-
Zhang, M.; Zhou, G.D.; Aw, A.: Exploring syntactic structured features over parse trees for relation extraction using kernel methods (2008)
0.08
0.07843415 = product of:
0.1568683 = sum of:
0.1568683 = product of:
0.3137366 = sum of:
0.3137366 = weight(_text_:tree in 2055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3137366 = score(doc=2055,freq=14.0), product of:
0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.95810163 = fieldWeight in 2055, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2055)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Extracting semantic relationships between entities from text documents is challenging in information extraction and important for deep information processing and management. This paper proposes to use the convolution kernel over parse trees together with support vector machines to model syntactic structured information for relation extraction. Compared with linear kernels, tree kernels can effectively explore implicitly huge syntactic structured features embedded in a parse tree. Our study reveals that the syntactic structured features embedded in a parse tree are very effective in relation extraction and can be well captured by the convolution tree kernel. Evaluation on the ACE benchmark corpora shows that using the convolution tree kernel only can achieve comparable performance with previous best-reported feature-based methods. It also shows that our method significantly outperforms previous two dependency tree kernels for relation extraction. Moreover, this paper proposes a composite kernel for relation extraction by combining the convolution tree kernel with a simple linear kernel. Our study reveals that the composite kernel can effectively capture both flat and structured features without extensive feature engineering, and easily scale to include more features. Evaluation on the ACE benchmark corpora shows that the composite kernel outperforms previous best-reported methods in relation extraction.
-
Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Chen, H.: Kernel-based learning for biomedical relation extraction (2008)
0.07
0.07114877 = product of:
0.14229754 = sum of:
0.14229754 = product of:
0.28459507 = sum of:
0.28459507 = weight(_text_:tree in 1611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28459507 = score(doc=1611,freq=8.0), product of:
0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.8691081 = fieldWeight in 1611, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Relation extraction is the process of scanning text for relationships between named entities. Recently, significant studies have focused on automatically extracting relations from biomedical corpora. Most existing biomedical relation extractors require manual creation of biomedical lexicons or parsing templates based on domain knowledge. In this study, we propose to use kernel-based learning methods to automatically extract biomedical relations from literature text. We develop a framework of kernel-based learning for biomedical relation extraction. In particular, we modified the standard tree kernel function by incorporating a trace kernel to capture richer contextual information. In our experiments on a biomedical corpus, we compare different kernel functions for biomedical relation detection and classification. The experimental results show that a tree kernel outperforms word and sequence kernels for relation detection, our trace-tree kernel outperforms the standard tree kernel, and a composite kernel outperforms individual kernels for relation extraction.
-
Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.F.; Pan, Y.; Yu, Y.: Semplore: an IR approach to scalable hybrid query of Semantic Web data (2007)
0.03
0.029645318 = product of:
0.059290636 = sum of:
0.059290636 = product of:
0.11858127 = sum of:
0.11858127 = weight(_text_:tree in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11858127 = score(doc=231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.36212835 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As an extension to the current Web, Semantic Web will not only contain structured data with machine understandable semantics but also textual information. While structured queries can be used to find information more precisely on the Semantic Web, keyword searches are still needed to help exploit textual information. It thus becomes very important that we can combine precise structured queries with imprecise keyword searches to have a hybrid query capability. In addition, due to the huge volume of information on the Semantic Web, the hybrid query must be processed in a very scalable way. In this paper, we define such a hybrid query capability that combines unary tree-shaped structured queries with keyword searches. We show how existing information retrieval (IR) index structures and functions can be reused to index semantic web data and its textual information, and how the hybrid query is evaluated on the index structure using IR engines in an efficient and scalable manner. We implemented this IR approach in an engine called Semplore. Comprehensive experiments on its performance show that it is a promising approach. It leads us to believe that it may be possible to evolve current web search engines to query and search the Semantic Web. Finally, we briefy describe how Semplore is used for searching Wikipedia and an IBM customer's product information.
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.01
0.013536024 = product of:
0.027072048 = sum of:
0.027072048 = product of:
0.054144096 = sum of:
0.054144096 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054144096 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.01
0.011844021 = product of:
0.023688043 = sum of:
0.023688043 = product of:
0.047376085 = sum of:
0.047376085 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047376085 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005)
0.01
0.011844021 = product of:
0.023688043 = sum of:
0.023688043 = product of:
0.047376085 = sum of:
0.047376085 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047376085 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:58
-
Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006)
0.01
0.010152018 = product of:
0.020304035 = sum of:
0.020304035 = product of:
0.04060807 = sum of:
0.04060807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060807 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.01
0.010152018 = product of:
0.020304035 = sum of:
0.020304035 = product of:
0.04060807 = sum of:
0.04060807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060807 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009)
0.01
0.010152018 = product of:
0.020304035 = sum of:
0.020304035 = product of:
0.04060807 = sum of:
0.04060807 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060807 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.2010 12:35:22
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.01
0.010152018 = product of:
0.020304035 = sum of:
0.020304035 = product of:
0.04060807 = sum of:
0.04060807 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060807 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.010152018 = product of:
0.020304035 = sum of:
0.020304035 = product of:
0.04060807 = sum of:
0.04060807 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060807 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
-
Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008)
0.01
0.009571414 = product of:
0.019142829 = sum of:
0.019142829 = product of:
0.038285658 = sum of:
0.038285658 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038285658 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Dobrev, P.; Kalaydjiev, O.; Angelova, G.: From conceptual structures to semantic interoperability of content (2007)
0.01
0.008460015 = product of:
0.01692003 = sum of:
0.01692003 = product of:
0.03384006 = sum of:
0.03384006 = weight(_text_:22 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03384006 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: knowledge architectures for smart applications: 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2007, Sheffield, UK, July 22 - 27, 2007 ; proceedings. Eds.: U. Priss u.a
