Search (71 results, page 2 of 4)

0.0017435154 = product of:
  0.024409214 = sum of:
    0.024409214 = weight(_text_:web in 5719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024409214 = score(doc=5719,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 5719, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5719)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

The VOSviewer software provides easy access to bibliometric mapping using data from Dimensions, Scopus and Web of Science. The properly formatted and structured citation data, and the ease in which it can be exported open up new avenues for use during citation searches and eference interviews. This paper details specific techniques for using advanced searches in Dimensions, exporting the citation data, and drawing insights from the maps produced in VOS Viewer. These search techniques and data export practices are fast and accurate enough to build into reference interviews for graduate students, faculty, and post-PhD researchers. The search results derived from them are accurate and allow a more comprehensive view of citation networks embedded in ordinary complex boolean searches.

0.0017435154 = product of:
  0.024409214 = sum of:
    0.024409214 = weight(_text_:web in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024409214 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

In den letzten Jahren ist das Angebot an Academic Search Engines für die Recherche nach Fachliteratur zu allen Wissenschaftsgebieten stark angewachsen und ergänzt die beliebten kommerziellen Angebote wie Web of Science oder Scopus. Der Artikel zeigt die wesentlichen Unterschiede zwischen bibliothekarischen Discovery-Systemen und Academic Search Engines wie Base, Dimensions oder Open Alex auf und diskutiert Möglichkeiten, wie beide von einander profitieren können. Diese Entwicklungsperspektiven betreffen Aspekte wie die Kontextualisierung von Wissen, die Datenmodellierung, die automatischen Datenanreicherung sowie den Zuschnitt von Suchräumen.

0.0013482874 = product of:
  0.018876024 = sum of:
    0.018876024 = weight(_text_:information in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018876024 = score(doc=1077,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3628561 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Purpose This paper offers a definition of the core of information science, which encompasses most research in the field. The definition provides a unique identity for information science and positions it in the disciplinary universe. Design/methodology/approach After motivating the objective, a definition of the core and an explanation of its key aspects are provided. The definition is related to other definitions of information science before controversial discourse aspects are briefly addressed: discipline vs. field, science vs. humanities, library vs. information science and application vs. theory. Interdisciplinarity as an often-assumed foundation of information science is challenged. Findings Information science is concerned with how information is manifested across space and time. Information is manifested to facilitate and support the representation, access, documentation and preservation of ideas, activities, or practices, and to enable different types of interactions. Research and professional practice encompass the infrastructures - institutions and technology -and phenomena and practices around manifested information across space and time as its core contribution to the scholarly landscape. Information science collaborates with other disciplines to work on complex information problems that need multi- and interdisciplinary approaches to address them. Originality/value The paper argues that new information problems may change the core of the field, but throughout its existence, the discipline has remained quite stable in its central focus, yet proved to be highly adaptive to the tremendous changes in the forms, practices, institutions and technologies around and for manifested information.

0.0012839122 = product of:
  0.01797477 = sum of:
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.0012839122 = product of:
  0.01797477 = sum of:
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=712,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

In traditional classification, fictional works are indexed only by their form, genre, and language, while their subject content is believed to be irrelevant. However, recent research suggests that this may not be the best approach. We tested indexing of a small sample of selected fictional works by Integrative Levels Classification (ILC2), a freely faceted system based on phenomena instead of disciplines and considered the structure of the resulting classmarks. Issues in the process of subject analysis, such as selection of relevant vs. non-relevant themes and citation order of relevant ones, are identified and discussed. Some phenomena that are covered in scholarly literature can also be identified as relevant themes in fictional literature and expressed in classmarks. This can allow for hybrid search and retrieval systems covering both fiction and nonfiction, which will result in better leveraging of the knowledge contained in fictional works.

0.001147117 = product of:
  0.016059637 = sum of:
    0.016059637 = product of:
      0.04817891 = sum of:
        0.04817891 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04817891 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

2. 3.2020 14:08:22

0.0010591936 = product of:
  0.01482871 = sum of:
    0.01482871 = weight(_text_:information in 5684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01482871 = score(doc=5684,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 5684, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5684)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Informationskompetenz in den Bibliotheken und in der Informationswissenschaft. Es ist erschreckend, dass im Zeitalter der vieldiskutierten "Desinformationen" und "Fake News" im Medienbereich der einzige Beitrag der Informationswissenschaft in der Betonung einer irgendwie ausgestalteten "Informationskompetenz", manchmal ergänzt um eine ebenso imaginäre "Medienkompetenz" besteht. Man möchte sich gern zum verbindlichen Entscheider darüber erklären, was wahre und falsche Information, was Hate Speech und Fakten sind. Der Türöffner dafür soll das bibliothekarisch besetzte Feld der "Informationskompetenz" sein, dass man nunmehr für den Gesamtbereich der "Information" besetzen möchte. Die ursprüngliche Beschränkung der bibliothekarischen Domäne der Informationskompetenz auf eine berufsrelevante Vermittlung von InformationsSUCHkompetenz wird dafür geopfert. Der Ursprung des Begriffes "Informationskompetenz" liegt im Bibliotheksbereich und sollte dort beheimatet bleiben.

Content

Fortsetzung von: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch: Wie man mit "Information" umgehen sollte: Das Beispiel der Medienforschung. Unter: Open Password. 2020, Nr.777 vom 29. Juni 2020 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=Wzk0LCIxODU1NzhmZDQ2ZDAiLDAsMCw4NSwxXQ].

Theme

Information

0.0010591936 = product of:
  0.01482871 = sum of:
    0.01482871 = weight(_text_:information in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01482871 = score(doc=5911,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Information als "Wissen in Aktion" zu definieren, scheint der Informationswissenschaft zu reichen. Und das in einer Welt, wie das Fachportal woxiwon (https://synonyme.woxikon.de/synonyme/information.php) ausweist, bei über 460 Synonyma für den Begriff "Information", die in fast dreißig Gruppen geclustert sind. Cluster 1: "Aufmerksamkeit" mit den Dimensionen der Nutzererwartungen "Aktualität", "Werbung", "Schlagzeilen" sowie "Provokation durch Fake & Klatsch". Cluster 2: "Verbundenheit" Cluster 3: "Gemeinsamkeit" Cluster 4: "Intellektuelle Leistung"

Content

Fortsetzung von: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch: die Kapitulation der Informationswissenschaft vor dem eigenen Basisbegriff. Unter: Open Password. 2020, Nr.759 vom 25. Mai 2020 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=Wzk0LCIxODU1NzhmZDQ2ZDAiLDAsMCw4NSwxXQ]. Weitere Fortsetzung als: Informationskompetenz in den Bibliotheken und in der Informationswissenschaft - Das Verlangen nach einer verständlichen Wissenschaftssprache. In: Open Password. 2020, Nr.784 vom 09. Juli 2020. Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzExNiwiM2Y4YjgwNDBiM2QxIiwwLDAsMTA2LDFd.

Theme

Information

0.001008966 = product of:
  0.014125523 = sum of:
    0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014125523 = score(doc=326,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Die Informationswissenschaft, eine Disziplin ohne Theorie, ohne Bezugsrahmen und ohne Klärung ihres Grundbegriffes. Zahlreiche FachvertreterInnen der Informationswissenschaft bereiten erst recht das Feld für Hate Speech und Fake News vor - mit ihrem ungeklärten (Un)begriff der "Information", - mit ihrer Forderung nach "Informationskompetenz", ein Terrain, das eigentlich der Bibliothekswissenschaft zusteht, - mit ihrer Theorielosigkeit, - mit ihrer unkritischen Ablehnung einer ernsthaften Auseinandersetzung sowie - mit ihrem ungeklärten Domänenverständnis.

Content

Fortsetzung als: Wie man mit Information umgehen sollte - Das Beispiel der Medienforschung. Unter: Open Password. 2020, Nr.777 vom 29. Juni 2020 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=Wzk0LCIxODU1NzhmZDQ2ZDAiLDAsMCw4NSwxXQ].

Theme

Information

0.001008966 = product of:
  0.014125523 = sum of:
    0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014125523 = score(doc=345,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Auf der im März 2021 abgehaltenen (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März -10.März 2021) wurde nochmals nachdrücklich auf die domänenspezifische, fast mit Alleinstellungsanspruch versehene "Informationskompetenz" (Information Literacy) der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft hingewiesen. Erneut wurden "Zukunftsdiskurse" zu "Informationskompetenz und Demokratie" angekündigt und "Positionspapiere" zur Informationskompetenz und Informationskompetenzvermittlung präsentiert (D. Cetta, J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl, E. Montanari: Positionspapiere. Informationskompetenz und Informationskompetenzvermittlung: Aktueller Stand und Perspektiven. Hildesheim 2019).

