Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Harbig, D.; Schneider, R.: Ontology Learning im Rahmen von MyShelf (2006) 0.00 
    0.0023661365 = product of:
  0.018929092 = sum of:
    0.018929092 = product of:
      0.07571637 = sum of:
        0.07571637 = weight(_text_:recherche in 5781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07571637 = score(doc=5781,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18062086 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.41920057 = fieldWeight in 5781, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5781)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Artikel befasst sich mit maschinellem Lernen von Ontologien. Es werden verschiedene Ansätze zum Ontology Learning vorgestellt. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Einsatz maschineller Lernalgorithmen zum automatischen Erwerb von Ontologien für das virtuelle Bibliotheksregal MyShelf. Dieses bietet Benutzern bei der Recherche durch Ontology Switching einen flexibleren Zugang zu Informationsbeständen. Basierend auf Textkorpora wurden Lerntechniken angewandt, um deren Potential für die Erstellung von Ontologien zu überprüfen.
  2. Griffiths, T.L.; Steyvers, M.: ¬A probabilistic approach to semantic representation (2002) 0.00 
    0.0021476443 = product of:
  0.017181154 = sum of:
    0.017181154 = product of:
      0.051543463 = sum of:
        0.051543463 = weight(_text_:29 in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051543463 = score(doc=3671,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 6.2015 14:55:01
    29. 6.2015 16:09:05
  3. Semenova, E.; Stricker, M.: ¬Eine Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen : Entwicklung eines Instrumentariums für die Wissenskommunikation (2007) 0.00 
    0.0016900975 = product of:
  0.01352078 = sum of:
    0.01352078 = product of:
      0.05408312 = sum of:
        0.05408312 = weight(_text_:recherche in 1889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05408312 = score(doc=1889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18062086 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.29942897 = fieldWeight in 1889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1889)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Interdisziplinarität als Kennzeichen des modernen Wissenschaftslebens setzt in Forschung und Lehre eine effiziente Wissenschaftskommunikation voraus, bei der sich die Partner über eine gemeinsame Sprache verständigen können. Klassifikationen und Thesauri übernehmen dabei eine wichtige Rolle. Zu beobachten ist, dass vorhandene Instrumente in ihrem Gefüge zu inflexibel sind, um die komplex ineinander verwobenen Felder der Wissenschaft in ihrer dynamischen Entwicklung adäquat abzubilden, zur (Selbst-)Verständigung über das Wesen und Struktur der Wissenschaftslandschaft sowie zum erfolgreichen Wissensaustausch beizutragen. Ontologien erschließen neue Wege zur Lösung dieser Aufgaben. In einigen Einzelwissenschaften und Teilgebieten ist diesbezüglich eine rege Tätigkeit zu beobachten, es fehlt allerdings noch ein fachübergreifendes Instrumentarium. Im Vortrag wird das von der DFG geförderte Projekt "Entwicklung einer Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen" vorgestellt. Es gilt, die oben beschriebene Lücke zu schließen und eine umfassende Ontologie für Erschließung, Recherche und Datenaustausch bei der Wissenschaftskommunikation zu erstellen. Diese Ontologie soll dazu beitragen, eine effiziente Wissenskommunikation, besonders bei interdisziplinären Projekten, zu unterstützen, verfügbare Ressourcen auffindbar zu machen und mögliche Knotenstellen künftiger Kooperationen zu verdeutlichen. Ausgehend von der Kritik an vorhandenen Instrumenten wird derzeit ein Begriffsmodell für die Beschreibung von Wissenschaftsdisziplinen, ihrer zentralen Facetten sowie ihrer interdisziplinären Beziehungen untereinander entwickelt. Das Modell, inspiriert vom Topic Maps Paradigma, basiert auf einer überschaubaren Menge zentraler Konzepte sowie prinzipiell inverser Beziehungen. Eine entsprechende Ontologie wird in unterschiedlichen (technischen) Beschreibungsformaten formuliert werden können. Dies bildet den Grundstein für den Fokus des Projekts, flexible, verteilte, benutzer- wie pflegefreundliche technische Umsetzungen zu entwickeln und mit Kooperationspartnern zu implementieren.
  4. Mustafa El Hadi, W.: Terminologies, ontologies and information access (2006) 0.00 
    0.0015186139 = product of:
  0.012148911 = sum of:
    0.012148911 = product of:
      0.03644673 = sum of:
        0.03644673 = weight(_text_:29 in 1488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03644673 = score(doc=1488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1488)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 2.2008 16:25:23
  5. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.00 
    0.0015049529 = product of:
  0.012039623 = sum of:
    0.012039623 = product of:
      0.03611887 = sum of:
        0.03611887 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03611887 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  6. Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004) 0.00 
    0.0013287871 = product of:
  0.010630297 = sum of:
    0.010630297 = product of:
      0.031890888 = sum of:
        0.031890888 = weight(_text_:29 in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031890888 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
  7. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.00 
    0.0013168338 = product of:
  0.01053467 = sum of:
    0.01053467 = product of:
      0.03160401 = sum of:
        0.03160401 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03160401 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
  8. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005) 0.00 
    0.0013168338 = product of:
  0.01053467 = sum of:
    0.01053467 = product of:
      0.03160401 = sum of:
        0.03160401 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03160401 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:58
  9. Fischer, D.H.: ¬Ein Lehrbeispiel für eine Ontologie : OpenCyc (2004) 0.00 
    0.0011830683 = product of:
  0.009464546 = sum of:
    0.009464546 = product of:
      0.037858184 = sum of:
        0.037858184 = weight(_text_:recherche in 4568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037858184 = score(doc=4568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18062086 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.20960028 = fieldWeight in 4568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4568)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    Wer über Ontologien und Ontologiesysteme spricht, sollte auch das System OpenCyc kennen. Aber was heißt hier "kennen"? Ich habe mich als Leser und experimentierender Benutzer mit diesem System intensiver befasst und unter einer Reihe von spezielleren Fragen an das System meine Erfahrungen in einigen Arbeitspapieren protokolliert. Sie sind über das Internet zugänglich'. Hier möchte ich der allgemeinen Orientierung über OpenCyc dienende Anmerkungen dazugeben. Bereits eine Recherche mit der Suchmaschine Google, den Suchworten "Cyc OpenCyc" und Beschränkung der Quellen auf Sprache Deutsch oder Herkunft Deutschland erbringt einige der auch hier wiedergegebenen vordergründigen Informationen, sie zeigt aber auch, dass sich Professoren oder Studenten im Jahr 2003 z.B. in Ulm, Heidelberg, Berlin, Bamberg, Bonn und Darmstadt mit dem Thema Cyc und OpenCyc beschäftigt haben entsprechend meiner Titelthese.
  10. Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004) 0.00 
    0.0011389605 = product of:
  0.009111684 = sum of:
    0.009111684 = product of:
      0.02733505 = sum of:
        0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02733505 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
  11. Vallet, D.; Fernández, M.; Castells, P.: ¬An ontology-based information retrieval model (2005) 0.00 
    0.0011389605 = product of:
  0.009111684 = sum of:
    0.009111684 = product of:
      0.02733505 = sum of:
        0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 4708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02733505 = score(doc=4708,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4708, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4708)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    The Semantic Web: research and applications ; second European Semantic WebConference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29 - June 1, 2005 ; proceedings. Eds.: A. Gómez-Pérez u. J. Euzenat
  12. Matuszek, C.; Cabral, J.; Witbrock, M.; DeOliveira, J.: ¬An introduction to the syntax and content of Cyc (2006) 0.00 
    0.0011389605 = product of:
  0.009111684 = sum of:
    0.009111684 = product of:
      0.02733505 = sum of:
        0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 4605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02733505 = score(doc=4605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4605)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Formalizing and compiling background knowledge and its applications to knowledge representation and question answering : papers from the AAAI spring symposium ; [March 27 - 29, 2006, Stanford, California] / Chitta Baral, chair
  13. Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006) 0.00 
    0.0011287146 = product of:
  0.009029717 = sum of:
    0.009029717 = product of:
      0.02708915 = sum of:
        0.02708915 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02708915 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  14. Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008) 0.00 
    0.0011287146 = product of:
  0.009029717 = sum of:
    0.009029717 = product of:
      0.02708915 = sum of:
        0.02708915 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02708915 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  15. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.00 
    0.0011287146 = product of:
  0.009029717 = sum of:
    0.009029717 = product of:
      0.02708915 = sum of:
        0.02708915 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02708915 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  16. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.00 
    0.0011287146 = product of:
  0.009029717 = sum of:
    0.009029717 = product of:
      0.02708915 = sum of:
        0.02708915 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02708915 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  17. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.00 
    0.0011287146 = product of:
  0.009029717 = sum of:
    0.009029717 = product of:
      0.02708915 = sum of:
        0.02708915 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02708915 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
  18. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.00 
    0.0010641625 = product of:
  0.0085133 = sum of:
    0.0085133 = product of:
      0.025539897 = sum of:
        0.025539897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025539897 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  19. Calegari, S.; Sanchez, E.: Object-fuzzy concept network : an enrichment of ontologies in semantic information retrieval (2008) 0.00 
    9.4913365E-4 = product of:
  0.007593069 = sum of:
    0.007593069 = product of:
      0.022779208 = sum of:
        0.022779208 = weight(_text_:29 in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022779208 = score(doc=2393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    9.11.2008 13:07:29
  20. McGuinness, D.L.: Ontologies come of age (2003) 0.00 
    9.4913365E-4 = product of:
  0.007593069 = sum of:
    0.007593069 = product of:
      0.022779208 = sum of:
        0.022779208 = weight(_text_:29 in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022779208 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49

Authors

Languages

  • e 17
  • d 4

Themes