-
Bowen, J.: FRBR : coming soon to your library? (2005)
0.02
0.018134935 = product of:
0.054404803 = sum of:
0.054404803 = sum of:
0.018790042 = weight(_text_:of in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018790042 = score(doc=122,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model holds great potential for improving access to library resources, but may not affect all libraries in the same way. The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules), assisted by the work of its Format Variation Working Group, is exploring ways to incorporate FRBR into the next edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules to facilitate collocation at the level of the FRBR entity expression. Several library system vendors are also adding FRBR-based functionality to their systems. A combination of these two approaches to FRBR can provide significant benefits to users. Most FRBR entities and attributes are already present in library catalog records, and the influence of FRBR can also be seen in existing library activities. FRBR is thus not something totally foreign, but a fresh, more rigorous way of thinking about what libraries already do that provides a basis for designing new ways to improve users' access to library resources.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.02
0.018134935 = product of:
0.054404803 = sum of:
0.054404803 = sum of:
0.018790042 = weight(_text_:of in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018790042 = score(doc=2548,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.02
0.018134935 = product of:
0.054404803 = sum of:
0.054404803 = sum of:
0.018790042 = weight(_text_:of in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018790042 = score(doc=302,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.02
0.01775607 = product of:
0.053268205 = sum of:
0.053268205 = sum of:
0.01171765 = weight(_text_:of in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01171765 = score(doc=114,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.02
0.017670318 = product of:
0.053010955 = sum of:
0.053010955 = sum of:
0.017396197 = weight(_text_:of in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017396197 = score(doc=3601,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The web site LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.02
0.017670318 = product of:
0.053010955 = sum of:
0.053010955 = sum of:
0.017396197 = weight(_text_:of in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017396197 = score(doc=2608,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005)
0.02
0.017165082 = product of:
0.051495243 = sum of:
0.051495243 = sum of:
0.015880484 = weight(_text_:of in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015880484 = score(doc=125,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005)
0.02
0.016726863 = product of:
0.050180584 = sum of:
0.050180584 = sum of:
0.020501617 = weight(_text_:of in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501617 = score(doc=124,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.029678967 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029678967 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013)
0.02
0.016606232 = product of:
0.049818695 = sum of:
0.049818695 = sum of:
0.014203937 = weight(_text_:of in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014203937 = score(doc=2603,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006)
0.02
0.016435925 = product of:
0.04930777 = sum of:
0.04930777 = sum of:
0.019628802 = weight(_text_:of in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019628802 = score(doc=1088,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.029678967 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029678967 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus den Jahren 2002-2003. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2001 (2004)
0.01
0.013990799 = product of:
0.041972395 = sum of:
0.041972395 = product of:
0.08394479 = sum of:
0.08394479 = weight(_text_:22 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08394479 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 13:32:22
-
Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005)
0.01
0.013850185 = product of:
0.041550554 = sum of:
0.041550554 = product of:
0.08310111 = sum of:
0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08310111 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005)
0.01
0.013850185 = product of:
0.041550554 = sum of:
0.041550554 = product of:
0.08310111 = sum of:
0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08310111 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus dem Jahr 2005. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2004 (2006)
0.01
0.0069250925 = product of:
0.020775277 = sum of:
0.020775277 = product of:
0.041550554 = sum of:
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 1756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=1756,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1756, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1756)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 13:05:01
-
Williams, R.V.; Whitmire, L.; Bradley, C.: Bibliography of the history of information science in North America : 1900-1995 (1997)
0.00
0.0049790437 = product of:
0.014937131 = sum of:
0.014937131 = product of:
0.029874261 = sum of:
0.029874261 = weight(_text_:of in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029874261 = score(doc=53,freq=26.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.43605784 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A bibliography of the history of information science in North America, 1900-1995, created by the University of South Caroline College of Library and Information Science, USA, under a grant from the Special Interest Group Projects Fund of the American Society for Information Science. The project identified early individual and organizations of information science in the USA and Canada, determines the location of the personal/professional papers and archives of these pioneers, and compiled the bibliography. The bibliography id divided into: books (including encyclopaedia articles), journal articles, and unpublished papers
- Footnote
- Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.4, S.373-379
-
Bibliography of papers on classification and allied subjects (1956)
0.00
0.004463867 = product of:
0.0133916 = sum of:
0.0133916 = product of:
0.0267832 = sum of:
0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0267832 = score(doc=294,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 12(1956), S.227-230
-
Weese, L.C. de: ¬A bibliography of library user studies (1967)
0.00
0.004463867 = product of:
0.0133916 = sum of:
0.0133916 = product of:
0.0267832 = sum of:
0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0267832 = score(doc=4476,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Jain, A.K. u. L.C. De Weese: A statistical study of book use
-
Julien, C.-A.; Leide, J.E.; Bouthillier, F.: Controlled user evaluations of information visualization interfaces for text retrieval : literature review and meta-analysis (2008)
0.00
0.0041003237 = product of:
0.01230097 = sum of:
0.01230097 = product of:
0.02460194 = sum of:
0.02460194 = weight(_text_:of in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02460194 = score(doc=1718,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This review describes experimental designs (users, search tasks, measures, etc.) used by 31 controlled user studies of information visualization (IV) tools for textual information retrieval (IR) and a meta-analysis of the reported statistical effects. Comparable experimental designs allow research designers to compare their results with other reports, and support the development of experimentally verified design guidelines concerning which IV techniques are better suited to which types of IR tasks. The studies generally use a within-subject design with 15 or more undergraduate students performing browsing to known-item tasks on sets of at least 1,000 full-text articles or Web pages on topics of general interest/news. Results of the meta-analysis (N = 8) showed no significant effects of the IV tool as compared with a text-only equivalent, but the set shows great variability suggesting an inadequate basis of comparison. Experimental design recommendations are provided which would support comparison of existing IV tools for IR usability testing.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.6, S.1012-1024
-
Webster, S.: ¬An annotated bibliography for object-oriented analysis and design (1994)
0.00
0.003945538 = product of:
0.0118366135 = sum of:
0.0118366135 = product of:
0.023673227 = sum of:
0.023673227 = weight(_text_:of in 1571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023673227 = score(doc=1571,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 1571, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1571)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Introduces some of the literature on object-orientated analysis and design, concentrating on the study of object oriented development methods. Outlines both regular and irregular sources of material on object oriented development methods and it lists over 240 references of which approximately 60 are annotated
-
Heilprin, L.B.: Foundations of information science reexamined (1989)
0.00
0.003945538 = product of:
0.0118366135 = sum of:
0.0118366135 = product of:
0.023673227 = sum of:
0.023673227 = weight(_text_:of in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023673227 = score(doc=340,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews the literature supporting the consensus of opinion that although many laws, theories, hypothesis and speculations about information have been proposed, adequate scientific and epistemic foundations for a general science of information have not yet appeared
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 24(1989), S.343-372
