Search (552 results, page 1 of 28)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Lindstädt, B.: Forschungsdatenmanagement als überregionale Aufgabe der Informationsversorgung : was kann eine Zentrale Fachbibliothek wie ZB MED Leibniz-Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften leisten? (2015) 0.13
    0.12959561 = product of:
      0.323989 = sum of:
        0.08135532 = weight(_text_:biologie in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08135532 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.50974214 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
        0.015934372 = weight(_text_:und in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015934372 = score(doc=2825,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
        0.015934372 = weight(_text_:und in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015934372 = score(doc=2825,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
        0.016185544 = weight(_text_:der in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016185544 = score(doc=2825,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
        0.08135532 = weight(_text_:biologie in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08135532 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.50974214 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
        0.08135532 = weight(_text_:biologie in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08135532 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.50974214 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
        0.015934372 = weight(_text_:und in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015934372 = score(doc=2825,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
        0.015934372 = weight(_text_:und in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015934372 = score(doc=2825,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
      0.4 = coord(8/20)
    
    Abstract
    Forschungsdaten sind in aller Munde. Soll sich eine überregionale tätige Bibliothek deshalb auf diesem Feld engagieren? Und falls ja, für wen und wie? Auf der Grundlage einer breit angelegten Markt- und Zielgruppenanalyse strebt ZB MED ein zielgruppengerechtes Angebot im Bereich Forschungsdatenmanagement an, das sich in erster Linie an den Bedürfnissen der lebenswissenschaftlichen Fächer ausrichtet.
    Field
    Biologie
  2. Poley, C.: LIVIVO: Neue Herausforderungen an das ZB MED-Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften (2016) 0.11
    0.11108195 = product of:
      0.27770486 = sum of:
        0.06973313 = weight(_text_:biologie in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06973313 = score(doc=2173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.43692183 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
        0.013658034 = weight(_text_:und in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013658034 = score(doc=2173,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
        0.013658034 = weight(_text_:und in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013658034 = score(doc=2173,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
        0.013873324 = weight(_text_:der in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013873324 = score(doc=2173,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.25648075 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
        0.06973313 = weight(_text_:biologie in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06973313 = score(doc=2173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.43692183 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
        0.06973313 = weight(_text_:biologie in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06973313 = score(doc=2173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.43692183 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
        0.013658034 = weight(_text_:und in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013658034 = score(doc=2173,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
        0.013658034 = weight(_text_:und in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013658034 = score(doc=2173,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
      0.4 = coord(8/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Medizin (ZB MED) hat als Anbieterin von Suchportalen in den Lebenswissenschaften eine lange Tradition. Mit LIVIVO steht seit 2015 ein neues Produkt zur Verfügung, das erstmals das gesamte Fächerspektrum von ZB MED abdeckt: Medizin, Gesundheit, Ernährungs-, Umwelt- und Agrarwissenschaften. In der Anfangsphase von LIVIVO stand der Aufbau eines modernen Fachportals mit einer neuen Suchmaschine im Vordergrund, das die Funktionalitäten der Vorgängerportale miteinander vereinigt. Dabei wurde eine neue Weboberfläche entwickelt, die sich durch eine hohe Benutzerfreundlichkeit und ein responsives Webdesign auszeichnet. Das große Potential für die Entwicklung von LIVIVO liegt im Bereitstellen von Suchdiensten basierend auf den mehr als 55 Millionen Metadatensätzen. Aktuelle Arbeiten von ZB MED beschäftigen sich nun damit, automatische Schnittstellen für Suchservices anzubieten. Gleichzeitig wird mit dem Aufbau des ZB MED-Knowledge-Environment eine unverzichtbare Datenbasis für Forschungsarbeiten an ZB MED geschaffen. Dieser Aufsatz wird auf die aktuellen Herausforderungen eines wissenschaftlichen Portals am Beispiel von LIVIVO eingehen, Lösungsansätze skizzieren und davon ausgehend die Entwicklungslinien vorzeichnen.
    Field
    Biologie
  3. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.08
    0.08055519 = product of:
      0.40277594 = sum of:
        0.051280193 = product of:
          0.15384057 = sum of:
            0.15384057 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15384057 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20529667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15384057 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15384057 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20529667 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.15384057 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15384057 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20529667 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.043814592 = product of:
          0.087629184 = sum of:
            0.087629184 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087629184 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1549426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.565559 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  4. Voß, J.: Versuch einer Bibliographie von Bibliographien von Bibliographien von Bibliographien (2016) 0.08
    0.078149885 = product of:
      0.2604996 = sum of:
        0.1859203 = weight(_text_:bibliographien in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1859203 = score(doc=3061,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17148633 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0817666 = idf(docFreq=100, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            1.0841697 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.0817666 = idf(docFreq=100, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=3061,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=3061,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
        0.015103361 = weight(_text_:der in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015103361 = score(doc=3061,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=3061,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=3061,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Der Artikel beschreibt die Erstellung einer Meta-Meta-Meta-Bibliographie und liefert eine Bewertung des Ergebnis, bestehend aus vier Universalbibliographien und vier Auswahlbibliographien.
    Footnote
    Prototyp eines Dokuments, das in erschreckender Weise die Unkenntnis des Verfassers zeigt, der maximal Ergebnisse seines eigenen Lernfortschritts aufzeigt.
  5. Eversberg, B.: Zur Zukunft der Katalogisierung : ... jenseits RAK und AACR (2004) 0.06
    0.06425758 = product of:
      0.21419191 = sum of:
        0.09392348 = weight(_text_:bibliographien in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09392348 = score(doc=3632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17148633 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0817666 = idf(docFreq=100, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.54770243 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.0817666 = idf(docFreq=100, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
        0.02602072 = weight(_text_:und in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02602072 = score(doc=3632,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
        0.02602072 = weight(_text_:und in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02602072 = score(doc=3632,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
        0.016185544 = weight(_text_:der in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016185544 = score(doc=3632,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
        0.02602072 = weight(_text_:und in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02602072 = score(doc=3632,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
        0.02602072 = weight(_text_:und in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02602072 = score(doc=3632,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    "Katalogisierung" klingt in manchen Ohren altmodisch. Man redet heute von "Metadaten"! Gemeint ist aber nichts völlig anderes. Es gibt nur viele neue Formen, Praktiken und Nutzungen, während sich früher Katalogdaten fast nur in Katalogen und Bibliographien befanden. "Metadaten" ist nur ein neuer Oberbegriff, aber in einer Katalogdatenbank haben wir längst mehr und andersartige Datenelemente und Funktionen als in Zettelkatalogen. Es ist notwendig, weiter auszugreifen als es die klassischen Regelwerke, RAK und AACR, getan haben, und deren hergebrachte Konzepte zu überdenken.
    Footnote
    Präsentation zum Vortrag "Zur Zukunft der Katalogisierung" während des Österreichischen Bibliothekartages in Linz 22.09.2004, Themenkreis: Google und die Zukunft der bibliothekarischen Erschließung. - Zuletzt aktualisiert: 15.07.2008.
  6. Kojakeva, K.J.: Bibliographien: Einsichten eines ihrer möglichen Leser - ein Rundgang (2016) 0.06
    0.059448116 = product of:
      0.19816038 = sum of:
        0.08050584 = weight(_text_:bibliographien in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08050584 = score(doc=3062,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17148633 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0817666 = idf(docFreq=100, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.46945924 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.0817666 = idf(docFreq=100, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
        0.024936043 = weight(_text_:und in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024936043 = score(doc=3062,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
        0.024936043 = weight(_text_:und in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024936043 = score(doc=3062,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
        0.017910382 = weight(_text_:der in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017910382 = score(doc=3062,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
        0.024936043 = weight(_text_:und in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024936043 = score(doc=3062,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
        0.024936043 = weight(_text_:und in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024936043 = score(doc=3062,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Wenn ein Begriff im Beginn sein Einiges erkennen und aus sich selbst das Viele sehen, beleuchten und verstehen will, in diesem Prozess zur Zweiheit, ja eigentlich zum Vielen und Vielfachen fortschreiten möchte und zunächst auf sich selber stößt, mag zunächst befremdlich wirken, den Gedanken der Bibliographie direkt an den Begriff des Rekursiven, des Selbstreferenziellen zu binden. Dies kann dem Denken geschehen, indem es annimmt, nur ein Text (im Sinne einer Darlegung von schriftlich niedergelegten und logisch geführten Gedankengängen in der Form sich bedingender und fortlaufender Zeichen) könne sich auf Quellen beziehen und diese Form des Textes (der damit in Sinne einer wie auch immer gearteten mathematischem Menge als jene der "Nicht-Quellen" erscheint) im Wege stehen würde, gedanklich unmittelbar eine Rekursion beziehungsweise eine Selbstzuwendung zu ermöglichen Beziehungsweise diese auf sich selbst bezogene Hinwendung überhaupt erkennbar werden zu lassen, da die Zitate und/oder ihre verschiedenen Formen der Benennung ihrer Quellen (etwa im Chicago Citation Style, Fuß- und Endnoten) sich immer auf "Außentexte" beziehen und spontan eine Art Beziehung meinen, des "entre-deux" (zwischen Zweien).
  7. Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021) 0.06
    0.058846213 = product of:
      0.16813204 = sum of:
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=236,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=236,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
        0.023122204 = weight(_text_:der in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023122204 = score(doc=236,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=236,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
        0.037552148 = product of:
          0.075104296 = sum of:
            0.075104296 = weight(_text_:philosophie in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075104296 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12829916 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.58538413 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=236,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
        0.01640412 = product of:
          0.03280824 = sum of:
            0.03280824 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03280824 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Frage, was Leben ist, hat Humberto Maturana beantwortet. Die Frage, was Erkennen ist, ließ ihn nie los. Nun ist der Forscher an den Schnittstellen von Neurobiologie und Philosophie in Santiago de Chile gestorben.
    Date
    7. 5.2021 22:10:24
    Source
    https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/buecher/biologe-und-philosoph-humberto-maturana-gestorben-17330542.html?printPagedArticle=true&service=printPreview
  8. Seefried, E.: ¬Die Gestaltbarkeit der Zukunft und ihre Grenzen : zur Geschichte der Zukunftsforschung (2015) 0.06
    0.058522925 = product of:
      0.16720836 = sum of:
        0.021794286 = weight(_text_:und in 4312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021794286 = score(doc=4312,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 4312, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4312)
        0.04273434 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 4312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04273434 = score(doc=4312,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11508996 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3713125 = fieldWeight in 4312, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4312)
        0.021794286 = weight(_text_:und in 4312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021794286 = score(doc=4312,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 4312, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4312)
        0.029094804 = weight(_text_:der in 4312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029094804 = score(doc=4312,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.5378853 = fieldWeight in 4312, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4312)
        0.021794286 = weight(_text_:und in 4312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021794286 = score(doc=4312,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 4312, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4312)
        0.021794286 = weight(_text_:und in 4312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021794286 = score(doc=4312,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 4312, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4312)
        0.00820206 = product of:
          0.01640412 = sum of:
            0.01640412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01640412 = score(doc=4312,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4312, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4312)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beleuchtet die Geschichte der Zukunftsforschung in der Bundesrepublik und in den westlichen Industriegesellschaften vom 19. Jahrhundert bis in die Gegenwart. Er charakterisiert die Vorläufer der modernen Zukunftsforschung am Beginn der europäischen "Hochmoderne" um 1900, stellt aber die Formierungs- und Transformationsphase der 1950er- bis frühen 1980er-Jahre in den Mittelpunkt. Zentrale Faktoren für die Konzeptionierung einer Meta-Disziplin Zukunftsforschung waren der Systemwettlauf des Kalten Krieges, welcher der Entwicklung von Methoden der Vorausschau und Planung Dynamik verlieh, und ein teilweise frappantes wissenschaftliches Vertrauen in diese neuen methodisch-theoretischen Zugänge und Techniken der Vorausschau - insbesondere die Kybernetik -, welche die Zukunft prognostizierbar und damit plan- und steuerbar zu machen schienen. Den Kontext bildeten eine gesellschaftliche Aufbruchstimmung und eine hohe politische Technik- und Planungsaffinität der 1960er-Jahre, welche das Verständnis der Zukunftsforschung bestärkten, dass der Mensch aus der Fülle der möglichen Zukünfte wählen und so die Zukunft geradezu frei gestalten könne. Dieses überzogene Machbarkeitsdenken betraf insbesondere die bundesdeutsche Zukunftsforschung. In den 1970er-Jahren wurden allerdings die Grenzen dieses Anspruchs deutlich. In der Folge pragmatisierte sich die Zukunftsforschung in methodischer Hinsicht. Nicht zuletzt trug dieser übersteigerte Machbarkeitsglaube der 1960er-Jahre dazu bei, dass die Zukunftsforschung in der Bundesrepublik lange wenig institutionalisiert war.
