
0.07668626 = weight(_text_:systems in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07668626 = score(doc=4931,freq=4.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.48018348 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes a typical traditional 1989 free text system and discusses developments in data storage, in search strategy and in the storage and retrieval of real time data. Outlines the following areas in which free text systems are likely to develop: standards; integration; dynamic data exchange; improved user interfaces; and better retrieval methods
-
Tenopir, C.; Ro, J.S.: Full text databases (1990)
0.01
0.011677254 = product of:
0.035031762 = sum of:
0.035031762 = weight(_text_:information in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035031762 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Information technology and libraries. 10(1991) S.156-157 (E. Kanter)
- Series
- New directions in information management; 21
