Search (547 results, page 1 of 28)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.10
    0.09927674 = product of:
      0.19855347 = sum of:
        0.047273763 = product of:
          0.14182128 = sum of:
            0.14182128 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14182128 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009458431 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009458431 = score(doc=400,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.27559727 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.14182128 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14182128 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Type
    a
  2. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.09
    0.08537831 = product of:
      0.17075662 = sum of:
        0.031515844 = product of:
          0.094547525 = sum of:
            0.094547525 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094547525 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0055303955 = weight(_text_:a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055303955 = score(doc=5820,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.16114321 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.13371038 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13371038 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  3. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.07
    0.066741586 = product of:
      0.13348317 = sum of:
        0.031515844 = product of:
          0.094547525 = sum of:
            0.094547525 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094547525 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.007419804 = weight(_text_:a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007419804 = score(doc=701,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.094547525 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094547525 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25234294 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  4. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.01
    0.014706166 = product of:
      0.029412333 = sum of:
        0.0043721613 = weight(_text_:a in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0043721613 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.01159795 = product of:
          0.0463918 = sum of:
            0.0463918 = weight(_text_:g in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0463918 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.013442221 = product of:
          0.040326662 = sum of:
            0.040326662 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040326662 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    A discussion on current initiatives regarding terminology registries.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  5. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.01
    0.011824572 = product of:
      0.023649145 = sum of:
        0.006121026 = weight(_text_:a in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006121026 = score(doc=5095,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
        0.008118565 = product of:
          0.03247426 = sum of:
            0.03247426 = weight(_text_:g in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03247426 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.009409554 = product of:
          0.028228661 = sum of:
            0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028228661 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
    Source
    Working with conceptual structures: contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: G. Stumme
    Type
    a
  6. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005) 0.01
    0.010294316 = product of:
      0.020588633 = sum of:
        0.003060513 = weight(_text_:a in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003060513 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
        0.008118565 = product of:
          0.03247426 = sum of:
            0.03247426 = weight(_text_:g in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03247426 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.009409554 = product of:
          0.028228661 = sum of:
            0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028228661 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:58
    Type
    a
  7. Hohmann, G.: ¬Die Anwendung des CIDOC-CRM für die semantische Wissensrepräsentation in den Kulturwissenschaften (2010) 0.01
    0.008823699 = product of:
      0.017647399 = sum of:
        0.0026232968 = weight(_text_:a in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0026232968 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
        0.0069587696 = product of:
          0.027835079 = sum of:
            0.027835079 = weight(_text_:g in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027835079 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.008065332 = product of:
          0.024195995 = sum of:
            0.024195995 = weight(_text_:22 in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024195995 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Type
    a
  8. Dobrev, P.; Kalaydjiev, O.; Angelova, G.: From conceptual structures to semantic interoperability of content (2007) 0.01
    0.008704156 = product of:
      0.017408311 = sum of:
        0.0048882253 = weight(_text_:a in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048882253 = score(doc=4607,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
        0.005798975 = product of:
          0.0231959 = sum of:
            0.0231959 = weight(_text_:g in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0231959 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.0067211105 = product of:
          0.020163331 = sum of:
            0.020163331 = weight(_text_:22 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020163331 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Smart applications behave intelligently because they understand at least partially the context where they operate. To do this, they need not only a formal domain model but also formal descriptions of the data they process and their own operational behaviour. Interoperability of smart applications is based on formalised definitions of all their data and processes. This paper studies the semantic interoperability of data in the case of eLearning and describes an experiment and its assessment. New content is imported into a knowledge-based learning environment without real updates of the original domain model, which is encoded as a knowledge base of conceptual graphs. A component called mediator enables the import by assigning dummy metadata annotations for the imported items. However, some functionality of the original system is lost, when processing the imported content, due to the lack of proper metadata annotation which cannot be associated fully automatically. So the paper presents an interoperability scenario when appropriate content items are viewed from the perspective of the original world and can be (partially) reused there.