    Date
    22. 6.2018 13:47:33
  9. Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015) 0.06
    0.055368267 = product of:
      0.15819505 = sum of:
        0.018210711 = weight(_text_:und in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018210711 = score(doc=1432,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
        0.048348386 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048348386 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11508996 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42009214 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
        0.018210711 = weight(_text_:und in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018210711 = score(doc=1432,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
        0.02388051 = weight(_text_:der in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02388051 = score(doc=1432,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.44148692 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
        0.018210711 = weight(_text_:und in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018210711 = score(doc=1432,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
        0.018210711 = weight(_text_:und in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018210711 = score(doc=1432,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
        0.013123296 = product of:
          0.026246592 = sum of:
            0.026246592 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026246592 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Schon zur Wende ins 20. Jahrhundert zweifelte der belgische Privatgelehrte Paul Otlet an der Zukunft des Buches und der Bibliothek. Statt dessen begann er damit, eine Dokumentation und Neuorganisation des Weltwissens anzulegen, und mittels eines Karteikartensystems (Répertoire Bibliographique Universel) zu vernetzen. Dieses Projekt eines flexiblen, abfrageorientierten Wissensbestandes in einem 'Hypermedium' (Otlet) besetzte jene technologische Leerstelle, die inzwischen eine die bibliothekarische Epoche aufsprengende neue Wissenskultur der digitalen Medialität produziert hat.
    Date
    22. 8.2016 15:58:46
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  10. Koch, M.: ¬Das Wissen der Welt : vor 300 Jahren wurde der Mathematiker und Enzyklopädist Jean-Baptiste le Rond d'Alembert geboren (2017) 0.05
    0.054412387 = product of:
      0.15546396 = sum of:
        0.017385824 = weight(_text_:und in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017385824 = score(doc=4688,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.32394084 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
        0.030217743 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030217743 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11508996 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.2625576 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
        0.017385824 = weight(_text_:und in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017385824 = score(doc=4688,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.32394084 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
        0.028318804 = weight(_text_:der in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028318804 = score(doc=4688,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.5235391 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
        0.017385824 = weight(_text_:und in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017385824 = score(doc=4688,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.32394084 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
        0.017385824 = weight(_text_:und in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017385824 = score(doc=4688,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.32394084 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
        0.02738412 = product of:
          0.05476824 = sum of:
            0.05476824 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05476824 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1549426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.35347438 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Bis heute findet sich der Name des französischen Gelehrten und Mathematikers Jean-Baptiste le Rond d'Alembert in vielen Geschichtsbüchern. Das hat vor allem einen Grund: Gemeinsam mit dem Philosophen Denis Diderot gab d'Alembert eines der wichtigsten Werke der Aufklärung heraus. Dessen etwas ausladender Titel lautet: »Enzyklopädie oder ein durchdachtes Wörterbuch der Wissenschaften, Künste und Handwerke«. Ziel der Herausgeber war es, »ein allgemeines Bild der Anstrengungen des menschlichen Geistes auf allen Gebieten und in allen Jahrhunderten zu entwerfen«. An der Abfassung der mehr als 70 000 Enzyklopädie-Artikel beteiligte sich fast die gesamte geistige Elite Frankreichs, darunter Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Voltaire und Montesquieu. Der erste Band erschien 1751 und enthielt ein viel beachtetes Vorwort von d'Alembert, der gelegentlich erklärte: Das Wissen der Menschheit stamme nicht von einem Monarchen oder aus Rom, sondern vom individuellen Sinn und Verstand. Erwartungsgemäß stand der französische König Ludwig XV. dem Werk ebenso ablehnend gegenüber wie Papst Clemens XIII., der die Enzyklopädie 1759 auf den Index der verbotenen Bücher setzen ließ. Doch alle Versuche, den Fortgang des Projekts zu verhindern, scheiterten. Zuletzt umfasste das aufklärerische Mammutwerk 35 Bände; den Schluss bildete 1780 ein zweibändiges Register.
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
    Source
    Neues Deutschland. 2017, S.26 [https://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/1069694.das-wissen-der-welt.html]
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  11. Suchsland, R.: Kritik der paranoiden Vernunft (2020) 0.05
    0.052383374 = product of:
      0.17461124 = sum of:
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=322,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
        0.060435485 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060435485 = score(doc=322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11508996 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.5251152 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=322,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
        0.023122204 = weight(_text_:der in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023122204 = score(doc=322,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=322,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=322,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Allgemeine Verunsicherung im Informationsdschungel: Schwarze Utopien und neue Ordnung am Abgrund des Chaos.
    Footnote
    Zu Verschwörungstheorien und Fake News. Mit einer Zusammenstellung von Beispielen aus der Geschichte.
    Series
    Telepolis: Kultur und Medien
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Kritik-der-paranoiden-Vernunft-4770674.html?seite=all
  12. Jaeger, L.: ¬Das Spannungsfeld zwischen Freiheit und Solidarität (2021) 0.05
    0.0512866 = product of:
      0.17095533 = sum of:
        0.022303475 = weight(_text_:und in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022303475 = score(doc=959,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
        0.022303475 = weight(_text_:und in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022303475 = score(doc=959,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
        0.016019532 = weight(_text_:der in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016019532 = score(doc=959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
        0.022303475 = weight(_text_:und in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022303475 = score(doc=959,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
        0.022303475 = weight(_text_:und in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022303475 = score(doc=959,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
        0.06572189 = product of:
          0.13144378 = sum of:
            0.13144378 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13144378 = score(doc=959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1549426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.84833854 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Wie die Corona-Krise einen alten Konflikt der offenen Gesellschaft zuspitzt. Argumentation basierend auf Popper.
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Das-Spannungsfeld-zwischen-Freiheit-und-Solidaritaet-6010838.html?view=print
  13. Pasquinelli, M.: Die Regierung des digitalen Mehrwerts : Von der Netz-Gesellschaft zur Gesellschaft der Metadaten (2010) 0.05
    0.050583187 = product of:
      0.16861062 = sum of:
        0.021794286 = weight(_text_:und in 5192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021794286 = score(doc=5192,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 5192, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5192)
        0.052338667 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 5192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052338667 = score(doc=5192,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11508996 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.4547631 = fieldWeight in 5192, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5192)
        0.021794286 = weight(_text_:und in 5192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021794286 = score(doc=5192,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 5192, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5192)
        0.029094804 = weight(_text_:der in 5192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029094804 = score(doc=5192,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.5378853 = fieldWeight in 5192, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5192)
        0.021794286 = weight(_text_:und in 5192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021794286 = score(doc=5192,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 5192, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5192)
        0.021794286 = weight(_text_:und in 5192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021794286 = score(doc=5192,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 5192, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5192)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    In einer Zukunftsvision der kalifornischen Technokultur wird die Singularitätmärchenhaft als der Moment verklärt, in dem die Fortschritte der Vernetzung und Rechenleistung darin gipfeln werden, dass Computer "Bewusstsein" und Unabhängigkeit vom Menschen erlangen.2 Der Mythos, dass die Maschinen eines Tages die Kontrolle über genau jene Menschheit übernehmen werden, der sie ihre Existenz verdanken, ist nach einem Jahrhundert Science-Fiction, von Samuel Butlers Roman Erewhon aus dem Jahr 1872 (der unter anderem Gilles Deleuze und Felix Guattari zu ihrem Begriff der Maschine angeregt hat) bis zum Film Matrix von 1999, zum Volks-Aberglauben geworden. Derartige dystopische und eindeutig reaktionäre Visionen bilden nicht nur den gegenwärtigen Konflikt zwischen kollektivem Körper und maschineller Ausbeutung ab, sondern stützen sich auch unverkennbar auf die techno-deterministische Annahme einer Autonomie der Maschinen von der politischen Macht des Sozialen. Am Begriff der Singularität lässt sich beispielhaft zeigen, wo das Netz seine Grenzen findet, wo Momente des Bruchs auftreten, und wo Transformationen zu neuen technologischen und sozialen Konfiguration stattfinden. Die Geschichte der Medien ist eine Geschichte der kontinuierlichen Akkumulation von Energie, eine Geschichte von Paradigmen-Brüchen und von Übergängen durch Momente der Singularität. Dabei reproduziert sich ein und dieselbe Ökonomie über alle Abfolgen von Krisen und Brüchen hinweg, von einer Produktionsform zur anderen, so dass man beinahe den Moment der Singularität selbst als das bestimmende Modell der Ökonomie betrachten könnte, die sich ja aus den Effekten der Akkumulation und der Verwandlung von einfachem Geld in Finanzkapital speist.
  14. Schleim, S.: Fake Science? : Die Sache mit den Raubverlagen (2018) 0.05
    0.046935163 = product of:
      0.15645054 = sum of:
        0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019315375 = score(doc=1627,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
        0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019315375 = score(doc=1627,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
        0.013873324 = weight(_text_:der in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013873324 = score(doc=1627,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.25648075 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
        0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019315375 = score(doc=1627,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
        0.065315716 = weight(_text_:erkenntnis in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065315716 = score(doc=1627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15446307 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.378767 = idf(docFreq=203, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.4228565 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.378767 = idf(docFreq=203, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
        0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019315375 = score(doc=1627,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Über gute Wissenschaft und die Privatisierung öffentlicher Mittel Publizieren, von lateinisch publicare = veröffentlichen, ist ein Wesensmerkmal der Wissenschaft. Neue wissenschaftliche Kenntnisse sollen nicht nur den Fachkollegen und potenziell für den Fortschritt der ganzen Menschheit zur Verfügung stehen, sondern durch die Veröffentlichung auch überprüfbar werden. So würden langfristig Fehler aufgespürt, entfernt und dann gesicherte Erkenntnis übrig bleiben. So weit die Theorie. In der Praxis haben große Verlagshäuser wie Elsevier (laut Wikipedia rund 2,5 Milliarden Pfund Jahresumsatz), Springer Nature (rund 1,6 Milliarden Euro), Taylor and Francis (rund 530 Millionen Pfund) oder Wiley (rund 1,7 Milliarden Dollar), die die Veröffentlichungen traditionell organisieren, große Umsätze und damit auch große Profitinteressen. In Zeiten des Internets und des e-Publishings wird deren Rolle zunehmend in Frage gestellt. Immer mehr Zeitschriften erscheinen nur noch online. Und selbst bei denjenigen, die noch als Papierversion zirkulieren, spielt sich für die Wissenschaftler das Wesentliche in den Vorab-Veröffentlichungen online ab. Bis die Druckausgabe erscheint, sind die Studien mitunter schon längst Schnee von gestern.
  15. Bönicke, K.: Ungleiche Geschwister : Zum Verhältnis von Form und Inhalt bei Lukács und Holz (2019) 0.05
    0.04546645 = product of:
      0.15155482 = sum of:
        0.025753833 = weight(_text_:und in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025753833 = score(doc=5261,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.47985753 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
        0.025753833 = weight(_text_:und in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025753833 = score(doc=5261,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.47985753 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
        0.018497765 = weight(_text_:der in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018497765 = score(doc=5261,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
        0.025753833 = weight(_text_:und in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025753833 = score(doc=5261,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.47985753 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
        0.030041717 = product of:
          0.060083434 = sum of:
            0.060083434 = weight(_text_:philosophie in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060083434 = score(doc=5261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12829916 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.4683073 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.025753833 = weight(_text_:und in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025753833 = score(doc=5261,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.47985753 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Das Diktum der Einheit von Form und Inhalt ist für die Ästhetiken von Georg Lukács und Hans Heinz Holz zentral. Der Vortrag möchte die These entwickeln, dass beide Theoretiker die Rolle von Form und Inhalt dennoch unterschiedlich gewichten - Lukács zugunsten des Inhalts, Holz zugunsten der Form - und einen Ausblick auf die sich daraus ergebenden Folgen geben.
