Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"b"
  1. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.10
    0.100689024 = product of:
      0.15103354 = sum of:
        0.014646845 = weight(_text_:in in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014646845 = score(doc=4309,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.13638669 = sum of:
          0.087850705 = weight(_text_:education in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.087850705 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051176514 = queryNorm
              0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04853598 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051176514 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014) 0.09
    0.08518355 = product of:
      0.12777533 = sum of:
        0.010872464 = weight(_text_:in in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010872464 = score(doc=2608,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
        0.11690286 = sum of:
          0.0753006 = weight(_text_:education in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0753006 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051176514 = queryNorm
              0.3123144 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
          0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041602265 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051176514 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.05
    0.051956832 = product of:
      0.1558705 = sum of:
        0.1558705 = sum of:
          0.100400805 = weight(_text_:education in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.100400805 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051176514 = queryNorm
              0.4164192 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05546969 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051176514 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20
  4. Clark, A.J.: Education and training for librarianship and information work : annual bibliography, 1990 (1991) 0.05
    0.047329392 = product of:
      0.14198817 = sum of:
        0.14198817 = product of:
          0.28397635 = sum of:
            0.28397635 = weight(_text_:education in 2692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28397635 = score(doc=2692,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                1.1778114 = fieldWeight in 2692, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Education for information. 9(1991), S.167-224
  5. Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus den Jahren 2002-2003. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2001 (2004) 0.04
    0.03966052 = product of:
      0.059490778 = sum of:
        0.010462033 = weight(_text_:in in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010462033 = score(doc=4,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
        0.049028743 = product of:
          0.098057486 = sum of:
            0.098057486 = weight(_text_:22 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098057486 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:32:22
  6. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.03
    0.02815431 = product of:
      0.042231463 = sum of:
        0.014496619 = weight(_text_:in in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014496619 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.03
    0.02815431 = product of:
      0.042231463 = sum of:
        0.014496619 = weight(_text_:in in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014496619 = score(doc=1085,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Aliprand, J.M.: Scripts, languages, and authority control (2005) 0.03
    0.026380857 = product of:
      0.039571285 = sum of:
        0.011836439 = weight(_text_:in in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011836439 = score(doc=455,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Library vendors' use of Unicode is leading to library systems with multiscript capability, which offers the prospect of multiscript authority records. Although librarians tend to focus on Unicode in relation to non-Roman scripts, language is a more important feature of authority records than script. The concept of a catalog locale (of which language is one aspect) is introduced. Restrictions on the structure and content of a MARC 21 authority record are outlined, and the alternative structures for authority records containing languages written in non-Roman scripts are described.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.03
    0.026380857 = product of:
      0.039571285 = sum of:
        0.011836439 = weight(_text_:in in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011836439 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005) 0.02
    0.024635023 = product of:
      0.036952533 = sum of:
        0.012684541 = weight(_text_:in in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012684541 = score(doc=128,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus dem Jahr 2005. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2004 (2006) 0.02
    0.024635023 = product of:
      0.036952533 = sum of:
        0.012684541 = weight(_text_:in in 1756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012684541 = score(doc=1756,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1756, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1756)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 1756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=1756,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1756, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1756)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die von Wilbert Ubbens und Dr. Willi Höfig im Jahr 1982 begründete und bis zum Jahr 2002 jeweils in Heft 3 dieser Zeitschrift veröffentlichte Bibliographie wird mit der vorliegenden Übersicht fortgesetzt. Die Gliederung nach Schlagwörtern und die Zitierweise wurden weitgehend beibehalten, um sowohl die Orientierung zu erleichtern als auch spätere Hinweise auf diese Bibliographie zu vereinfachen. Wo nötig, wurden wieder erläuternde Hinweise in englischer Sprache hinzugefügt. Für diese Übersicht wurden auch wieder Nachweise aus den verwandten Bereichen der Archive, Dokumentationsstellen und Museen aufgenommen, um die für Zeitungen wünschenswerte spartenübergreifende Zusammenarbeit zu fördern.
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:05:01
  12. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.02
    0.024635023 = product of:
      0.036952533 = sum of:
        0.012684541 = weight(_text_:in in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012684541 = score(doc=3599,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Patron queries at a four-year comprehensive college's online public access catalog were examined via transaction logs from March 2007. Three representative days were isolated for a more detailed examination of search characteristics. The results show that library users employed an average of one to three terms in a search, did not use Boolean operators, and made use of limits one-tenth of the time. Failed queries remained problematic, as a full one-third of searches resulted in zero hits. Implications and recommendations for improvements in the online public access catalog are discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Gabbard, R.: Recent literature shows accelerated growth in hypermedia tools : an annotated bibliography (1994) 0.02
    0.024069648 = product of:
      0.03610447 = sum of:
        0.008369626 = weight(_text_:in in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008369626 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.31-40
  14. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.02
    0.024069648 = product of:
      0.03610447 = sum of:
        0.008369626 = weight(_text_:in in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008369626 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.02
    0.024069648 = product of:
      0.03610447 = sum of:
        0.008369626 = weight(_text_:in in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008369626 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Lundy, M.W.: Evidence of application of the DCRB core standard in WorldCat and RLIN (2006) 0.02
    0.02322495 = product of:
      0.034837425 = sum of:
        0.014036291 = weight(_text_:in in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014036291 = score(doc=1087,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
        0.020801133 = product of:
          0.041602265 = sum of:
            0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041602265 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Core Standard for Rare Books, known as the DCRB Core standard, was approved by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging for use beginning in January 1999. Comparable to the core standards for other types of materials, the DCRB Core standard provides requirements for an intermediate level of bibliographic description for the cataloging of rare books. While the Core Standard for Books seems to have found a place in general cataloging practice, the DCRB Core standard appears to have met with resistance among rare book cataloging practitioners. This study investigates the extent to which such resistance exists by examining all of the DCRB Core records in the OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) Online Union Catalog (WorldCat) and the Research Libraries Croup Union Catalog (RLIN) databases that were created during the standard's first five years. The study analyzes the content of the records for adherence to the standard and investigates the ways in which the flexibility of the standard and cataloger's judgment augmented many records with more than the mandatory elements of description and access.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.02
    0.023083251 = product of:
      0.034624875 = sum of:
        0.010356884 = weight(_text_:in in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010356884 = score(doc=114,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006) 0.02
    0.023083251 = product of:
      0.034624875 = sum of:
        0.010356884 = weight(_text_:in in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010356884 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005) 0.02
    0.023083251 = product of:
      0.034624875 = sum of:
        0.010356884 = weight(_text_:in in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010356884 = score(doc=127,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996) 0.02
    0.022880081 = product of:
      0.06864024 = sum of:
        0.06864024 = product of:
          0.13728048 = sum of:
            0.13728048 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13728048 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 9.1997 19:22:27
    Source
    Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193

Years

Languages

  • e 56
  • d 4
  • More… Less…