Search (51 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.06 
    0.06120594 = product of:
  0.09180891 = sum of:
    0.06227356 = weight(_text_:p in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06227356 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
    0.029535348 = product of:
      0.059070695 = sum of:
        0.059070695 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059070695 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  2. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.03 
    0.03060297 = product of:
  0.045904454 = sum of:
    0.03113678 = weight(_text_:p in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03113678 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
    0.014767674 = product of:
      0.029535348 = sum of:
        0.029535348 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029535348 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01
  3. Hannech, A.: Système de recherche d'information étendue basé sur une projection multi-espaces (2018) 0.02 
    0.02492208 = product of:
  0.07476624 = sum of:
    0.07476624 = product of:
      0.14953248 = sum of:
        0.14953248 = weight(_text_:le in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14953248 = score(doc=4472,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.28605723 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.52273625 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Depuis son apparition au début des années 90, le World Wide Web (WWW ou Web) a offert un accès universel aux connaissances et le monde de l'information a été principalement témoin d'une grande révolution (la révolution numérique). Il est devenu rapidement très populaire, ce qui a fait de lui la plus grande et vaste base de données et de connaissances existantes grâce à la quantité et la diversité des données qu'il contient. Cependant, l'augmentation et l'évolution considérables de ces données soulèvent d'importants problèmes pour les utilisateurs notamment pour l'accès aux documents les plus pertinents à leurs requêtes de recherche. Afin de faire face à cette explosion exponentielle du volume de données et faciliter leur accès par les utilisateurs, différents modèles sont proposés par les systèmes de recherche d'information (SRIs) pour la représentation et la recherche des documents web. Les SRIs traditionnels utilisent, pour indexer et récupérer ces documents, des mots-clés simples qui ne sont pas sémantiquement liés. Cela engendre des limites en termes de la pertinence et de la facilité d'exploration des résultats. Pour surmonter ces limites, les techniques existantes enrichissent les documents en intégrant des mots-clés externes provenant de différentes sources. Cependant, ces systèmes souffrent encore de limitations qui sont liées aux techniques d'exploitation de ces sources d'enrichissement. Lorsque les différentes sources sont utilisées de telle sorte qu'elles ne peuvent être distinguées par le système, cela limite la flexibilité des modèles d'exploration qui peuvent être appliqués aux résultats de recherche retournés par ce système. Les utilisateurs se sentent alors perdus devant ces résultats, et se retrouvent dans l'obligation de les filtrer manuellement pour sélectionner l'information pertinente. S'ils veulent aller plus loin, ils doivent reformuler et cibler encore plus leurs requêtes de recherche jusqu'à parvenir aux documents qui répondent le mieux à leurs attentes. De cette façon, même si les systèmes parviennent à retrouver davantage des résultats pertinents, leur présentation reste problématique. Afin de cibler la recherche à des besoins d'information plus spécifiques de l'utilisateur et améliorer la pertinence et l'exploration de ses résultats de recherche, les SRIs avancés adoptent différentes techniques de personnalisation de données qui supposent que la recherche actuelle d'un utilisateur est directement liée à son profil et/ou à ses expériences de navigation/recherche antérieures. Cependant, cette hypothèse ne tient pas dans tous les cas, les besoins de l'utilisateur évoluent au fil du temps et peuvent s'éloigner de ses intérêts antérieurs stockés dans son profil.
    Dans d'autres cas, le profil de l'utilisateur peut être mal exploité pour extraire ou inférer ses nouveaux besoins en information. Ce problème est beaucoup plus accentué avec les requêtes ambigües. Lorsque plusieurs centres d'intérêt auxquels est liée une requête ambiguë sont identifiés dans le profil de l'utilisateur, le système se voit incapable de sélectionner les données pertinentes depuis ce profil pour répondre à la requête. Ceci a un impact direct sur la qualité des résultats fournis à cet utilisateur. Afin de remédier à quelques-unes de ces limitations, nous nous sommes intéressés dans ce cadre de cette thèse de recherche au développement de techniques destinées principalement à l'amélioration de la pertinence des résultats des SRIs actuels et à faciliter l'exploration de grandes collections de documents. Pour ce faire, nous proposons une solution basée sur un nouveau concept d'indexation et de recherche d'information appelé la projection multi-espaces. Cette proposition repose sur l'exploitation de différentes catégories d'information sémantiques et sociales qui permettent d'enrichir l'univers de représentation des documents et des requêtes de recherche en plusieurs dimensions d'interprétations. L'originalité de cette représentation est de pouvoir distinguer entre les différentes interprétations utilisées pour la description et la recherche des documents. Ceci donne une meilleure visibilité sur les résultats retournés et aide à apporter une meilleure flexibilité de recherche et d'exploration, en donnant à l'utilisateur la possibilité de naviguer une ou plusieurs vues de données qui l'intéressent le plus. En outre, les univers multidimensionnels de représentation proposés pour la description des documents et l'interprétation des requêtes de recherche aident à améliorer la pertinence des résultats de l'utilisateur en offrant une diversité de recherche/exploration qui aide à répondre à ses différents besoins et à ceux des autres différents utilisateurs. Cette étude exploite différents aspects liés à la recherche personnalisée et vise à résoudre les problèmes engendrés par l'évolution des besoins en information de l'utilisateur. Ainsi, lorsque le profil de cet utilisateur est utilisé par notre système, une technique est proposée et employée pour identifier les intérêts les plus représentatifs de ses besoins actuels dans son profil. Cette technique se base sur la combinaison de trois facteurs influents, notamment le facteur contextuel, fréquentiel et temporel des données. La capacité des utilisateurs à interagir, à échanger des idées et d'opinions, et à former des réseaux sociaux sur le Web, a amené les systèmes à s'intéresser aux types d'interactions de ces utilisateurs, au niveau d'interaction entre eux ainsi qu'à leurs rôles sociaux dans le système. Ces informations sociales sont abordées et intégrées dans ce travail de recherche. L'impact et la manière de leur intégration dans le processus de RI sont étudiés pour améliorer la pertinence des résultats.
