Search (56 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Alaya, N.; Yahia, S.B.; Lamolle, M.: Ranking with ties of OWL ontology reasoners based on learned performances (2016) 0.05 
    0.052498147 = product of:
  0.104996294 = sum of:
    0.104996294 = product of:
      0.20999259 = sum of:
        0.20999259 = weight(_text_:2500 in 3378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20999259 = score(doc=3378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44400162 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.47295457 = fieldWeight in 3378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3378)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Over the last decade, several ontology reasoners have been proposed to overcome the computational complexity of inference tasks on expressive ontology languages such as OWL 2 DL. Nevertheless, it is well-accepted that there is no outstanding reasoner that can outperform in all input ontologies. Thus, deciding the most suitable reasoner for an ontology based application is still a time and effort consuming task. In this paper, we suggest to develop a new system to provide user support when looking for guidance over ontology reasoners. At first, we will be looking at automatically predict a single reasoner empirical performances, in particular its robustness and efficiency, over any given ontology. Later, we aim at ranking a set of candidate reasoners in a most preferred order by taking into account information regarding their predicted performances. We conducted extensive experiments covering over 2500 well selected real-world ontologies and six state-of-the-art of the most performing reasoners. Our primary prediction and ranking results are encouraging and witnessing the potential benefits of our approach.
  2. Veltman, K.H.: Towards a Semantic Web for culture 0.04 
    0.04199852 = product of:
  0.08399704 = sum of:
    0.08399704 = product of:
      0.16799408 = sum of:
        0.16799408 = weight(_text_:2500 in 4040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16799408 = score(doc=4040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44400162 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.37836367 = fieldWeight in 4040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Today's semantic web deals with meaning in a very restricted sense and offers static solutions. This is adequate for many scientific, technical purposes and for business transactions requiring machine-to-machine communication, but does not answer the needs of culture. Science, technology and business are concerned primarily with the latest findings, the state of the art, i.e. the paradigm or dominant world-view of the day. In this context, history is considered non-essential because it deals with things that are out of date. By contrast, culture faces a much larger challenge, namely, to re-present changes in ways of knowing; changing meanings in different places at a given time (synchronically) and over time (diachronically). Culture is about both objects and the commentaries on them; about a cumulative body of knowledge; about collective memory and heritage. Here, history plays a central role and older does not mean less important or less relevant. Hence, a Leonardo painting that is 400 years old, or a Greek statue that is 2500 years old, typically have richer commentaries and are often more valuable than their contemporary equivalents. In this context, the science of meaning (semantics) is necessarily much more complex than semantic primitives. A semantic web in the cultural domain must enable us to trace how meaning and knowledge organisation have evolved historically in different cultures. This paper examines five issues to address this challenge: 1) different world-views (i.e. a shift from substance to function and from ontology to multiple ontologies); 2) developments in definitions and meaning; 3) distinctions between words and concepts; 4) new classes of relations; and 5) dynamic models of knowledge organisation. These issues reveal that historical dimensions of cultural diversity in knowledge organisation are also central to classification of biological diversity. New ways are proposed of visualizing knowledge using a time/space horizon to distinguish between universals and particulars. It is suggested that new visualization methods make possible a history of questions as well as of answers, thus enabling dynamic access to cultural and historical dimensions of knowledge. Unlike earlier media, which were limited to recording factual dimensions of collective memory, digital media enable us to explore theories, ways of perceiving, ways of knowing; to enter into other mindsets and world-views and thus to attain novel insights and new levels of tolerance. Some practical consequences are outlined.
  3. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04 
    0.041184437 = product of:
  0.08236887 = sum of:
    0.08236887 = product of:
      0.24710661 = sum of:
        0.24710661 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24710661 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43967736 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  4. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.03 
    0.027456291 = product of:
  0.054912582 = sum of:
    0.054912582 = product of:
      0.16473775 = sum of:
        0.16473775 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16473775 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43967736 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  5. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.03 
    0.027456291 = product of:
  0.054912582 = sum of:
    0.054912582 = product of:
      0.16473775 = sum of:
        0.16473775 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16473775 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43967736 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  6. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.02 
    0.017566094 = product of:
  0.03513219 = sum of:
    0.03513219 = product of:
      0.07026438 = sum of:
        0.07026438 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07026438 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  7. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02 
    0.017566094 = product of:
  0.03513219 = sum of:
    0.03513219 = product of:
      0.07026438 = sum of:
        0.07026438 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07026438 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  8. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02 
    0.017566094 = product of:
  0.03513219 = sum of:
    0.03513219 = product of:
      0.07026438 = sum of:
        0.07026438 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07026438 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  9. Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002) 0.02 
    0.017566094 = product of:
  0.03513219 = sum of:
    0.03513219 = product of:
      0.07026438 = sum of:
        0.07026438 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07026438 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 5.2010 16:22:35
  10. Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018) 0.02 
    0.017566094 = product of:
  0.03513219 = sum of:
    0.03513219 = product of:
      0.07026438 = sum of:
        0.07026438 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07026438 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
  11. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.01 
    0.014905325 = product of:
  0.02981065 = sum of:
    0.02981065 = product of:
      0.0596213 = sum of:
        0.0596213 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0596213 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
  12. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01 
    0.014052874 = product of:
  0.028105749 = sum of:
    0.028105749 = product of:
      0.056211498 = sum of:
        0.056211498 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056211498 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  13. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01 
    0.014052874 = product of:
  0.028105749 = sum of:
    0.028105749 = product of:
      0.056211498 = sum of:
        0.056211498 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056211498 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  14. Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997) 0.01 
    0.014052874 = product of:
  0.028105749 = sum of:
    0.028105749 = product of:
      0.056211498 = sum of:
        0.056211498 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056211498 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1.10.2018 14:13:22
  15. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.01 
    0.014052874 = product of:
  0.028105749 = sum of:
    0.028105749 = product of:
      0.056211498 = sum of:
        0.056211498 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056211498 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  16. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.01 
    0.012296265 = product of:
  0.02459253 = sum of:
    0.02459253 = product of:
      0.04918506 = sum of:
        0.04918506 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04918506 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
  17. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005) 0.01 
    0.012296265 = product of:
  0.02459253 = sum of:
    0.02459253 = product of:
      0.04918506 = sum of:
        0.04918506 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04918506 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:58
  18. Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010) 0.01 
    0.012296265 = product of:
  0.02459253 = sum of:
    0.02459253 = product of:
      0.04918506 = sum of:
        0.04918506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04918506 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:41:16
  19. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.01 
    0.012296265 = product of:
  0.02459253 = sum of:
    0.02459253 = product of:
      0.04918506 = sum of:
        0.04918506 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04918506 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
  20. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.01 
    0.012296265 = product of:
  0.02459253 = sum of:
    0.02459253 = product of:
      0.04918506 = sum of:
        0.04918506 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04918506 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18160807 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05186091 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 11

Types

  • a 42
  • el 14
  • x 5
  • m 2
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications