Search (74 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Classification theory, yesterday and today (1976) 0.00
    0.003280611 = product of:
      0.049209163 = sum of:
        0.049209163 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049209163 = score(doc=1618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.37076265 = fieldWeight in 1618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1618)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Until very recently, classification theory was held to be nothing but an expressed or unconscious knowledge framed in intuitively given reasons for the subdivision and arrangement of any universe. Today, after clarification of the elements of classification systems as well as the basis of concept relationshios it is possible to apply a number of principles in the evaluation of existing systems as well as in the construction of new ones and by this achieving relatively predictable and repeatable results
  2. Perreault, J.M.: Some problems in the BSO (1979) 0.00
    0.003280611 = product of:
      0.049209163 = sum of:
        0.049209163 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049209163 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.37076265 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    This critical analysis of the BSO draft covers its main structural characteristics from the standpoint of its convenient utilisation, style, terminology, notation, polygraphic making. The analysis concludes that individual shortcomings inherent to the scheme don't exclude its positive evaluation on the whole as a more perfect scheme compared to the Library of Congree Classification and Colon Classification
  3. Stokolova, N.A.: Syntactic tools and semantic power of information languages : Pt.2 of 'Elements of a semantic theory of information retrieval' (1976) 0.00
    0.003280611 = product of:
      0.049209163 = sum of:
        0.049209163 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049209163 = score(doc=1888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.37076265 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Different kinds of syntactic tools of information languages (IL) in use, considered as meaning-distinguished tools, are described as simplified forms of some initial IL grammar tools called 'standard phrases' which are n-place relational predicates of a special kind. A quantitative evaluation is attempted of the effects which the idiosyncracies of the syntactic tools of IL's have on their semantic power
  4. Hutchins, W.J.: ¬The concept of 'aboutness' in subject indexing (1978) 0.00
    0.0028705348 = product of:
      0.04305802 = sum of:
        0.04305802 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04305802 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    The common view of the 'aboutness' of documents is that the index entries (or classifications) assigned to documents represent or indicate in some way the total contents of documents; indexing and classifying are seen as processes involving the 'summerization' of the texts of documents. In this paper an alternative concept of 'aboutness' is proposed based on an analysis of the linguistic organization of texts, which is felt to be more appropriate in many indexing environments (particularly in non-specialized libraries and information services) and which has implications for the evaluation of the effectiveness of indexing systems
  5. Fischer, W.L.: Toleranzräume (1970) 0.00
    0.0028579382 = product of:
      0.04286907 = sum of:
        0.04286907 = product of:
          0.08573814 = sum of:
            0.08573814 = weight(_text_:22 in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08573814 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Archimedes. 22(1970) H.4, S.101-107
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.00
    0.0028579382 = product of:
      0.04286907 = sum of:
        0.04286907 = product of:
          0.08573814 = sum of:
            0.08573814 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08573814 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
  7. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.00
    0.0028579382 = product of:
      0.04286907 = sum of:
        0.04286907 = product of:
          0.08573814 = sum of:
            0.08573814 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08573814 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
  8. Schulze, U.: Erfahrungen bei der Anwendung automatischer Klassifizierungsverfahren zur Inhaltsanalyse einer Dokumentenmenge (1978) 0.00
    0.002587875 = product of:
      0.03881812 = sum of:
        0.03881812 = product of:
          0.07763624 = sum of:
            0.07763624 = weight(_text_:analyse in 83) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07763624 = score(doc=83,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.46569893 = fieldWeight in 83, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=83)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Die der Analyse zugrundeliegende Dokumentenmenge besteht aus 1.000 Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichtes, deren volle Texte maschinenlesbar zur Verfügung standen. Vorgestellt werden die Anwendung eines iterativen Centroidverfahrens auf etwa 1.000 Wörter und die Anwendung eines Single-Linkage-Verfahrens in einer nicht-hierarchischen Variante, sowie die auf der Graphentheorie basierenden Verfahren und die verschiedener Ähnlichkeitsfunktionen und der Einfluß auf die Ergebnisse
  9. Mlitzke, E.: Zur Klassifikation von Aussagen (1979) 0.00
    0.002587875 = product of:
      0.03881812 = sum of:
        0.03881812 = product of:
          0.07763624 = sum of:
            0.07763624 = weight(_text_:analyse in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07763624 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.46569893 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Um eine facettenartige Bedeutungsanalyse von Aussagen nach universellen Aspekten zu ermöglichen, wird eine allgemeine Standard-Aussageform vorgeschlagen, die aus folgender Begriffskette besteht: A: Antrieb, Auslöser, Motivation; Z: Ziel; M: Methode; S: System, Substrat; E: Ergebnis, Effekt, Erfahrung, Entscheidung; H: Hintergrund, die auch durch die geläufigen Fragepronomen: warum, wozu, was, wie, wovon angesprochen werden. Es wird gezeigt, wie diese, als 'Semoperatoren' bezeichneten Aussageelemente bei der klassifikatorischen Analyse allgemein und mit Bezug auf die Physik verwenden werden können
  10. Gödert, W.: Verbale Sacherschließung im Fach Mathematik (1979) 0.00
    0.002587875 = product of:
      0.03881812 = sum of:
        0.03881812 = product of:
          0.07763624 = sum of:
            0.07763624 = weight(_text_:analyse in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07763624 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.46569893 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    In der Theorie des Schlagwortkatalogs wurden bisher keine Untersuchungen über die spezifischen Eigenheiten eines Faches, seiner Terminologie und die Informationsbedürfnisse seiner Benutzer durchgeführt In dieser Arbeit wird der Versuch einer solchen Untersuchung für das Fach Mathematik unternommen. Neben einer genauen Analyse der Fachterminologie steht die Verknüpfung der verbalen Indexierung mit einer vorhandenen Fachklassifikation - dem Klassifikationsschema der American Mathematical Society - unter Ausnutzung von Fremddaten im Mittelpunkt dieser Untersuchung. Auf diesem Wege können sowohl Qualität als auch Konsistenz der Verschlagwortung gesteigert werden. Es werden praktische Anwendungsmög/ichkeiten abgeleitet.
  11. Cooper, W.S.: Indexing documents by Gedanken experimentation (1978) 0.00
    0.0024604585 = product of:
      0.036906876 = sum of:
        0.036906876 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036906876 = score(doc=412,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.278072 = fieldWeight in 412, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=412)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Although it is widely accepted that indexing and cataloging are central to the document and reference retrieval process, there is as yet little unamity on the issue of how these operations ought to be carried out. Since indexing is a decision-making process, decision theory and utility theory have been proposed as a possible theoretical framework within which to formulate decision rules for indexing. These decision rules may be interpreted operationally as guides to th thought processes appropriate to the making of sound indexing decisions. Ond such thought process involves "gedanken experimentation", in which the indexer is led to an indexing decision by performing suitable thought experiments. This approach to indexing, in addition to providing a theoretical basis for what the indexer does, lends itself to various training schemes for the education of indexers, to the provision of graphic aids to indexing, and to the evaluation of indexing performance. There are also ramifications for automatic indexing.
  12. Beaujean, M.: Zur Klassifizierung von Personalschriften (1976) 0.00
    0.0022863504 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = product of:
          0.06859051 = sum of:
            0.06859051 = weight(_text_:22 in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859051 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    7. 4.2001 15:35:22
  13. Dehnhard, H.: Gutachten zur Frage einer Einheitsklassifikation für die Bibliotheken der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1972) 0.00
    0.0022863504 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = product of:
          0.06859051 = sum of:
            0.06859051 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859051 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungsblatt. VdB NW. N.F. 22(1972), S.367-369
  14. Birket-Smith, K.: ¬Die Klassifikation der Library of Congress mit ausländischen Augen gesehen (1972) 0.00
    0.0022863504 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = product of:
          0.06859051 = sum of:
            0.06859051 = weight(_text_:22 in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859051 = score(doc=1124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungsblatt. VdB NW. N.F. 22(1972), S.117-131
  15. Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971) 0.00
    0.0022863504 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = product of:
          0.06859051 = sum of:
            0.06859051 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859051 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
  16. Höhne, H.: Zur Durchsetzung der Einheitsklassifikation im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen der DDR (1978) 0.00
    0.0022863504 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = product of:
          0.06859051 = sum of:
            0.06859051 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859051 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen. 92(1978), S.18-22
  17. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.00
    0.0022863504 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = product of:
          0.06859051 = sum of:
            0.06859051 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859051 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  18. Ringshausen, H.: Vom Schlagwortkatalog zum Schlag-Stichwortkatalog (1973/74) 0.00
    0.0022863504 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = product of:
          0.06859051 = sum of:
            0.06859051 = weight(_text_:22 in 2767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859051 = score(doc=2767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2767)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    DFW. 22(1973/74), S.41-42
  19. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.00
    0.0022863504 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = product of:
          0.06859051 = sum of:
            0.06859051 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859051 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  20. Foskett, D.J.: Classification and indexing in the social sciences (1970) 0.00
    0.0022863504 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = product of:
          0.06859051 = sum of:
            0.06859051 = weight(_text_:22 in 4957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859051 = score(doc=4957,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4957, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4957)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 22(1970), S.90-101

Languages

  • e 38
  • d 36