9.986174E-4 = product of:
  0.013980643 = sum of:
    0.013980643 = weight(_text_:information in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013980643 = score(doc=304,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Das Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education entwirft ein spezifisches Verständnis von Informationskompetenz als Grundlage für die Teilnahme am akademischen Diskurs. Über die Frage nach dem impliziten Gebrauch von information und literacy als zentralen Begriffen fragt der Beitrag nach der Übertragbarkeit dieser Sicht von Informationskompetenz auf andere Diskurse als den akademischen.

9.962944E-4 = product of:
  0.013948122 = sum of:
    0.013948122 = weight(_text_:web in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013948122 = score(doc=872,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time, we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles, as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding and of GPT-3 in general.

9.6690713E-4 = product of:
  0.013536699 = sum of:
    0.013536699 = weight(_text_:information in 713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013536699 = score(doc=713,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 713, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=713)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Cataloging practices, as exemplified by the five user tasks of the IFLA Library Reference Model, can support information literacy practices. The six frames of the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education are used as lenses to examine the user tasks. Two themes emerge from this examination: context matters, and catalogers must tailor bibliographic descriptions to meet users' expectations and information needs. Catalogers need to solicit feedback from various user communities to reform cataloging practices to remain current and viable. Such conversations will enrich the catalog and enhance (reclaim?) its position as a primary tool for research and learning. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1939828.

9.5593097E-4 = product of:
  0.013383033 = sum of:
    0.013383033 = product of:
      0.040149096 = sum of:
        0.040149096 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040149096 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

4. 5.2020 17:22:40

9.5593097E-4 = product of:
  0.013383033 = sum of:
    0.013383033 = product of:
      0.040149096 = sum of:
        0.040149096 = weight(_text_:22 in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040149096 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

4. 5.2020 17:22:28

9.5593097E-4 = product of:
  0.013383033 = sum of:
    0.013383033 = product of:
      0.040149096 = sum of:
        0.040149096 = weight(_text_:22 in 5907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040149096 = score(doc=5907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5907)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

22. 6.2020 19:11:24

9.5593097E-4 = product of:
  0.013383033 = sum of:
    0.013383033 = product of:
      0.040149096 = sum of:
        0.040149096 = weight(_text_:22 in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040149096 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

22. 6.2020 19:16:24

9.5593097E-4 = product of:
  0.013383033 = sum of:
    0.013383033 = product of:
      0.040149096 = sum of:
        0.040149096 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040149096 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

7. 5.2021 22:10:24

9.5593097E-4 = product of:
  0.013383033 = sum of:
    0.013383033 = product of:
      0.040149096 = sum of:
        0.040149096 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040149096 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25

8.0575584E-4 = product of:
  0.011280581 = sum of:
    0.011280581 = weight(_text_:information in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011280581 = score(doc=338,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Wenn ein Programmkomitee für ein wissenschaftliches Symposium mit 65 Personen besetzt wird, dann darf man sich auf ein breites und qualitativ fundiertes Programm und Symposium freuen, auch wenn der Abstimmungsbedarf zwischen den 65 Komiteemitgliedern extrem aufwendig gewesen sein muss. Coronabedingt musste das dreitätige Symposium virtuell stattfinden und organisiert werden. Dennoch wurde als offizieller Tagungsort Regensburg gewählt und wohl auch in Erinnerung an den leider viel zu früh verstorbenen Rainer Hammwöhner das Thema "Information Science and its Neighbours from Data Science to Digital Humanities" im Subtitel des Tagungsthemas "Information between Data and Knowledge" gewählt. Schließlich war es Rainer Hammwöhner (in Zusammenarbeit mit David Elsweiler und Christian Wolff), der schon 2015 auf den für die deutschsprachige Informationswissenschaft erschreckenden Tatbestand einer langjährig naiv anmutenden Ignoranz des internationalen "Information Behavior"-Forschungsfeldes hinwies: "Man wird der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft nicht wirklich unrecht tun, wenn man sie in Sachen Informationsverhalten als Spätentwickler charakterisiert. Einem der Herausgeber dieses Themenheftes ist diesbezüglich noch gut in Erinnerung, wie er 2007 im Rahmen des informationswissenschaftlichen Symposiums in Köln von einem Kollegen aus Down Under gefragt wurde, warum es denn in Deutschland keine Forschung zu diesem Thema gebe, wo dies doch in der englischsprachigen Community seit Jahren ein heißes Thema sei" (David Elsweiler, Rainer Hammwöhner und Christian Wolff, Regensburg: Informationsverhalten als Forschungsgegenstand, in: Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis 2015; 66(1): 1-2).