Search (292 results, page 15 of 15)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Auer, S.; Kasprzik, A.; Sens, I.: Von dokumentenbasierten zu wissensbasierten Informationsflüssen : Die Rolle wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken im Transformationsprozess. Teil 1: Vor einer Revolution der wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation (2019) 0.00 
    0.0016214849 = product of:
  0.011350393 = sum of:
    0.011350393 = product of:
      0.022700787 = sum of:
        0.022700787 = weight(_text_:w in 5241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022700787 = score(doc=5241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 5241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Abdruck in: Bredemeier, W. (Hrsg.): Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft: Hat die Infromationswissenschaft eine Zukunft? Grundlagen und Perspektiven - Angebote in der Lehre - An den Fronten der Informationswissenschaft. Berlin: Simon Verlag für Bibliothekswesen 2019. S.170-186.
  2. Lewandowski, D.: ¬Die Informationswissenschaft hat ein strukturelles, kein inhaltliches Problem : Ein Sechs-Punkte-Programm, um aus dem Status eines kleinen Faches herauszukommen (2019) 0.00 
    0.0016214849 = product of:
  0.011350393 = sum of:
    0.011350393 = product of:
      0.022700787 = sum of:
        0.022700787 = weight(_text_:w in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022700787 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    Vgl. auch die Stellungnahme von W. Bredemeier in: Open Password. Nr.676 vom 10.12.2019 u.d.T.: Fehlende Theorie und fehlender Bezugsrahmen auch bei "Human Recorded Information": Fahrlässige Aufgabe des einzigen Alleinstellungsmerkmals, den die Disziplin von vornherein hatte, Die Informationswissenschaft als Hügellandschaft mit "Stand-alone-USPs" [https://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=833&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045]. Vgl. auch den Bericht über die Berliner Tagung von Stefan Hauff-Hartwig in: Bibliotheksdienst 54(2020) H.1, S.27- . Vgl. auch die Erwiderung: Jörs, B.: Wider eine Überschätzung der gegenwärtigen Leistungen der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft: Keine fehlende Fundierung? Doch mit gesellschaftlicher Relevanz ausgestattet?. Bernd Jörs antwortet Dirk Lewandowski. In: Open Password. Nr. 691 vom 21.01.2020, [https://www.password- online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzksMCw2MjY0LCIxMjF0dWVibnVuczBra2dnY2d3d2c0ODB3ODgwazRzYyIsOCwwXQ].
  3. Wei, W.; Ram, S.: Utilizing sozial bookmarking tag space for Web content discovery : a social network analysis approach (2010) 0.00 
    0.0016214849 = product of:
  0.011350393 = sum of:
    0.011350393 = product of:
      0.022700787 = sum of:
        0.022700787 = weight(_text_:w in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022700787 = score(doc=1,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  4. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.00 
    0.0013692075 = product of:
  0.009584452 = sum of:
    0.009584452 = product of:
      0.019168904 = sum of:
        0.019168904 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019168904 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22
  5. Freyberg, L.: ¬Die Lesbarkeit der Welt : Rezension zu 'The Concept of Information in Library and Information Science. A Field in Search of Its Boundaries: 8 Short Comments Concerning Information'. In: Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 22 (2015), 1, 57-80. Kurzartikel von Luciano Floridi, Søren Brier, Torkild Thellefsen, Martin Thellefsen, Bent Sørensen, Birger Hjørland, Brenda Dervin, Ken Herold, Per Hasle und Michael Buckland (2016) 0.00 
    0.0013692075 = product of:
  0.009584452 = sum of:
    0.009584452 = product of:
      0.019168904 = sum of:
        0.019168904 = weight(_text_:22 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019168904 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  6. Rötzer, F.: KI-Programm besser als Menschen im Verständnis natürlicher Sprache (2018) 0.00 
    0.0013692075 = product of:
  0.009584452 = sum of:
    0.009584452 = product of:
      0.019168904 = sum of:
        0.019168904 = weight(_text_:22 in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019168904 = score(doc=4217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:32:44
  7. Jäger, L.: Von Big Data zu Big Brother (2018) 0.00 
    0.0013692075 = product of:
  0.009584452 = sum of:
    0.009584452 = product of:
      0.019168904 = sum of:
        0.019168904 = weight(_text_:22 in 5234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019168904 = score(doc=5234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5234)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:33:49
  8. Bredemeier, W.: Podiumsdiskussion "Zukunft wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken?!" : Mit provokanten Thesen an neues Format angepasst (2020) 0.00 
    0.0012161136 = product of:
  0.008512795 = sum of:
    0.008512795 = product of:
      0.01702559 = sum of:
        0.01702559 = weight(_text_:w in 5739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01702559 = score(doc=5739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.12631156 = fieldWeight in 5739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  9. Foerster, H. von; Müller, A.; Müller, K.H.: Rück- und Vorschauen : Heinz von Foerster im Gespräch mit Albert Müller und Karl H. Müller (2001) 0.00 
    0.0010269056 = product of:
  0.007188339 = sum of:
    0.007188339 = product of:
      0.014376678 = sum of:
        0.014376678 = weight(_text_:22 in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014376678 = score(doc=5988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    10. 9.2006 17:22:54
  10. Lavoie, B.; Connaway, L.S.; Dempsey, L.: Anatomy of aggregate collections : the example of Google print for libraries (2005) 0.00 
    0.0010269056 = product of:
  0.007188339 = sum of:
    0.007188339 = product of:
      0.014376678 = sum of:
        0.014376678 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014376678 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:08:22
  11. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00 
    0.0010269056 = product of:
  0.007188339 = sum of:
    0.007188339 = product of:
      0.014376678 = sum of:
        0.014376678 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014376678 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
  12. DeSilva, J.M.; Traniello, J.F.A.; Claxton, A.G.; Fannin, L.D.: When and why did human brains decrease in size? : a new change-point analysis and insights from brain evolution in ants (2021) 0.00 
    0.0010269056 = product of:
  0.007188339 = sum of:
    0.007188339 = product of:
      0.014376678 = sum of:
        0.014376678 = weight(_text_:22 in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014376678 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 22 October 2021 [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.742639/full]

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 148
  • e 140
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Themes