    Content
    Am 5. Februar hatte die Gesellschaft für dialektische Philosophie zur diesjährigen Hans-Heinz-Holz-Tagung mit dem Thema »Realismus als ästhetisches Prinzip« an die Universität Wien geladen. Vgl.: http://www.dialektische-philosophie.org/?p=1556.
  16. Widmann, V.: ¬Die Sache mit der Menschenwürde und dem Wert des Lebens (2020) 0.05
    0.045143276 = product of:
      0.15047759 = sum of:
        0.021027917 = weight(_text_:und in 5377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021027917 = score(doc=5377,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5377, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5377)
        0.021027917 = weight(_text_:und in 5377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021027917 = score(doc=5377,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5377, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5377)
        0.02388051 = weight(_text_:der in 5377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02388051 = score(doc=5377,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.44148692 = fieldWeight in 5377, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5377)
        0.021027917 = weight(_text_:und in 5377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021027917 = score(doc=5377,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5377, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5377)
        0.0424854 = product of:
          0.0849708 = sum of:
            0.0849708 = weight(_text_:philosophie in 5377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0849708 = score(doc=5377,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12829916 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.6622865 = fieldWeight in 5377, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5377)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.021027917 = weight(_text_:und in 5377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021027917 = score(doc=5377,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5377, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5377)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Diskussion um Menschenwürde und Lebensschutz prosperiert in der Corona-Krise. Die Feuilletons renommierter Zeitschriften sind der Austragungsort, Koryphäen aus Juristerei, Philosophie und Politik die Protagonisten der Debatte.
    Field
    Philosophie
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Die-Sache-mit-der-Menschenwuerde-und-dem-Wert-des-Lebens-4720866.html?seite=all
  17. Schleim, S.: Bin ich derselbe wie vor und in einem Jahr? (2019) 0.05
    0.045088805 = product of:
      0.15029602 = sum of:
        0.022303475 = weight(_text_:und in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022303475 = score(doc=3942,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.022303475 = weight(_text_:und in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022303475 = score(doc=3942,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.016019532 = weight(_text_:der in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016019532 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.022303475 = weight(_text_:und in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022303475 = score(doc=3942,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.045062575 = product of:
          0.09012515 = sum of:
            0.09012515 = weight(_text_:philosophie in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09012515 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12829916 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.70246094 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.022303475 = weight(_text_:und in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022303475 = score(doc=3942,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Ein Versuch über personale Identität in der Zeit
    Field
    Philosophie
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Bin-ich-derselbe-wie-vor-und-in-einem-Jahr-4491191.html?view=print
  18. Schleim, S.: Reduktionismus und die Erklärung von Alltagsphänomenen (2021) 0.04
    0.04416144 = product of:
      0.14720479 = sum of:
        0.023509927 = weight(_text_:und in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023509927 = score(doc=74,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
        0.023509927 = weight(_text_:und in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023509927 = score(doc=74,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
        0.010679688 = weight(_text_:der in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010679688 = score(doc=74,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
        0.023509927 = weight(_text_:und in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023509927 = score(doc=74,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
        0.0424854 = product of:
          0.0849708 = sum of:
            0.0849708 = weight(_text_:philosophie in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0849708 = score(doc=74,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12829916 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.6622865 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.023509927 = weight(_text_:und in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023509927 = score(doc=74,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Teil 2 der Serie über Bewusstsein, Philosophie, Religion und Naturwissenschaft.
    Content
    Vorgänger als: 'Wissenschaft und Religion: Konflikt oder Kooperation?' Unter: https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Wissenschaft-und-Religion-Konflikt-oder-Kooperation-6004714.html?seite=all. Vgl. auch: https://heise.de/-6009962.
    Field
    Philosophie
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Reduktionismus-und-die-Erklaerung-von-Alltagsphaenomenen-6009962.html?wt_mc=nl.red.telepolis.telepolis-nl.2021-04-16.link.link
  19. Löhrer, G.: Der Anti-Dualismus, sein Vokabular und dessen Ambiguität : eine methodische Bemerkung zu Searles monistischen Auffassungen in der Philosophie des Geistes (2005) 0.04
    0.043897495 = product of:
      0.14632498 = sum of:
        0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019315375 = score(doc=4505,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
        0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019315375 = score(doc=4505,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
        0.013873324 = weight(_text_:der in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013873324 = score(doc=4505,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.25648075 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
        0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019315375 = score(doc=4505,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
        0.05519016 = product of:
          0.11038032 = sum of:
            0.11038032 = weight(_text_:philosophie in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11038032 = score(doc=4505,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.12829916 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.86033547 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.298292 = idf(docFreq=600, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019315375 = score(doc=4505,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Wie passen mentale Phänomene wie Bewusstsein, Intentionalität und mentale Verursachung zum "Rest des Universums" und wie bringen wir unsere Theorien dieser Phänomene im Gebäude unserer übrigen Welterklärungen unter? Wie muss eine Theorie aussehen, die wissenschaftlichen Ansprüchen und neurowissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen gerecht wird, ohne grundlegende Intuitionen und bewusste, subjektive wie qualitative Erfahrungen des Mentalen zu unterdrücken oder zu marginalisieren? - John Rogers Searle vertritt in seinem Buch Mind eine in Teilen verfeinerte Version jenes geschmeidigen Monismus, der auch seine früheren Arbeiten zur Philosophie des Geistes kennzeichnet. Ziel seiner Überlegungen ist eine, "biological naturalism" genannte, umfassende und einheitliche Theorie des Mentalen, die er für die Philosophie als das Projekt menschlicher Selbstverständigung für vordringlich hält. In ihrem Zentrum wiederum steht eine Theorie des Bewusstseins.
    Content
    Besprechung zu: Searle, J.R.: Geist. Beim hier vorliegenden Text handelt es sich um die vorletzte Fassung. (Vgl.: https://www.uni-erfurt.de/fileadmin/user-docs/Philosophie/praktphil/Online-Texte/Der_Antidualismus_sein_Vokabular_und_dessen_Ambiguitaet.pdf.)
    Field
    Philosophie
    Source
    Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie. 14(2005) H.2, S.182-204
  20. Herzer, M.: Kurze Geschichte der Numa-Forschung (2016) 0.04
    0.042808983 = product of:
      0.1426966 = sum of:
        0.019713672 = weight(_text_:und in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019713672 = score(doc=3066,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
        0.04273434 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04273434 = score(doc=3066,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11508996 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3713125 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
        0.019713672 = weight(_text_:und in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019713672 = score(doc=3066,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
        0.021107588 = weight(_text_:der in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021107588 = score(doc=3066,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.390223 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
        0.019713672 = weight(_text_:und in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019713672 = score(doc=3066,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
        0.019713672 = weight(_text_:und in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019713672 = score(doc=3066,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Numa Praetorius war das Pseudonym des Straßburger Juristen und Schriftstellers Eugen Wilhelm (1866-1951). Er benutzte es in den Jahren 1899 bis 1932 für seine Beiträge zu deutschen, französischen und italienischen Zeitschriften, Jahrbüchern und Serien, in denen er sich fast stets zu homosexuellen Themen äußerte. Am Anfang der 1970er Jahre entstand in der BRD und in Westberlin eine Emanzipationsbewegung der Schwulen, bald auch der Lesben, die aus der studentischen Protestbewegung gegen den Vietnamkrieg hervorgegangen war. Schon früh entdeckte sie ihr Interesse an der Geschichte der Schwulenverfolgung und -emanzipation, fand in Bibliotheken und Archiven die Bände des Jahrbuchs für sexuelle Zwischenstufen als beste Quelle zum Einstieg in die Thematik, und darin die "Bibliographie der Homosexualität", die ein "Dr. jur. Numa Praetorius" beinahe in jedem Jahrgang geschrieben hatte. Diese Bibliographie war eigentlich keine. Es handelt sich vielmehr um eine Sammlung manchmal sehr umfangreicher kritischer Referate zu Büchern und Zeitschriftenaufsätzen zur Homosexualität. Im Fall des Buches Homosexualität und Strafgesetz, das ein Rostocker Juraprofessor Wachenfeld als Warnung vor der Schwulenemanzipation verfasst hatte, füllte die Besprechung mehr als hundert Seiten im Jahrbuch von 1902. Das war Numas Rekord, dabei war Wachenfelds Buch nicht viel dicker (150 Seiten).

Years

Languages

  • d 486
  • e 58
  • a 1
  • no 1
  • More… Less…