  4. Hitzler, P.; Janowicz, K.: Ontologies in a data driven world : finding the middle ground (2013) 0.02 
    0.024909422 = product of:
  0.074728265 = sum of:
    0.074728265 = weight(_text_:p in 803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074728265 = score(doc=803,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 803, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=803)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  5. Stuart, D.: Practical ontologies for information professionals (2016) 0.02 
    0.019222042 = product of:
  0.057666123 = sum of:
    0.057666123 = weight(_text_:p in 5152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057666123 = score(doc=5152,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.3678603 = fieldWeight in 5152, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5152)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    C H A P T E R 1 What is an ontology?; Introduction; The data deluge and information overload; Defining terms; Knowledge organization systems and ontologies; Ontologies, metadata and linked data; What can an ontology do?; Ontologies and information professionals; Alternatives to ontologies; The aims of this book; The structure of this book; C H A P T E R 2 Ontologies and the semantic web; Introduction; The semantic web and linked data; Resource Description Framework (RDF); Classes, subclasses and properties; The semantic web stack; Embedded RDF; Alternative semantic visionsLibraries and the semantic web; Other cultural heritage institutions and the semantic web; Other organizations and the semantic web; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 3 Existing ontologies; Introduction; Ontology documentation; Ontologies for representing ontologies; Ontologies for libraries; Upper ontologies; Cultural heritage data models; Ontologies for the web; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 4 Adopting ontologies; Introduction; Reusing ontologies: application profiles and data models; Identifying ontologies; The ideal ontology discovery tool; Selection criteria; Conclusion C H A P T E R 5 Building ontologiesIntroduction; Approaches to building an ontology; The twelve steps; Ontology development example: Bibliometric Metrics Ontology element set; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 6 Interrogating ontologies; Introduction; Interrogating ontologies for reuse; Interrogating a knowledge base; Understanding ontology use; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 7 The future of ontologies and the information professional; Introduction; The future of ontologies for knowledge discovery; The future role of library and information professionals; The practical development of ontologies
  6. Muljarto, A.-R.; Salmon, J.-M.; Neveu, P.; Charnomordic, B.; Buche, P.: Ontology-based model for food transformation processes : application to winemaking (2014) 0.02 
    0.017613623 = product of:
  0.052840866 = sum of:
    0.052840866 = weight(_text_:p in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052840866 = score(doc=1594,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  7. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.02 
    0.017311713 = product of:
  0.051935136 = sum of:
    0.051935136 = product of:
      0.20774055 = sum of:
        0.20774055 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20774055 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36963323 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  8. Bauckhage, C.: Moderne Textanalyse : neues Wissen für intelligente Lösungen (2016) 0.02 
    0.016606282 = product of:
  0.049818847 = sum of:
    0.049818847 = weight(_text_:p in 2568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049818847 = score(doc=2568,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 2568, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2568)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Type
    p
  9. Helbig, H.: Knowledge representation and the semantics of natural language (2014) 0.01 
    0.014678019 = product of:
  0.044034056 = sum of:
    0.044034056 = weight(_text_:p in 2396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044034056 = score(doc=2396,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.28089944 = fieldWeight in 2396, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2396)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Classification
    P
    LCC
    P
  10. Hunger, M.; Neubauer, P.: ¬Die vernetzte Welt : Abfragesprachen für Graphendatenbanken (2013) 0.01 
    0.012454711 = product of:
  0.037364133 = sum of:
    0.037364133 = weight(_text_:p in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037364133 = score(doc=1101,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  11. Wunner, T.; Buitelaar, P.; O'Riain, S.: Semantic, terminological and linguistic interpretation of XBRL (2010) 0.01 
    0.012454711 = product of:
  0.037364133 = sum of:
    0.037364133 = weight(_text_:p in 1122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037364133 = score(doc=1122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1122)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  12. Mohr, J.W.; Bogdanov, P.: Topic models : what they are and why they matter (2013) 0.01 
    0.012454711 = product of:
  0.037364133 = sum of:
