Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Rötzer, F.: Sahra Wagenknecht über die Digitalisierung (1999) 0.01 
    0.011779339 = product of:
  0.090308264 = sum of:
    0.055722013 = weight(_text_:buch in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055722013 = score(doc=3951,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109575786 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.5085249 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
    0.020021284 = weight(_text_:und in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020021284 = score(doc=3951,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
    0.014564968 = weight(_text_:im in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014564968 = score(doc=3951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
  0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    Abstract
    Florian Rötzer hat in einem langen Gespräch mit Sahra Wagenknecht, aus dem das Buch "Couragiert gegen den Strom. Über Goethe, die Macht und die Zukunft!" hervorgegangen ist, u.a. darüber gesprochen, wie Kultur und philosophisches Denken die politischen Vorstellungen und den politischen Stil der linken Politikerin geprägt haben. Dabei ging es auch um den Kapitalismus und dessen Abschaffung, um den Kern linker Politik, die Konkurrenz in der Wirtschaft und auch über die Digitalisierung sowie die Ideen, mit einer Maschinensteuer oder einem bedingungslosen Grundeinkommen das Schlimmste zu verhindern. Telepolis veröffentlicht einen Auszug aus dem Buch, das im Westendverlag erschienen ist.
  2. Marloth, H.: Thesen über die Beziehungen zwischen Informationspolitik, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis : Saarbrücker Thesen (1996) 0.01 
    0.009531303 = product of:
  0.10960999 = sum of:
    0.018089388 = weight(_text_:und in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018089388 = score(doc=3275,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
    0.0915206 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0915206 = score(doc=3275,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.86204916 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Content
    Vortrag vor der Bundesfachschaftstagung Information und Dokumentation auf dem Jahrestreffen am 7. Juni 1996 in Saarbrücken. Mit einem historischen Abriss der Entwicklung der Informationswissenschaft in Deutschland.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  3. Zimmer, D.E.: Mr. Searle im Chinesischen Zimmer : über Computer, Gehirne und Geist (1990) 0.00 
    0.0034228407 = product of:
  0.03936267 = sum of:
    0.021707265 = weight(_text_:und in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021707265 = score(doc=4385,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
    0.017655406 = weight(_text_:im in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017655406 = score(doc=4385,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.26501122 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Abstract
    EINE PROVOKATION feiert Geburtstag. Vor nunmehr zehn Jahren löste sie eine kontroverse Debatte aus, die anders als die meisten wissenschaftlichen Debatten nach dem Austausch der Argumente und Daten nicht im Nu erledigt war. Sie zieht sich bis heute hin und macht keinerlei Anstalten, sich zu legen. Vordergründig geht es um Chinesische Zimmer und Chinesische Turnhallen, um Schnellrestaurants, um sprechende Maschinen, um Computer und wieviel Intelligenz sie eines Tages ihr eigen nennen könnten - und in Wahrheit bei alledem um die Letzten Dinge, jene, die Leidenschaften wekken: Was ist der menschliche Geist? Kann es eines Tages eine Maschine geben, die Geist hat? Was die Kontroverse in Gang setzte, war eine Herausforderung an die junge Disziplin der Künstlichen Intelligenz. Das menschliche Geistorgan, so lautete sie, funktioniere nicht wie ein Computer, und folglich könne ein Computer es auch nie und nimmer duplizieren.
  4. GERHARD : eine Spezialsuchmaschine für die Wissenschaft (1998) 0.00 
    0.0029909855 = product of:
  0.03439633 = sum of:
    0.024968514 = weight(_text_:im in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024968514 = score(doc=381,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.37478244 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
    0.0094278185 = product of:
      0.018855637 = sum of:
        0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018855637 = score(doc=381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Date
    1. 4.2002 11:01:35
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Karner, J.: Mailüfterl, Al Chorezmi und Künstliche Intelligenz (1999) 0.00 
    0.002577857 = product of:
  0.029645357 = sum of:
    0.0171611 = weight(_text_:und in 3950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0171611 = score(doc=3950,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.328536 = fieldWeight in 3950, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3950)
    0.012484257 = weight(_text_:im in 3950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012484257 = score(doc=3950,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 3950, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3950)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Abstract
    Der österreichische Computerpionier Heinz Zemanek hat mit dem Lötkolben in der Hand begonnen, Computer zu bauen. Er hat die Entwicklung des Computers aktiv miterlebt - von der Relais-Additionsschaltung bis zum Halbleiter-Chip, von der Lochstreifen-Befehlseingabe bis zur formalen Definition der Programmiersprachen. Er hat kybernetische Modelle mit Studenten und Mitarbeitern gebaut und programmiert. Gemeinsam mit seinem Kollegen Konrad Zuse gilt er als Begründer der modernen Datenverarbeitung in Europa. 1954 baute er das Mailüfterl einen volltransistorisierten Binär-Dezimal-Rechenautomaten", der aus 3.000 Transistoren, 5.000 Dioden und 30 km Draht bestand. Mit einer Breite von 4 Metern, einer Höhe von 2,5 Metern und einer Tiefe von 50 Zentimetern war das Ungetüm gegenüber den damaligen Röhrenrechnern klein. Auch mit kybernetischen Grundmodellen wie der "Maus im Labyrinth", der "künstlichen Schildkröte" oder dem "Homöostat" betrat er Neuland.
  6. Retti, G.: "Schlagwortnormdatei" und "Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog" (1995) 0.00 
    0.0023676122 = product of:
  0.02722754 = sum of:
    0.012662571 = weight(_text_:und in 1354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012662571 = score(doc=1354,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1354, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1354)
    0.014564968 = weight(_text_:im in 1354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014564968 = score(doc=1354,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 1354, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1354)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Abstract
    Es scheint naheliegend, daß der Unsicherheit, welche durch die "Vielfalt der möglichen sprachlichen Ausdrucksweisen für einen Sachverhalt" beim Beschlagworter ausgelöst wird, dadurch begegnet werden soll, "daß immer nur eine der möglichen Formen gewählt wird". Der Ruf nach einer "Standardisie- rung der Schlagwörter" geht damit Hand in Hand. Zwei Ergebnisse dieser Standardisierungsbemühungen werden im folgenden dargestellt; ein Punkt aber sollte dabei nicht übersehen werden: "Ein allgemein akzeptiertes Verfahren der Inhaltsanalyse gibt es bisher nicht und es ist offen, ob das Problem überhaupt gelöst werden kann." Standardisiert kann demnach nur das Schlagwortsystem werden, nicht aber seine konkrete Anwendung bei der inhaltlichen Erschließung von Dokumenten.
  7. Pitti, D.V.: Encoded Archival Description : an introduction and overview (1999) 0.00 
    0.0015964593 = product of:
  0.018359281 = sum of:
    0.009666322 = product of:
      0.019332644 = sum of:
        0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019332644 = score(doc=1152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008692958 = product of:
      0.017385917 = sum of:
        0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017385917 = score(doc=1152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Abstract
    Encoded Archival Description (EAD) is an emerging standard used internationally in an increasing number of archives and manuscripts libraries to encode data describing corporate records and personal papers. The individual descriptions are variously called finding aids, guides, handlists, or catalogs. While archival description shares many objectives with bibliographic description, it differs from it in several essential ways. From its inception, EAD was based on SGML, and, with the release of EAD version 1.0 in 1998, it is also compliant with XML. EAD was, and continues to be, developed by the archival community. While development was initiated in the United States, international interest and contribution are increasing. EAD is currently administered and maintained jointly by the Society of American Archivists and the United States Library of Congress. Developers are currently exploring ways to internationalize the administration and maintenance of EAD to reflect and represent the expanding base of users.
    Date
    26.12.2011 16:29:28
  8. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.00 
    0.0014500424 = product of:
  0.016675487 = sum of:
    0.005499561 = product of:
      0.010999122 = sum of:
        0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010999122 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011175927 = product of:
      0.022351854 = sum of:
        0.022351854 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022351854 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  9. Buckland, M.; Chen, A.; Chen, H.M.; Kim, Y.; Lam, B.; Larson, R.; Norgard, B.; Purat, J.; Gey, F.: Mapping entry vocabulary to unfamiliar metadata vocabularies (1999) 0.00 
    0.0010772684 = product of:
  0.012388586 = sum of:
    0.007674677 = weight(_text_:und in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007674677 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
    0.0047139092 = product of:
      0.0094278185 = sum of:
        0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0094278185 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january99/buckland/01buckland.html und http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/metadata/oasis.html.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.1, xx S
  10. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.00 
    9.7181974E-4 = product of:
  0.022351854 = sum of:
    0.022351854 = product of:
      0.044703707 = sum of:
        0.044703707 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044703707 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  11. Rusch-Feja, D.; Becker, H.J.: Global Info : the German digital libraries project (1999) 0.00 
    8.904019E-4 = product of:
  0.010239622 = sum of:
    0.0044443165 = product of:
      0.008888633 = sum of:
        0.008888633 = weight(_text_:1 in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008888633 = score(doc=1242,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.15353142 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0057953056 = product of:
      0.011590611 = sum of:
        0.011590611 = weight(_text_:international in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011590611 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.14742646 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Abstract
    The concept for the German Digital Libraries Program is imbedded in the Information Infrastructure Program of the German Federal Government for the years 1996-2000 which has been explicated in the Program Paper entitled "Information as Raw Material for Innovation".3 The Program Paper was published 1996 by the Federal Ministry for Education, Research, and Technology. The actual grants program "Global Info" was initiated by the Information and Communication Commission of the Joint Learned Societies to further technological advancement in enabling all researchers in Germany direct access to literature, research results, and other relevant information. This Commission was founded by four of the learned societies in 1995, and it has sponsored a series of workshops to increase awareness of leading edge technology and innovations in accessing electronic information sources. Now, nine of the leading research-level learned societies -- often those with umbrella responsibilities for other learned societies in their field -- are members of the Information and Communication Commission and represent the mathematicians, physicists, computer scientists, chemists, educational researchers, sociologists, psychologists, biologists and information technologists in the German Association of Engineers. (The German professional librarian societies are not members, as such, of this Commission, but are represented through delegates from libraries in the learned societies and in the future, hopefully, also by the German Association of Documentalists or through the cooperation between the documentalist and librarian professional societies.) The Federal Ministry earmarked 60 Million German Marks for projects within the framework of the German Digital Libraries Program in two phases over the next six years. The scope for the German Digital Libraries Program was announced in a press release in April 1997,4 and the first call for preliminary projects and expressions of interest in participation ended in July 1997. The Consortium members were suggested by the Information and Communication Commission of the Learned Societies (IuK Kommission), by key scientific research funding agencies in the German government, and by the publishers themselves. The first official meeting of the participants took place on December 1, 1997, at the Deutsche Bibliothek, located in the renowned center of German book trade, Frankfurt, thus documenting the active role and participation of libraries and publishers. In contrast to the Digital Libraries Project of the National Science Foundation in the United States, the German Digital Libraries project is based on furthering cooperation with universities, scientific publishing houses (including various international publishers), book dealers, and special subject information centers, as well as academic and research libraries. The goals of the German Digital Libraries Project are to achieve: 1) efficient access to world wide information; 2) directly from the scientist's desktop; 3) while providing the organization for and stimulating fundamental structural changes in the information and communication process of the scientific community.
  12. Zimmer, D.E.: ¬Das Unbehagen an der Autorität : Erziehung: "Respekt und Liebe schließen sich nicht aus" (II) (1996) 0.00 
    8.704906E-4 = product of:
  0.020021284 = sum of:
    0.020021284 = weight(_text_:und in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020021284 = score(doc=4452,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Abstract
    Das Phänomen Autorität macht uns zu schaffen. Es ist aber nicht die eher anthropologische Frage, ob Autorität sein muß, die Ideologen und Philosophen bewegt hat. Es ging, zumal seit dem Triumph Hitlers, um eine speziellere Frage, nämlich: Was bringt den Faschisten hervor? Woher rührt dessen "eigentümliche Mischung aus Aggressivität und hündischer Geducktheit" (Joachim C. Fest)? Was macht den Menschen, der nach oben katzbuckelt, liebedienert und stumm gehorcht und der nach unten tritt? Wie könnte man ihn verhindern? Eine Antwort darauf war die antiautoritäre Erziehung: ein alternatives Programm, aus der keine autoritären Persönlichkeiten, sondern mündige, selbständige, demokratische Menschen hervorgehen sollten.
  13. Peters, C.; Picchi, E.: Across languages, across cultures : issues in multilinguality and digital libraries (1997) 0.00 
    5.0393963E-4 = product of:
  0.011590611 = sum of:
    0.011590611 = product of:
      0.023181222 = sum of:
        0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023181222 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Abstract
    With the recent rapid diffusion over the international computer networks of world-wide distributed document bases, the question of multilingual access and multilingual information retrieval is becoming increasingly relevant. We briefly discuss just some of the issues that must be addressed in order to implement a multilingual interface for a Digital Library system and describe our own approach to this problem.
  14. Paskin, N.: DOI: current status and outlook (1999) 0.00 
    5.0393963E-4 = product of:
  0.011590611 = sum of:
    0.011590611 = product of:
      0.023181222 = sum of:
        0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 1245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023181222 = score(doc=1245,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 1245, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Abstract
    Over the past few months the International DOI Foundation (IDF) has produced a number of discussion papers and other materials about the Digital Object Identifier (DOIsm) initiative. They are all available at the DOI web site, including a brief summary of the DOI origins and purpose. The aim of the present paper is to update those papers, reflecting recent progress, and to provide a summary of the current position and context of the DOI. Although much of the material presented here is the result of a consensus by the organisations forming the International DOI Foundation, some of the points discuss work in progress. The paper describes the origin of the DOI as a persistent identifier for managing copyrighted materials and its development under the non-profit International DOI Foundation into a system providing identifiers of intellectual property with a framework for open applications to be built using them. Persistent identification implementations consistent with URN specifications have up to now been hindered by lack of widespread availability of resolution mechanisms, content typology consensus, and sufficiently flexible infrastructure; DOI attempts to overcome these obstacles. Resolution of the DOI uses the Handle System®, which offers the necessary functionality for open applications. The aim of the International DOI Foundation is to promote widespread applications of the DOI, which it is doing by pioneering some early implementations and by providing an extensible framework to ensure interoperability of future DOI uses. Applications of the DOI will require an interoperable scheme of declared metadata with each DOI; the basis of the DOI metadata scheme is a minimal "kernel" of elements supplemented by additional application-specific elements, under an umbrella data model (derived from the INDECS analysis) that promotes convergence of different application metadata sets. The IDF intends to require declaration of only a minimal set of metadata, sufficient to enable unambiguous look-up of a DOI, but this must be capable of extension by others to create open applications.
  15. Rindflesch, T.C.; Aronson, A.R.: Semantic processing in information retrieval (1993) 0.00 
    4.903207E-4 = product of:
  0.011277375 = sum of:
    0.011277375 = product of:
      0.02255475 = sum of:
        0.02255475 = weight(_text_:29 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255475 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Date
    29. 6.2015 14:51:28
  16. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.00 
    4.1649418E-4 = product of:
  0.009579366 = sum of:
    0.009579366 = product of:
      0.019158732 = sum of:
        0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019158732 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  17. Shneiderman, B.; Byrd, D.; Croft, W.B.: Clarifying search : a user-interface framework for text searches (1997) 0.00 
    2.7327013E-4 = product of:
  0.0062852125 = sum of:
    0.0062852125 = product of:
      0.012570425 = sum of:
        0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 1258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012570425 = score(doc=1258,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 1258, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1258)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 3(1997) no.1, xx S
  18. Brin, S.; Page, L.: ¬The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine (1998) 0.00 
    2.4153895E-4 = product of:
  0.0055553955 = sum of:
    0.0055553955 = product of:
      0.011110791 = sum of:
        0.011110791 = weight(_text_:1 in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011110791 = score(doc=947,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Date
    1. 2.2001 9:35:56
    Source
    Computer networks. 30(1998) no.1-7, S.107-117
  19. Baker, T.: Languages for Dublin Core (1998) 0.00 
    2.2047358E-4 = product of:
  0.005070892 = sum of:
    0.005070892 = product of:
      0.010141784 = sum of:
        0.010141784 = weight(_text_:international in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010141784 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.12899815 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Abstract
    Over the past three years, the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative has achieved a broad international consensus on the semantics of a simple element set for describing electronic resources. Since the first workshop in March 1995, which was reported in the very first issue of D-Lib Magazine, Dublin Core has been the topic of perhaps a dozen articles here. Originally intended to be simple and intuitive enough for authors to tag Web pages without special training, Dublin Core is being adapted now for more specialized uses, from government information and legal deposit to museum informatics and electronic commerce. To meet such specialized requirements, Dublin Core can be customized with additional elements or qualifiers. However, these refinements can compromise interoperability across applications. There are tradeoffs between using specific terms that precisely meet local needs versus general terms that are understood more widely. We can better understand this inevitable tension between simplicity and complexity if we recognize that metadata is a form of human language. With Dublin Core, as with a natural language, people are inclined to stretch definitions, make general terms more specific, specific terms more general, misunderstand intended meanings, and coin new terms. One goal of this paper, therefore, will be to examine the experience of some related ways to seek semantic interoperability through simplicity: planned languages, interlingua constructs, and pidgins. The problem of semantic interoperability is compounded when we consider Dublin Core in translation. All of the workshops, documents, mailing lists, user guides, and working group outputs of the Dublin Core Initiative have been in English. But in many countries and for many applications, people need a metadata standard in their own language. In principle, the broad elements of Dublin Core can be defined equally well in Bulgarian or Hindi. Since Dublin Core is a controlled standard, however, any parallel definitions need to be kept in sync as the standard evolves. Another goal of the paper, then, will be to define the conceptual and organizational problem of maintaining a metadata standard in multiple languages. In addition to a name and definition, which are meant for human consumption, each Dublin Core element has a label, or indexing token, meant for harvesting by search engines. For practical reasons, these machine-readable tokens are English-looking strings such as Creator and Subject (just as HTML tags are called HEAD, BODY, or TITLE). These tokens, which are shared by Dublin Cores in every language, ensure that metadata fields created in any particular language are indexed together across repositories. As symbols of underlying universal semantics, these tokens form the basis of semantic interoperability among the multiple Dublin Cores. As long as we limit ourselves to sharing these indexing tokens among exact translations of a simple set of fifteen broad elements, the definitions of which fit easily onto two pages, the problem of Dublin Core in multiple languages is straightforward. But nothing having to do with human language is ever so simple. Just as speakers of various languages must learn the language of Dublin Core in their own tongues, we must find the right words to talk about a metadata language that is expressable in many discipline-specific jargons and natural languages and that inevitably will evolve and change over time.
  20. Dolin, R.; Agrawal, D.; El Abbadi, A.; Pearlman, J.: Using automated classification for summarizing and selecting heterogeneous information sources (1998) 0.00 
    2.0495258E-4 = product of:
  0.0047139092 = sum of:
    0.0047139092 = product of:
      0.0094278185 = sum of:
        0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0094278185 = score(doc=316,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 4(1998) no.1

Authors

Languages

  • e 22
  • d 7

Themes