Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

Notess, G.R.: Tracking title search capabilities (2001) 0.02

0.019663153 = product of:
  0.039326306 = sum of:
    0.039326306 = product of:
      0.07865261 = sum of:
        0.07865261 = weight(_text_:5 in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07865261 = score(doc=558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.515852 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 5. 6.2001 11:36:02

Umstätter, W.: Freitext oder kontrolliertes Vokabular : was ist besser? (1983) 0.02

0.017205259 = product of:
  0.034410518 = sum of:
    0.034410518 = product of:
      0.068821035 = sum of:
        0.068821035 = weight(_text_:5 in 2035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068821035 = score(doc=2035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.45137048 = fieldWeight in 2035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: 5. Frühjahrstagung der DGD in Neu-Isenburg vom 26.-28. April 1983: Vorträge

Stegentritt, E.: EMIR: Multilinguales Freitextretrieval Projekt (1992) 0.01

0.014747365 = product of:
  0.02949473 = sum of:
    0.02949473 = product of:
      0.05898946 = sum of:
        0.05898946 = weight(_text_:5 in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05898946 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.38688898 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz

Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01

0.0141583625 = product of:
  0.028316725 = sum of:
    0.028316725 = product of:
      0.05663345 = sum of:
        0.05663345 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05663345 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 23. 1.1999 19:22:09

Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.01

0.0141583625 = product of:
  0.028316725 = sum of:
    0.028316725 = product of:
      0.05663345 = sum of:
        0.05663345 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05663345 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 7.2000 17:48:06

Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.01

0.0141583625 = product of:
  0.028316725 = sum of:
    0.028316725 = product of:
      0.05663345 = sum of:
        0.05663345 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05663345 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 14. 6.2001 12:22:31

Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.01

0.0141583625 = product of:
  0.028316725 = sum of:
    0.028316725 = product of:
      0.05663345 = sum of:
        0.05663345 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05663345 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197

Dow Jones unveils knowledge indexing system (1997) 0.01

0.013903949 = product of:
  0.027807899 = sum of:
    0.027807899 = product of:
      0.055615798 = sum of:
        0.055615798 = weight(_text_:5 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055615798 = score(doc=751,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.36476243 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 5. 9.1996 21:13:24
Source: Advanced technology libraries. 26(1997) no.5, S.2-3

Wildemuth, B.M.: Measures of success in searching a full-text fact base (1990) 0.01
```
0.012165956 = product of:
  0.024331912 = sum of:
    0.024331912 = product of:
      0.048663825 = sum of:
        0.048663825 = weight(_text_:5 in 2050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048663825 = score(doc=2050,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.31916714 = fieldWeight in 2050, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2050)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The traditional measures of online searching proficiency (recall and precision) are less appropriate when applied to the searching of full text databases. The pilot study investigated and evaluated 5 measures of overall success in searching a full text data bank. Data was drawn from INQUIRER searches conducted by medical students at North Carolina Univ. at Chapel Hill. INQUIRER ia an online database of facts and concepts in microbiology. The 5 measures were: success/failure; precision; search term overlap; number of search cycles; and time per search. Concludes that the last 4 measures look promising for the evaluation of fact data bases such as ENQUIRER

Shewale, N.G.: Information delivery of full-text databases in academic and research libraries using hypermedia (1998) 0.01

0.012165956 = product of:
  0.024331912 = sum of:
    0.024331912 = product of:
      0.048663825 = sum of:
        0.048663825 = weight(_text_:5 in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048663825 = score(doc=3566,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.31916714 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote: Paper presented at the 5th National Convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), at Bhubaneswar, 4-5 March 1998
Source: Information management in academic and research libraries: Proceedings of the 5th National convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), Bhubaneswar, India, 4-5 March 1998. Ed. by M. Mahapatra et al

Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.01

0.010618771 = product of:
  0.021237543 = sum of:
    0.021237543 = product of:
      0.042475086 = sum of:
        0.042475086 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042475086 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 9. 1.1996 10:22:31

Molto, M.: Improving full text search performance through textual analysis (1993) 0.01

0.009831577 = product of:
  0.019663153 = sum of:
    0.019663153 = product of:
      0.039326306 = sum of:
        0.039326306 = weight(_text_:5 in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039326306 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.257926 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.5, S.614-632

Baguhn, J.: Volltextretrieval : stürmische Entwicklungen (1995) 0.01

0.009831577 = product of:
  0.019663153 = sum of:
    0.019663153 = product of:
      0.039326306 = sum of:
        0.039326306 = weight(_text_:5 in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039326306 = score(doc=2329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.257926 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Cogito. 11(1995) H.5, S.62-63

Tenopir, C.: Full-text retrieval : systems and files (1994) 0.01

0.009831577 = product of:
  0.019663153 = sum of:
    0.019663153 = product of:
      0.039326306 = sum of:
        0.039326306 = weight(_text_:5 in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039326306 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.257926 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Advances in library automation and networking. Vol.5. Ed.: J.A. Hewitt and C.W. Bailey

Paijmans, H.: Gravity wells of meaning : detecting information rich passages in scientific texts (1997) 0.01

0.009831577 = product of:
  0.019663153 = sum of:
    0.019663153 = product of:
      0.039326306 = sum of:
        0.039326306 = weight(_text_:5 in 7444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039326306 = score(doc=7444,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.257926 = fieldWeight in 7444, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7444)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of documentation. 53(1997) no.5, S.520-536

Pritchard-Schoch, T.: Comparing natural language retrieval : Win & Freestyle (1995) 0.01

0.009831577 = product of:
  0.019663153 = sum of:
    0.019663153 = product of:
      0.039326306 = sum of:
        0.039326306 = weight(_text_:5 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039326306 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.257926 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 5. 1.1999 18:02:40

Rosemann, L.: ¬Die Volltextabfrage und das Alleinstellungsmerkmal des physischen Buches (2006) 0.01
```
0.005213981 = product of:
  0.010427962 = sum of:
    0.010427962 = product of:
      0.020855924 = sum of:
        0.020855924 = weight(_text_:5 in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020855924 = score(doc=5142,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.13678591 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Content

