Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × type_ss:"x"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.04
    0.03778407 = sum of:
      0.03658085 = product of:
        0.1463234 = sum of:
          0.1463234 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1463234 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.39053032 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.001203219 = product of:
        0.002406438 = sum of:
          0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.002406438 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
    Pages
    iii, 82 S
  2. Kiren, T.: ¬A clustering based indexing technique of modularized ontologies for information retrieval (2017) 0.01
    0.0136852665 = product of:
      0.027370533 = sum of:
        0.027370533 = sum of:
          0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.002406438 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
          0.024964094 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024964094 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Pages
    ix, 74 S
  3. Kara, S.: ¬An ontology-based retrieval system using semantic indexing (2012) 0.00
    0.0015630275 = product of:
      0.003126055 = sum of:
        0.003126055 = product of:
          0.00625211 = sum of:
            0.00625211 = weight(_text_:s in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00625211 = score(doc=3829,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of science in Computer Engineering (XII, 57 S.)
    Source
    Information Systems. 37(2012) no. 4, S.294-305
  4. Seidlmayer, E.: ¬An ontology of digital objects in philosophy : an approach for practical use in research (2018) 0.00
    0.0014889077 = product of:
      0.0029778155 = sum of:
        0.0029778155 = product of:
          0.005955631 = sum of:
            0.005955631 = weight(_text_:s in 5496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005955631 = score(doc=5496,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 5496, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5496)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Master thesis Library and Information Science, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Technische Hochschule Köln. Schön auch: Bei Google Scholar unter 'Eva, S.' nachgewiesen.
    Pages
    64 S
  5. Beßler, S.: Wissensrepräsentation musealer Bestände mittels semantischer Netze : Analyse und Annotation eines Teilbestands des Haus der Geschichte der BRD in Bonn (2010) 0.00
    0.0012762066 = product of:
      0.0025524131 = sum of:
        0.0025524131 = product of:
          0.0051048263 = sum of:
            0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051048263 = score(doc=4024,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    X, 54 S
  6. Dietiker, S.: Cognitive Map einer Bibliothek : eine Überprüfung der Methodentauglichkeit im Bereich Bibliothekswissenschaft - am Beispiel der Kantonsbibliothek Graubünden (2016) 0.00
    0.0010635054 = product of:
      0.0021270108 = sum of:
        0.0021270108 = product of:
          0.0042540217 = sum of:
            0.0042540217 = weight(_text_:s in 4570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042540217 = score(doc=4570,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4570, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4570)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    108 S
  7. Ehlen, D.: Semantic Wiki : Konzeption eines Semantic MediaWiki für das Reallexikon zur Deutschen Kunstgeschichte (2010) 0.00
    0.0010528166 = product of:
      0.0021056333 = sum of:
        0.0021056333 = product of:
          0.0042112665 = sum of:
            0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042112665 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    59 S
  8. Brumm, A.: Modellierung eines Informationssystems zum Bühnentanz als semantisches Wiki (2010) 0.00
    0.0010528166 = product of:
      0.0021056333 = sum of:
        0.0021056333 = product of:
          0.0042112665 = sum of:
            0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042112665 = score(doc=4025,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    75 S
  9. Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013) 0.00
    0.0010528166 = product of:
      0.0021056333 = sum of:
        0.0021056333 = product of:
          0.0042112665 = sum of:
            0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042112665 = score(doc=1077,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
    Pages
    243 S
  10. Martins, S. de Castro: Modelo conceitual de ecossistema semântico de informações corporativas para aplicação em objetos multimídia (2019) 0.00
    8.508044E-4 = product of:
      0.0017016088 = sum of:
        0.0017016088 = product of:
          0.0034032175 = sum of:
            0.0034032175 = weight(_text_:s in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034032175 = score(doc=117,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    276 S
  11. Meyer, A.: Begriffsrelationen im Kategoriensystem der Wikipedia : Entwicklung eines Relationeninventars zur kollaborativen Anwendung (2010) 0.00
    7.520119E-4 = product of:
      0.0015040238 = sum of:
        0.0015040238 = product of:
          0.0030080476 = sum of:
            0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0030080476 = score(doc=4429,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    103 S
  12. Pfeiffer, S.: Entwicklung einer Ontologie für die wissensbasierte Erschließung des ISDC-Repository und die Visualisierung kontextrelevanter semantischer Zusammenhänge (2010) 0.00
    7.4445386E-4 = product of:
      0.0014889077 = sum of:
        0.0014889077 = product of:
          0.0029778155 = sum of:
            0.0029778155 = weight(_text_:s in 4658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029778155 = score(doc=4658,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.059458308 = fieldWeight in 4658, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    XXIII, 85 S
  13. Ziemba, L.: Information retrieval with concept discovery in digital collections for agriculture and natural resources (2011) 0.00
    6.016095E-4 = product of:
      0.001203219 = sum of:
        0.001203219 = product of:
          0.002406438 = sum of:
            0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 4728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002406438 = score(doc=4728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 4728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    172 S
  14. Castellanos Ardila, J.P.: Investigation of an OSLC-domain targeting ISO 26262 : focus on the left side of the software V-model (2016) 0.00
    6.016095E-4 = product of:
      0.001203219 = sum of:
        0.001203219 = product of:
          0.002406438 = sum of:
            0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002406438 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    92 S
  15. Sebastian, Y.: Literature-based discovery by learning heterogeneous bibliographic information networks (2017) 0.00
    6.016095E-4 = product of:
      0.001203219 = sum of:
        0.001203219 = product of:
          0.002406438 = sum of:
            0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002406438 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    xix, 215 S
  16. Hannech, A.: Système de recherche d'information étendue basé sur une projection multi-espaces (2018) 0.00
    4.254022E-4 = product of:
      8.508044E-4 = sum of:
        8.508044E-4 = product of:
          0.0017016088 = sum of:
            0.0017016088 = weight(_text_:s in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0017016088 = score(doc=4472,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.033976175 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Since its appearance in the early 90's, the World Wide Web (WWW or Web) has provided universal access to knowledge and the world of information has been primarily witness to a great revolution (the digital revolution). It quickly became very popular, making it the largest and most comprehensive database and knowledge base thanks to the amount and diversity of data it contains. However, the considerable increase and evolution of these data raises important problems for users, in particular for accessing the documents most relevant to their search queries. In order to cope with this exponential explosion of data volume and facilitate their access by users, various models are offered by information retrieval systems (IRS) for the representation and retrieval of web documents. Traditional SRIs use simple keywords that are not semantically linked to index and retrieve these documents. This creates limitations in terms of the relevance and ease of exploration of results. To overcome these limitations, existing techniques enrich documents by integrating external keywords from different sources. However, these systems still suffer from limitations that are related to the exploitation techniques of these sources of enrichment. When the different sources are used so that they cannot be distinguished by the system, this limits the flexibility of the exploration models that can be applied to the results returned by this system. Users then feel lost to these results, and find themselves forced to filter them manually to select the relevant information. If they want to go further, they must reformulate and target their search queries even more until they reach the documents that best meet their expectations. In this way, even if the systems manage to find more relevant results, their presentation remains problematic. In order to target research to more user-specific information needs and improve the relevance and exploration of its research findings, advanced SRIs adopt different data personalization techniques that assume that current research of user is directly related to his profile and / or previous browsing / search experiences.
    Pages
    351 S