-
Pankowski, T.: Ontological databases with faceted queries (2022)
0.03
0.031629387 = product of:
0.063258775 = sum of:
0.063258775 = product of:
0.12651755 = sum of:
0.12651755 = weight(_text_:class in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12651755 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.44173864 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The success of the use of ontology-based systems depends on efficient and user-friendly methods of formulating queries against the ontology. We propose a method to query a class of ontologies, called facet ontologies ( fac-ontologies ), using a faceted human-oriented approach. A fac-ontology has two important features: (a) a hierarchical view of it can be defined as a nested facet over this ontology and the view can be used as a faceted interface to create queries and to explore the ontology; (b) the ontology can be converted into an ontological database , the ABox of which is stored in a database, and the faceted queries are evaluated against this database. We show that the proposed faceted interface makes it possible to formulate queries that are semantically equivalent to $${\mathcal {SROIQ}}^{Fac}$$ SROIQ Fac , a limited version of the $${\mathcal {SROIQ}}$$ SROIQ description logic. The TBox of a fac-ontology is divided into a set of rules defining intensional predicates and a set of constraint rules to be satisfied by the database. We identify a class of so-called reflexive weak cycles in a set of constraint rules and propose a method to deal with them in the chase procedure. The considerations are illustrated with solutions implemented in the DAFO system ( data access based on faceted queries over ontologies ).
-
Hoekstra, R.: BestMap: context-aware SKOS vocabulary mappings in OWL 2 (2009)
0.03
0.031311493 = product of:
0.06262299 = sum of:
0.06262299 = product of:
0.12524597 = sum of:
0.12524597 = weight(_text_:class in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12524597 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.43729892 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes an approach to SKOS vocabulary mapping that takes into account the context in which vocabulary terms are used in annotations. The standard vocabulary mapping properties in SKOS only allow for binary mappings between concepts. In the BestMap ontology, annotated resources are the contexts in which annotations coincide and allow for a more fine grained control over when mappings hold. A mapping between two vocabularies is defined as a class that groups descriptions of a resource. We use the OWL 2 features for property chains, disjoint properties, union, intersection and negation together with careful use of equivalence and subsumption to specify these mappings.
-
Assem, M. van; Gangemi, A.; Schreiber, G.: Conversion of WordNet to a standard RDF/OWL representation (2006)
0.03
0.026838424 = product of:
0.053676847 = sum of:
0.053676847 = product of:
0.107353695 = sum of:
0.107353695 = weight(_text_:class in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107353695 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.37482765 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an overview of the work in progress at the W3C to produce a standard conversion of WordNet to the RDF/OWL representation language in use in the SemanticWeb community. Such a standard representation is useful to provide application developers a high-quality resource and to promote interoperability. Important requirements in this conversion process are that it should be complete and should stay close to WordNet's conceptual model. The paper explains the steps taken to produce the conversion and details design decisions such as the composition of the class hierarchy and properties, the addition of suitable OWL semantics and the chosen format of the URIs. Additional topics include a strategy to incorporate OWL and RDFS semantics in one schema such that both RDF(S) infrastructure and OWL infrastructure can interpret the information correctly, problems encountered in understanding the Prolog source files and the description of the two versions that are provided (Basic and Full) to accommodate different usages of WordNet.
-
Putkey, T.: Using SKOS to express faceted classification on the Semantic Web (2011)
0.03
0.02530351 = product of:
0.05060702 = sum of:
0.05060702 = product of:
0.10121404 = sum of:
0.10121404 = weight(_text_:class in 311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10121404 = score(doc=311,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.3533909 = fieldWeight in 311, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=311)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Methodology Based on information from research papers, more research was done on SKOS and examples of SKOS and shared faceted classifications in the Semantic Web and about SKOS and how to express SKOS in RDF/XML. Once confident with these ideas, the author used a faceted taxonomy created in a Vocabulary Design class and encoded it using SKOS. Instead of writing RDF in a program such as Notepad, a thesaurus tool was used to create the taxonomy according to SKOS standards and then export the thesaurus in RDF/XML format. These processes and tools are then analyzed. Results The initial statement of the problem was simply an extension of the survey paper done earlier in this class. To continue on with the research, more research was done into SKOS - a standard for expressing thesauri, taxonomies and faceted classifications so they can be shared on the semantic web.
-
Frické, M.: Logical division (2016)
0.02
0.022365354 = product of:
0.044730708 = sum of:
0.044730708 = product of:
0.089461416 = sum of:
0.089461416 = weight(_text_:class in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089461416 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.31235638 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Division is obviously important to Knowledge Organization. Typically, an organizational infrastructure might acknowledge three types of connecting relationships: class hierarchies, where some classes are subclasses of others, partitive hierarchies, where some items are parts of others, and instantiation, where some items are members of some classes (see Z39.19 ANSI/NISO 2005 as an example). The first two of these involve division (the third, instantiation, does not involve division). Logical division would usually be a part of hierarchical classification systems, which, in turn, are central to shelving in libraries, to subject classification schemes, to controlled vocabularies, and to thesauri. Partitive hierarchies, and partitive division, are often essential to controlled vocabularies, thesauri, and subject tagging systems. Partitive hierarchies also relate to the bearers of information; for example, a journal would typically have its component articles as parts and, in turn, they might have sections as their parts, and, of course, components might be arrived at by partitive division (see Tillett 2009 as an illustration). Finally, verbal division, disambiguating homographs, is basic to controlled vocabularies. Thus Division is a broad and relevant topic. This article, though, is going to focus on Logical Division.
-
Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017)
0.02
0.017157149 = product of:
0.034314297 = sum of:
0.034314297 = product of:
0.068628594 = sum of:
0.068628594 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068628594 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13.12.2017 14:17:22
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.02
0.017157149 = product of:
0.034314297 = sum of:
0.034314297 = product of:
0.068628594 = sum of:
0.068628594 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068628594 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Miles, A.; Matthews, B.; Beckett, D.; Brickley, D.; Wilson, M.; Rogers, N.: SKOS: A language to describe simple knowledge structures for the web (2005)
0.02
0.015655747 = product of:
0.031311493 = sum of:
0.031311493 = product of:
0.06262299 = sum of:
0.06262299 = weight(_text_:class in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06262299 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.21864946 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- This type of effort is common in the digital library community, where a group of experts will interact with a user community to create a thesaurus for a specific domain (e.g. the Art & Architecture Thesaurus AAT AAT) or an overarching classification scheme (e.g. the Dewey Decimal Classification). A similar type of activity is being undertaken more recently in a less centralised manner by web communities, producing for example the DMOZ web directory DMOZ, or the Topic Exchange for weblog topics Topic Exchange. The web, including the semantic web, provides a medium within which communities can interact and collaboratively build and use vocabularies of concepts. A simple language is required that allows these communities to express the structure and content of their vocabularies in a machine-understandable way, enabling exchange and reuse. The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is an ideal language for making statements about web resources and publishing metadata. However, RDF provides only the low level semantics required to form metadata statements. RDF vocabularies must be built on top of RDF to support the expression of more specific types of information within metadata. Ontology languages such as OWL OWL add a layer of expressive power to RDF, and provide powerful tools for defining complex conceptual structures, which can be used to generate rich metadata. However, the class-oriented, logically precise modelling required to construct useful web ontologies is demanding in terms of expertise, effort, and therefore cost. In many cases this type of modelling may be superfluous or unsuited to requirements. Therefore there is a need for a language for expressing vocabularies of concepts for use in semantically rich metadata, that is powerful enough to support semantically enhanced search, but simple enough to be undemanding in terms of the cost and expertise required to use it."
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.013725719 = product of:
0.027451439 = sum of:
0.027451439 = product of:
0.054902878 = sum of:
0.054902878 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054902878 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021)
0.01
0.013725719 = product of:
0.027451439 = sum of:
0.027451439 = product of:
0.054902878 = sum of:
0.054902878 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054902878 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005)
0.01
0.012010004 = product of:
0.024020009 = sum of:
0.024020009 = product of:
0.048040017 = sum of:
0.048040017 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048040017 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:25
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.01
0.012010004 = product of:
0.024020009 = sum of:
0.024020009 = product of:
0.048040017 = sum of:
0.048040017 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048040017 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.012010004 = product of:
0.024020009 = sum of:
0.024020009 = product of:
0.048040017 = sum of:
0.048040017 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048040017 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (2003)
0.01
0.010294289 = product of:
0.020588579 = sum of:
0.020588579 = product of:
0.041177157 = sum of:
0.041177157 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041177157 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 8.2010 14:22:28
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.01
0.010294289 = product of:
0.020588579 = sum of:
0.020588579 = product of:
0.041177157 = sum of:
0.041177157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041177157 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.01
0.010294289 = product of:
0.020588579 = sum of:
0.020588579 = product of:
0.041177157 = sum of:
0.041177157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041177157 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.010294289 = product of:
0.020588579 = sum of:
0.020588579 = product of:
0.041177157 = sum of:
0.041177157 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041177157 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.010294289 = product of:
0.020588579 = sum of:
0.020588579 = product of:
0.041177157 = sum of:
0.041177157 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041177157 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.01
0.008578574 = product of:
0.017157149 = sum of:
0.017157149 = product of:
0.034314297 = sum of:
0.034314297 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034314297 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