4. Vermutlich wird sich aufgrund der genannten Gründe der Buchservice Volltextsuche als heterogen darstellen: Einige Verlage werden gar nicht mitspielen, andere werden ein Buch im Vollzugriff, ein anderes nur zum Teil, ein drittes nur als Metainformation usw. indizieren lassen. Dies wird letztlich ebenfalls die Trefferqualität schmälern, da der Nutzer dann wiederum wissen muss, genau welche Informationen und Texte ihm bei seiner Suche vorenthalten werden. Das gedruckte Sachbuch wird gegen seinen eigenen digitalen Klon ein Alleinstellungsmerkmal brauchen, um weiterhin attraktiv zu sein. 5. Ein solches Alleinstellungsmerkmal würde m.E. maßgeblich durch die Erstellung von gedruckten Registern bereits in der Druckausgabe erreicht werden. Damit würde die Druckausgabe tatsächlich an Wert gewinnen und der Buchkäufer erhielte einen echten Mehrwert. Zum einen spiegelt sich bereits in der Erstellung konventioneller gedruckter Register die zweite digitale Revolution wider: Moderne Registererstellung basiert heutzutage ebenfalls auf der digitalen Verwertung des Volltextes. Zum anderen erfordert das "Registermachen" zugleich die Erbringung jener o.g. sachdienlichen Mehrinformationen wie Verweisungsbegriffe, vernünftige Klassifizierungen, nicht-redundante Begriffsauswahl etc., die nur begrenzt automatisierbar sind und Fachwissen erfordern. Erst diese beiden Komponenten lassen die Indexierung schlussendlich zu einer hochwertigen Aufbereitung sequentieller Information werden. 6. Genau diese Mehr- und Metainformationen, die die vorausgegangene Erstellung eines Print-Vollregisters geliefert hat, lassen sich dann in den Suchalgorithmus der Online-Suche zur Qualitätssteigerung der Treffer einrechnen."

Date

5. 7.2006 17:58:17
Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005) 0.00
```
0.0049157883 = product of:
  0.009831577 = sum of:
    0.009831577 = product of:
      0.019663153 = sum of:
        0.019663153 = weight(_text_:5 in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019663153 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052250203 = queryNorm
            0.128963 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Content

5: Interaktion 5.1 Frage-Antwort- bzw. Dialogsysteme: Forschungen und Projekte 5.2 Darstellung und Visualisierung von Wissen 5.3 Das Dialogsystem im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 5.4 Ergebnisdarstellung und Antwortpräsentation im LeWi-Kontext 6: Testumgebungen und -ergebnisse 7: Ergebnisse und Ausblick 7.1 Ausgangssituation 7.2 Schlussfolgerungen 7.3 Ausblick Anhang A Auszüge aus der Grob- bzw. Feinklassifikation des BMM Anhang B MPRO - Formale Beschreibung der wichtigsten Merkmale ... Anhang C Fragentypologie mit Beispielsätzen (Auszug) Anhang D Semantische Merkmale im morphologischen Lexikon (Auszug) Anhang E Regelbeispiele für die Fragentypzuweisung Anhang F Aufstellung der möglichen Suchen im LeWi-Dialogmodul (Auszug) Anhang G Vollständiger Dialogbaum zu Beginn des Projektes Anhang H Statuszustände zur Ermittlung der Folgefragen (Auszug)

Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects