Search (88 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.03 
    0.03149821 = product of:
  0.094494626 = sum of:
    0.094494626 = product of:
      0.14174193 = sum of:
        0.094403625 = weight(_text_:theory in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094403625 = score(doc=1149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
        0.04733831 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04733831 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a test of the validity of using Google Scholar to evaluate the publications of researchers by comparing the premises on which its search engine, PageRank, is based, to those of Garfield's theory of citation indexing. It finds that the premises are identical and that PageRank and Garfield's theory of citation indexing validate each other.
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  2. Franke, F.: ¬Das Framework for Information Literacy : neue Impulse für die Förderung von Informationskompetenz in Deutschland?! (2017) 0.02 
    0.02167916 = product of:
  0.065037474 = sum of:
    0.065037474 = product of:
      0.0975562 = sum of:
        0.062052473 = weight(_text_:29 in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062052473 = score(doc=2248,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.40390027 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
        0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035503734 = score(doc=2248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/2017H4S22-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2017H4S22-29.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.4, S.22-29
  3. Landwehr, A.: China schafft digitales Punktesystem für den "besseren" Menschen (2018) 0.02 
    0.02113474 = product of:
  0.06340422 = sum of:
    0.06340422 = product of:
      0.095106326 = sum of:
        0.047768015 = weight(_text_:29 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047768015 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
        0.04733831 = weight(_text_:22 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04733831 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:29:46
  4. Voß, J.: Classification of knowledge organization systems with Wikidata (2016) 0.02 
    0.019015294 = product of:
  0.057045877 = sum of:
    0.057045877 = product of:
      0.085568815 = sum of:
        0.050065085 = weight(_text_:theory in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050065085 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
        0.035503734 = weight(_text_:22 in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035503734 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Pages
    S.15-22
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
  5. Albinus, L.: Can science cope with more than one world? : a cross-reading of Habermas, Popper, and Searle (2013) 0.01 
    0.010365643 = product of:
  0.031096928 = sum of:
    0.031096928 = product of:
      0.09329078 = sum of:
        0.09329078 = weight(_text_:theory in 4520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09329078 = score(doc=4520,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.5136716 = fieldWeight in 4520, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4520)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this article is to critically assess the 'three-world theory' as it is presented-with some slight but decisive differences-by Ju¨rgen Habermas and Karl Popper. This theory presents the philosophy of science with a conceptual and material problem, insofar as it claims that science has no single access to all aspects of the world. Although I will try to demonstrate advantages of Popper's idea of 'the third world' of ideas, the shortcomings of his ontological stance become visible from the pragmatic point of view in Habermas's theory of communicative acts. With regard to the critique that the three-world theory has met in both its pragmatic and ontological versions, I will take a closer look at John Searle's naturalistic counter-position. By teasing out some problematic implications in his theory of causation, I aim to show that Searle's approach is, in fact, much closer to Popper's than he might think. Finally, while condoning Habermas's distinction between the natural world and the lifeworld, I will opt for a pragmatically differentiated view of 'the real', rather than speaking of different worlds.
  6. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.01 
    0.009298123 = product of:
  0.027894368 = sum of:
    0.027894368 = product of:
      0.0836831 = sum of:
        0.0836831 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0836831 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  7. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.01 
    0.00919296 = product of:
  0.02757888 = sum of:
    0.02757888 = product of:
      0.08273663 = sum of:
        0.08273663 = weight(_text_:29 in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08273663 = score(doc=5624,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
    4. 8.2019 19:52:29
    Issue
    [29. Juli 2019].
  8. Gödert, W.: Digitale Euthanasie? (2018) 0.01 
    0.0079613365 = product of:
  0.02388401 = sum of:
    0.02388401 = product of:
      0.071652025 = sum of:
        0.071652025 = weight(_text_:29 in 5898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071652025 = score(doc=5898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5898)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Open Password. 2018, Nr.372 vom 29. Mai 2018 [https://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=480&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045]
  9. Grandt, J.: Vom Gebrauch der Worte (2017) 0.01 
    0.0079613365 = product of:
  0.02388401 = sum of:
    0.02388401 = product of:
      0.071652025 = sum of:
        0.071652025 = weight(_text_:29 in 3258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071652025 = score(doc=3258,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3258, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3258)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    28. 2.2017 13:29:03
  10. Moebius, R.: ¬Die Zitiercommunity (2019) 0.01 
    0.0079613365 = product of:
  0.02388401 = sum of:
    0.02388401 = product of:
      0.071652025 = sum of:
        0.071652025 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071652025 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1. 4.2019 10:29:34
  11. Koch, C.: Can a photodiode be conscious? (2013) 0.01 
    0.00741705 = product of:
  0.02225115 = sum of:
    0.02225115 = product of:
      0.06675345 = sum of:
        0.06675345 = weight(_text_:theory in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06675345 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    New York Review of Books, [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/01/10/can-information-theory-explain-consciousness/]. 2013
  12. Tozer, J.: How long is the perfect book? : Bigger really is better. What the numbers say (2019) 0.01 
    0.00741705 = product of:
  0.02225115 = sum of:
    0.02225115 = product of:
      0.06675345 = sum of:
        0.06675345 = weight(_text_:theory in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06675345 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    British novelist E.M. Forster once complained that long books "are usually overpraised" because "the reader wishes to convince others and himself that he has not wasted his time." To test his theory we collected reader ratings for 737 books tagged as "classic literature" on Goodreads.com, a review aggregator with 80m members. The bias towards chunky tomes was substantial. Slim volumes of 100 to 200 pages scored only 3.87 out of 5, whereas those over 1,000 pages scored 4.19. Longer is better, say the readers.
  13. Maguire, P.; Maguire, R.: Consciousness is data compression (2010) 0.01 
    0.00741705 = product of:
  0.02225115 = sum of:
    0.02225115 = product of:
      0.06675345 = sum of:
        0.06675345 = weight(_text_:theory in 4972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06675345 = score(doc=4972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 4972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4972)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In this article we advance the conjecture that conscious awareness is equivalent to data compression. Algorithmic information theory supports the assertion that all forms of understanding are contingent on compression (Chaitin, 2007). Here, we argue that the experience people refer to as consciousness is the particular form of understanding that the brain provides. We therefore propose that the degree of consciousness of a system can be measured in terms of the amount of data compression it carries out.
  14. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Reception of externalized knowledge : a constructivistic model based on Popper's Three Worlds and Searle's Collective Intentionality (2019) 0.01 
    0.00741705 = product of:
  0.02225115 = sum of:
    0.02225115 = product of:
      0.06675345 = sum of:
        0.06675345 = weight(_text_:theory in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06675345 = score(doc=5205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    We provide a model for the reception of knowledge from externalized information sources. The model is based on a cognitive understanding of information processing and draws up ideas of an exchange of information in communication processes. Karl Popper's three-world theory with its orientation on falsifiable scientific knowledge is extended by John Searle's concept of collective intentionality. This allows a consistent description of externalization and reception of knowledge including scientific knowledge as well as everyday knowledge.
  15. Strittmatter, K.: Chinas digitaler Plan für den besseren Menschen (2017) 0.01 
    0.0066344473 = product of:
  0.019903341 = sum of:
    0.019903341 = product of:
      0.059710022 = sum of:
        0.059710022 = weight(_text_:29 in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059710022 = score(doc=2114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    19. 9.2017 14:45:29
  16. Bredemeier, W.: Was sagt uns die Debatte zu "Fake News" über die Qualität unserer etablierten Medien? : Medienkritik in der Zeit alternativer Fakten (2017) 0.01 
    0.0066344473 = product of:
  0.019903341 = sum of:
    0.019903341 = product of:
      0.059710022 = sum of:
        0.059710022 = weight(_text_:29 in 3661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059710022 = score(doc=3661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3661)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    29. 5.2017 10:43:39
  17. Bieber, F.; Berthold, J.: Es gibt kein besseres Argument als ein gutes Buch (2018) 0.01 
    0.0066344473 = product of:
  0.019903341 = sum of:
    0.019903341 = product of:
      0.059710022 = sum of:
        0.059710022 = weight(_text_:29 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059710022 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    29. 5.2018 20:17:13
  18. Schnetker, M.F.J.; Becker, M.: Transhumanismus : Von der Technikverehrung zur Mythologie (2019) 0.01 
    0.0066344473 = product of:
  0.019903341 = sum of:
    0.019903341 = product of:
      0.059710022 = sum of:
        0.059710022 = weight(_text_:29 in 5308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059710022 = score(doc=5308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15363316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5308)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
  19. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.01 
    0.0065747662 = product of:
  0.019724298 = sum of:
    0.019724298 = product of:
      0.05917289 = sum of:
        0.05917289 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05917289 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15294059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  20. Araújo, P.C. de.; Tennis, J.; Guimarães, J.A.: Metatheory and knowledge organization (2017) 0.01 
    0.006555808 = product of:
  0.019667422 = sum of:
    0.019667422 = product of:
      0.059002265 = sum of:
        0.059002265 = weight(_text_:theory in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059002265 = score(doc=3858,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18161562 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04367448 = queryNorm
            0.3248744 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Metatheory is meta-analytic work that comes from sociology and its purpose is the analysis of theory. Metatheory is a common form of scholarship in knowledge organization (KO). This paper presents an analysis of five papers that are metatheoretical investigations in KO. The papers were published between 2008 and 2015 in the journal Knowledge Organization. The preliminary findings from this paper are that though the authors do metatheoretical work it is not made explicit by the majority of the authors. Of the four types of metatheoretical work, metatheorizing in order to better understand theory (Mu) is most popular. Further, the external/intellectual approach, which imports analytical lenses from other fields, was applied in four of the five papers. And, the use of metatheory as a method of analysis is closely related to these authors' concern about epistemological, theoretical and methodological issues in the KO domain. Metatheory, while not always explicitly acknowledged as a method, is a valuable tool to better understand the foundations, the development of research, and the influence from other domains on KO.

Authors

Languages

  • d 49
  • e 37
  • a 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Themes