Search (492 results, page 1 of 25)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Almeida Campos, M.L. de; Machado Campos, M.L.; Dávila, A.M.R.; Espanha Gomes, H.; Campos, L.M.; Lira e Oliveira, L. de: Information sciences methodological aspects applied to ontology reuse tools : a study based on genomic annotations in the domain of trypanosomatides (2013) 0.07
    0.06583983 = product of:
      0.09875974 = sum of:
        0.0029507861 = weight(_text_:s in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029507861 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
        0.09580895 = sum of:
          0.06519786 = weight(_text_:de in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06519786 = score(doc=635,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045187026 = queryNorm
              0.33574134 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
          0.03061109 = weight(_text_:22 in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03061109 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045187026 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:03:53
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.50-61
  2. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.06
    0.063730985 = product of:
      0.09559647 = sum of:
        0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035409431 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
        0.09205553 = sum of:
          0.055322222 = weight(_text_:de in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055322222 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045187026 = queryNorm
              0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
          0.036733307 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036733307 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045187026 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
    Imprint
    Berlin : De Gruyter Saur
    Pages
    XIV, 294 S
  3. Baião Salgado Silva, G.; Lima, G.Â. Borém de Oliveira: Using topic maps in establishing compatibility of semantically structured hypertext contents (2012) 0.05
    0.053109154 = product of:
      0.07966373 = sum of:
        0.0029507861 = weight(_text_:s in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029507861 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
        0.07671294 = sum of:
          0.046101853 = weight(_text_:de in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046101853 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045187026 = queryNorm
              0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.03061109 = weight(_text_:22 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03061109 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045187026 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:39:23
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.6, S.432-445
  4. Hannech, A.: Système de recherche d'information étendue basé sur une projection multi-espaces (2018) 0.05
    0.049513653 = product of:
      0.07427048 = sum of:
        0.0016692167 = weight(_text_:s in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016692167 = score(doc=4472,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.033976175 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
        0.072601266 = product of:
          0.14520253 = sum of:
            0.14520253 = weight(_text_:de in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14520253 = score(doc=4472,freq=124.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.74773145 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
                  11.135529 = tf(freq=124.0), with freq of:
                    124.0 = termFreq=124.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Depuis son apparition au début des années 90, le World Wide Web (WWW ou Web) a offert un accès universel aux connaissances et le monde de l'information a été principalement témoin d'une grande révolution (la révolution numérique). Il est devenu rapidement très populaire, ce qui a fait de lui la plus grande et vaste base de données et de connaissances existantes grâce à la quantité et la diversité des données qu'il contient. Cependant, l'augmentation et l'évolution considérables de ces données soulèvent d'importants problèmes pour les utilisateurs notamment pour l'accès aux documents les plus pertinents à leurs requêtes de recherche. Afin de faire face à cette explosion exponentielle du volume de données et faciliter leur accès par les utilisateurs, différents modèles sont proposés par les systèmes de recherche d'information (SRIs) pour la représentation et la recherche des documents web. Les SRIs traditionnels utilisent, pour indexer et récupérer ces documents, des mots-clés simples qui ne sont pas sémantiquement liés. Cela engendre des limites en termes de la pertinence et de la facilité d'exploration des résultats. Pour surmonter ces limites, les techniques existantes enrichissent les documents en intégrant des mots-clés externes provenant de différentes sources. Cependant, ces systèmes souffrent encore de limitations qui sont liées aux techniques d'exploitation de ces sources d'enrichissement. Lorsque les différentes sources sont utilisées de telle sorte qu'elles ne peuvent être distinguées par le système, cela limite la flexibilité des modèles d'exploration qui peuvent être appliqués aux résultats de recherche retournés par ce système. Les utilisateurs se sentent alors perdus devant ces résultats, et se retrouvent dans l'obligation de les filtrer manuellement pour sélectionner l'information pertinente. S'ils veulent aller plus loin, ils doivent reformuler et cibler encore plus leurs requêtes de recherche jusqu'à parvenir aux documents qui répondent le mieux à leurs attentes. De cette façon, même si les systèmes parviennent à retrouver davantage des résultats pertinents, leur présentation reste problématique. Afin de cibler la recherche à des besoins d'information plus spécifiques de l'utilisateur et améliorer la pertinence et l'exploration de ses résultats de recherche, les SRIs avancés adoptent différentes techniques de personnalisation de données qui supposent que la recherche actuelle d'un utilisateur est directement liée à son profil et/ou à ses expériences de navigation/recherche antérieures. Cependant, cette hypothèse ne tient pas dans tous les cas, les besoins de l'utilisateur évoluent au fil du temps et peuvent s'éloigner de ses intérêts antérieurs stockés dans son profil.
    Dans d'autres cas, le profil de l'utilisateur peut être mal exploité pour extraire ou inférer ses nouveaux besoins en information. Ce problème est beaucoup plus accentué avec les requêtes ambigües. Lorsque plusieurs centres d'intérêt auxquels est liée une requête ambiguë sont identifiés dans le profil de l'utilisateur, le système se voit incapable de sélectionner les données pertinentes depuis ce profil pour répondre à la requête. Ceci a un impact direct sur la qualité des résultats fournis à cet utilisateur. Afin de remédier à quelques-unes de ces limitations, nous nous sommes intéressés dans ce cadre de cette thèse de recherche au développement de techniques destinées principalement à l'amélioration de la pertinence des résultats des SRIs actuels et à faciliter l'exploration de grandes collections de documents. Pour ce faire, nous proposons une solution basée sur un nouveau concept d'indexation et de recherche d'information appelé la projection multi-espaces. Cette proposition repose sur l'exploitation de différentes catégories d'information sémantiques et sociales qui permettent d'enrichir l'univers de représentation des documents et des requêtes de recherche en plusieurs dimensions d'interprétations. L'originalité de cette représentation est de pouvoir distinguer entre les différentes interprétations utilisées pour la description et la recherche des documents. Ceci donne une meilleure visibilité sur les résultats retournés et aide à apporter une meilleure flexibilité de recherche et d'exploration, en donnant à l'utilisateur la possibilité de naviguer une ou plusieurs vues de données qui l'intéressent le plus. En outre, les univers multidimensionnels de représentation proposés pour la description des documents et l'interprétation des requêtes de recherche aident à améliorer la pertinence des résultats de l'utilisateur en offrant une diversité de recherche/exploration qui aide à répondre à ses différents besoins et à ceux des autres différents utilisateurs. Cette étude exploite différents aspects liés à la recherche personnalisée et vise à résoudre les problèmes engendrés par l'évolution des besoins en information de l'utilisateur. Ainsi, lorsque le profil de cet utilisateur est utilisé par notre système, une technique est proposée et employée pour identifier les intérêts les plus représentatifs de ses besoins actuels dans son profil. Cette technique se base sur la combinaison de trois facteurs influents, notamment le facteur contextuel, fréquentiel et temporel des données. La capacité des utilisateurs à interagir, à échanger des idées et d'opinions, et à former des réseaux sociaux sur le Web, a amené les systèmes à s'intéresser aux types d'interactions de ces utilisateurs, au niveau d'interaction entre eux ainsi qu'à leurs rôles sociaux dans le système. Ces informations sociales sont abordées et intégrées dans ce travail de recherche. L'impact et la manière de leur intégration dans le processus de RI sont étudiés pour améliorer la pertinence des résultats.
    Since its appearance in the early 90's, the World Wide Web (WWW or Web) has provided universal access to knowledge and the world of information has been primarily witness to a great revolution (the digital revolution). It quickly became very popular, making it the largest and most comprehensive database and knowledge base thanks to the amount and diversity of data it contains. However, the considerable increase and evolution of these data raises important problems for users, in particular for accessing the documents most relevant to their search queries. In order to cope with this exponential explosion of data volume and facilitate their access by users, various models are offered by information retrieval systems (IRS) for the representation and retrieval of web documents. Traditional SRIs use simple keywords that are not semantically linked to index and retrieve these documents. This creates limitations in terms of the relevance and ease of exploration of results. To overcome these limitations, existing techniques enrich documents by integrating external keywords from different sources. However, these systems still suffer from limitations that are related to the exploitation techniques of these sources of enrichment. When the different sources are used so that they cannot be distinguished by the system, this limits the flexibility of the exploration models that can be applied to the results returned by this system. Users then feel lost to these results, and find themselves forced to filter them manually to select the relevant information. If they want to go further, they must reformulate and target their search queries even more until they reach the documents that best meet their expectations. In this way, even if the systems manage to find more relevant results, their presentation remains problematic. In order to target research to more user-specific information needs and improve the relevance and exploration of its research findings, advanced SRIs adopt different data personalization techniques that assume that current research of user is directly related to his profile and / or previous browsing / search experiences.
    Footnote
    Thèse de doctorat, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi.
    Pages
    351 S
  5. Oliveira Lima, G.A.B. de: Hypertext model - HTXM : a model for hypertext organization of documents (2008) 0.04
    0.042625204 = product of:
      0.063937806 = sum of:
        0.0029507861 = weight(_text_:s in 2504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029507861 = score(doc=2504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2504)
        0.06098702 = product of:
          0.12197404 = sum of:
            0.12197404 = weight(_text_:de in 2504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12197404 = score(doc=2504,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.6281146 = fieldWeight in 2504, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2504)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    This article reports an applied research on the construction and implementation of a semantically structured conceptual prototype to help in the organization and representation of human knowledge in hypertextual systems, based on four references: the Facet Analysis Theory (FAT), the Conceptual Map Theory, semantic structure of hypertext links and the technical guidelines of the Associacao Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT). This prototype, called Modelo Hipertextual para Organizacao de Documentos (MHTX) - Model For Hypertext Organization of Documents HTXM - is formed by a semantic structure called Conceptual Map (CM) and Expanded Summary (ES), the latter based on the summary of a selected doctoral thesis to which access points were designed. In the future, this prototype maybe used to implement a digital libraty called BTDECI - UFMG (Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertacöes do Programa de Pós-Graduacao da Escola de Ciência da Informacao da UFMG - Library of Theses and Dissertations of the Graduate Program of School of Information Science of Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais).
    Pages
    S.177-183
  6. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.04
    0.040913574 = product of:
      0.122740716 = sum of:
        0.122740716 = sum of:
          0.07376297 = weight(_text_:de in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07376297 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045187026 = queryNorm
              0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.048977744 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048977744 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045187026 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
    Editor
    Carroll, J.J. u. J. de Roo
  7. Almeida, M.B.: Ontologia em Ciência da Informação: Teoria e Método (1ª ed., Vol. 1). CRV. http://dx.doi.org/10.24824/978655578679.8; Tecnologia e Aplicações (1ª ed., Vol. 2). CRV. http://dx.doi.org/10.24824/978652511477.4; Curso completo com teoria e exercícios (1ª ed., volume suplementar para professores). CRV. [Review] (2022) 0.04
    0.03924211 = product of:
      0.058863167 = sum of:
        0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035409431 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
        0.055322222 = product of:
          0.110644445 = sum of:
            0.110644445 = weight(_text_:de in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110644445 = score(doc=631,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Nos últimos 30 anos, o tema das ontologias tem sido um dos terrenos mais férteis de investigação na área da Organização do Conhecimento. É um tema complexo e revestido de polémica, pela dificuldade na definição do próprio conceito e pelas apropriações que diferentes campos científicos têm exercido sobre ele. Com origem no domínio da filosofia, a ontologia é hoje um território partilhado pelas Ciências da Computação, com destaque para a Ciência dos Dados (Data Science), e pela Ciência da Informação, particularmente pela Organização do Conhecimento. São raros os autores desta área que não escreveram sobre o tema, abordando as suas fronteiras conceptuais ou discutindo a relação das ontologias com outros sistemas de organização do conhecimento, como as taxonomias, os tesauros ou as classificações.
    Source
    Boletim do Arquivo da Universidade de Coimbra 35(2022) no.1, S.191-198
  8. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04
    0.03824512 = product of:
      0.057367675 = sum of:
        0.05382673 = product of:
          0.21530692 = sum of:
            0.21530692 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21530692 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3830961 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035409431 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Pages
    S.140-150
  9. Maculan, B.C.M. dos; Lima, G.A. de; Oliveira, E.D.: Conversion methods from thesaurus to ontologies : a review (2016) 0.04
    0.0379197 = product of:
      0.05687955 = sum of:
        0.0047212574 = weight(_text_:s in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047212574 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
        0.052158292 = product of:
          0.104316585 = sum of:
            0.104316585 = weight(_text_:de in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.104316585 = score(doc=4695,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Pages
    S.300-307
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  10. Martins, S. de Castro: Modelo conceitual de ecossistema semântico de informações corporativas para aplicação em objetos multimídia (2019) 0.04
    0.036997817 = product of:
      0.055496726 = sum of:
        0.0033384333 = weight(_text_:s in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033384333 = score(doc=117,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
        0.052158292 = product of:
          0.104316585 = sum of:
            0.104316585 = weight(_text_:de in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.104316585 = score(doc=117,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação da Universidade Federal Fluminense como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciência da Informação.
    Imprint
    Niteroi : UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL FLUMINENSE / INSTITUTO DE ARTE E COMUNICAÇÃO SOCIAL / DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO
    Pages
    276 S
  11. Fagundes, P.B.; Freund, G.P.; Vital, L.P.; Monteiro de Barros, C.; Macedo, D.D.J.de: Taxonomias, ontologias e tesauros : possibilidades de contribuição para o processo de Engenharia de Requisitos (2020) 0.03
    0.03270176 = product of:
      0.04905264 = sum of:
        0.0029507861 = weight(_text_:s in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029507861 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
        0.046101853 = product of:
          0.09220371 = sum of:
            0.09220371 = weight(_text_:de in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09220371 = score(doc=5828,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.47480997 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Em Questão, Porto Alegre. 26(2020) no.1, S.237-254
  12. Campos, L.M.: Princípios teóricos usados na elaboracao de ontologias e sua influência na recuperacao da informacao com uso de de inferências [Theoretical principles used in ontology building and their influence on information retrieval using inferences] (2021) 0.03
    0.03270176 = product of:
      0.04905264 = sum of:
        0.0029507861 = weight(_text_:s in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029507861 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
        0.046101853 = product of:
          0.09220371 = sum of:
            0.09220371 = weight(_text_:de in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09220371 = score(doc=826,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.47480997 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Ponto de Acesso, Salvador. 15(2021) no.3, S.344-380
  13. Zeh, T.: Ontologien in den Informationswissenschaften (2011) 0.03
    0.027735163 = product of:
      0.041602742 = sum of:
        0.0047212574 = weight(_text_:s in 4981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047212574 = score(doc=4981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4981)
        0.036881484 = product of:
          0.07376297 = sum of:
            0.07376297 = weight(_text_:de in 4981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07376297 = score(doc=4981,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4981, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4981)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.ontoport.org/alfresco -> "My Home"; http://www.xing.com/t/de/ONTOLOGIEN
    Source
    Mitgliederbrief. ErnstSchröderZentrum. 2011, Nr.42 vom 30.05.2011, S.3
  14. Finke, M.; Risch, J.: "Match Me If You Can" : Sammeln und semantisches Aufbereiten von Fußballdaten (2017) 0.03
    0.027735163 = product of:
      0.041602742 = sum of:
        0.0047212574 = weight(_text_:s in 3723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047212574 = score(doc=3723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3723)
        0.036881484 = product of:
          0.07376297 = sum of:
            0.07376297 = weight(_text_:de in 3723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07376297 = score(doc=3723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 3723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: www.info7.de/info7_2017-2_S-36-51.pdf.
    Source
    Info7. 2017, Nr.2, S.37-43
  15. Almeida Campos, M.L. de; Espanha Gomes, H.: Ontology : several theories on the representation of knowledge domains (2017) 0.03
    0.027735163 = product of:
      0.041602742 = sum of:
        0.0047212574 = weight(_text_:s in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047212574 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
        0.036881484 = product of:
          0.07376297 = sum of:
            0.07376297 = weight(_text_:de in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07376297 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.3, S.178-186
  16. Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018) 0.03
    0.02597145 = product of:
      0.038957175 = sum of:
        0.008346084 = weight(_text_:s in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008346084 = score(doc=4523,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
        0.03061109 = product of:
          0.06122218 = sum of:
            0.06122218 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06122218 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Sokol, J.: Spielend lernen. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.11, S.72-76.
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
  17. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.03
    0.025496744 = product of:
      0.038245115 = sum of:
        0.03588449 = product of:
          0.14353795 = sum of:
            0.14353795 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14353795 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3830961 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.0023606287 = weight(_text_:s in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023606287 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
    Pages
    249 S
  18. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.03
    0.025496744 = product of:
      0.038245115 = sum of:
        0.03588449 = product of:
          0.14353795 = sum of:
            0.14353795 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14353795 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3830961 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.0023606287 = weight(_text_:s in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023606287 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
    Pages
    iii, 82 S
  19. Hepp, M.; Bruijn, J. de: GenTax : a generic methodology for deriving OWL and RDF-S ontologies from hierarchical classifications, thesauri, and inconsistent taxonomies (2007) 0.03
    0.025139896 = product of:
      0.037709843 = sum of:
        0.0051109116 = weight(_text_:s in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051109116 = score(doc=4692,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
        0.03259893 = product of:
          0.06519786 = sum of:
            0.06519786 = weight(_text_:de in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06519786 = score(doc=4692,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.33574134 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Hierarchical classifications, thesauri, and informal taxonomies are likely the most valuable input for creating, at reasonable cost, non-toy ontologies in many domains. They contain, readily available, a wealth of category definitions plus a hierarchy, and they reflect some degree of community consensus. However, their transformation into useful ontologies is not as straightforward as it appears. In this paper, we show that (1) it often depends on the context of usage whether an informal hierarchical categorization schema is a classification, a thesaurus, or a taxonomy, and (2) present a novel methodology for automatically deriving consistent RDF-S and OWL ontologies from such schemas. Finally, we (3) demonstrate the usefulness of this approach by transforming the two e-business categorization standards eCl@ss and UNSPSC into ontologies that overcome the limitations of earlier prototypes. Our approach allows for the script-based creation of meaningful ontology classes for a particular context while preserving the original hierarchy, even if the latter is not a real subsumption hierarchy in this particular context. Human intervention in the transformation is limited to checking some conceptual properties and identifying frequent anomalies, and the only input required is an informal categorization plus a notion of the target context. In particular, the approach does not require instance data, as ontology learning approaches would usually do.
    Content
    Vgl. unter: http://www.heppnetz.de/files/hepp-de-bruijn-ESWC2007-gentax-CRC.pdf.
    Pages
    S.129-144
  20. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.02
    0.024341775 = product of:
      0.03651266 = sum of:
        0.0059015723 = weight(_text_:s in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059015723 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045187026 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
        0.03061109 = product of:
          0.06122218 = sum of:
            0.06122218 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06122218 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045187026 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22

Years

Languages

  • e 372
  • d 108
  • pt 4
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 383
  • el 76
  • m 38
  • x 34
  • s 15
  • r 8
  • n 5
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications