Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Foerster, H. von; Müller, A.; Müller, K.H.: Rück- und Vorschauen : Heinz von Foerster im Gespräch mit Albert Müller und Karl H. Müller (2001) 0.04 
    0.042734735 = product of:
  0.0641021 = sum of:
    0.0035803982 = product of:
      0.01790199 = sum of:
        0.01790199 = weight(_text_:22 in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01790199 = score(doc=5988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.060521703 = sum of:
      0.042619713 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042619713 = score(doc=5988,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.18082327 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044043828 = queryNorm
          0.23569816 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
      0.01790199 = weight(_text_:22 in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01790199 = score(doc=5988,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044043828 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Noch einige Schritte weiter zurück. Oft haben mich Bibliothekare angesprochen, wie sollte man eine Bibliothek aufbauen? Wir schauen, sagten sie, in eine Bibliothek so hinein, als wäre sie wie ein Gedächtnis. "Das ist schön, aber wissen Sie, wie das Gedächtnis funktioniert? "Nein, aber viele Leute sagen, das Gedächtnis arbeitet wie eine große Bibliothek. Man muß nur hineingreifen und das richtige Buch finden. "Das ist alles wunderschön und sehr lieb, aber wissen Sie, die Leute, die ein Buch suchen, suchen es ja nur, weil sie ein Problem haben und hoffen, in dem Buch die Antwort für das Problem zu finden. Das Buch ist nur ein Zwischenträger von einer Frage und einer vielleicht in dem Buch zu findenden Antwort. Aber das Buch ist nicht die Antwort. "Aha, wie stellen Sie sich das vor? Wir sollten das Problem so sehen, daß die Inhalte der Bücher, die semantische Struktur - wenn man jetzt diesen Ausdruck wieder verwenden möchte - dieser Bücher in einem System sitzt, sodaß ich in diese semantische Struktur mit meiner Frage einsteigen kann, und mir die semantische Struktur dieses Systems sagt, dann mußt du Karl Müllers Arbeiten über Symbole lesen, dann wirst du wissen, was du suchst. Ich wüßte aber von vornherein überhaupt nicht, wer der Karl Müller ist, daß er über Symbole geschrieben hat, etc., aber das System kann mir das liefern.
    Date
    10. 9.2006 17:22:54
  2. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.04 
    0.039382376 = product of:
  0.05907356 = sum of:
    0.01687816 = product of:
      0.0843908 = sum of:
        0.0843908 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0843908 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0421954 = product of:
      0.0843908 = sum of:
        0.0843908 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0843908 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  3. Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.; Bekavac, B.: Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich : AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de (2002) 0.04 
    0.03617395 = product of:
  0.10852185 = sum of:
    0.10852185 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10852185 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20799294 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044043828 = queryNorm
        0.52175736 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  4. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.03 
    0.03341705 = product of:
  0.050125573 = sum of:
    0.014321593 = product of:
      0.07160796 = sum of:
        0.07160796 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07160796 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.03580398 = product of:
      0.07160796 = sum of:
        0.07160796 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07160796 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  5. Brahms, E.: Digital library initiatives of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (2001) 0.03 
    0.030694611 = product of:
  0.092083834 = sum of:
    0.092083834 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.092083834 = score(doc=1190,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20799294 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044043828 = queryNorm
        0.44272578 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) is the central public funding organization for academic research in Germany. It is thus comparable to a research council or a national research foundation. According to its statutes, DFG's mandate is to serve science and the arts in all fields by supporting research projects carried out at universities and public research institutions in Germany, to promote cooperation between researchers, and to forge and support links between German academic science, industry and partners in foreign countries. In the fulfillment of its tasks, the DFG pays special attention to the education and support of young scientists and scholars. DFG's mandate and operations follow the principle of territoriality. This means that its funding activities are restricted, with very few exceptions, to individuals and institutions with permanent addresses in Germany. Fellowships are granted for work in other countries, but most fellowship programs are restricted to German citizens, with a few exceptions for permanent residents of Germany holding foreign passports.
  6. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.03 
    0.029906537 = product of:
  0.044859804 = sum of:
    0.032556552 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032556552 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20799294 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044043828 = queryNorm
        0.1565272 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
    0.01230325 = product of:
      0.0246065 = sum of:
        0.0246065 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0246065 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18082327 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.13608038 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
  7. Kaiser, M.; Lieder, H.J.; Majcen, K.; Vallant, H.: New ways of sharing and using authority information : the LEAF project (2003) 0.02 
    0.024922114 = product of:
  0.03738317 = sum of:
    0.027130462 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027130462 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20799294 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044043828 = queryNorm
        0.13043934 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
    0.010252709 = product of:
      0.020505417 = sum of:
        0.020505417 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020505417 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18082327 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.113400325 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article presents an overview of the LEAF project (Linking and Exploring Authority Files)1, which has set out to provide a framework for international, collaborative work in the sector of authority data with respect to authority control. Elaborating the virtues of authority control in today's Web environment is an almost futile exercise, since so much has been said and written about it in the last few years.2 The World Wide Web is generally understood to be poorly structured-both with regard to content and to locating required information. Highly structured databases might be viewed as small islands of precision within this chaotic environment. Though the Web in general or any particular structured database would greatly benefit from increased authority control, it should be noted that our following considerations only refer to authority control with regard to databases of "memory institutions" (i.e., libraries, archives, and museums). Moreover, when talking about authority records, we exclusively refer to personal name authority records that describe a specific person. Although different types of authority records could indeed be used in similar ways to the ones presented in this article, discussing those different types is outside the scope of both the LEAF project and this article. Personal name authority records-as are all other "authorities"-are maintained as separate records and linked to various kinds of descriptive records. Name authority records are usually either kept in independent databases or in separate tables in the database containing the descriptive records. This practice points at a crucial benefit: by linking any number of descriptive records to an authorized name record, the records related to this entity are collocated in the database. Variant forms of the authorized name are referenced in the authority records and thus ensure the consistency of the database while enabling search and retrieval operations that produce accurate results. On one hand, authority control may be viewed as a positive prerequisite of a consistent catalogue; on the other, the creation of new authority records is a very time consuming and expensive undertaking. As a consequence, various models of providing access to existing authority records have emerged: the Library of Congress and the French National Library (Bibliothèque nationale de France), for example, make their authority records available to all via a web-based search service.3 In Germany, the Personal Name Authority File (PND, Personennamendatei4) maintained by the German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek, Frankfurt/Main) offers a different approach to shared access: within a closed network, participating institutions have online access to their pooled data. The number of recent projects and initiatives that have addressed the issue of authority control in one way or another is considerable.5 Two important current initiatives should be mentioned here: The Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) and Virtual International Authority File (VIAF).
  8. Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (2002) 0.02 
    0.019691188 = product of:
  0.02953678 = sum of:
    0.00843908 = product of:
      0.0421954 = sum of:
        0.0421954 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0421954 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0210977 = product of:
      0.0421954 = sum of:
        0.0421954 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0421954 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.
  9. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.02 
    0.01949328 = product of:
  0.029239919 = sum of:
    0.008354262 = product of:
      0.04177131 = sum of:
        0.04177131 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04177131 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.020885656 = product of:
      0.04177131 = sum of:
        0.04177131 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04177131 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
  10. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.02 
    0.016708525 = product of:
  0.025062786 = sum of:
    0.0071607963 = product of:
      0.03580398 = sum of:
        0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580398 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.01790199 = product of:
      0.03580398 = sum of:
        0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580398 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  11. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.02 
    0.016708525 = product of:
  0.025062786 = sum of:
    0.0071607963 = product of:
      0.03580398 = sum of:
        0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580398 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.01790199 = product of:
      0.03580398 = sum of:
        0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580398 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
  12. Atran, S.; Medin, D.L.; Ross, N.: Evolution and devolution of knowledge : a tale of two biologies (2004) 0.02 
    0.016708525 = product of:
  0.025062786 = sum of:
    0.0071607963 = product of:
      0.03580398 = sum of:
        0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580398 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.01790199 = product of:
      0.03580398 = sum of:
        0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03580398 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    23. 1.2022 10:22:18
  13. Beuth, P.: Voyeure gesucht : Böse Nachbarn (2008) 0.02 
    0.015347306 = product of:
  0.046041917 = sum of:
    0.046041917 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046041917 = score(doc=2226,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20799294 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044043828 = queryNorm
        0.22136289 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    "Mitten in Frankfurt lebt eine bösartige Friseurin, die geparkte Autos zerkratzt und in die Psychiatrie gehört. Findet jedenfalls ihr Nachbar, der diese Anschuldigungen im Internet für jedermann sichtbar veröffentlicht hat: Auf der viel gescholtenen Seite www.rottenneighbor.com befindet er sich mit solchen Behauptungen in bester Gesellschaft. Vermeintliche Drogendealer, Schlampen, Betrüger - sie alle haben ihre Einträge auf der Karte von Frankfurt erhalten, in einigen Fällen sogar mit exakter Anschrift und vollem Namen. Die Denunzianten selbst bleiben lieber anonym. Der überwiegende Teil der Einträge auf der Website liest sich allerdings eher so: "Im Hauptbahnhof wohnt ein Geist - hat meine Mama mal gesagt." Es mag Menschen geben, die das wahnsinnig witzig finden, jedenfalls zeigt es, wie ernst Rottenneighbor wirklich zu nehmen ist. Zuletzt hatte das Portal aus den USA für Aufsehen gesorgt, weil es für viele deutsche User tagelang nicht oder nur über Umwege zu erreichen war. Zensurverdacht wurde unter Bloggern laut, zumal der Seitenbetreiber im kalifornischen Santa Barbara zunächst nicht auf Anfragen reagierte. Als er es dann tat, erklärte er die Probleme mit dem rasant gestiegenen Interesse aus Deutschland. Die Server hätten die "mehreren hunderttausend Zugriffe am Tag" nicht verkraftet. Tatsächlich kommen derzeit 80 Prozent aller Zugriffe auf die Seite aus Deutschland, befeuert vom reflexhaften Aufschrei von Journalisten und Politikern. In den USA ist das Interesse längst schon wieder gesunken, von einst 300.000 Besuchern im Monat auf zuletzt noch 60.000. Dort schrieben die Medien bereits im Januar, was Kulturpessimisten hierzulande nun nachbeten: Über "erhebliche Eingriffe in die Persönlichkeitsrechte" hatte sich etwa Norbert Schneider, Direktor der Landesmedienanstalt NRW kürzlich erregt und Google aufgefordert, das "Cyber-Mobbing" nicht mit seinen Stadtplänen zu unterstützen.
    Viel Wirbel - dabei ist das Ende der Aufmerksamkeit für die öffentliche Nachbarschaftsschelte bereits abzusehen. Zu sehr ähneln sich die Anfeindungen, zu gering ist der Nutzwert, als dass die Seite lange interessant bleiben könnte. Sobald die Medien und Blogger mit dem Thema durch sind, werden die Abrufe wieder klar sinken. Das Abendland wird nicht untergehen. Das zeigt auch die Geschichte, denn "Anschwärzen 2.0" ist beileibe kein neues Phänomen. Den fragwürdigen Titel eines Pionier-Prangers im Internet darf sogar das deutsche Angebot von rache-ist-suess.de für sich beanspruchen. Die Seite wurde 1999 zum Anlaufpunkt für Teenager, die über Ex-Freunde und zickige Rivalinnen lästern wollten. Im vorigen Jahr wurde die Seite stillgelegt. Zwar sind die Tiraden immer noch zu lesen, aber keiner spricht mehr über das Portal. Über langfristige gesamtgesellschaftliche Schäden ist nichts bekannt. Auch die Seite dontdatehimgirl.com ist so ein Fall: Frauen warnen vor Dates mit Männern, die sie für Fremdgänger, Lügner oder Verlierer halten - oft mit komplettem Namen und sogar Fotos. Auch diese Seite kommt aus den USA, auch hier finden sich Einträge aus Frankfurt, Bonn und Berlin. Wie verdreht oder erlogen die Infos sind, kann niemand prüfen. Aber Webstatistiken zufolge hat das Portal selbst in den USA kaum 90000 Besucher im Monat und dürfte so eher als Frust-Abladestation dienen denn als Warnsystem. Psychologin Katja Schwab, Autorin des "Psychologieblogs" (psychologieblog.de), erklärt die Motive der Denunzianten mit simplen Rachebedürfnissen: "Sie wollen nach einem Konflikt ihr Selbstwertgefühl wiederherstellen. Dafür bedienen sich die Menschen immer der am einfachsten zugänglichen Mittel."Den "Tätern" gebe es ein gutes Gefühl, wenigstens irgendetwas unternommen zu haben, und auch den Lesern der Schmähungen gehe es ums Selbstwertgefühl. "Es ist menschlich, sich nach unten zu vergleichen, um das Selbst zu erhöhen. Wenn wir sehen, dass andere Probleme haben, fühlen wir uns besser."
  14. Boldi, P.; Santini, M.; Vigna, S.: PageRank as a function of the damping factor (2005) 0.01 
    0.013923772 = product of:
  0.020885658 = sum of:
    0.0059673307 = product of:
      0.029836653 = sum of:
        0.029836653 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029836653 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.014918326 = product of:
      0.029836653 = sum of:
        0.029836653 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029836653 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  15. Baeza-Yates, R.; Boldi, P.; Castillo, C.: Generalizing PageRank : damping functions for linkbased ranking algorithms (2006) 0.01 
    0.013923772 = product of:
  0.020885658 = sum of:
    0.0059673307 = product of:
      0.029836653 = sum of:
        0.029836653 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029836653 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.014918326 = product of:
      0.029836653 = sum of:
        0.029836653 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029836653 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  16. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.01 
    0.011139018 = product of:
  0.016708527 = sum of:
    0.0047738645 = product of:
      0.023869323 = sum of:
        0.023869323 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023869323 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.011934661 = product of:
      0.023869323 = sum of:
        0.023869323 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023869323 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22
  17. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung bibliografischer Titeldatensätze der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie (2009) 0.01 
    0.011139018 = product of:
  0.016708527 = sum of:
    0.0047738645 = product of:
      0.023869323 = sum of:
        0.023869323 = weight(_text_:22 in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023869323 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.011934661 = product of:
      0.023869323 = sum of:
        0.023869323 = weight(_text_:22 in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023869323 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 1.2010 14:41:24
  18. Bradford, R.B.: Relationship discovery in large text collections using Latent Semantic Indexing (2006) 0.01 
    0.011139018 = product of:
  0.016708527 = sum of:
    0.0047738645 = product of:
      0.023869323 = sum of:
        0.023869323 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023869323 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.011934661 = product of:
      0.023869323 = sum of:
        0.023869323 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023869323 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism, and Security, SIAM Data Mining Conference, Bethesda, MD, 20-22 April, 2006. [http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm06/workproceed/Link%20Analysis/15.pdf]
  19. dpa: Europeana hat Startschwierigkeiten : Europas Online-Bibliothek (2008) 0.01 
    0.009666346 = product of:
  0.028999038 = sum of:
    0.028999038 = product of:
      0.057998076 = sum of:
        0.057998076 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 4537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057998076 = score(doc=4537,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18082327 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.32074454 = fieldWeight in 4537, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4537)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    "Brüssel. Die erste gemeinsame Online-Bibliothek der Europäischen Union ist nach nur wenigen Stunden wegen technischer Probleme wieder abgeschaltet worden. Ein unerwarteter Besucheransturm legte das Portal www.europeana.eu lahm, sagte ein Sprecher der EU-Kommission am Freitag in Brüssel. Die 20 Millionen Klicks pro Stunde habe die Seite nicht verkraftet. "Wir waren ausgerüstet für fünf Millionen Klicks", begründete der Sprecher die Panne. Spätestens bis Mitte Dezember soll die Seite wieder zur Verfügung stehen. Zuvor müsse zusätzliche Computerkapazität im Rechenzentrum der Universität Amsterdam angemietet werden. Bereits am Donnerstagmittag war die Zahl der Server von drei auf sechs verdoppelt worden, nachdem die Seite bereits in den ersten Stunden nach der Freischaltung vorübergehend zusammengebrochen war. "Die Kosten können noch aus dem Budget der Europeana abgedeckt werden", sagte der Sprecher. Europeana macht Dokumente, Bücher, Gemälde, Filme und Fotografien aus europäischen Sammlungen kostenlos im Internet zugänglich. Bisher sind dort knapp drei Millionen Objekte eingestellt, bis 2010 sollen es zehn Millionen sein. Mehr als 1000 Archive, Museen und Bibliotheken haben bereits digitalisiertes Material geliefert. Die Kommission stellt zwei Millionen Euro pro Jahr für den Unterhalt der Plattform bereit. Die Kosten für die Digitalisierung tragen die Mitgliedstaaten."
  20. dpa: Europeana gestartet : Europa eröffnet virtuelle Bibliothek (2008) 0.01 
    0.009666346 = product of:
  0.028999038 = sum of:
    0.028999038 = product of:
      0.057998076 = sum of:
        0.057998076 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057998076 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18082327 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044043828 = queryNorm
            0.32074454 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    "Die Europäische Union hat zum ersten Mal eine gemeinsame digitale Bibliothek. Auf dem Internetportal www.europeana.eu stehen seit Donnerstag fast drei Millionen Dokumente, Bücher, Gemälde,Filme und Fotografien aus europäischen Sammlungen zur Verfügung, teilte die EU-Kommission mit. Bereits in den ersten Stunden nach der Freischaltung besuchten mehr als zehn Millionen Internetnutzer die Seite, die vorübergehend zusammenbrach. Die Zahl der Server wurde daraufhin von drei auf sechs verdoppelt. "Wir hätten uns in unseren kühnsten Träumen nicht vorstellen können, dass es einen solchen Ansturm auf Europeana gibt", sagte EU-Medienkommissarin Viviane Reding in Brüssel. Bis 2010 sollen auf dem Portal zehn Millionen Objekte in allen EU-Sprachen abrufbar sein. Mehr als 1000 Archive, Museen und Bibliotheken lieferten bereits digitalisiertes Material. Die Kommission stellt zwei Millionen Euro pro Jahr für den Unterhalt der Plattform bereit. Die Kosten für die Digitalisierung tragen die Mitgliedstaaten. Bisher ist nur ein Prozent aller europäischen Kulturgüter elektronisch verfügbar. Um die angestrebte Zahl von zehn Millionen Werken bis 2010 zu erreichen, müssen die Staaten nach Schätzung der Kommission zusammen weitere 350 Millionen Euro in die Hand nehmen. Wie viel die Mitgliedstaaten bisher aufbrachten, blieb offen. Die EU will die Erforschung und Entwicklung von Technologien in dem Bereich in den kommenden zwei Jahren mit 119 Millionen Euro fördern. Die EU-Kulturminister sprachen sich dafür aus, das kulturelle Angebot im Internet weiter auszubauen und gleichzeitig ihren Kampf gegen Online-Piraterie zu verstärken. "Wir wollen legale glaubwürdige Angebote für Verbraucher schaffen", sagte die französische Ressortchefin Christine Albanel, die derzeit die Ministerrunde führt"

Authors

Languages

  • e 16
  • d 8

Themes