    0.037364133 = weight(_text_:p in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037364133 = score(doc=1142,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  13. Amarger, F.; Chanet, J.-P.; Haemmerlé, O.; Hernandez, N.; Roussey, C.: SKOS sources transformations for ontology engineering : agronomical taxonomy use case (2014) 0.01 
    0.012454711 = product of:
  0.037364133 = sum of:
    0.037364133 = weight(_text_:p in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037364133 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  14. Buizza, G.: Subject analysis and indexing : an "Italian version" of the analytico-synthetic model (2011) 0.01 
    0.012454711 = product of:
  0.037364133 = sum of:
    0.037364133 = weight(_text_:p in 1812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037364133 = score(doc=1812,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1812, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1812)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
  15. Fernández, M.; Cantador, I.; López, V.; Vallet, D.; Castells, P.; Motta, E.: Semantically enhanced Information Retrieval : an ontology-based approach (2011) 0.01 
    0.011742415 = product of:
  0.035227243 = sum of:
    0.035227243 = weight(_text_:p in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035227243 = score(doc=230,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Currently, techniques for content description and query processing in Information Retrieval (IR) are based on keywords, and therefore provide limited capabilities to capture the conceptualizations associated with user needs and contents. Aiming to solve the limitations of keyword-based models, the idea of conceptual search, understood as searching by meanings rather than literal strings, has been the focus of a wide body of research in the IR field. More recently, it has been used as a prototypical scenario (or even envisioned as a potential "killer app") in the Semantic Web (SW) vision, since its emergence in the late nineties. However, current approaches to semantic search developed in the SW area have not yet taken full advantage of the acquired knowledge, accumulated experience, and technological sophistication achieved through several decades of work in the IR field. Starting from this position, this work investigates the definition of an ontology-based IR model, oriented to the exploitation of domain Knowledge Bases to support semantic search capabilities in large document repositories, stressing on the one hand the use of fully fledged ontologies in the semantic-based perspective, and on the other hand the consideration of unstructured content as the target search space. The major contribution of this work is an innovative, comprehensive semantic search model, which extends the classic IR model, addresses the challenges of the massive and heterogeneous Web environment, and integrates the benefits of both keyword and semantic-based search. Additional contributions include: an innovative rank fusion technique that minimizes the undesired effects of knowledge sparseness on the yet juvenile SW, and the creation of a large-scale evaluation benchmark, based on TREC IR evaluation standards, which allows a rigorous comparison between IR and SW approaches. Conducted experiments show that our semantic search model obtained comparable and better performance results (in terms of MAP and P@10 values) than the best TREC automatic system.
  16. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.01 
    0.011541142 = product of:
  0.034623425 = sum of:
    0.034623425 = product of:
      0.1384937 = sum of:
        0.1384937 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1384937 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36963323 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  17. Gnoli, C.; Pullman, T.; Cousson, P.; Merli, G.; Szostak, R.: Representing the structural elements of a freely faceted classification (2011) 0.01 
    0.010378927 = product of:
  0.03113678 = sum of:
    0.03113678 = weight(_text_:p in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03113678 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  18. Djioua, B.; Desclés, J.-P.; Alrahabi, M.: Searching and mining with semantic categories (2012) 0.01 
    0.010378927 = product of:
  0.03113678 = sum of:
    0.03113678 = weight(_text_:p in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03113678 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  19. Mahesh, K.; Karanth, P.: ¬A novel knowledge organization scheme for the Web : superlinks with semantic roles (2012) 0.01 
    0.010378927 = product of:
  0.03113678 = sum of:
    0.03113678 = weight(_text_:p in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03113678 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  20. Solskinnsbakk, G.; Gulla, J.A.; Haderlein, V.; Myrseth, P.; Cerrato, O.: Quality of hierarchies in ontologies and folksonomies (2012) 0.01 
    0.010378927 = product of:
  0.03113678 = sum of:
    0.03113678 = weight(_text_:p in 1034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03113678 = score(doc=1034,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1034, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1034)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Authors

Languages

  • e 41
  • d 9
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 37
  • el 8
  • m 6
  • x 3
  • p 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications