-
Pepper, S.; Groenmo, G.O.: Towards a general theory of scope (2002)
0.05
0.054134816 = product of:
0.10826963 = sum of:
0.10826963 = product of:
0.21653926 = sum of:
0.21653926 = weight(_text_:maps in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21653926 = score(doc=539,freq=12.0), product of:
0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.7603764 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper is concerned with the issue of scope in topic maps. Topic maps are a form of knowledge representation suitable for solving a number of complex problems in the area of information management, ranging from findability (navigation and querying) to knowledge management and enterprise application integration (EAI). The topic map paradigm has its roots in efforts to understand the essential semantics of back-of-book indexes in order that they might be captured in a form suitable for computer processing. Once understood, the model of a back-of-book index was generalised in order to cover the needs of digital information, and extended to encompass glossaries and thesauri, as well as indexes. The resulting core model, of typed topics, associations, and occurrences, has many similarities with the semantic networks developed by the artificial intelligence community for representing knowledge structures. One key requirement of topic maps from the earliest days was to be able to merge indexes from disparate origins. This requirement accounts for two further concepts that greatly enhance the power of topic maps: subject identity and scope. This paper concentrates on scope, but also includes a brief discussion of the feature known as the topic naming constraint, with which it is closely related. It is based on the authors' experience in creating topic maps (in particular, the Italian Opera Topic Map, and in implementing processing systems for topic maps (in particular, the Ontopia Topic Map Engine and Navigator.
-
Bold, N.; Kim, W.-J.; Yang, J.-D.: Converting object-based thesauri into XML Topic Maps (2010)
0.05
0.045934916 = product of:
0.09186983 = sum of:
0.09186983 = product of:
0.18373966 = sum of:
0.18373966 = weight(_text_:maps in 4799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18373966 = score(doc=4799,freq=6.0), product of:
0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.6452008 = fieldWeight in 4799, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4799)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Constructing ontology is considerably time consuming process in general. Since there are a vast amount of thesauri currently available, it may be a feasible solution to exploit thesauri, when constructing ontology in a short period of time. This paper designs and implements a XTM (XML Topic Maps) code converter generating XTM coded ontology from an object based thesaurus. It is an extended thesaurus, which enriches the conventional thesauri with user defined associations, a notion of instances and occurrences associated with them. The reason we adopt XTM is that it is a verified and practical methodology to semantically reorganize the conceptual structure of extant web applications with minimal effort. Moreover, since XTM is conceptually similar to our object based thesauri, recommendation and inference mechanism already developed in our system could be easily applied to the generated XTM ontology. To show that the XTM ontology is correct, we also verify it with onto pia Omnigator and Vizigator, the components of Ontopia Knowledge Suite (OKS) tool.
- Object
- Topic maps
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021)
0.01
0.0137326745 = product of:
0.027465349 = sum of:
0.027465349 = product of:
0.054930698 = sum of:
0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054930698 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.01201609 = product of:
0.02403218 = sum of:
0.02403218 = product of:
0.04806436 = sum of:
0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04806436 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.01
0.010299506 = product of:
0.020599011 = sum of:
0.020599011 = product of:
0.041198023 = sum of:
0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041198023 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.010299506 = product of:
0.020599011 = sum of:
0.020599011 = product of:
0.041198023 = sum of:
0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041198023 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.010299506 = product of:
0.020599011 = sum of:
0.020599011 = product of:
0.041198023 = sum of:
0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041198023 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.01
0.008582922 = product of:
0.017165843 = sum of:
0.017165843 = product of:
0.034331687 = sum of:
0.034331687 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034331687 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