    Source
    Conceptual structures: knowledge architectures for smart applications: 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2007, Sheffield, UK, July 22 - 27, 2007 ; proceedings. Eds.: U. Priss u.a
    Type
    a
  9. Baião Salgado Silva, G.; Lima, G.Â. Borém de Oliveira: Using topic maps in establishing compatibility of semantically structured hypertext contents (2012) 0.01
    0.008153245 = product of:
      0.01630649 = sum of:
        0.0037864032 = weight(_text_:a in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0037864032 = score(doc=633,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
        0.005798975 = product of:
          0.0231959 = sum of:
            0.0231959 = weight(_text_:g in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0231959 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.0067211105 = product of:
          0.020163331 = sum of:
            0.020163331 = weight(_text_:22 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020163331 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Considering the characteristics of hypertext systems and problems such as cognitive overload and the disorientation of users, this project studies subject hypertext documents that have undergone conceptual structuring using facets for content representation and improvement of information retrieval during navigation. The main objective was to assess the possibility of the application of topic map technology for automating the compatibilization process of these structures. For this purpose, two dissertations from the UFMG Information Science Post-Graduation Program were adopted as samples. Both dissertations had been duly analyzed and structured on the MHTX (Hypertextual Map) prototype database. The faceted structures of both dissertations, which had been represented in conceptual maps, were then converted into topic maps. It was then possible to use the merge property of the topic maps to promote the semantic interrelationship between the maps and, consequently, between the hypertextual information resources proper. The merge results were then analyzed in the light of theories dealing with the compatibilization of languages developed within the realm of information technology and librarianship from the 1960s on. The main goals accomplished were: (a) the detailed conceptualization of the merge process of the topic maps, considering the possible compatibilization levels and the applicability of this technology in the integration of faceted structures; and (b) the production of a detailed sequence of steps that may be used in the implementation of topic maps based on faceted structures.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:39:23
    Type
    a
  10. Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010) 0.01
    0.0063625826 = product of:
      0.019087747 = sum of:
        0.009678192 = weight(_text_:a in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009678192 = score(doc=3694,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.28200063 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
        0.009409554 = product of:
          0.028228661 = sum of:
            0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028228661 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    A method to develop a prototype domain ontology has been described. The domain selected for the study is Accelerator Driven Systems. This is a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary subject comprising Nuclear Physics, Nuclear and Reactor Engineering, Reactor Fuels and Radioactive Waste Management. Since Accelerator Driven Systems is a vast topic, select areas in it were singled out for the study. Both qualitative and quantitative methods such as Content analysis, Facet analysis and Clustering were used, to develop the web-based model.
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:41:16
    Type
    a
  11. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01
    0.0059381276 = product of:
      0.017814383 = sum of:
        0.0043721613 = weight(_text_:a in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0043721613 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
        0.013442221 = product of:
          0.040326662 = sum of:
            0.040326662 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040326662 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
    Type
    a
  12. Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018) 0.01
    0.0059381276 = product of:
      0.017814383 = sum of:
        0.0043721613 = weight(_text_:a in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0043721613 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
        0.013442221 = product of:
          0.040326662 = sum of:
            0.040326662 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040326662 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
    Type
    a
  13. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.01
    0.005842707 = product of:
      0.01752812 = sum of:
        0.008118565 = product of:
          0.03247426 = sum of:
            0.03247426 = weight(_text_:g in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03247426 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.009409554 = product of:
          0.028228661 = sum of:
            0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028228661 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
  14. Suchanek, F.M.; Kasneci, G.; Weikum, G.: YAGO: a large ontology from Wikipedia and WordNet (2008) 0.01
    0.005753664 = product of:
      0.017260991 = sum of:
        0.007419804 = weight(_text_:a in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007419804 = score(doc=3404,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
        0.009841187 = product of:
          0.039364748 = sum of:
            0.039364748 = weight(_text_:g in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039364748 = score(doc=3404,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.35212007 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents YAGO, a large ontology with high coverage and precision. YAGO has been automatically derived from Wikipedia and WordNet. It comprises entities and relations, and currently contains more than 1.7 million entities and 15 million facts. These include the taxonomic Is-A hierarchy as well as semantic relations between entities. The facts for YAGO have been extracted from the category system and the infoboxes of Wikipedia and have been combined with taxonomic relations from WordNet. Type checking techniques help us keep YAGO's precision at 95%-as proven by an extensive evaluation study. YAGO is based on a clean logical model with a decidable consistency. Furthermore, it allows representing n-ary relations in a natural way while maintaining compatibility with RDFS. A powerful query model facilitates access to YAGO's data.
    Type
    a
  15. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.005453642 = product of:
      0.016360926 = sum of:
        0.008295594 = weight(_text_:a in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008295594 = score(doc=2655,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.24171482 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
        0.008065332 = product of:
          0.024195995 = sum of:
            0.024195995 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024195995 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
    Type
    a
  16. Cumyn, M.; Reiner, G.; Mas, S.; Lesieur, D.: Legal knowledge representation using a faceted scheme (2019) 0.01
    0.0054246066 = product of:
      0.016273819 = sum of:
        0.006995458 = weight(_text_:a in 5788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006995458 = score(doc=5788,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5788, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5788)
        0.00927836 = product of:
          0.03711344 = sum of:
            0.03711344 = weight(_text_:g in 5788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03711344 = score(doc=5788,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.331982 = fieldWeight in 5788, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5788)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    A database supports legal research by matching a user's request for information with documents of the database that contain it. Indexes are among the oldest tools to achieve that aim. Many legal publishers continue to provide manual subject indexing of legal documents, in addition to automatic full-text indexing, which improves the performance of a full-text search.
  17. Suchanek, F.M.; Kasneci, G.; Weikum, G.: YAGO: a core of semantic knowledge unifying WordNet and Wikipedia (2007) 0.01
    0.0054223086 = product of:
      0.016266925 = sum of:
        0.0064257383 = weight(_text_:a in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064257383 = score(doc=3403,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
        0.009841187 = product of:
          0.039364748 = sum of:
            0.039364748 = weight(_text_:g in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039364748 = score(doc=3403,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.35212007 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    We present YAGO, a light-weight and extensible ontology with high coverage and quality. YAGO builds on entities and relations and currently contains more than 1 million entities and 5 million facts. This includes the Is-A hierarchy as well as non-taxonomic relations between entities (such as hasWonPrize). The facts have been automatically extracted from Wikipedia and unified with WordNet, using a carefully designed combination of rule-based and heuristic methods described in this paper. The resulting knowledge base is a major step beyond WordNet: in quality by adding knowledge about individuals like persons, organizations, products, etc. with their semantic relationships - and in quantity by increasing the number of facts by more than an order of magnitude. Our empirical evaluation of fact correctness shows an accuracy of about 95%. YAGO is based on a logically clean model, which is decidable, extensible, and compatible with RDFS. Finally, we show how YAGO can be further extended by state-of-the-art information extraction techniques.
  18. Sandkühler, H.J.: Epistemologischer Realismus und die Wirklichkeit des Wissens : eine Verteidigung der Philosophie des Geistes gegen Naturalismus und Reduktionismus (1992) 0.01
    0.0053233705 = product of:
      0.01597011 = sum of:
        0.0043721613 = weight(_text_:a in 1663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0043721613 = score(doc=1663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1663)
        0.01159795 = product of:
          0.0463918 = sum of:
            0.0463918 = weight(_text_:g in 1663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0463918 = score(doc=1663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1663)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Stellungnahmen dazu von D. Pätzold, T. Metscher u. G. Pasternack
    Type
    a
  19. Roth, G.; Schwegler, H.: Kognitive Referenz und Selbstreferentialität des Gehirns : ein Beitrag zur Klärung des Verhältnisses zwischen Erkenntnistheorie und Hirnforschung (1992) 0.01
    0.0053233705 = product of:
      0.01597011 = sum of:
        0.0043721613 = weight(_text_:a in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0043721613 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
        0.01159795 = product of:
          0.0463918 = sum of:
            0.0463918 = weight(_text_:g in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0463918 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Type
    a
  20. Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997) 0.01
    0.0052334378 = product of:
      0.015700312 = sum of:
        0.004946536 = weight(_text_:a in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004946536 = score(doc=4476,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
        0.010753776 = product of:
          0.032261327 = sum of:
            0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032261327 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    1.10.2018 14:13:22
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

  • e 438
  • d 93
  • pt 5
  • el 1
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 419
  • el 144
  • m 24
  • x 22
  • n 13
  • s 11
  • p 5
  • r 5
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications