Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.10 
    0.09923969 = product of:
  0.19847938 = sum of:
    0.13840169 = weight(_text_:objects in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13840169 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
    0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0600777 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  2. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.02 
    0.021456322 = product of:
  0.08582529 = sum of:
    0.08582529 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08582529 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  3. Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997) 0.02 
    0.017165057 = product of:
  0.06866023 = sum of:
    0.06866023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06866023 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1.10.2018 14:13:22
  4. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.01 
    0.012873792 = product of:
  0.05149517 = sum of:
    0.05149517 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05149517 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
  5. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01 
    0.012873792 = product of:
  0.05149517 = sum of:
    0.05149517 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05149517 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31

Authors

Themes